scholarly journals Temporal Recruitment of the mSin3A-Histone Deacetylase Corepressor Complex to the ETS Domain Transcription Factor Elk-1

2001 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
pp. 2802-2814 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shen-Hsi Yang ◽  
Elaine Vickers ◽  
Alexander Brehm ◽  
Tony Kouzarides ◽  
Andrew D. Sharrocks
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Histone Deacetylase ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Hormone Receptors ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Mitogen Activated Protein Kinase ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Histone Deacetylase 1 ◽  
Corepressor Complex ◽  
Eukaryotic Genes

ABSTRACT The transcriptional status of eukaryotic genes is determined by a balance between activation and repression mechanisms. The nuclear hormone receptors represent classical examples of transcription factors that can regulate this balance by recruiting corepressor and coactivator complexes in a ligand-dependent manner. Here, we demonstrate that the equilibrium between activation and repression via a single transcription factor, Elk-1, is altered following activation of the Erk mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade. In addition to its C-terminal transcriptional activation domain, Elk-1 contains an N-terminal transcriptional repression domain that can recruit the mSin3A-histone deacetylase 1 corepressor complex. Recruitment of this corepressor is enhanced in response to activation of the Erk pathway in vivo, and this recruitment correlates kinetically with the shutoff of one of its target promoters, c-fos. Elk-1 therefore undergoes temporal activator-repressor switching and contributes to both the activation and repression of target genes following growth factor stimulation.

scholarly journals Smad-Dependent Recruitment of a Histone Deacetylase/Sin3A Complex Modulates the Bone Morphogenetic Protein-Dependent Transcriptional Repressor Activity of Nkx3.2

2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (23) ◽  
pp. 8704-8717 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dae-Won Kim ◽  
Andrew B. Lassar
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Bone Morphogenetic Protein ◽  
Histone Deacetylase ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Transcriptional Repressor ◽  
Bmp Signaling ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Histone Deacetylase 1 ◽  
Morphogenetic Protein ◽  
Repressor Activity

ABSTRACT We have previously shown that Nkx3.2, a transcriptional repressor that is expressed in the sclerotome and developing cartilage, can activate the chondrocyte differentiation program in somitic mesoderm in a bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-dependent manner. In this work, we elucidate how BMP signaling modulates the transcriptional repressor activity of Nkx3.2. We have found that Nkx3.2 forms a complex, in vivo, with histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1) and Smad1 and -4 in a BMP-dependent manner. The homeodomain and NK domain of Nkx3.2 support the interaction of this transcription factor with HDAC1 and Smad1, respectively, and both of these domains are required for the transcriptional repressor activity of Nkx3.2. Furthermore, the recruitment of an HDAC/Sin3A complex to Nkx3.2 requires that Nkx3.2 interact with Smad1 and -4. Indeed, Nkx3.2 both fails to associate with the HDAC/Sin3A complex and represses target gene transcription in a cell line lacking Smad4, but it performs these functions if exogenous Smad4 is added to these cells. While prior work has indicated that BMP-dependent Smads can support transcriptional activation, our findings indicate that BMP-dependent Smads can also potentiate transcriptional repression, depending upon the identity of the Smad-interacting transcription factor.

scholarly journals Histone deacetylase 3 preferentially binds and collaborates with the transcription factor RUNX1 to repress AML1–ETO–dependent transcription in t(8;21) AML

2020 ◽  
Vol 295 (13) ◽  
pp. 4212-4223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chun Guo ◽  
Jian Li ◽  
Nickolas Steinauer ◽  
Madeline Wong ◽  
Brent Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Fusion Protein ◽  
Histone Deacetylase ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Chromosomal Translocation ◽  
Histone Deacetylase 3 ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
Related Transcription Factor ◽  
Almost All

In up to 15% of acute myeloid leukemias (AMLs), a recurring chromosomal translocation, termed t(8;21), generates the AML1–eight–twenty-one (ETO) leukemia fusion protein, which contains the DNA-binding domain of Runt-related transcription factor 1 (RUNX1) and almost all of ETO. RUNX1 and the AML1–ETO fusion protein are coexpressed in t(8;21) AML cells and antagonize each other's gene-regulatory functions. AML1–ETO represses transcription of RUNX1 target genes by competitively displacing RUNX1 and recruiting corepressors such as histone deacetylase 3 (HDAC3). Recent studies have shown that AML1–ETO and RUNX1 co-occupy the binding sites of AML1–ETO–activated genes. How this joined binding allows RUNX1 to antagonize AML1–ETO–mediated transcriptional activation is unclear. Here we show that RUNX1 functions as a bona fide repressor of transcription activated by AML1–ETO. Mechanistically, we show that RUNX1 is a component of the HDAC3 corepressor complex and that HDAC3 preferentially binds to RUNX1 rather than to AML1–ETO in t(8;21) AML cells. Studying the regulation of interleukin-8 (IL8), a newly identified AML1–ETO–activated gene, we demonstrate that RUNX1 and HDAC3 collaboratively repress AML1–ETO–dependent transcription, a finding further supported by results of genome-wide analyses of AML1–ETO–activated genes. These and other results from the genome-wide studies also have important implications for the mechanistic understanding of gene-specific coactivator and corepressor functions across the AML1–ETO/RUNX1 cistrome.

