Income support programmes for the older adults in South Asia: a scoping review protocol

IntroductionSouth Asian countries are ageing and experiencing a rapid increase in proportion of the older population. Income support programmes are of central importance for the older adults as they may help to mitigate the poverty risks associated with ageing and losing the ability to generate income from labour. Evidence related to the income support programmes can help in understanding whether the programmes have been impactful. This scoping review will map the evidence (and gaps) related to income support programmes and create a base to identify the feasibility of future primary research and/or the scope of systematic reviews in the areas where evidence is available.Methods and analysisThe Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodology will be followed. Eligibility criteria for the scoping review will be based on the ‘PCC’ or the ‘Population–Concept–Context’ concept. Advanced search for the relevant articles will be conducted in MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase, Scopus, Campbell Collaboration, 3ie International Initiative for Impact Evaluation and Web of Science. Additional resources search will be conducted in important organisational websites. Findings of the scoping review will be summarised using descriptive information (frequencies and percentages) for the available evidence on concept (ie, income support programmes), population characteristics and other study variables.Ethics and disseminationThe review is based on data from available literature, hence an ethical approval is not necessary. With this review, we attempt to provide recommendations to the research community and the policymakers about the currently available evidence and the research required for income support of older adults in South Asia, so that resources can be directed towards addressing the same. We plan to disseminate the findings through presentation in international conference and publication in a peer-reviewed journal.Review registrationNot registered.

Download Full-text

Adolescent undernutrition in South Asia: a scoping review protocol

BMJ Open ◽

10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031955 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 10 (1) ◽

pp. e031955

Author(s):

Sara Estecha Querol ◽

Lena Al-Khudairy ◽

Romaina Iqbal ◽

Samantha Johnson ◽

Paramjit Gill

Keyword(s):

South Asia ◽

Scoping Review ◽

Grey Literature ◽

Research Priorities ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Bibliographic Databases ◽

Future Research ◽

Eligibility Criteria ◽

Ethical Approval ◽

Review Protocol

IntroductionThe aim of the protocol is to present the methodology of a scoping review that aims to synthesise up-to-date evidence on adolescent undernutrition in South Asia.Methods and analysisThe proposed scoping review will be guided by Arksey and O’Malley’s framework and the Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers’ Manual. The scoping review question, eligibility criteria and search strategy will be based on the Population, Concept and Context strategy. We will conduct the search in electronic bibliographic databases (Medline (OVID), Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Scopus) as well as various grey literature sources in order to synthesise and present the findings with descriptive statistics and a narrative description of both quantitative and qualitative evidence.Ethics and disseminationThis study protocol does not require ethical approval. This protocol will accurately describe the proposed scoping review that will map the evidence on adolescent undernutrition in South Asia. The proposed review aims to gather published and unpublished literature to inform policy and healthcare organisations as well as identify future research priorities in South Asia.

Download Full-text

Explicit and implicit experience of own’s body in painful musculoskeletal disorders and rheumatic diseases: A scoping review protocol of available quantitative and qualitative evidence

SAGE Open Medicine ◽

10.1177/2050312118820026 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 6 ◽

pp. 205031211882002 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Antonello Viceconti ◽

Eleonora Maria Camerone ◽

Deborah Luzzi ◽

Matteo Pardini ◽

Diego Ristori ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Scoping Review ◽

