AB0124 STRUCTURAL DAMAGE IN THE FOOT IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS: DON’T MISS THE OTHER METATARSOPHALANGEAL JOINTS
Background:The foot involvement in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) affects the functionality and the quality of life in patients. Despite this, the clinicians do not give enough care to the foot in RA patients, especially if asymptomatic, resulting in joint damage, deformity, and disability. The distribution of erosions of the other MTP joints (excluding the 5th) has not previously been studied.Objectives:This study aimed to investigate the distribution of erosions in MTP joints and their clinical implications.Methods:We conducted a retrospective study including patients with RA according to the American college of rheumatology/ the European league against rheumatism classification criteria. Sociodemographic data, as well as disease activity related characteristics, were recorded.Posterior–anterior radiographs of the hands and feet of each patient were assessed for erosions.All patients were assessed by Ultrasonography (US) of the hands. US erosions were scored 0-3 according to Szkudlarek [1]. We divided patients into two groups (G1 without MTPs erosions and G2 with MTPs erosions).Results:We enrolled forty-two females and eleven males in our studies. The mean age was 58.6 years ±12.7 [23-77], and the mean disease duration was 8.4 years [1-47]. Rheumatoid factor or cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (Anti-CCP) were positive in 62.3% of cases. The mean DAS28ESR score was 5.1±1.16 [2.5-7.7]. Half of the patients had the active disease (52.8%). Hand erosions evaluated with plain radiographs and the US were found in 43.1% and 50.9% of cases, respectively. The distribution of foot erosions (15.1%) was at follows: 5th right MTP (7.5%), the 5th right IPP (2%), the 1st left MTP (2%), 3th left MTP (3.8%), 4th left MTP (5.7%) and the 5th left MTP (9.4%). Erosions on MTPs with the exclusion of the 5th MTP were present in 9.4% of cases. The presence of MTPs erosion was more frequent in males (p=0.01) but was not associated with age (p=0.6) or disease duration (p=0.2). Seropositivity was similar between the two groups (p=0.06). Similarly, the inflammatory markers (ESR and CRP), as well as DAS28 ESR, did not differ between the two groups (p>0.05). MTPs erosion was not associated with the presence of hand erosions on a plain radiograph (p=0.445). However, MTPs erosion was significantly more frequent in patients with less erosive hands-on US (p=0.034).Conclusion:Our study showed that screening of other MTPs (excluding the 5th) is mandatory in RA diagnosis. Interestingly, in our result, MTPs erosion is more frequent in males with less erosive hands.Disclosure of Interests:None declared