Stage IV ovarian cancer: a retrospective study on patient's management and outcome in a single institution

2005 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 606-611
Author(s):  
Y. Brunisholz ◽  
J. Miller ◽  
A. Proietto
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Distant Metastases ◽  
Optimal Cytoreduction ◽  
Pleural Effusions ◽  
Primary Surgery ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Stage Iv Disease

The management of stage IV epithelial ovarian carcinoma remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare our results to other published series. A retrospective database and casenote review was performed on all patients diagnosed with stage IV disease over a ten-year period (1992–2002). Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan–Meier and Mantel–Haenszel methods. The study group comprised 23 women. Nine had positive pleural effusions (39.1%), and 14 had other sites of metastases (60.9%). Nine patients underwent interval debulking (39.1%), and 14 were operated on primarily (60.9%). We had six postoperative complications (26.1%) but no perioperative deaths. Optimal cytoreduction (inferior or equal to 2 cm residual disease) was obtained in 18 patients (78.3%). The overall median survival was 22.6 months. There was no statistically significant difference in overall or disease-free survival between primary surgery and interval debulking. Patients with positive pleural effusions had significantly reduced survival compared to those with distant metastases in other sites. Interestingly, there was no difference in survival between optimally and suboptimally cytoreduced patients. Debulking surgery can be performed in patients with stage IV ovarian cancer, with an acceptable level of morbidity. Optimal cytoreduction is achievable in the majority of these patients. Interval debulking should be considered in selected patients

A retrospective analysis of neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy versus up-front surgery in advanced ovarian cancer

2006 ◽  
Vol 16 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 47-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Steed ◽  
A. M. Oza ◽  
J. Murphy ◽  
S. Laframboise ◽  
G. Lockwood ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Postoperative Chemotherapy ◽  
Pleural Effusions ◽  
Primary Surgery ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Significant Difference

The objective of this study is to compare progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of ovarian cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery to primary surgery and postoperative chemotherapy. Retrospective analysis from 1998 to 2003 of 116 patients with ovarian cancer was performed. Fifty women diagnosed by positive cytology received three cycles of carboplatin and paclitaxel. Thirty-six patients subsequently underwent cytoreductive surgery and completed three further cycles postoperatively. The OS and PFS were compared in 66 women treated with primary surgery and postoperative chemotherapy. A statistically significant difference was observed for OS (P= 0.03, HR = 1.85, CI = 1.06–3.23) and PFS (P= 0.04, HR = 1.61, CI = 1.03–2.53) favoring the primary surgery group. Due to the small numbers, age, grade, stage, pleural effusions, and histologic cell type were controlled for separately in the bivariate analyses. Controlling for stage made the results weaker. A matched subgroup survival analysis was performed on patients who had surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. After matching for stage and grade and controlling age and pleural effusions (N= 28 matched pairs), there was no statistical difference for OS (P= 0.95, HR = 1.04, CI = 0.33–3.30) or PFS (P= 0.79, HR = 1.11, CI = 0.98–1.04). It is concluded that primary surgery should be considered in all patients. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy may be an alternative in a subset of women with the intent to also perform interval debulking.

Distant metastases in ovarian carcinoma

2003 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Cormio ◽  
C. Rossi ◽  
A. Cazzolla ◽  
L. Resta ◽  
G. Loverro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Ovarian Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Disease ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Distant Metastases ◽  
Distant Disease ◽  
Distant Metastatic Disease ◽  
Interval Time ◽  
Stage Iv Disease

Distant metastases are unusual at presentation and during the course of ovarian carcinoma. The aim of the present study was to determine the incidence and prognostic factors of distant metastases consistent with stage IV disease in ovarian cancer patients. A retrospective chart review was conducted on 162 patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma treated at our Unit between 1991 and 2000. Pertinent clinical information, pathologic data, treatment, and prognostic factors for survival following documentation of distant metastatic disease were collected. The significance of the association between metastatic status and various clinical variables was assessed using the standard chi-square test. Survival time was calculated from the time of diagnosis of ovarian cancer and from the time of diagnosis of the distant metastases. A logistic regression procedure was used to estimate the odds of metastatic status given the presence of certain clinical variables. A total of 67 metastatic sites were diagnosed in 50 patients. Thirteen patients (8%) had distant metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis, 37 patients (22%) had distant metastases at the time of recurrent of progressive disease. Site of metastases were: liver, 21; pleura, 11; lung, 8; central nervous system and skin, 7 each; extra-abdominal lymph nodes and spleen, 5 each; bone, 2; and breast, 1. Significant risk factors for the development of distant metastases were stage, grade, and lymph node involvement. Median interval time between diagnosis of ovarian cancer and documentation of metastatic disease was 44 months (range 3–105), and at the time of diagnosis of distant disease, 36 of 50 patients (72%) had other sites of disease (intra-abdominal or extra-abdominal). Median survival from diagnosis of distant disease was 12 months (range 1–58). In univariate analysis performance status (P = 0.03), the presence of other sites of disease (P = 0.04) and interval time between diagnosis of ovarian cancer and documentation of distant metases (P = 0.03) were the only factors significantly associated with survival. Long interval time remained significant for prognosis in multivariate analysis also (P = 0.04). Distant metastasis consistent with stage IV disease is a late complication that occurs in about one third of ovarian cancer patients. Prognosis after documentation of distant metastases is poor. We conclude the most important prognostic factor associated with survival is the interval time between diagnosis of ovarian cancer and documentation of distant metastases.

