scholarly journals Age-stratified outcomes of bioprosthetic and mechanical aortic valve replacements in an Australian cohort of 13 377 patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. e000036
Author(s):  
Oluwadamisola Temilade Sotade ◽  
Michael Falster ◽  
Leonard N Girardi ◽  
Sallie-Anne Pearson ◽  
Louisa R Jorm
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Mechanical Valve ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Mortality Data ◽  
Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Major Hemorrhage ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Rate Ratios

ObjectivesTo quantify age-stratified outcomes of bioprosthetic valve (BV) and mechanical valve (MV) surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) in Australian patients.DesignRetrospective cohort study using population-based linked hospital morbidity and mortality data.SettingPublic and private hospitals.ParticipantsPatients aged 18 years and over undergoing AVR from 2001 to 2013, stratified by age (18–64 years; 65+ years).Main outcome measuresAge-standardized index AVR rates; rates and multivariable-adjusted (age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index) incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for reoperation, incident cardiovascular events (hospitalization or death for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), stroke, major hemorrhage or thromboembolism) and mortality (cardiovascular and all-cause).ResultsOur cohort comprised 13 377 patients, of whom 3464 (26%) were aged 18–64 years. Annual age-standardized AVR rates increased by 2.7% with BV implants increasing in both age groups. After 5 years of follow-up, patients implanted with BV had lower rates of stroke (IRR: 0.40, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.60) and hemorrhage (IRR: 0.36, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.50). Among patients 65+ years, those implanted with BV had lower rates of AMI, hemorrhage, and cardiovascular and all-cause mortality than those implanted with MV (IRR: 0.71, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.96; IRR: 0.77, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.95; IRR: 0.80, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.92 and IRR: 0.85, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.97, respectively). After 6–10 years of follow-up, reoperation rates among patients 18–64 years were markedly higher in those implanted with BV compared with MV (IRR: 5.48, 95% CI 2.38 to 12.62) and rates of AMI were lower among patients implanted with BV compared with MV (IRR: 0.49, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.94). Among patients 65+ years rates of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality remained significantly lower for patients implanted with BV compared with MV.ConclusionsThis study provides real-world evidence of AVR use and outcomes. Use of BV implants is increasing irrespective of age. Valve choice in younger patients requires thorough evaluation of patient factors influencing both short-term outcomes and longer-term risks of reoperation, stroke and hemorrhage.

scholarly journals Survival of Mantle Cell Lymphoma in the Era of Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: A Population-Based Analysis

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 182-182
Author(s):  
Mengyang Di ◽  
Can Cui ◽  
Shalin K. Kothari ◽  
Amer M. Zeidan ◽  
Nikolai Podoltsev ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Bruton Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Support Research

