scholarly journals When the left brain is not right the right brain may be left: report of personal experience of occipital hemianopia

1999 ◽  
Vol 67 (2) ◽  
pp. 169-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Cole
Keyword(s):  
Personal Experience ◽  
Left Brain ◽  
Right Brain ◽  
The Right

Orientation and lateralized cue use in pigeons navigating a large indoor environment

2002 ◽  
Vol 205 (12) ◽  
pp. 1795-1805 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helmut Prior ◽  
Frank Lingenauber ◽  
Jörg Nitschke ◽  
Onur Güntürkün
Keyword(s):  
Reference Frame ◽  
Brain Lateralization ◽  
Spatial Cues ◽  
Brain Hemisphere ◽  
Brain Hemispheres ◽  
Left Brain ◽  
Right Brain ◽  
Starting Location ◽  
The Right ◽  
Global Reference Frame

SUMMARY The pigeon's use of different visuo-spatial cues was studied under controlled laboratory conditions that simulated analogous aspects of a homing situation. The birds first learned the route to a goal that was not visible from the starting location, but became visible as it was approached. Birds could orientate within a mainly geometric global reference frame, using prominent landmarks within their range, or by `piloting' along local cues. After learning the route, the birds were tested from familiar and unfamiliar release points, and several aspects of the available cues were varied systematically. The study explored the contribution of the left and right brain hemispheres by performing tests with the right or left eye occluded. The results show that pigeons can establish accurate bearings towards a non-visible goal by using a global reference frame only. Furthermore, there was a peak of searching activity at the location predicted by the global reference frame. Search at this location and directedness of the bearings were equally high with both right and left eye, suggesting that both brain hemispheres have the same competence level for these components of the task. A lateralization effect occurred when prominent landmarks were removed or translated. While the right brain hemisphere completely ignored such changes,the left brain hemisphere was distracted by removal of landmarks. After translation of landmarks, the left but not the right brain hemisphere allocated part of the searching activity to the site predicted by the new landmark position. The results show that a mainly geometric global visual reference frame is sufficient to determine exact bearings from familiar and unfamiliar release points. Overall, the results suggest a model of brain lateralization with a well-developed global spatial reference system in either hemisphere and an extra capacity for the processing of object features in the left brain.

scholarly journals Artistic Production Following Brain Damage: A Study of Three Artists

Leonardo ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 405-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anjan Chatterjee ◽  
Bianca Bromberger ◽  
William B. Smith ◽  
Rebecca Sternschein ◽  
Page Widick
Keyword(s):  
Brain Damage ◽  
Right Hemisphere ◽  
Neural Basis ◽  
Left Brain ◽  
Right Hemisphere Damage ◽  
Right Brain ◽  
Art Production ◽  
The Right ◽  
Left Brain Damage ◽  
Insight Into

We know little about the neurologic bases of art production. The idea that the right brain hemisphere is the “artistic brain” is widely held, despite the lack of evidence for this claim. Artists with brain damage can offer insight into these laterality questions. The authors used an instrument called the Assessment of Art Attributes to examine the work of two individuals with left-brain damage and one with right-hemisphere damage. In each case, their art became more abstract and distorted and less realistic. They also painted with looser strokes, less depth and more vibrant colors. No unique pattern was observed following right-brain damage. However, art produced after left-brain damage also became more symbolic. These results show that the neural basis of art production is distributed across both hemispheres in the human brain.

scholarly journals Christian Faith View On Mid-Brain Activation System And Its Impact On The Spirituality Of Children Aged 6 To 12 Years Old In Surabaya

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-19
Author(s):  
Connie Laurina
Keyword(s):  
Field Research ◽  
Vital Role ◽  
Research Approach ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Left Brain ◽  
Right Brain ◽  
God's Word ◽  
Activation System ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Brain

God created humans as the most special creation compared to His other creations. Human intelligence is caused by one organ which, although small in size, has a very vital role, namely the brain. Advances in knowledge and technology have encouraged scientists to try solving the mysteries of the brain. Many studies have focused on the right brain and left brain, or to balance the right brain and left brain. But in recent years, there has been a training/self-development institute who stated that they had found a way to balance the right and left brain, namely by activating the midbrain. This midbrain activation method is aimed at children aged 5-15 years because it is considered that children at this age are more easily activated in a very short time through a computer.The method used in writing this work is a Literature Study that contains various information on matters related to the topic of discussion. In addition to using literature, writing will be complemented by field research, using a Check List to interview respondents. The research approach used are qualitative and quantitative approach. A The qualitative approach obtains data regarding respondent's experiences. This writing has the aim of finding ( knowing ) whether the Midbrain Activation system is in accordance with God's Word or against God's Word; to open the horizons of parents, congregations and even readers of this paper, especially those with children, so that they can be more careful in choosing training for their children.