Eligibility Criteria ◽

Clinical Role ◽

Body Experience ◽

Scoping Reviews ◽

Ethical Approval ◽

Review Protocol ◽

Research Questions ◽

Meta Analyses ◽

Population Concept

Introduction: Our body experience is organized at twofold levels: perceptual and cognitive-emotional. These higher-order processes are clearly different from the primary sensory processing of somatic stimuli (somatosensation). However, most of the available studies have mainly investigated the mechanisms of somatosensation. Moreover, disturbances of our body experience have been documented in some pathological conditions of interest for rehabilitative interventions, but their clinical role and relevance is yet to be clarified. Because in this field we have limited knowledge on perceptual and cognitive body experience, there emerges a need to better clarify this matter. The aim of the present scoping review is to systematically map this topic and to examine the magnitude and the nature of the available evidences. Materials and Methods: The scoping review will be performed following the six-stage methodology suggested by Arksey and O’Malley. Ten electronic databases will be investigated since their inception. The search strategy will be peer reviewed by PRESS 2015 Evidence-Based Checklist as a quality assurance step. All records retrieved will be screened by two independent reviewers. The Population, Concept, and Context method will be adopted for eligibility criteria and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses will be used for results reporting. Two reviewers with different background will perform the search process independently. One author will extract data, checked by a second reviewer checking the matching with the research questions and goals. Any disagreements will be solved by a third reviewer. Ethics and Dissemination: Ethical approval is not required for scoping reviews. Dissemination will include submission to peer-reviewed journal and presentations in conferences in the area of rehabilitation.

Download Full-text

A Scoping Review of Community Based Geriatric Health Assessment and Screening Tools used in South Asia Region

10.1101/2021.02.19.21252051 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Sucharita Panigrahi ◽

Trilochan Bhoi ◽

Sanghamitra Pati ◽

Jaya Singh Kshatri

Keyword(s):

Older Adults ◽

Health Status ◽

South Asia ◽

Scoping Review ◽

Health Assessment ◽

The Elderly ◽

Holistic Health ◽

Screening Tools ◽

Older Population ◽

Eligibility Criteria

AbstractThere have been many geriatric tools developed to assess health status targeting especially for older adults from developed nations but not context specific. Whereas finger count tools are available for LMICs, especially the South Asia population. CGA, as opposed to medical examination, uses multiple tools to capture a holistic health status of the older adults in line with the more comprehensive WHO definition of health. It includes a harmonized evaluation of the clinical, functional, psychological, environmental and social health status of older population. Although there is no standardized format for carrying out CGA, there is broad consensus on the domains that need to be measured. For the better caring of culturally diverse South Asian older population, we need to develop more culturally competent CGHA tools. So, this review summarised studies that describe validated tools for assessing geriatric health in community settings in South Asia. We followed Arksey and O’Malley’s five-stage scoping review framework, refined with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology, to identify the research questions, identify relevant studies, select studies, chart the data, and collate and summarize the data. Using the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, a search of 3 databases (PubMed, Embase and PsychInfo was undertaken. After applying eligibility criteria to 607 articles, only 46 studies met the inclusion criteria. 7 studies reported on medical assessment, 4 studies assessed psychological condition,6 studies assessed functional issue,2 studies assessed social wellbeing and 9 studies reported on different domains. None study measured all domains. 24 tools calibrated with Gold standard measure, were validated and reliable by assessed with psychometric properties such as sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and ROC-AUC. Meanwhile, 21 tools were validated exclusively for older adults, whereas there are no validated tools available for CGHA in South Asia. This review will guide us for development of CGHA tools or adaptation of existing tools in our context. As well, it will help practitioners to develop tools to measure comprehensive health of the elderly in their context.

Download Full-text

Hypnotherapy for Procedural Pain and Distress in Children: A scoping Review Protocol

Pain Medicine ◽

10.1093/pm/pnab038 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Daly Geagea ◽

Zephanie Tyack ◽

Roy Kimble ◽

Lars Eriksson ◽

Vince Polito ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Scoping Review ◽

Grey Literature ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Procedural Pain ◽

Future Research ◽

Theoretical Frameworks ◽

Eligibility Criteria ◽

Pharmacological Agents ◽

Review Protocol ◽

Meta Analyses

Abstract Objective Inadequately treated pain and distress elicited by medical procedures can put children at higher risks of acute and chronic biopsychosocial sequelae. Children can benefit from hypnotherapy, a psychological tailored intervention, as an adjunct to pharmacological agents to address the multiple components of pain and distress. Despite providing evidence on the effectiveness and potential superiority of hypnotherapy to other psychological interventions, research on hypnotherapy for paediatric procedural pain and distress has been predominantly limited to oncology and needle procedures. Plus, there is a lack of reporting of intervention manuals, factors influencing hypnotic responding, pain unpleasantness outcomes, theoretical frameworks, adverse events, as well as barriers and facilitators to the feasibility of delivering the intervention and study procedures. The proposed review aims to map the range and nature of the evidence on hypnotherapy for procedural pain and distress in children to identify gaps in literature and areas requiring further investigation. Methods This review will follow the Arksey and O'Malley (2005) methodology and incorporate additional scoping review recommendations by The Joanna Briggs Institute and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses. Relevant studies will be identified through searching published literature databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus and Web of Science) and grey literature in addition to hand-searching of reference lists and key journals. Two authors will independently screen titles and abstracts of search results followed by full-texts review against eligibility criteria. Conclusion Findings are anticipated to guide future research and inform the development of tailored hypnotic interventions in children.