Abstract Background: Despite advances in chemoimmunotherapy and stem cell transplantation, mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) has historically been difficult to treat. Patients with advanced age and high-risk features (e.g. blastoid/pleomorphic features, high MIPI score, complex karyotype, TP53 mutation) face particularly poor outcomes with standard chemoimmunotherapy. Ibrutinib, a Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi), was approved for second-line use in MCL in 2013. Other BTKis - acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib were approved in 2017 and 2019, respectively. BTKi provides a well-tolerated chemotherapy-free option for these hard-to-treat subgroups, especially the older patients. In this population-based study, we evaluated survival outcomes prior to and after the approval of ibrutinib, and hypothesized that survival benefit observed early after approval would be greatest in older patients not typically candidates for consolidative transplantation in the first-line setting. Methods: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, we included all adult patients diagnosed with MCL in the years 2007-2018 and followed them to the end of 2018 or death, whichever came first. The pre-BTKi era was defined by year of diagnosis 2007-2011, and the BTKi era was between 2014 and 2018. The years 2012-2013 were considered as a "washout" period to allow practice change related to the approval of ibrutinib. As age plays an important role in treatment decisions, including whether to use consolidative transplantation, patients were divided based on age at diagnosis: <60, 60-69, 70-79, and ≥80 years. Outcomes of interest included all-cause mortality, and mortality from MCL (MFM). We applied multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model for all-cause mortality, adjusting for age, sex, race, stage, and median household income at census level, and reported adjusted hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). We also conducted multivariable competing risk analyses for MFM, considering all other causes of death as the competing events, and reported subhazard ratio (sHR) with 95% CI. To eliminate potential confounding by duration of follow-up among patients diagnosed in different periods, we used only three-year follow-up data for primary analyses, and all available follow-up data for sensitivity analyses. Results: We identified 7,625 individuals diagnosed with MCL during our study period (3,424 and 4,201 diagnosed during 2007-2011 and 2014-2018, respectively). The majority were male (71%) and white (90%), with 49% of patients 70 years or older. The median follow-up was 9.2 and 2.4 years for patients diagnosed during 2007-2011 and 2014-2018, respectively. The 3-year all-cause mortality and 3-year MFM rates were 39.8% and 27.3%, respectively, in the overall population. Both the 3-year all-cause mortality and MFM increased as age increased. The 3-year all-cause mortality was lower in the BTKi era among all age groups, except patients <60 years old, and the 3-year MFM was lower in the BTKi era among all age groups. The numeric difference of 3-year outcomes was more substantial in patients aged 70-79 for both all-cause mortality (pre-BTKi era: 47.8%, BTKi era: 40.4%) and MFM (pre-BTKi era: 33.9%, BTKi era: 27.5%) (Table, Figure A and B). In the multivariable analyses, risk of death was significantly lower during the BTKi era in the 60-69 (HR:0.85, 95% CI: 0.72-1.00) and 70-79 (HR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.70-0.92) age groups. MFM was also significantly lower during the BTKi era in these two age groups (60-69: sHR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.64-0.94; 70-79: sHR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.65-0.90, Table). The results were largely unchanged in sensitivity analyses (results not shown). Conclusion: In this large population-based cohort analysis of individuals diagnosed with MCL, overall and lymphoma-specific survival improved in the BTKi era. At a median follow up of 2.4 years in our BTKi cohort, significant survival benefits were observed in those older than 60 but less than 80 years of age, and the observed benefits were greatest in the 70-79 age group. Future real-world studies should examine the impact of novel agents on treatment patterns and outcomes of MCL over a longer follow up period. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Kothari: Incyte pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria. Zeidan: Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy; Jasper: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Other: Clinical Trial Committees, Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy, Research Funding; BeyondSpring: Consultancy; Acceleron: Consultancy, Research Funding; BioCryst: Other: Clinical Trial Committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Clinical Trial Committees, Travel support, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Other: Clinical Trial Committees, Research Funding; Ionis: Consultancy; Loxo Oncology: Consultancy, Other: Clinical Trial Committees; Astex: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Epizyme: Consultancy; Cardiff Oncology: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Other: Clinical Trial Committees; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Geron: Other: Clinical Trial Committees; Pfizer: Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Kura: Consultancy, Other: Clinical Trial Committees; Aprea: Consultancy, Research Funding. Podoltsev: PharmaEssentia: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squib: Honoraria; CTI BioPharma: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Blueprint Medicines: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Neparidze: Janssen: Research Funding; Eidos Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding. Shallis: Curis: Divested equity in a private or publicly-traded company in the past 24 months. Ma: Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding. Huntington: AbbVie: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; SeaGen: Consultancy; DTRM Biopharm: Research Funding; Flatiron Health Inc.: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Bayer: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genentech: Consultancy; Servier: Consultancy; Thyme Inc: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Association of BMI with risk of CVD mortality and all-cause mortality

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (7) ◽  
pp. 1226-1234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chee Cheong Kee ◽  
Mohd Ghazali Sumarni ◽  
Kuang Hock Lim ◽  
Sharmini Selvarajah ◽  
Jamaiyah Haniff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dietary Habits ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Mortality Data ◽  
Positive Trend ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Never Smokers ◽  
Cvd Mortality

