scholarly journals Efektifitas Penggunaan Otak Kanan dan Otak Kiri terhadap Pencapaian Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa

PALAPA ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 351-368
Author(s):  
Baiq Yuni Wahyuningsih ◽  
M. Abdurrahman Sunni

This study aims to see an overview of the use of the right and left brain of STMIK Mataram students and how much it affects the achievement of their learning outcomes. This type of research is a descriptive study with a quantitative approach. Data collection was carried out through questionnaires and test questions. The data analysis technique was carried out by using descriptive statistics and simple regression analysis to determine the closeness of the correlation coefficient between the independent variable (X), namely the level of use of the right brain and left brain and the dependent variable (Y), namely student learning outcomes. The results showed that in general, the level of use of the students' right brain was moderate with a percentage of 34.375%. The number of students who think using the right brain in the very high category is 6.25%, the high category is 31.25%, the low and very low category is 25% and 3.125%. The level of use of the students' left brain is classified as moderate with a percentage of 56.25%. Students who think using the left brain are in the very high category of 9.375%, the high category is 15.625%, the low and very low category is 12.5% ​​and 6.25%. Meanwhile, for the achievement of learning outcomes in general, the learning outcomes score was classified into the low category with a value range of 53 - 65 as many as 12 people (37.5%), 8 people (25%) and very high respectively. 4 people (12.5%). While the determinant coefficient obtained was 31.7%. In other words, that the use of the right brain and left brain has an effect of 31.7% on the calculus learning outcomes achieved by students.

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 481-489
Author(s):  
Guntoro Edy Prayogi ◽  
Sripatmi Sripatmi ◽  
Muhammad Turmuzi ◽  
Hapipi Hapipi

This study aims to describe the mistakes made by the VIIA grade students of SMP Negeri 19 Mataram in solving story questions about the set material in terms of learning achievement. With the research subject, namely 6 students of class VIIA which has been selected based on learning achievement. This research is a descriptive qualitative type with research instruments in the form of written test sheets and interview guidelines. The data analysis technique was carried out by the students completed the questions using the Polya analysis or not, if using the Polya analysis, the stages were correct or not, if using the Polya analysis with the correct steps, the students' answers would be analyzed using the Polya analysis. The results of the study were at the stage of understanding the problem, the subject made mistakes 16.66% with a small category, at the stage of choosing the right problem-solving strategy made an error  20% with a small category, at the stage of solving the problem subject made a mistake 51.66% with the high category and at the stage of re-checking subjects made mistakes 64,58% with the very high category.


Author(s):  
Yupriana Asis

This study aims to improve chemistry learning outcomes in SMA Negeri 1 Takalar students through the application of a problem-based learning model. This study uses a classroom action research method. The subjects of this study were 38 students of class X IPA1. Data collection was carried out through observation, tests, and documentation. The data analysis technique of this research is using descriptive analysis. The results of this study indicate that in the first cycle the average score of student learning outcomes was 8.04 in the high category, in the second cycle the average score of learning outcomes was 8.84 with the very high category. Based on the results of this analysis, it can be concluded that the learning outcomes of students in class X IPA1 chemistry can be improved through the application of problem-based learning models.


2002 ◽  
Vol 205 (12) ◽  
pp. 1795-1805 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helmut Prior ◽  
Frank Lingenauber ◽  
Jörg Nitschke ◽  
Onur Güntürkün

SUMMARY The pigeon's use of different visuo-spatial cues was studied under controlled laboratory conditions that simulated analogous aspects of a homing situation. The birds first learned the route to a goal that was not visible from the starting location, but became visible as it was approached. Birds could orientate within a mainly geometric global reference frame, using prominent landmarks within their range, or by `piloting' along local cues. After learning the route, the birds were tested from familiar and unfamiliar release points, and several aspects of the available cues were varied systematically. The study explored the contribution of the left and right brain hemispheres by performing tests with the right or left eye occluded. The results show that pigeons can establish accurate bearings towards a non-visible goal by using a global reference frame only. Furthermore, there was a peak of searching activity at the location predicted by the global reference frame. Search at this location and directedness of the bearings were equally high with both right and left eye, suggesting that both brain hemispheres have the same competence level for these components of the task. A lateralization effect occurred when prominent landmarks were removed or translated. While the right brain hemisphere completely ignored such changes,the left brain hemisphere was distracted by removal of landmarks. After translation of landmarks, the left but not the right brain hemisphere allocated part of the searching activity to the site predicted by the new landmark position. The results show that a mainly geometric global visual reference frame is sufficient to determine exact bearings from familiar and unfamiliar release points. Overall, the results suggest a model of brain lateralization with a well-developed global spatial reference system in either hemisphere and an extra capacity for the processing of object features in the left brain.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rusnida Rusnida