Download Full-text

Effects of sport-related repetitive subconcussive head impacts on biofluid markers: a scoping review protocol

BMJ Open ◽

10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046452 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (6) ◽

pp. e046452

Author(s):

Liivia-Mari Lember ◽

Michail Ntikas ◽

Stefania Mondello ◽

Lindsay Wilson ◽

Angus Hunter ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Scoping Review ◽

Unmet Need ◽

Research Priorities ◽

Medical Decision ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Eligibility Criteria ◽

Head Impacts ◽

Review Protocol ◽

Ebsco Host ◽

Clinical Trials Registry

IntroductionSport-related repetitive subconcussive head impacts (RSHIs) are increasingly thought to be associated with adverse long-term outcomes. However, owing to potentially subtle effects, accurate assessment of harm to the brain as a consequence of RSHI is a major challenge and an unmet need. Several studies suggest that biofluid markers can be valuable objective tools to aid the diagnosis and injury characterisation and help in medical decision-making. Still, by and large, the results have been limited, heterogeneous and inconsistent. The main aims of this scoping review are therefore (1) to systematically examine the extent, nature and quality of available evidence from studies investigating effects of RSHI on fluid biomarkers and (2) to formulate guidelines and identify gaps with the aim to inform future clinical studies and the development of research priorities.Methods and analysesWe will use a comprehensive search strategy to retrieve all available and relevant articles in the literature. The following electronic databases will be systematically searched: MEDLINE (EBSCO host; from 1809 to 2020); Scopus (from 1788 to 2020); SPORTDiscus (from 1892 to 2020); CINAHL Complete (from 1937 to 2020); PsycINFO (from 1887 to 2020); Cochrane Library (to 2020); OpenGrey (to 2020); ClinicalTrials.gov (to 2020) and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (to 2020). We will consider primarily biomedical studies evaluating the biofluid markers following RSHI. Two independent reviewers will screen articles for inclusion using predefined eligibility criteria and extract data of retained articles. Disagreements will be resolved through consensus or arbitrated by a third reviewer if necessary. Data will be reported qualitatively given the heterogeneity of the included studies. In synthesising the evidence, we will structure results by markers, sample types, outcomes, sport and timepoints.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval is not required. We will submit results for peer-review publication, and present at relevant conferences.

Download Full-text

Mapping the prevalence of the neglected sexual side effects after prostate cancer treatment and the questionnaires used in their screening: a scoping review protocol

Systematic Reviews ◽

10.1186/s13643-020-01473-9 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 9 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Pierre Röscher ◽

Jacqueline M. van Wyk

Keyword(s):

Prostate Cancer ◽

Side Effects ◽

Scoping Review ◽

Research Question ◽

Prostate Cancer Treatment ◽

Eligibility Criteria ◽

Sexual Stimulation ◽

Sexual Side Effects ◽

Review Team ◽

Review Protocol

Abstract Background Interventions to treat early prostate cancer (PCa) can leave men with debilitating sexual side effects. The cluster of side effects referred to as the neglected sexual side effects (NSSE) may remain permanent, undiagnosed and untreated because men are hesitant to disclose them. Questionnaires offer a discreet way into the discussion, subsequent diagnosis and possible treatment of the NSSE. This study will be conducted to map the evidence about the prevalence of the neglected sexual side effects (NSSE) after PCa treatment, and use of questionnaires in its diagnosis and screening. Methods This systematic scoping review will involve searching the following electronic databases: PubMed, Science Direct and Google Scholar. Following title searching, two-independent reviewers will conduct screening of abstracts and full articles. Eligibility criteria will guide the screenings. Data will be extracted from the included studies, and the emerging themes will be analysed. The review team will analyse the implications of the findings concerning the research question and aim of the study. The mixed method appraisal tool (MMAT) will be employed for quality appraisal of included studies. Discussion We anticipate finding a number of studies that describe the prevalence of NSSE after early PCa treatment and that report on using questionnaires to screen for the presence of symptoms including orgasm-associated incontinence, urinary incontinence during sexual stimulation, altered perceptions of orgasm, orgasm associated pain, penile shortening and penile deformity. The study findings will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal, peer presentations and presentations at relevant conferences.

