scholarly journals CCT3-LINC00326 axis regulates hepatocarcinogenic lipid metabolism

Gut ◽  
2022 ◽  
pp. gutjnl-2021-325109
Author(s):  
Jonas Nørskov Søndergaard ◽  
Christian Sommerauer ◽  
Ionut Atanasoai ◽  
Laura C Hinte ◽  
Keyi Geng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lipid Metabolism ◽  
Tumour Growth ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Patient Survival ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Cell Phenotype ◽  
Independent Manner ◽  
Altered Expression ◽  
Regulatory Processes

ObjectiveTo better comprehend transcriptional phenotypes of cancer cells, we globally characterised RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) to identify altered RNAs, including long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs).DesignTo unravel RBP-lncRNA interactions in cancer, we curated a list of ~2300 highly expressed RBPs in human cells, tested effects of RBPs and lncRNAs on patient survival in multiple cohorts, altered expression levels, integrated various sequencing, molecular and cell-based data.ResultsHigh expression of RBPs negatively affected patient survival in 21 cancer types, especially hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). After knockdown of the top 10 upregulated RBPs and subsequent transcriptome analysis, we identified 88 differentially expressed lncRNAs, including 34 novel transcripts. CRISPRa-mediated overexpression of four lncRNAs had major effects on the HCC cell phenotype and transcriptome. Further investigation of four RBP-lncRNA pairs revealed involvement in distinct regulatory processes. The most noticeable RBP-lncRNA connection affected lipid metabolism, whereby the non-canonical RBP CCT3 regulated LINC00326 in a chaperonin-independent manner. Perturbation of the CCT3-LINC00326 regulatory network led to decreased lipid accumulation and increased lipid degradation in cellulo as well as diminished tumour growth in vivo.ConclusionsWe revealed that RBP gene expression is perturbed in HCC and identified that RBPs exerted additional functions beyond their tasks under normal physiological conditions, which can be stimulated or intensified via lncRNAs and affected tumour growth.

scholarly journals Identification of novel posttranscriptional targets of the BCR/ABL oncoprotein by ribonomics: requirement of E2F3 for BCR/ABL leukemogenesis

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 111 (2) ◽  
pp. 816-828 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna M. Eiring ◽  
Paolo Neviani ◽  
Ramasamy Santhanam ◽  
Joshua J. Oaks ◽  
Ji Suk Chang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Binding ◽  
Bone Marrow Cells ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Blast Crisis ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Hnrnp A1 ◽  
Altered Expression

Several RNA binding proteins (RBPs) have been implicated in the progression of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) from the indolent chronic phase to the aggressively fatal blast crisis. In the latter phase, expression and function of specific RBPs are aberrantly regulated at transcriptional or posttranslational levels by the constitutive kinase activity of the BCR/ABL oncoprotein. As a result, altered expression/function of RBPs leads to increased resistance to apoptotic stimuli, enhanced survival, growth advantage, and differentiation arrest of CD34+ progenitors from patients in CML blast crisis. Here, we identify the mRNAs bound to the hnRNP-A1, hnRNP-E2, hnRNP-K, and La/SSB RBPs in BCR/ABLtransformed myeloid cells. Interestingly, we found that the mRNA encoding the transcription factor E2F3 associates to hnRNP-A1 through a conserved binding site located in the E2F3 3′ untranslated region (UTR). E2F3 levels were up-regulated in CML-BCCD34+ in a BCR/ABL kinase– and hnRNP-A1 shuttling–dependent manner. Moreover, by using shRNA-mediated E2F3 knock-down and BCR/ABL-transduced lineage-negative bone marrow cells from E2F3+/+ and E2F3−/− mice, we show that E2F3 expression is important for BCR/ABL clonogenic activity and in vivo leukemogenic potential. Thus, the complexity of the mRNA/RBP network, together with the discovery of E2F3 as an hnRNP-A1–regulated factor, outlines the relevant role played by RBPs in posttranscriptional regulation of CML development and progression.

scholarly journals Dynamic interactions between the RNA chaperone Hfq, small regulatory RNAs and mRNAs in live bacterial cells

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seongjin Park ◽  
Karine Prévost ◽  
Emily M. Heideman ◽  
Marie-Claude Carrier ◽  
Matthew A. Reyer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Regulation ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Normal Growth ◽  
Bacterial Cells ◽  
Rnase E ◽  
Independent Manner ◽  
Rna Chaperone ◽  
Mrna Binding