This research is motivated by teacher-centered learning so that the lack of student activity in solving problems and finding answers together. This study aims to improve mathematical collaborative skills and student learning outcomes through the application of a magic ball-assisted group investigation learning model. This study is a classroom action research study on third grade students at SDN 008 Talang Perigi. The instrument used was the observation sheet and learning outcomes test. The results showed in the first cycle of collaborative mathematical skills students obtained an average of 55.77% with a high category and in the second cycle increased to 73.44% with a very high category. Student learning outcomes in the first cycle had an average of 67.83 with a percentage of classical completeness of 53%, increasing in the second cycle to 75.67 with a percentage of classical completeness of 83%. Based on the results of the study it can be concluded that the application of the learning model of investigation ball assisted by magic ball can improve the collaborative skills of mathematics and learning outcomes of third grade students of SDN 008 Talang Perigi.


2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-77
Author(s):  
Malik Ibrahim

The current study aims to describe the effectiveness of CTL approach (REACT) to improve students' self confidence in mathematics. It is a classroom action research (PTK). The subjects of the study were students of grade VIII MTs Nurul Ihsan Sukarara in the academic year 2017/2018 consisting of 29 students. Data analysis technique used is descriptive analysis. The findings show that students' confidence in mathematics in the first cycle reached 10.3% for high category, 55.2% for moderate, and 34.5% for low category. Meanwhile, in the second cycle students' self-confidence score on mathematics reached 6.9% for very high category, 72.41% for high category, and 20.69% for moderate. This study indicates that there is an increase of students' self confidence in mathematics due to CTL approach (REACT).


Leonardo ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 405-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anjan Chatterjee ◽  
Bianca Bromberger ◽  
William B. Smith ◽  
Rebecca Sternschein ◽  
Page Widick

We know little about the neurologic bases of art production. The idea that the right brain hemisphere is the “artistic brain” is widely held, despite the lack of evidence for this claim. Artists with brain damage can offer insight into these laterality questions. The authors used an instrument called the Assessment of Art Attributes to examine the work of two individuals with left-brain damage and one with right-hemisphere damage. In each case, their art became more abstract and distorted and less realistic. They also painted with looser strokes, less depth and more vibrant colors. No unique pattern was observed following right-brain damage. However, art produced after left-brain damage also became more symbolic. These results show that the neural basis of art production is distributed across both hemispheres in the human brain.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-19
Author(s):  
Connie Laurina

God created humans as the most special creation compared to His other creations. Human intelligence is caused by one organ which, although small in size, has a very vital role, namely the brain. Advances in knowledge and technology have encouraged scientists to try solving the mysteries of the brain. Many studies have focused on the right brain and left brain, or to balance the right brain and left brain. But in recent years, there has been a training/self-development institute who stated that they had found a way to balance the right and left brain, namely by activating the midbrain. This midbrain activation method is aimed at children aged 5-15 years because it is considered that children at this age are more easily activated in a very short time through a computer.The method used in writing this work is a Literature Study that contains various information on matters related to the topic of discussion. In addition to using literature, writing will be complemented by field research, using a Check List to interview respondents. The research approach used are qualitative and quantitative approach. A The qualitative approach obtains data regarding respondent's experiences. This writing has the aim of finding ( knowing ) whether the Midbrain Activation system is in accordance with God's Word or against God's Word; to open the horizons of parents, congregations and even readers of this paper, especially those with children, so that they can be more careful in choosing training for their children.