Download Full-text

Type and use of digital technology in learning health systems: a scoping review protocol

BMJ Open ◽

10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026204 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 9 (5) ◽

pp. e026204

Author(s):

Lysanne Lessard ◽

Agnes Grudniewicz ◽

Antoine Sauré ◽

Agnieszka Szczotka ◽

James King ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Health Systems ◽

Scoping Review ◽

Digital Technology ◽

Technology Use ◽

Data Extraction ◽

Grey Literature ◽

Future Research ◽

Efficiency And Effectiveness ◽

Ethical Approval ◽

Review Protocol

IntroductionHealth systems in North America and Europe have been criticised for their lack of safety, efficiency and effectiveness despite rising healthcare costs. In response, healthcare leaders and researchers have articulated the need to transform current health systems into continuously and rapidly learning health systems (LHSs). While digital technology has been envisioned as providing the transformational power for LHSs by generating timely evidence and supporting best care practices, it remains to be ascertained if it is indeed playing this role in current LHS initiatives. This paper presents a protocol for a scoping review that aims at providing a comprehensive understanding of how and to what extent digital technology is used within LHSs. Results will help to identify gaps in the literature as a means to guide future research on this topic.Methods and analysisMultiple databases and grey literature will be searched with terms related to learning health systems. Records selection will be done in duplicate by two reviewers applying pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data extraction from selected records will be done by two reviewers using a piloted data charting form. Results will be synthesised through a descriptive numerical summary and a mapping of digital technology use onto types of LHSs and phases of learning within LHSs.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval is not required for this scoping review. Preliminary results will be shared with stakeholders to account for their perspectives when drawing conclusions. Final results will be disseminated through presentations at relevant conferences and publications in peer-reviewed journals.

Download Full-text

Nonimmersive Brain Gaming for Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment: A Scoping Review

The Gerontologist ◽

10.1093/geront/gny164 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 59 (6) ◽

pp. e764-e781 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Pallavi Sood ◽

Sandra L Kletzel ◽

Shilpa Krishnan ◽

Hannes Devos ◽

Ahmed Negm ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Older Adults ◽

Cognitive Impairment ◽

Scoping Review ◽

Research Field ◽

Cognitive Outcome ◽

Future Research ◽

Eligibility Criteria ◽

Technological Advances ◽

Design And Methods

Abstract Background Technological advances have allowed a variety of computerized cognitive training tools to be engineered in ways that are fun and entertaining yet challenging at a level that can maintain motivation and engagement. This revolution has created an opportunity for gerontological scientists to evaluate brain gaming approaches to improve cognitive and everyday function. The purpose of this scoping review is to provide a critical overview of the existing literature on nonimmersive, electronic brain gaming interventions in older adults with mild cognitive impairment or dementia. Research Design and Methods Systematic search was conducted using 7 electronic databases from inception through July 2017. A comprehensive 2-level eligibility process was used to identify studies for inclusion based on PRISMA guidelines. Results Seventeen studies met eligibility criteria. Majority of the studies were randomized controlled trials (n = 13) and incorporated an active control (n = 9). Intervention doses ranged from 4 to 24 weeks in duration with an average of 8.4 (±5.1 standard deviation [SD]) weeks. Session durations ranged from 30 to 100 min with an average of 54 (±25 SD) minutes. Nearly half of studies included a follow-up, ranging from 3 months to 5 years (n = 8). For most studies, brain gaming improved at least one cognitive outcome (n = 12); only one study reported improvement in activities of daily living. Discussion and Implications This scoping review conveys the breadth of an emerging research field, which will help guide future research to develop standards and recommendations for brain gaming interventions which are currently lacking.

