scholarly journals Trajectories of opioid consumption from day of surgery to 28 days postoperatively: a prospective cohort study in patients undergoing abdominal, joint, or spine surgery

2021 ◽  
pp. rapm-2021-102910
Author(s):  
Robert J McCarthy ◽  
Ashley Meng Adams ◽  
Amanda C Sremac ◽  
Wendy Jo Kreider ◽  
Pete L Pelletier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spine Surgery ◽  
Latent Class ◽  
Class Group ◽  
Independent Predictor ◽  
Opioid Consumption ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Group Modeling ◽  
Prospective Longitudinal ◽  
Analgesic Use

IntroductionDescriptions of opioid use trajectories and their association with postsurgical pain and opioid consumption are limited. We hypothesized that trajectories of opioid consumption in the first 28 days following surgery would be associated with unique patterns of pain and duration of opioid use.MethodsA prospective longitudinal cohort of patients undergoing elective inpatient abdominal, joint, or spine surgery between June 2016 and June 2019 was studied. At hospital discharge and every 7 days for 28 days, patients were assessed for pain, analgesic use, pain interference, satisfaction, and side effects. Duration of opioid use was determined for 6 months. The primary analysis used latent class group modeling to identify trajectories of opioid use.ResultsDecreasing, high, and persistent opioid trajectories were identified following joint and spine surgery and a decreasing and persistent trajectory following abdominal surgery. Reported pain was greater in the high and persistent trajectories compared with the decreasing use trajectories. Compared with the decreasing opioid trajectory, the median duration of opioid use was increased by 4.5 (95% CI 1 to 22, p<0.01) weeks in persistent opioid use abdominal and by 6 (95% CI 0 to 6, p<0.01) weeks in the high or persistent use joint and spine groups. The odds (95% CI) of opioid use at 6 months in the high or persistent opioid use trajectory was 24.3 (2.9 to 203.4) for abdominal and 3.7 (1.9 to 7.0) for joint or spine surgery compared with the decreasing use trajectory. Morphine milliequivalent per 24 hours of hospitalization was the primary independent predictor of opioid use trajectories.ConclusionsWe observed distinct opioid use trajectories following abdominal and joint or spine surgery that were associated with different patterns of pain and duration of opioid use postoperatively. Prediction of postoperative opioid use trajectory groups may be clinically important for identifying risk of prolonged opioid use.

scholarly journals Influence of catastrophizing, anxiety, and depression on in-hospital opioid consumption, pain, and quality of recovery after adult spine surgery

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 119-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren K. Dunn ◽  
Marcel E. Durieux ◽  
Lucas G. Fernández ◽  
Siny Tsang ◽  
Emily E. Smith-Straesser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spine Surgery ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Psychological Intervention ◽  
Opioid Consumption ◽  
Anxiety And Depression ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Quality Of Recovery ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
The Impact

OBJECTIVEPerception of perioperative pain is influenced by various psychological factors. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of catastrophizing, anxiety, and depression on in-hospital opioid consumption, pain scores, and quality of recovery in adults who underwent spine surgery.METHODSPatients undergoing spine surgery were enrolled in this study, and the preoperatively completed questionnaires included the verbal rating scale (VRS), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Quality of recovery was assessed using the 40-item Quality of Recovery questionnaire (QoR40). Opioid consumption and pain scores according to the VRS were recorded daily until discharge.RESULTSOne hundred thirty-nine patients were recruited for the study, and 101 completed the QoR40 assessment postoperatively. Patients with higher catastrophizing scores were more likely to have higher maximum pain scores postoperatively (estimate: 0.03, SE: 0.01, p = 0.02), without increased opioid use (estimate: 0.44, SE: 0.27, p = 0.11). Preoperative anxiety (estimate: 1.18, SE: 0.65, p = 0.07) and depression scores (estimate: 1.06, SE: 0.71, p = 0.14) did not correlate with increased postoperative opioid use; however, patients with higher preoperative depression scores had lower quality of recovery after surgery (estimate: −1.9, SE: 0.56, p < 0.001).CONCLUSIONSCatastrophizing, anxiety, and depression play important roles in modulating postoperative pain. Preoperative evaluation of these factors, utilizing a validated tool, helps to identify patients at risk. This might allow for earlier psychological intervention that could reduce pain severity and improve the quality of recovery.

Effects of an opioid stewardship program on opioid consumption and related outcomes after multilevel lumbar spine fusion: a pre- and postimplementation analysis of 268 patients

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Marie-Jacqueline Reisener ◽  
Alexander P. Hughes ◽  
Ichiro Okano ◽  
Jiaqi Zhu ◽  
Artine Arzani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Spine Surgery ◽  
Effect Size ◽  
Lumbar Fusion ◽  
Opioid Consumption ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Opioid Prescribing ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Stewardship Program