Minimal Macroscopic Residual Disease (0.1–1 cm). Is It Still a Surgical Goal in Advanced Ovarian Cancer?

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 906-911 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis M. Chiva ◽  
Teresa Castellanos ◽  
Sonsoles Alonso ◽  
Antonio Gonzalez-Martin
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Pubmed Database

ObjectiveThe objective of this review was to try to determine by searching in the literature what is the survival in patients with advanced ovarian cancer after a primary debulking with minimal macroscopic residual disease (MMRD; 0.1–10 mm). Additionally, this review aimed to explore the survival in patients with residual disease from 0.1 to 0.5 cm.MethodsA retrospective search was accomplished in the PubMed database looking for all English-language articles published between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2014, under the following search strategy: “ovarian cancer and cytoreduction” or “ovarian cancer and phase III trial”. We selected those articles that contain information on both percentage of MMRD (0.1–1 cm) and median overall survival (OS) in this subset of patients with stage III to stage IV ovarian cancer after primary debulking surgery.ResultsThirteen publications were obtained including information of a total 11,999 patients with stage III to stage IV ovarian cancer. Five thousand thirty-seven patients (42%) had MMRD after the primary debulking (0.1–1 cm). Median overall survival in patients with MMRD was 40 months and disease-free survival (DFS) was 16 months. This group of patients obtained an advantage of 10 months in OS (40 vs 30 m) and 4 months in DFS (16 vs 12 m) compared with the group with suboptimal debulking (P < 0.001). Compared with the group of complete resection, patients with minimal macroscopic residuum showed a significant inferior median OS and DFS of 30 months and 14 months, respectively (OS, 70 vs 40 m; DFS, 30 vs 16 m) (P < 0.001). The group of residual disease of 0.1 to 0.5 cm reached a median survival of 53 months.ConclusionsPatients with ovarian cancer with MMRD after primary surgery obtain a modest but significant advantage in survival (10 months) over suboptimal patients. Patients with macroscopic residual disease (0.1–0.5 cm) obtain a better survival (53 months) than those with more than 0.5 to 1 cm. We propose that they should be classified as a different prognostic group.

scholarly journals Use and Effectiveness of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Treatment of Ovarian Cancer

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (32) ◽  
pp. 3854-3863 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larissa A. Meyer ◽  
Angel M. Cronin ◽  
Charlotte C. Sun ◽  
Kristin Bixel ◽  
Michael A. Bookman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Matched Sample ◽  
Stage Iiic ◽  
Stage Iv Disease ◽  
Postoperative Residual

Purpose In 2010, a randomized clinical trial demonstrated noninferior survival for patients with advanced ovarian cancer who were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) compared with primary cytoreductive surgery (PCS). We examined the use and effectiveness of NACT in clinical practice. Patients and Methods A multi-institutional observational study of 1,538 women with stages IIIC to IV ovarian cancer who were treated at six National Cancer Institute–designated cancer centers. We examined NACT use in patients who were diagnosed between 2003 and 2012 (N = 1,538) and compared overall survival (OS), morbidity, and postoperative residual disease in a propensity-score matched sample of patients (N = 594). Results NACT use increased from 16% during 2003 to 2010 to 34% during 2011 to 2012 in stage IIIC disease ( Ptrend < .001), and from 41% to 62% in stage IV disease ( Ptrend < .001). Adoption of NACT varied by institution, from 8% to 30% for stage IIIC disease (P < .001) and from 27% to 61% ( P = .007) for stage IV disease during this time period. In the matched sample, NACT was associated with shorter OS in stage IIIC disease (median OS: 33 v 43 months; hazard ratio [HR], 1.40; 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.77) compared with PCS, but not stage IV disease (median OS: 31 v 36 months; HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.52). Patients with stages IIIC and IV disease who received NACT were less likely to have ≥ 1 cm postoperative residual disease, an intensive care unit admission, or a rehospitalization (all P ≤ .04) compared with those who received PCS treatment. However, among women with stage IIIC disease who achieved microscopic or ≤ 1 cm postoperative residual disease, NACT was associated with decreased OS (HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.01 to 2.18; P = .04). Conclusion Use of NACT increased significantly between 2003 and 2012. In this observational study, PCS was associated with increased survival in stage IIIC, but not stage IV disease. Future studies should prospectively consider the efficacy of NACT by extent of residual disease in unselected patients.