Download Full-text

Barriers to effective prescribing in older adults: applying the theoretical domains framework in the ambulatory setting – a scoping review

BMC Geriatrics ◽

10.1186/s12877-020-01766-7 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 20 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Sabrina Lau ◽

Penny Lun ◽

Wendy Ang ◽

Keng Teng Tan ◽

Yew Yoong Ding

Keyword(s):

Older Adults ◽

Scoping Review ◽

Grey Literature ◽

Inappropriate Prescribing ◽

Theoretical Domains Framework ◽

Ambulatory Setting ◽

Eligibility Criteria ◽

Related Factors ◽

Prescribing Behaviour ◽

The Impact

Abstract Background As the population ages, potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in the older adults may become increasingly prevalent. This undermines patient safety and creates a potential source of major morbidity and mortality. Understanding the factors that influence prescribing behaviour may allow development of interventions to reduce PIP. The aim of this study is to apply the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to explore barriers to effective prescribing for older adults in the ambulatory setting. Methods A scoping review was performed based on the five-stage methodological framework developed by Arksey and O’Malley. From 30 Aug 2018 to 5 Sep 2018, we conducted our search on PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Web of Science. We also searched five electronic journals, Google and Google Scholar to identify additional sources and grey literature. Two reviewers applied eligibility criteria to the title and abstract screening, followed by full text screening, before systematically charting the data. Results A total of 5731 articles were screened. Twenty-nine studies met the selection criteria for qualitative analysis. We mapped our results using the 14-domain TDF, eventually identifying 10 domains of interest for barriers to effective prescribing. Of these, significant domains include physician-related factors such as “Knowledge”, “Skills”, and “Social/Professional Role and Identity”; issues with “Environmental Context and Resources”; and the impact of “Social Influences” and “Emotion” on prescribing behaviour. Conclusion The TDF elicited multiple domains which both independently and collectively lead to barriers to effective prescribing for older adults in the ambulatory setting. Changing the prescribing climate will thus require interventions targeting multiple stakeholders, including physicians, patients and hospital/clinic systems. Further work is needed to explore individual domains and guide development of frameworks to aid guide prescribing for older adults in the ambulatory setting.

Download Full-text

Defining, reporting, and monitoring near-falls in older adults: a scoping review protocol

Geriatrics Gerontology and Aging ◽

10.5327/z2447-212320212000129 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 15 ◽

Author(s):

Carina Junqueira Cervato ◽

Giselle Layse Andrade Buarque ◽

Katie Robinson ◽

Rachael Frost ◽

James Gavind ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Older Adults ◽

Contributing Factors ◽

Eligibility Criteria ◽

Poor Vision ◽

Falls In Older Adults ◽

Review Protocol ◽

Recovery Mechanisms ◽

Near Falls ◽

Traditional Risk Factors ◽

Risk Factors For Falls

INTRODUCTION: In addition to traditional risk factors for falls (e.g., reduced muscle strength, polypharmacy, and poor vision), researchers have been investigating whether other factors, such as near-falls, can be identified to allow early intervention and prevention. A near-fall can be defined as a slip, trip, or loss of balance that would result in a fall if adequate recovery mechanisms were not activated. Despite the increasing interest in near-falls, there is no consensus about the definition, reporting methods, and contributing factors. OBJECTIVE: To identify how near-falls among older adults have been defined, reported, and monitored in the scientific literature. METHODS: Indexed literature published in English, Spanish, and Portuguese will be considered and retrieved from 10 databases, until August 31st, 2020. Two authors will independently screen titles, abstracts, and full texts against the eligibility criteria, and disagreements will be resolved by a third reviewer. This review will consider studies with different designs that have included older adults (aged 60 years and over), recruited participants from different settings, and had an explicit definition and/or reporting of near-falls. A customized form will be used to extract data from the included studies. The results will be presented in tabular form, accompanied by a narrative summary. This protocol is registered at https://osf.io/txnv4. EXPECTED RESULTS AND RELEVANCE: Depending on the results, a conceptual framework for near-fall reporting, contributing factors, and a possible prodrome of falls will also be presented. It is expected that the present study will help professionals identify and manage near-falls in different settings.

Download Full-text