Author(s):  
Afrah Maulida

This study aims to find out: 1)Application of evaluation of student<br />learning outcomes on curriculum KTSP in PAI subjects in SMP Negeri 1<br />Binjai District Langkat Regency Teaching Year 2017/2018.<br />2)Implementation of the evaluation of student learning outcomes on<br />curriculum 2013 in PAI subjects in SMP Negeri 1 Binjai District Langkat<br />Regency Teaching Year 2017/2018. 3) Analysis of the implementation of<br />the evaluation of student learning outcomes in the educational unit<br />curriculum (KTSP) and curriculum 2013 in the subjects of PAI in SMP<br />Negeri 1 Binjai District, Langkat Regency Teachings Year 2017/ 2018.The<br />method used in this study is a qualitative methodology by using the<br />description approach, while the instrument is the researcher. The data<br />comes from two sources namely primary and secondary data. Data<br />collection techniques consist of observation, interview, and<br />documentation. The analysis technique used is data reduction, data<br />presentation, and conclusion. The examination of the validity of the data<br />of researchers using 4 techniques of degree of trust, transparency,<br />dependence, and certainty with triangulation of sources and data<br />collection. The result of the research shows that the implementation of the<br />evaluation of student learning outcomes in KTSP and the curriculum 2013<br />in PAI subjects at SMP Negeri 1 Binjai District Langkat District 2017/ 2018<br />academic year is categorized quite well, KTSP is used in class IX, and<br />curriculum 2013 is used in class VII and VIII, this is because when<br />students enter the school until the students finish using a curriculum. The<br />standard of scores on the minimum completeness criteria (KKM) in<br />schools for the two curriculum is 65. The school has its own policy for the<br />assessment format. The value range for KTSP is the scale of 0-100, while<br />for the curriculum 2013 there is a change from a scale of 1-4 to a scale of 0-100. Student report cards for the curriculum 2013 are listed in each<br />assessment column namely attitude, knowledge and skill, while for KTSP<br />there is only an attitude assessment, and an assessment of knowledge with skill put together in a single assessment column. Assessment of attitudes in the KTSP report card has been written in it that is the assessment of the personality and noble character of the students filled by teachers with the assessment of the letter, while the attitude assessment in the curriculum 2013 report cards there is a column of assessment of spiritual attitudes and columns assessment of social attitudes that each is still empty, so assessment is filled by the teacher by writing the student's attitude that is seen during the student following the learning process at school.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 231
Author(s):  
Ni Putu Sri Diah Anggraeni ◽  
Gede Wira Bayu ◽  
I Gde Wawan Sudatha

This study aimed to develop an instrument for assessing science learning outcomes based on HOTS (Higher Order Thinking Skills). This research was development research that uses a 4D model (four-D model) with development stages consisting of define, design, develop, and distribute. This development research was only carried out until the development stage. The subject of this research was the HOTS-based science learning outcome assessment instrument in the form of grids and multiple-choice test sheets. Data were obtained by using interviews, observation, and test methods. The validation of the assessment instrument was carried out by two material experts using a validation sheet and 78 students for a limited trial using multiple-choice objective test instruments. The results obtained will be analyzed for validity, reliability, discriminatory power, level of difficulty, and quality of distractors. The results of the analysis of the HOTS-based science learning outcome assessment instrument had a validity of 0.90 which was in the very high category, reliability of 0.81 which was in the very high category. Distinguishing analysis obtained 2 items with very good criteria, 14 items with good criteria, and 9 items with sufficient criteria. In the difficulty level test, 12 questions were obtained in the easy category and 13 questions in the medium category. Analysis of the distractor quality test found 63 distractors were at the >5% level, which means the distractors are functioning well and 12 distractors were at the 5% level, which means the distractors were not functioning properly. These results indicated that the HOTS-based science learning outcome test assessment instrument developed was valid and reliable and is suitable for use as an assessment instrument in various styles of material.


Author(s):  
Launa Yenny Abadi Simanjuntak ◽  
Reh Bungana Perangin-Angin ◽  
Daulat Saragi

Learning media is a learning tool that is very important in the learning process. This study aims to produce scientific-based learning videos with problem-based learning models to improve the learning outcomes of Civic students in 4th grade elementary school in Parm testimonial, Toba Samosir district. This type of research is research and development using the 4D model. research instruments used in the form of an expert validation questionnaire, teacher and student response questionnaire and learning achievement tests. Then the data analysis in the form of expert validation analysis is carried out by material, language and media experts, practicality analysis is carried out by teacher and student questionnaires and effectiveness analysis is done by pretest and posttest. The stages of this research are define, design, develop and assess. The results of this study indicate that the validation rate of material experts is 80% in the very high category, the validation of linguists is 89% in the very high category and the validation of the media expert is 92% in the very high category while the N gain for student learning outcomes is 0.7 with the category high. Finally, instructional videos are also considered by teachers and students by obtaining 87.5% of teachers and obtaining an average of 79% of students in either category. Thus, scientific-based videos can improve student learning outcomes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document