AbstractRNA binding proteins play myriad roles in controlling and regulating RNAs and RNA-mediated functions, often through simultaneous binding to other cellular factors. In bacteria, the RNA chaperone Hfq modulates post-transcriptional gene regulation. Absence of Hfq leads to the loss of fitness and compromises the virulence of bacterial pathogens. Using live-cell super-resolution imaging, we are able to distinguish Hfq binding to different sizes of cellular RNAs. We demonstrate that under normal growth conditions, Hfq exhibits widespread mRNA binding activity. Particularly, the distal face of Hfq contributes mostly to the mRNA binding in vivo. In addition, binding of Hfq to these mRNAs can recruit RNase E to promote turnover of these mRNAs in an sRNA-independent manner, providing one mechanism to release Hfq from the pre-bound mRNAs. Finally, our data indicate that sRNAs, once expressed, can either co-occupy Hfq with the mRNA or displace the mRNA from Hfq, suggesting mechanisms through which sRNAs rapidly access Hfq to induce sRNA-mediated gene regulation. Our data collectively demonstrate that Hfq dynamically changes its interactions with different RNAs in response to changes in cellular conditions.

scholarly journals Dynamic interactions between the RNA chaperone Hfq, small regulatory RNAs, and mRNAs in live bacterial cells

eLife ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seongjin Park ◽  
Karine Prévost ◽  
Emily M Heideman ◽  
Marie-Claude Carrier ◽  
Muhammad S Azam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Regulatory Function ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Bacterial Cells ◽  
Rnase E ◽  
Independent Manner ◽  
Rna Chaperone ◽  
Mrna Binding

RNA-binding proteins play myriad roles in regulating RNAs and RNA-mediated functions. In bacteria, the RNA chaperone Hfq is an important post-transcriptional gene regulator. Using live-cell super-resolution imaging, we can distinguish Hfq binding to different sizes of cellular RNAs. We demonstrate that under normal growth conditions, Hfq exhibits widespread mRNA-binding activity, with the distal face of Hfq contributing mostly to the mRNA binding in vivo. In addition, sRNAs can either co-occupy Hfq with the mRNA as a ternary complex, or displace the mRNA from Hfq in a binding face-dependent manner, suggesting mechanisms through which sRNAs rapidly access Hfq to induce sRNA-mediated gene regulation. Finally, our data suggest that binding of Hfq to certain mRNAs through its distal face can recruit RNase E to promote turnover of these mRNAs in a sRNA-independent manner, and such regulatory function of Hfq can be decoyed by sRNA competitors that bind strongly at the distal face.

scholarly journals Compendium of Methods to Uncover RNA-Protein Interactions In Vivo

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 22
Author(s):  
Mrinmoyee Majumder ◽  
Viswanathan Palanisamy
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Control Of Gene Expression ◽  
Regulatory Pathways ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Protein Nucleic Acid

Control of gene expression is critical in shaping the pro-and eukaryotic organisms’ genotype and phenotype. The gene expression regulatory pathways solely rely on protein–protein and protein–nucleic acid interactions, which determine the fate of the nucleic acids. RNA–protein interactions play a significant role in co- and post-transcriptional regulation to control gene expression. RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) are a diverse group of macromolecules that bind to RNA and play an essential role in RNA biology by regulating pre-mRNA processing, maturation, nuclear transport, stability, and translation. Hence, the studies aimed at investigating RNA–protein interactions are essential to advance our knowledge in gene expression patterns associated with health and disease. Here we discuss the long-established and current technologies that are widely used to study RNA–protein interactions in vivo. We also present the advantages and disadvantages of each method discussed in the review.

scholarly journals RNA-Centric Approaches to Profile the RNA–Protein Interaction Landscape on Selected RNAs

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
André P. Gerber
Keyword(s):  
Mass Spectrometry ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Cell Protein ◽  
Transcriptional Regulatory Networks ◽  
Technological Advances

RNA–protein interactions frame post-transcriptional regulatory networks and modulate transcription and epigenetics. While the technological advances in RNA sequencing have significantly expanded the repertoire of RNAs, recently developed biochemical approaches combined with sensitive mass-spectrometry have revealed hundreds of previously unrecognized and potentially novel RNA-binding proteins. Nevertheless, a major challenge remains to understand how the thousands of RNA molecules and their interacting proteins assemble and control the fate of each individual RNA in a cell. Here, I review recent methodological advances to approach this problem through systematic identification of proteins that interact with particular RNAs in living cells. Thereby, a specific focus is given to in vivo approaches that involve crosslinking of RNA–protein interactions through ultraviolet irradiation or treatment of cells with chemicals, followed by capture of the RNA under study with antisense-oligonucleotides and identification of bound proteins with mass-spectrometry. Several recent studies defining interactomes of long non-coding RNAs, viral RNAs, as well as mRNAs are highlighted, and short reference is given to recent in-cell protein labeling techniques. These recent experimental improvements could open the door for broader applications and to study the remodeling of RNA–protein complexes upon different environmental cues and in disease.