Different lenses on death: The right brain/left brain construct as metaphor

Death Studies ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 84-86
Author(s):  
Allen P. Fertziger
Keyword(s):  
Left Brain ◽  
Right Brain ◽  
The Right

scholarly journals TMIC-39. DEVELOPMENT OF CD11b TRACER FOR THE IMMUNE PET IMAGING IN GLIOBLASTOMA MODEL - COULD BE A GAME CHANGER FOR IMMUNOTHERAPY APPROACHES

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi256-vi256
Author(s):  
Shubhanchi Nigam ◽  
Lauren McCarl ◽  
Rajeev Kumar ◽  
Carolyn Anderson ◽  
Barry Edwards ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Pet Imaging ◽  
Specific Activity ◽  
Malignant Gliomas ◽  
Myeloid Cells ◽  
Cd11b Expression ◽  
Left Brain ◽  
Right Brain ◽  
The Right

Abstract Glioblastoma is a lethal brain tumor, heavily infiltrated by tumor-associated myeloid cells (TAMCs). As up to 30% of a glioma cellular mass may be attributed to immunosuppressive myeloid cells, including myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). TAMCs impede natural and immunotherapy-driven anti-tumor responses, they are a high-priority and promising therapeutic target currently being evaluated in clinical trials. Multiple preclinical and clinical trials have attempted to target these cells, however monitoring of biologic responses to therapy remains a challenge. Quantifying real time status of MDSCs and TAMs at the tumor site using non-invasive immunoPET could improve therapeutic response and allow for better patient stratification and monitoring of targeted treatment responses. TAMCs highly expressed the cell surface marker, integrin CD11b (Mac-1, αMβ2) and may be a highly effective imaging target for immunoPET strategies. The human/mouse cross-reactive anti-CD11b antibody (clone M1/70) was radiolabeled with 89Zr for PET imaging. PET/CT imaging, with or without a blocking dose of anti-CD11b Ab, was performed in mice bearing established orthotopic syngeneic GL261 gliomas. Flow cytometry and histology in tissues collected from post-imaging biodistribution validated targeting of CD11b+ MDSCs and TAMs. There was significant Zr-89-anti-CD11b Ab uptake in the tumor ipsilateral right brain (SUVmean = 2.6 ± 0.24) compared to contralateral left brain (SUVmean = 0.6 ± 0.11). Blocking with 10-fold lower specific activity 89Zr-anti-CD11b Ab reduced the SUV in right brain with (SUVmean = 0.11 ± 0.06). Immune rich organs spleen and lymph nodes showed high uptake. These results correlated with biodistribution analysis. CD11b expression in the right and left brain were validated using flow cytometry, H&E and IHC, showing high CD11b expression in the right brain. Imaging TAMs and MDSCs with 89Zr-labeled anti-CD11b Ab targeting was validated in a mouse model of malignant gliomas, demonstrating the feasibility of monitoring immune response during immunotherapy.

Comparing Students in Architecture and Medicine: Findings from Two New Measures of Cognitive Style

1986 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 823-830 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alice Kienholz ◽  
John Hritzuk
Keyword(s):  
Information Processing ◽  
Medical Students ◽  
Cognitive Style ◽  
Human Information Processing ◽  
Left Brain ◽  
Right Brain ◽  
The Right ◽  
Measured Preference

59 students in architecture and 50 medical students were compared using two questionnaire-defined measures of cognitive style. The Inquiry Mode Questionnaire (InQ) measured cognitive style according to five major dimensions: synthesist, idealist, analyst, realist and pragmatist. Your Style of Learning and Thinking (SOLAT)—Form C, now published as the Human Information Processing Survey (HIP Survey), measured preference for one of three main styles: a visuospatial, nonlinear, holistic, right-brain style; a verbal, analytic, sequential, left-brain style; and an integrated style involving an integration of the right and left styles. Significant differences were found for the two groups on the two questionnaires. Students in architecture favored the idealist style on the InQ and right-brain style on the SOLAT. Medical students favored the realist style on the InQ and the left-brain style on the SOLAT. Association between the InQ synthesist-idealist combined scores and the SOLAT inferred right-brain style and between the InQ analyst-realist style and the SOLAT left-brain style were observed.