scholarly journals The TEA Transcription Factor Tec1 Confers Promoter-Specific Gene Regulation by Ste12-Dependent and -Independent Mechanisms

2010 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 514-531 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Heise ◽  
Julia van der Felden ◽  
Sandra Kern ◽  
Mario Malcher ◽  
Stefan Brückner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
A Genome ◽  
Regulated Gene Expression

ABSTRACT In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the TEA transcription factor Tec1 is known to regulate target genes together with a second transcription factor, Ste12. Tec1-Ste12 complexes can activate transcription through Tec1 binding sites (TCSs), which can be further combined with Ste12 binding sites (PREs) for cooperative DNA binding. However, previous studies have hinted that Tec1 might regulate transcription also without Ste12. Here, we show that in vivo, physiological amounts of Tec1 are sufficient to stimulate TCS-mediated gene expression and transcription of the FLO11 gene in the absence of Ste12. In vitro, Tec1 is able to bind TCS elements with high affinity and specificity without Ste12. Furthermore, Tec1 contains a C-terminal transcriptional activation domain that confers Ste12-independent activation of TCS-regulated gene expression. On a genome-wide scale, we identified 302 Tec1 target genes that constitute two distinct classes. A first class of 254 genes is regulated by Tec1 in a Ste12-dependent manner and is enriched for genes that are bound by Tec1 and Ste12 in vivo. In contrast, a second class of 48 genes can be regulated by Tec1 independently of Ste12 and is enriched for genes that are bound by the stress transcription factors Yap6, Nrg1, Cin5, Skn7, Hsf1, and Msn4. Finally, we find that combinatorial control by Tec1-Ste12 complexes stabilizes Tec1 against degradation. Our study suggests that Tec1 is able to regulate TCS-mediated gene expression by Ste12-dependent and Ste12-independent mechanisms that enable promoter-specific transcriptional control.

scholarly journals Transcriptional Repression by the SMRT-mSin3 Corepressor: Multiple Interactions, Multiple Mechanisms, and a Potential Role for TFIIB

1998 ◽  
Vol 18 (9) ◽  
pp. 5500-5510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chi-Wai Wong ◽  
Martin L. Privalsky
Keyword(s):  
Histone Deacetylase ◽  
Transcriptional Repression ◽  
Hormone Receptors ◽  
Alternative Pathway ◽  
Eukaryotic Transcription ◽  
Histone Deacetylase 1 ◽  
General Transcription Factor ◽  
Corepressor Complex ◽  
Chromatin Template ◽  
Physical Interactions

ABSTRACT A variety of eukaryotic transcription factors, including the nuclear hormone receptors, Max-Mad, BCL-6, and PLZF, appear to mediate transcriptional repression through the ability to recruit a multiprotein corepressor complex to the target promoter. This corepressor complex includes the SMRT/N-CoR polypeptides, mSin3A or -B, and histone deacetylase 1 or 2. The presence of a histone-modifying activity in the corepressor complex has led to the suggestion that gene silencing is mediated by modification of the chromatin template, perhaps rendering it less accessible to the transcriptional machinery. We report here, however, that the corepressor complex actually appears to exhibit multiple mechanisms of transcriptional repression, only one of which corresponds with detectable recruitment of the histone deacetylase. We provide evidence instead of an alternative pathway of repression that may be mediated by direct physical interactions between components of the corepressor complex and the general transcription factor TFIIB.

scholarly journals Histone Deacetylase 1 Can Repress Transcription by Binding to Sp1

1999 ◽  
Vol 19 (8) ◽  
pp. 5504-5511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelika Doetzlhofer ◽  
Hans Rotheneder ◽  
Gerda Lagger ◽  
Manfred Koranda ◽  
Vladislav Kurtev ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Histone Deacetylase ◽  
Transcriptional Repression ◽  
Trichostatin A ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Histone Deacetylase 1 ◽  
3T3 Fibroblasts ◽  
C Terminus ◽  
Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor Trichostatin ◽  
Carboxy Terminal