scholarly journals The clinical and pathological characteristics and survival of patients with advanced ovarian cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 205-210
Author(s):  
Miroslav Popović ◽  
Tanja Milić-Radić ◽  
Arnela Cerić-Banićević
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Figo Stage ◽  
Ovarian Tumour ◽  
Ca 125 ◽  
Optimal Cytoreduction ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Pathological Characteristics ◽  
Significant Difference

Introduction: Ovarian cancer has the highest mortality rate of all gynaecologic malignancies. The aim of this study was the evaluation of the clinical pathological characteristics and survival analysis of primarily operated patients with advanced stages of malignant epithelial ovarian tumour. Methods: The research was conducted as a cohort study with 59 patients with FIGO stage III and IV, which were primarily operated between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2010 (three years). Age, comorbidities, BMI, presence of ascites, the level of the marker CA-125, histopathology and FIGO stage were analysed. The survival rate was estimated at the level of 1, 3 and 5 years. Results: The median age was 53 years (range 29-86). The most common histopathological type was serous (66.1 %) and the most common FIGO stage was 3a (49.2 %). Optimal cytoreduction was performed in 35.5 % of patients, 84.7 % of patients survived for one year, 44.1 % three years and 37.3 % for five years. The median survival was 26.25 months (range 0-91). Chi-square test showed significant difference between the number of months of survival and: the value of CA125 (t = 2.004, p = 0.050), cytoreduction (p < 0.001) and FIGO stage (p < 0.01). Conclusion: According to the results of this study, optimal cytoreduction and FIGO stage significantly influence survival (p < 0.001). Optimal cytoreduction (< 2 cm of residual disease) had the highest prognostic value for survival. A total five-year survival in this study was 37.3 %.

Effect of introduction of paclitaxel on survival among women with stage III and IV ovarian cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5536-5536
Author(s):  
S. S. Dawood ◽  
C. Albaracin ◽  
A. Gonzalez-Angulo ◽  
M. Markman ◽  
B. Hennessy
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
Fda Approval ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Stage Iv Disease ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

5536 Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate survival over time in relation to FDA approval of paclitaxel (P) for second- and first-line treatment in a population-based cohort of women with stage III and de novo stage IV ovarian cancer. Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program was searched to identify 8,267 and 10,746 women with stage III and stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer diagnosed between 1988–2004. Women were divided according to their year of diagnosis and year of FDA approval of P for second- (1992) and first-line(1998) treatment of ovarian cancer: Group1 (1988–1991; before P approval); Group2 (1992–1997; P approved for second-line); Group3 (1998–2003; P approved for first-line). Overall (OS) and ovarian-cancer-specific survival (OCS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier product method and compared across groups with log rank statistic. Cox-proportional hazards models were fitted to determine the association of group year of diagnosis and survival after adjusting for patient/tumor characteristics. Results: Median age was 66 years. Median OCS was 44 and 18 months among women with stages III and IV disease, respectively. With stage III disease, 2-year OCS was 64%, 68%, and 70% for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (p < 0.0001). With stage IV disease, 2-year OCS was 39%, 41%, and 42% for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (p = 0.19). In the multivariable model for stage III disease, women in group 1 (HR = 1.4, 95% CI 1.2–1.5, p < 0.0001) and group 2 (HR = 1.2, 95% CI 1.1–1.3, p = 0.0003) had an increased hazard of ovarian-cancer-specific death vs. group 3. For stage IV disease, women in group 1 (HR = 1.2, 95% CI 1.12–1.3, p < 0.0001) had a significantly increased hazard of ovarian cancer-specific death, but no significant difference in group 2 (HR = 1.0, 95% CI 0.9–1.1, p = 0.88) vs. group 3. Similar trends were observed for OS. Conclusions: The survival of women with stages III and IV ovarian cancer has significantly improved with the introduction of P over the last two decades. However, the incremental improvement in survival with stage IV disease is clinically minimal and indeed not significant in the univariable analysis in the SEER patient cohort analyzed, suggesting a desperate need for new and more active drugs in these patients. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Topotecan Compared With No Therapy After Response to Surgery and Carboplatin/Paclitaxel in Patients With Ovarian Cancer: Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer (MITO-1) Randomized Study