The Computer and the Right Side of the Brain

1988 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 343-348
Author(s):  
Harold J. MCWhinnie
Keyword(s):  
Computer Graphics ◽  
Brain Activity ◽  
Research Literature ◽  
Computer Assisted ◽  
Creative Behavior ◽  
Left Brain ◽  
Computer Assisted Design ◽  
Right Brain ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Brain

This article presents a more theoretical discussion of the use of the microcomputer, selective computer graphics programs, as basic experiences which relate as much to right as to the left side of the brain. It reviews some selected research literature in art education which shows the importance of the right brain in various areas of creative behavior and drawing skills, and argues that while the computer has been shown as the sine qua non of left brain activity, conceptual and analytical thought processes, one can also approach it from a right brain perspective. This article details a personal experience of the use of computer with the right brain approach in computer graphics and computer assisted design.

scholarly journals Efektifitas Penggunaan Otak Kanan dan Otak Kiri terhadap Pencapaian Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa

PALAPA ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 351-368
Author(s):  
Baiq Yuni Wahyuningsih ◽  
M. Abdurrahman Sunni
Keyword(s):  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
High Category ◽  
Left Brain ◽  
Right Brain ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Level Of Use ◽  
Value Range ◽  
Simple Regression Analysis ◽  
The Right ◽  
Very High

This study aims to see an overview of the use of the right and left brain of STMIK Mataram students and how much it affects the achievement of their learning outcomes. This type of research is a descriptive study with a quantitative approach. Data collection was carried out through questionnaires and test questions. The data analysis technique was carried out by using descriptive statistics and simple regression analysis to determine the closeness of the correlation coefficient between the independent variable (X), namely the level of use of the right brain and left brain and the dependent variable (Y), namely student learning outcomes. The results showed that in general, the level of use of the students' right brain was moderate with a percentage of 34.375%. The number of students who think using the right brain in the very high category is 6.25%, the high category is 31.25%, the low and very low category is 25% and 3.125%. The level of use of the students' left brain is classified as moderate with a percentage of 56.25%. Students who think using the left brain are in the very high category of 9.375%, the high category is 15.625%, the low and very low category is 12.5% ​​and 6.25%. Meanwhile, for the achievement of learning outcomes in general, the learning outcomes score was classified into the low category with a value range of 53 - 65 as many as 12 people (37.5%), 8 people (25%) and very high respectively. 4 people (12.5%). While the determinant coefficient obtained was 31.7%. In other words, that the use of the right brain and left brain has an effect of 31.7% on the calculus learning outcomes achieved by students.

scholarly journals Peran Neurolinguistik dalam Pengajaran Bahasa

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 137
Author(s):  
Tri Budianingsih
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Language ◽  
Learning Process ◽  
Language Teaching ◽  
Target Language ◽  
Left Brain ◽  
Right Brain ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Mind ◽  
First Time

<p class="Default"><em>Abstrak-</em><strong>Pertama kali peneliti mengetahui peran neurolinguistik dalam pengajaran bahasa sempat mengalami kebingungan dalam memahami peran tersebut, karena penamaan yang terdengar asing bagi peneliti yang belum pernah didengar sebelumnya, tapi setelah peneliti memahami dan mengetahuinya peneliti mulai tertarik dalam penerapannya di dalam kelas dalam proses belajar mengajar. Metode ini sangat menerapkan pemahaman bahasa dalam otak kanan dan otak kiri manusia, memahami bahasa sasaran atau bahasa asing dengan menggunakan otak kiri atau otak kanan, hal ini dapat diketahui dalam makalah ini. </strong><strong>Dari uraian tersebut dapat didefinisikan bahwa Neuro Linguistic Programming merupakan sebuah model yang memprogram interaksi antara pikiran dan bahasa (verbal dan nonverbal) sehingga dapat menghasilkan pikiran dan perilaku yang diharapkan.</strong></p><p class="Default"><strong><em> </em></strong></p><p class="Default"><strong><em>Kata Kunci</em></strong><em>:</em> <em>Neurolinguistict, Language Teaching, Right Brain and Left Brain</em></p><p> </p><p><em>Abstract </em>- <strong>The first time researchers know the role of neurolinguistics in language teaching was confused in understanding the role, because the naming that sounds unfamiliar to researchers who have never heard before, but after researchers understand and find out researchers began to be interested in the application in the classroom in the learning process.  This method greatly applies the understanding of language in the right brain and the human left brain, understand the target language or foreign language using the left brain or right brain, this can be known in this paper. From the description can be defined that Neuro Linguistic Programming is a model that program the interaction between the mind and language (verbal and nonverbal) so as to generate thoughts and behaviors that are expected.</strong></p><p class="Default"><strong><em> </em></strong></p><p class="Default"><strong><em>Keywords:</em></strong><em> Neurolinguistik, Pengajaran Bahasa, Otak Kanan dan Otak Kiri</em></p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document