AbstractObjectiveTo determine the relationship between BMI and risk of CVD mortality and all-cause mortality among Malaysian adults.DesignPopulation-based, retrospective cohort study. Participants were followed up for 5 years from 2006 to 2010. Mortality data were obtained via record linkages with the Malaysian National Registration Department. Multiple Cox regression was applied to compare risk of CVD and all-cause mortality between BMI categories adjusting for age, gender and ethnicity. Models were generated for all participants, all participants the first 2 years of follow-up, healthy participants, healthy never smokers, never smokers, current smokers and former smokers.SettingAll fourteen states in Malaysia.SubjectsMalaysian adults (n 32 839) aged 18 years or above from the third National Health and Morbidity Survey.ResultsTotal follow-up time was 153 814 person-years with 1035 deaths from all causes and 225 deaths from CVD. Underweight (BMI<18·5 kg/m2) was associated with a significantly increased risk of all-cause mortality, while obesity (BMI ≥30·0 kg/m2) was associated with a heightened risk of CVD mortality. Overweight (BMI=25·0–29·9 kg/m2) was inversely associated with risk of all-cause mortality. Underweight was significantly associated with all-cause mortality in all models except for current smokers. Overweight was inversely associated with all-cause mortality in all participants. Although a positive trend was observed between BMI and CVD mortality in all participants, a significant association was observed only for severe obesity (BMI≥35·0 kg/m2).ConclusionsUnderweight was associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality and obesity with increased risk of CVD mortality. Therefore, maintaining a normal BMI through leading an active lifestyle and healthy dietary habits should continue to be promoted.

scholarly journals Association of disability with mortality in the Spanish adult non-institutionalised population

2021 ◽  
pp. jech-2021-217421
Author(s):  
Javier Damián ◽  
Alicia Padron-Monedero ◽  
Javier Almazán-Isla ◽  
Fernando J García López ◽  
Jesús de Pedro-Cuesta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mortality Risk ◽  
Adult Population ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Mortality Data ◽  
Standard Population ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Specific Mortality ◽  
Nationally Representative ◽  
Rate Ratios

BackgroundThere are scant studies focused on measuring the association between disability and all-cause mortality based on large representative national samples of the community-dwelling adult population; moreover, the number of such studies which also include cause-specific mortality is yet lower.MethodsLongitudinal cohort study that used baseline data from 162 381 adults who participated in a countrywide disability survey (2008). A nationally representative sample was selected and interviewed in their homes. We present data on people ≥18 years. Disability was considered as any substantial limitation found on a list of 44 life activities that have lasted or are expected to last more than 1 year and originate from an impairment. Cause-specific mortality data were obtained from the Spanish Statistical Office. Subjects contributed follow-up time from baseline interview until death or the censoring date (31 December 2017). We computed standardised rate ratios (SRRs), with age, sex, living with a partner and education level distribution of the total group as standard population.ResultsAdults with disability (11%) had an adjusted mortality rate more than twice as high as adults without disability (SRR 2.37, 95% CI 2.24 to 2.50). The increased mortality risk remained over the 10-year follow-up period. Mortality due to diseases of the nervous system (SRR 4.86, 95% CI 3.93 to 6.01), diseases of the musculoskeletal system (SRR 3.45, 95% CI 2.18 to 5.47), infectious diseases (SRR 3.38, 95% CI 2.27 to 5.01) and diabetes mellitus (SRR 3.56, 95% CI 2.71 to 4.68) was particularly high in those with disability.ConclusionsAll-cause mortality rates are markedly higher among adults with disability. Preventive measures and health promotion initiatives are needed to reduce mortality risk in this population. Special attention should be paid to disabled people with certain specific diseases.

scholarly journals Left atrial functional assessment and mortality in patients with severe aortic stenosis with sinus rhythm

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
João Ferreira ◽  
Valdirene Gonçalves ◽  
Patrícia Marques-Alves ◽  
Rui Martins ◽  
Sílvia Monteiro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Severe Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Heart Team ◽  
Pump Function ◽  
Volumetric Assessment ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Echocardiography Laboratory