scholarly journals Architecture of RNA influences plant biology

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiaying Zhu ◽  
Changhao Li ◽  
Xu Peng ◽  
Xiuren Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Mirna Biogenesis ◽  
Plant Responses ◽  
Tertiary Structures ◽  
Rna Transcripts ◽  
Environmental Variations ◽  
Living Organisms ◽  
Processing Stability

Abstract The majority of the genome is transcribed to RNA in living organisms. RNA transcripts can form astonishing arrays of secondary and tertiary structures via Watson-Crick, Hoogsteen or wobble base pairing. In vivo, RNA folding is not a simple thermodynamics event of minimizing free energy. Instead, the process is constrained by transcription, RNA binding proteins (RBPs), steric factors and micro-environment. RNA secondary structure (RSS) plays myriad roles in numerous biological processes, such as RNA processing, stability, transportation and translation in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Emerging evidence has also implicated RSS in RNA trafficking, liquid-liquid phase separation and plant responses to environmental variations such as temperature and salinity. At the molecular level, RSS is correlated with regulating splicing, polyadenylation, protein systhsis, and miRNA biogenesis and functions. In this review, we summarized newly reported methods for probing RSS in vivo and functions and mechanisms of RSS in plant physiology.

scholarly journals Posttranscriptional regulation of lipid metabolism by non-coding RNAs and RNA binding proteins

2018 ◽  
Vol 81 ◽  
pp. 129-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abhishek K. Singh ◽  
Binod Aryal ◽  
Xinbo Zhang ◽  
Yuhua Fan ◽  
Nathan L. Price ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lipid Metabolism ◽  
Posttranscriptional Regulation ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Non Coding Rnas

scholarly journals Identification of mRNAs Associated with αCP2-Containing RNP Complexes

2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (19) ◽  
pp. 7055-7067 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shelly A. Waggoner ◽  
Stephen A. Liebhaber
Keyword(s):  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Cell Function ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Translation Control ◽  
Viral Mrnas ◽  
Posttranscriptional Gene Regulation ◽  
Direct Binding

ABSTRACT Posttranscriptional controls in higher eukaryotes are central to cell differentiation and developmental programs. These controls reflect sequence-specific interactions of mRNAs with one or more RNA binding proteins. The α-globin poly(C) binding proteins (αCPs) comprise a highly abundant subset of K homology (KH) domain RNA binding proteins and have a characteristic preference for binding single-stranded C-rich motifs. αCPs have been implicated in translation control and stabilization of multiple cellular and viral mRNAs. To explore the full contribution of αCPs to cell function, we have identified a set of mRNAs that associate in vivo with the major αCP2 isoforms. One hundred sixty mRNA species were consistently identified in three independent analyses of αCP2-RNP complexes immunopurified from a human hematopoietic cell line (K562). These mRNAs could be grouped into subsets encoding cytoskeletal components, transcription factors, proto-oncogenes, and cell signaling factors. Two mRNAs were linked to ceroid lipofuscinosis, indicating a potential role for αCP2 in this infantile neurodegenerative disease. Surprisingly, αCP2 mRNA itself was represented in αCP2-RNP complexes, suggesting autoregulatory control of αCP2 expression. In vitro analyses of representative target mRNAs confirmed direct binding of αCP2 within their 3′ untranslated regions. These data expand the list of mRNAs that associate with αCP2 in vivo and establish a foundation for modeling its role in coordinating pathways of posttranscriptional gene regulation.

scholarly journals The Role of RNA-Binding Proteins in Vertebrate Neural Crest and Craniofacial Development

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 34
Author(s):  
Thomas E. Forman ◽  
Brenna J. C. Dennison ◽  
Katherine A. Fantauzzo
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Neural Crest ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Gene Expression Regulation ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Craniofacial Development ◽  
Specific Sequence ◽  
Altered Expression ◽  
Binding Domains

Cranial neural crest (NC) cells delaminate from the neural folds in the forebrain to the hindbrain during mammalian embryogenesis and migrate into the frontonasal prominence and pharyngeal arches. These cells generate the bone and cartilage of the frontonasal skeleton, among other diverse derivatives. RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) have emerged as critical regulators of NC and craniofacial development in mammals. Conventional RBPs bind to specific sequence and/or structural motifs in a target RNA via one or more RNA-binding domains to regulate multiple aspects of RNA metabolism and ultimately affect gene expression. In this review, we discuss the roles of RBPs other than core spliceosome components during human and mouse NC and craniofacial development. Where applicable, we review data on these same RBPs from additional vertebrate species, including chicken, Xenopus and zebrafish models. Knockdown or ablation of several RBPs discussed here results in altered expression of transcripts encoding components of developmental signaling pathways, as well as reduced cell proliferation and/or increased cell death, indicating that these are common mechanisms contributing to the observed phenotypes. The study of these proteins offers a relatively untapped opportunity to provide significant insight into the mechanisms underlying gene expression regulation during craniofacial morphogenesis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document