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (13) ◽  
pp. 2635-2642 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabino De Placido ◽  
Giovanni Scambia ◽  
Giovanni Di Vagno ◽  
Emanuele Naglieri ◽  
Alessandra Vernaglia Lombardi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose Topotecan is an active second-line treatment for advanced ovarian cancer. Its efficacy as consolidation treatment after first-line standard chemotherapy is unknown. Patients and Methods To investigate whether topotecan (1.5 mg/m2 on days 1 through 5, four cycles, every 3 weeks) prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) for patients responding to standard carboplatin (area under the curve 5) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m2 administered as a 3-hour infusion in six cycles; CP), a multicenter phase III study was performed with an 80% power to detect a 50% prolongation of median PFS. Patients were registered at diagnosis and randomized after the end of CP. Results Two hundred seventy-three patients were randomly assigned (topotecan, n = 137; observation, n = 136), with a median age of 56 years. Stage at diagnosis was advanced in three fourths of patients (stage III in 65% of patients; stage IV in 10%); after primary surgery, 46% had no residual disease and 20% were optimally debulked. After CP, 87% reached a clinical complete response, and 13% achieved a partial response. Neutropenia (grade 3/4 in 58% of the patients) and thrombocytopenia (grade 3 in 21%; grade 4 in 3%) were the most frequent toxicities attributed to topotecan. There was no statistically significant difference in PFS between the arms (P = .83; log-rank test): median PFS was 18.2 months in the topotecan arm and 28.4 in the control arm. Hazard ratio of progression for patients receiving topotecan was 1.18 (95% CI, 0.86 to 1.63) after adjustment for residual disease, interval debulking surgery, and response to CP. Conclusion The present analysis indicates that consolidation with topotecan does not improve PFS for patients with advanced ovarian cancer who respond to initial chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel.

Systematic review of adjuvant therapy for early stage (epithelial) ovarian cancer

2003 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 395-404 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Winter-Roach ◽  
L. Hooper ◽  
H. Kitchener
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Well Differentiated ◽  
Platinum Chemotherapy

A systematic review and meta analysis has been undertaken in order to evaluate the effectiveness of adjuvant therapy following surgery for early ovarian cancer. Trials reported since 1990 have been of a higher quality enabling a meta analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy vs adjuvant radiotherapy and a meta analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy vs observation. There was no significant difference between radiotherapy and chemotherapy, though these comprised studies which demonstrated considerable heterogeneity. Chemotherapy did confer significant benefit over observation in terms of both overall and disease free survival. Except for women in whom adequate surgical staging has revealed well differentiated disease confined to one or both ovaries with intact capsule, platinum chemotherapy should be offered to reduce risk of recurrence.

Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans Treated at a Single Institution: A Surgical Disease With a High Cure Rate

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (30) ◽  
pp. 7669-7675 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Fiore ◽  
Rosalba Miceli ◽  
Chiara Mussi ◽  
Salvatore Lo Vullo ◽  
Luigi Mariani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Reconstructive Surgery ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans ◽  
Distant Metastases ◽  
Local Relapse ◽  
Primary Group ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Significant Difference

Purpose Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) is a rare, low-grade, cutaneous sarcoma with autocrine overproduction of the platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) β-chain from gene rearrangement as a key pathogenetic factor, now susceptible of molecular-targeted therapy. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to explore the outcome of patients with primary or recurrent DFSP. Patients and Methods Two hundred eighteen patients surgically treated at the Istituto Nazionale per lo studio e la cura dei Tumori (Milan, Italy) over 20 years were reviewed. Local relapse, distant metastasis, and survival were studied. Results One hundred thirty-six patients (62.4%) presented with a primary DFSP, while 82 patients (37.6%) had a recurrent disease. In the primary group, margins were microscopically positive in 11.8%, while in the recurrent group they were positive in 14.6% (P =.613). In the primary group, patients undergoing re-excision after inadequate previous surgery had residual disease in 62% of cases. Reconstructive surgery was needed in 30%, significantly more frequently in patients with a recurrence or a head and neck tumor. The crude cumulative incidence of local relapses was 4% at 10 years, and 2% at 10 years for distant metastases. No significant difference was found between primary and recurrent patients, as well as between positive and negative margins. Conclusion This being one of the largest mono-institutional series of DFSP, we confirm that long-term outcome is excellent, in terms of both local and distant control, after a wide excision with negative margins. Reconstructive surgery is often needed. Novel medical therapies will be of use in a limited subgroup of patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document