ABSTRACT The members of the Sp1 transcription factor family can act as both negative and positive regulators of gene expression. Here we show that Sp1 can be a target for histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1)-mediated transcriptional repression. The histone deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A activates the chromosomally integrated murine thymidine kinase promoter in an Sp1-dependent manner. Coimmunoprecipitation experiments with Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts and 293 cells demonstrate that Sp1 and HDAC1 can be part of the same complex. The interaction between Sp1 and HDAC1 is direct and requires the carboxy-terminal domain of Sp1. Previously we have shown that the C terminus of Sp1 is necessary for the interaction with the transcription factor E2F1 (J. Karlseder, H. Rotheneder, and E. Wintersberger, Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:1659–1667, 1996). Coexpression of E2F1 interferes with HDAC1 binding to Sp1 and abolishes Sp1-mediated transcriptional repression. Our results indicate that one component of Sp1-dependent gene regulation involves competition between the transcriptional repressor HDAC1 and the transactivating factor E2F1.

scholarly journals mSin3A/Histone Deacetylase 2- and PRMT5-Containing Brg1 Complex Is Involved in Transcriptional Repression of the Myc Target Gene cad

2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (21) ◽  
pp. 7475-7487 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharmistha Pal ◽  
Romy Yun ◽  
Antara Datta ◽  
Lynne Lacomis ◽  
Hediye Erdjument-Bromage ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Histone Deacetylase ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Transcriptional Repression ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Carbamoyl Phosphate ◽  
Histone Deacetylase 2 ◽  
Protein Protein Interaction ◽  
Corepressor Complex ◽  
Expression Of Genes ◽  
In Cells

ABSTRACT The role of hSWI/SNF complexes in transcriptional activation is well characterized; however, little is known about their function in transcriptional repression. We have previously shown that subunits of the mSin3A/histone deacetylase 2 (HDAC2) corepressor complex copurify with hSWI/SNF complexes. Here we show that the type II arginine-specific methyltransferase PRMT5, which is involved in cyclin E repression, can be found in association with Brg1 and hBrm-based hSWI/SNF complexes. We also show that hSWI/SNF-associated PRMT5 can methylate hypoacetylated histones H3 and H4 more efficiently than hyperacetylated histones H3 and H4. Protein-protein interaction studies indicate that PRMT5 and mSin3A interact with the same hSWI/SNF subunits as those targeted by c-Myc. These observations prompted us to examine the expression profile of the c-Myc target genes, carbamoyl-phosphate synthase-aspartate carbamoyltransferase-dihydroorotase (cad) and nucleolin (nuc). We found that cad repression is altered in cells that express inactive Brg1 and in cells treated with the HDAC inhibitor depsipeptide. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation assays, we found that Brg1, mSin3A, HDAC2, and PRMT5 are directly recruited to the cad promoter. These results suggest that hSWI/SNF complexes, through their ability to interact with activator and repressor proteins, control expression of genes involved in cell growth and proliferation.

scholarly journals Localization of glucocorticoid receptor interacting protein 1 in murine tissues using two novel polyclonal antibodies

2001 ◽  
pp. 323-333 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Puustinen ◽  
N Sarvilinna ◽  
T Manninen ◽  
P Tuohimaa ◽  
T Ylikomi
Keyword(s):  
Mammary Gland ◽  
Glucocorticoid Receptor ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Hormone Receptors ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Polyclonal Antibodies ◽  
Nuclear Staining ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Interacting Protein ◽  
Cytoplasmic Expression

OBJECTIVE: Glucocorticoid receptor interacting protein 1 (GRIP1) is a coactivator that binds to the nuclear hormone receptors in a ligand-dependent manner and mediates transcriptional activation of the target genes. The aim of this study was to investigate GRIP1 expression in various murine tissues and whether the protein is nuclear, cytoplasmic, or both. DESIGN: Two novel polyclonal antibodies against amino acids 34-47 and 468-481 of GRIP1 were raised and characterized in order to study the GRIP1 expression with immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Transient transfection studies with COS cells showed a clearly nuclear staining pattern and also immunohistochemical localization of GRIP1 was mainly nuclear, but cytoplasmic expression was seen as well. GRIP1 was expressed in epithelial cells of the submandibular gland, gastrointestinal tract, pancreas, kidney, uterus, mammary gland, testis, prostate, trachea, lungs and adrenal gland. GRIP1 was also detected in stromal cells of colon, rectum, urinary bladder, vagina, uterus, mammary gland and trachea, and to a lesser extent in esophagus, ureter, urethra, thymus and spleen. Smooth muscle cells of the gastrointestinal and urinary tract, uterus, epididymis, prostrate and bronchioles expressed GRIP1. Blood vessels of many organs, capsule of the kidney and prostate, mesovarium, adipocytes of the mammary gland, pericardium and cartilage of the trachea were also GRIP1-positive. Liver, thyroid gland and striated muscle did not express GRIP1. CONCLUSIONS: GRIP1 was expressed in a wide variety of murine organs, and expression varied between cell types and organs. In addition to mainly nuclear localization of endogenous GRIP1, cytoplasmic expression was seen as well.