Abstract Background Aortic valve stenosis (AS) is the most common primary valvular heart disease leading to surgical or percutaneous aortic valve replacement (AVR) in Europe and its prevalence keeps growing. While other risk factors in severe AS are well documented, little is known about the prognostic value of left atrial (LA) function in AS. Our aim is to clarify the relationship between LA function measured at severe AS diagnosis (evaluated by means of volumetric assessment) and all-cause mortality during follow-up. Methods We retrospectively evaluated patients diagnosed with severe AS for the first time at our echocardiography laboratory. We evaluated LA reservoir, conduit and pump function by measuring LA volumes at different timings of cardiac cycle. Treatment strategy was decided according to heart team consensus and patient decision. We divided patients into groups according to terciles of LA reservoir, conduit and pump function. Primary outcome was defined by the occurrence of all-cause mortality during follow-up. Results A total of 408 patients were included in the analysis, with a median follow-up time of 45 months (interquartile range 54 months). 57.9% of patients underwent AVR and 44.9% of patients registered the primary outcome during follow-up. Left atrial emptying fraction (LAEF) was the best LA functional parameter and the best overall parameter in discriminating primary outcome (AUC 0.845, 95%CI 0.81–0.88, P < 0.001). After adjustment for clinical, demographic and echocardiographic variables, cumulative survival of patients with LAEF < 37% and LAEF 37 to 53% relative to patients with LAEF ≥54% remained significantly lower (HR 13.91, 95%CI 6.20–31.19, P < 0.001 and HR 3.40, 95%CI 1.57–7.37, P = 0.002, respectively). After adjustment for AVR, excess risk of LAEF < 37% and LAEF 37 to 53% relative to LAEF ≥54% remained significant (HR 11.71, 95%CI 5.20–26.40, P < 0.001 and HR 3.59, 95%CI 1.65–7.78, P = 0.001, respectively). Conclusions In patients with a first diagnosis of severe AS, LA function, evaluated by means of volumetric assessment, is an independent predictor of all-cause mortality and a more potent predictor of death compared to classical severity parameters. These data can be useful to identify high-risk patients who might benefit of AVR.

Outcome of Pulmonary Autograft After the Ross Procedure

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 508-515 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuki Nakayama ◽  
Takeshi Shinkawa ◽  
Goki Matsumura ◽  
Ryogo Hoki ◽  
Kei Kobayashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Hospital Discharge ◽  
Mechanical Valve ◽  
Good Health ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Ross Procedure ◽  
Prosthetic Aortic Valve ◽  
Related Risk ◽  
Combined Lesions

Background: The purpose of this study was to assess autograft function after the Ross procedure and to review surgical outcomes associated with autograft reoperations. Methods: This is a retrospective study of patients undergoing the Ross procedure since 1993. Autograft function and autograft reoperation were studied. Autograft failure was defined as more than moderate autograft regurgitation or autograft dilatation to more than 50 mm diameter or z-score of more than +4 in children. One hospital death was excluded from analysis as were patients with unknown late autograft status. Results: Among 75 patients analyzed, preoperative diagnosis before the Ross procedure included aortic regurgitation in 26, aortic stenosis in 19, combined lesions in 28, and 2 mechanical valve malfunctions. Median age at the Ross procedure was 12.1 (0.4-43.6) years with 44 children less than 15 years old. Six patients had greater than mild autograft regurgitation at post-Ross hospital discharge. During median follow-up of 14.9 years, there were 23 autograft failures. Eighteen autograft reoperations were performed on 17 patients (13 children), including 12 aortic valve replacements, 5 aortic root replacements (including 1 valve-sparing root replacement), and 1 Konno procedure. Freedom from autograft failure and autograft reoperation at 20 years after the Ross procedure was 52.0% and 66.3%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified greater than mild autograft regurgitation at hospital discharge from Ross procedure as a risk factor for autograft failure ( P < .01). All patients who underwent autograft reoperation survived and had good health status at a median of 6.9 years after the reoperation. Conclusions: The Ross procedure is effective in delaying prosthetic aortic valve replacement, although the time-related risk of autograft failure is a real consideration.

scholarly journals A.07 Characterizing the epidemiology of epilepsy in Saskatchewan, Canada

2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (s2) ◽  
pp. S11-S11
Author(s):  
L Hernandez Ronquillo ◽  
L Thorpe ◽  
P Pahwa ◽  
J Tellez Zenteno
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Secular Trends ◽  
Health Administrative Data ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Canadian Population ◽  
Incidence And Mortality ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Icd Codes

Background: There is no available estimate of the incidence and mortality of epilepsy in all age groups in the Canadian population. This study aimed to measure the incidence, prevalence, mortality and the secular trends for epilepsy in Saskatchewan between 2005 and 2010. Methods: A population-based cohort study was established from Saskatchewan’s provincial health administrative data. The population was followed until termination of coverage, death, or 31 December 2010. Individuals with epilepsy were identified based on ICD codes algorithms from 2005 to 2010. Results: The age-standardized incidence of epilepsy was 62 per 100,000 person-year. The age-standardized incidence rate of epilepsy in self-declared Registered Indians was 122 per 100,000 person-year. There was a significant decrease in the incidence of epilepsy for all groups over the study period. The age-standardized prevalence of epilepsy was 9 per 1,000 people. There was a significant increase in the prevalence of epilepsy over this time period. The adjusted mortality rate was 0.023 per 1000 person-year, and the all-cause Standardized Mortality Ration for epilepsy was 2.45. The SMR remained constant over the six-year period of the study. Conclusions: This study is the first in Canada to measure the incidence and all-cause mortality of epilepsy in all age groups.