scholarly journals Nuclear Receptor Coactivators (NCOAs) and Corepressors (NCORs) in the Brain

Endocrinology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 161 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zheng Sun ◽  
Yong Xu
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Receptor ◽  
Sexual Behaviors ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Hormone Receptors ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Autism Spectrum ◽  
Mammalian Brain ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Nuclear Receptor Coactivators ◽  
The Brain

Abstract Nuclear receptor coactivators (NCOAs) and corepressors (NCORs) bind to nuclear hormone receptors in a ligand-dependent manner and mediate the transcriptional activation or repression of the downstream target genes in response to hormones, metabolites, xenobiotics, and drugs. NCOAs and NCORs are widely expressed in the mammalian brain. Studies using genetic animal models started to reveal pivotal roles of NCOAs/NCORs in the brain in regulating hormonal signaling, sexual behaviors, consummatory behaviors, exploratory and locomotor behaviors, moods, learning, and memory. Genetic variants of NCOAs or NCORs have begun to emerge from human patients with obesity, hormonal disruption, intellectual disability, or autism spectrum disorders. Here we review recent studies that shed light on the function of NCOAs and NCORs in the central nervous system.

scholarly journals 8a, a New Acridine Antiproliferative and Pro-Apoptotic Agent Targeting HDAC1/DNMT1

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (11) ◽  
pp. 5516
Author(s):  
Qiting Zhang ◽  
Ziyan Wang ◽  
Xinyuan Chen ◽  
Haoxiang Qiu ◽  
Yifan Gu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Histone Deacetylase ◽  
Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Hdac Inhibitors ◽  
Mitochondrial Pathway ◽  
Epigenetic Therapy ◽  
Protein Interaction Data ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Histone Deacetylase 1 ◽  
Histiocytic Lymphoma ◽  
Dose Dependent

Epigenetic therapy using histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors has become an attractive project in new drug development. However, DNA methylation and histone acetylation are important epigenetic ways to regulate the occurrence and development of leukemia. Given previous studies, N-(2-aminophenyl)benzamide acridine (8a), as a histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1) inhibitor, induces apoptosis and shows significant anti-proliferative activity against histiocytic lymphoma U937 cells. HDAC1 plays a role in the nucleus, which we confirmed by finding that 8a entered the nucleus. Subsequently, we verified that 8a mainly passes through the endogenous (mitochondrial) pathway to induce cell apoptosis. From the protein interaction data, we found that 8a also affected the expression of DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1). Therefore, an experiment was performed to assess the binding of 8a to DNMT1 at the molecular and cellular levels. We found that the binding strength of 8a to DNMT1 enhanced in a dose-dependent manner. Additionally, 8a inhibits the expression of DNMT1 mRNA and its protein. These findings suggested that the anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic activities of 8a against leukemia cells were achieved by targeting HDAC1 and DNMT1.

scholarly journals New Insights into the Pleiotropic Drug Resistance Network from Genome-Wide Characterization of the YRR1 Transcription Factor Regulation System

2002 ◽  
Vol 22 (8) ◽  
pp. 2642-2649 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stéphane Le Crom ◽  
Frédéric Devaux ◽  
Philippe Marc ◽  
Xiaoting Zhang ◽  
W. Scott Moye-Rowley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drug Resistance ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Binding Site ◽  
Time Course ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Regulation System ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Pleiotropic Drug Resistance ◽  
Genome Wide

ABSTRACT Yrr1p is a recently described Zn2Cys6 transcription factor involved in the pleiotropic drug resistance (PDR) phenomenon. It is controlled in a Pdr1p-dependent manner and is autoregulated. We describe here a new genome-wide approach to characterization of the set of genes directly regulated by Yrr1p. We found that the time-course production of an artificial chimera protein containing the DNA-binding domain of Yrr1p activated the 15 genes that are also up-regulated by a gain-of-function mutant of Yrr1p. Gel mobility shift assays showed that the promoters of the genes AZR1, FLR1, SNG1, YLL056C, YLR346C, and YPL088W interacted with Yrr1p. The putative consensus Yrr1p binding site deduced from these experiments, (T/A)CCG(C/T)(G/T)(G/T)(A/T)(A/T), is strikingly similar to the PDR element binding site sequence recognized by Pdr1p and Pdr3p. The minor differences between these sequences are consistent with Yrr1p and Pdr1p and Pdr3p having different sets of target genes. According to these data, some target genes are directly regulated by Pdr1p and Pdr3p or by Yrr1p, whereas some genes are indirectly regulated by the activation of Yrr1p. Some genes, such as YOR1, SNQ2, and FLR1, are clearly directly controlled by both classes of transcription factor, suggesting an important role for the corresponding membrane proteins.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document