scholarly journals Acute cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in patients with hyperthyroidism: a population-based cohort study

2017 ◽  
Vol 176 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olaf M Dekkers ◽  
Erzsébet Horváth-Puhó ◽  
Suzanne C Cannegieter ◽  
Jan P Vandenbroucke ◽  
Henrik Toft Sørensen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Arterial Embolism ◽  
Registration System ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Objective Several studies have shown an increased risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) in hyperthyroidism, but most studies have been too small to address the effect of hyperthyroidism on individual cardiovascular endpoints. Our main aim was to assess the association among hyperthyroidism, acute cardiovascular events and mortality. Design It is a nationwide population-based cohort study. Data were obtained from the Danish Civil Registration System and the Danish National Patient Registry, which covers all Danish hospitals. We compared the rate of all-cause mortality as well as venous thromboembolism (VTE), acute myocardial infarction (AMI), ischemic and non-ischemic stroke, arterial embolism, atrial fibrillation (AF) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the two cohorts. Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated. Results The study included 85 856 hyperthyroid patients and 847 057 matched population-based controls. Mean follow-up time was 9.2 years. The HR for mortality was highest in the first 3 months after diagnosis of hyperthyroidism: 4.62, 95% CI: 4.40–4.85, and remained elevated during long-term follow-up (>3 years) (HR: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.33–1.37). The risk for all examined cardiovascular events was increased, with the highest risk in the first 3 months after hyperthyroidism diagnosis. The 3-month post-diagnosis risk was highest for atrial fibrillation (HR: 7.32, 95% CI: 6.58–8.14) and arterial embolism (HR: 6.08, 95% CI: 4.30–8.61), but the risks of VTE, AMI, ischemic and non-ischemic stroke and PCI were increased also 2- to 3-fold. Conclusions We found an increased risk for all-cause mortality and acute cardiovascular events in patients with hyperthyroidism.

scholarly journals Cause of Death After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: SWEDEHEART Observational Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalie Glaser ◽  
Michael Persson ◽  
Anders Franco‐Cereceda ◽  
Ulrik Sartipy
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
General Population ◽  
Life Expectancy ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Causes Of Death ◽  
Study Cohort ◽  
Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Standardized Mortality Ratios

Background Prior studies showed that life expectancy in patients who underwent surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) was lower than in the general population. Explanations for this shorter life expectancy are unknown. The aim of this nationwide, observational cohort study was to investigate the cause‐specific death following surgical AVR. Methods and Results We included 33 018 patients who underwent primary surgical AVR in Sweden between 1997 and 2018, with or without coronary artery bypass grafting. The SWEDEHEART (Swedish Web‐System for Enhancement and Development of Evidence‐Based Care in Heart Disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies) register and other national health‐data registers were used to obtain and characterize the study cohort and to identify causes of death, categorized as cardiovascular mortality, cancer mortality, or other causes of death. The relative risks for cause‐specific mortality in patients who underwent AVR compared with the general population are presented as standardized mortality ratios. During a mean follow‐up period of 7.3 years (maximum 22.0 years), 14 237 (43%) patients died. The cumulative incidence of death from cardiovascular, cancer‐related, or other causes was 23.5%, 8.3%, and 11.6%, respectively, at 10 years, and 42.8%, 12.8%, and 23.8%, respectively, at 20 years. Standardized mortality ratios for cardiovascular, cancer‐related, and other causes of death were 1.79 (95% CI, 1.75–1.83), 1.00 (95% CI, 0.97–1.04), and 1.08 (95% CI, 1.05–1.12), respectively. Conclusions We found that life expectancy following AVR was lower than in the general population. Lower survival after AVR was explained by an increased relative risk of cardiovascular death. Future studies should focus on the role of earlier surgery in patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis and on optimizing treatment and follow‐up after AVR. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02276950.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document