OBJECTIVE Opioid stewardship programs combine clinical, regulatory, and educational interventions to minimize inappropriate opioid use and prescribing for orthopedic and spine surgery. Most evaluations of stewardship programs quantify effects on prescriber behavior, whereas patient-relevant outcomes have been relatively neglected. The authors evaluated the impact of an opioid stewardship program on perioperative opioid consumption, prescribing, and related clinical outcomes after multilevel lumbar fusion. METHODS The study was based on a retrospective, quasi-experimental, pretest-posttest design in 268 adult patients who underwent multilevel lumbar fusion in 2016 (preimplementation, n = 141) or 2019 (postimplementation, n = 127). The primary outcome was in-hospital opioid consumption (morphine equivalent dose [MED], mg). Secondary outcomes included numeric rating scale pain scores (0–10), length of stay (LOS), incidence of opioid-induced side effects (gastrointestinal, nausea/vomiting, respiratory, sedation, cognitive), and preoperative and discharge prescribing. Outcomes were measured continuously during the hospital admission. Differences in outcomes between the epochs were assessed in bivariable (Wilcoxon signed-rank or Fisher’s exact tests) and multivariable (Wald’s chi-square test) analyses. RESULTS In bivariable analyses, there were significant decreases in preoperative opioid use (46% vs 28% of patients, p = 0.002), preoperative opioid prescribing (MED 30 mg [IQR 20–60 mg] vs 20 mg [IQR 11–39 mg], p = 0.003), in-hospital opioid consumption (MED 329 mg [IQR 188–575 mg] vs 199 mg [100–372 mg], p < 0.001), the incidence of any opioid-related side effect (62% vs 50%, p = 0.03), and discharge opioid prescribing (MED 90 mg [IQR 60–135 mg] vs 60 mg [IQR 45–80 mg], p < 0.0001) between 2016 and 2019. There were no significant differences in postanesthesia care unit pain scores (4 [IQR 3–6] vs 5 [IQR 3–6], p = 0.33), nursing floor pain scores (4 [IQR 3–5] vs 4 [IQR 3–5], p = 0.93), or total LOS (118 hours [IQR 81–173 hours] vs 103 hours [IQR 81–132 hours], p = 0.21). On multivariable analysis, the opioid stewardship program was significantly associated with decreased discharge prescribing (Wald’s chi square = 9.45, effect size −52.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] −86 to −19.0, p = 0.002). The number of lumbar levels fused had the strongest effect on total opioid consumption during the hospital stay (Wald’s chi square = 16.53, effect size = 539, 95% CI 279.1 to 799, p < 0.001), followed by preoperative opioid use (Wald’s chi square = 44.04, effect size = 5, 95% CI 4 to 7, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS A significant decrease in perioperative opioid prescribing, consumption, and opioid-related side effects was found after implementation of an opioid stewardship program. These gains were achieved without adverse effects on pain scores or LOS. These results suggest the major impact of opioid stewardship programs for spine surgery may be on changing prescriber behavior.

scholarly journals Influence of Preemptive Intravenous Ibuprofen on Post-Operative Pain and Opioid Consumption after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

QJM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 113 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
R A Hamad ◽  
M K Shams ◽  
M M Kamal ◽  
D M Hissein
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Postoperative Period ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Developed Countries ◽  
Opioid Consumption ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
A Prospective Study ◽  
Analgesic Use

Abstract Background cholecystectomy is the most common abdominal surgical procedure in developed countries, and is generally performed laparoscopically. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is regarded as the gold standard surgical technique for gallstone diseases. This procedure results in less postoperative pain, a better cosmetic outcome, shorter hospitalization faster healing, and earlier mobilization than open cholecystectomy. Aim of the Work the purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of a single preemptive dose of IV ibuprofen on postoperative pain and opioid consumption in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients and Methods this study will be a prospective study on patients who are scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy will be informed about the different components of postoperative pain they would experience, and they will be selected by the same investigator for their ability to differentiate these pain components and to use the visual analog scale. After approval of the local ethics committee. Results this study showed that a single preemptive dose of IV ibuprofen reduced 24-hour opioid consumption and was effective in the emergence of lower pain scores in the postoperative period. In addition, IV ibuprofen significantly reduced rescue analgesic use. In addition IV ibuprofen has played a key role with opioid sparing effect. Conclusion a single preemptive dose of 400 mg resulted in better pain scores by reducing postoperative opioid use in the 1st 24 hours in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy by 45%. It also reduced rescue analgesic use in the postoperative period and opioid-related side-effects such as nausea-vomiting.

scholarly journals Household Income as a Predictor for Surgical Outcomes and Opioid Use After Spine Surgery in the United States

2022 ◽  
pp. 219256822110708
Author(s):  
Umaru Barrie ◽  
Eric Y. Montgomery ◽  
Erica Ogwumike ◽  
Mark N. Pernik ◽  
Ivan Y. Luu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Disparities ◽  
Spine Surgery ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Surgical Outcomes ◽  
Household Income ◽  
The United States ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Opioid Consumption ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Cross Sectional

Study Design Cross-Sectional Study Objectives Socioeconomic status (SES) is a fundamental root of health disparities, however, its effect on surgical outcomes is often difficult to capture in clinical research, especially in spine surgery. Here, we present a large single-center study assessing whether SES is associated with cause-specific surgical outcomes. Methods Patients undergoing spine surgery between 2015 and 2019 were assigned income in accordance with the national distribution and divided into quartiles based on the ZIP code-level median household income. We performed univariate, chi-square, and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) analysis assessing the independent association of SES, quantified by household income, to operative outcomes, and multiple metrics of opioid consumption. Results 1199 patients were enrolled, and 1138 patients were included in the analysis. Low household income was associated with the greatest rates of 3-month opioid script renewal (OR:1.65, 95% CI:1.14-2.40). In addition, low-income was associated with higher rates of perioperative opioid consumption compared to higher income including increased mean total morphine milligram equivalent (MME) 252.25 (SD 901.32) vs 131.57 (SD 197.46) (P < .046), and inpatient IV patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) MME 121.11 (SD 142.14) vs 87.60 (SD 86.33) (P < .023). In addition, household income was independently associated with length of stay (LOS), and emergency room (ER) revisits with low-income patients demonstrating significantly longer postop LOS and increasing postoperative ER visits. Conclusions Considering the comparable surgical management provided by the single institution, the associated differences in postoperative outcomes as defined by increased morbidities and opioid consumption can potentially be attributed to health disparities caused by SES.

Emergency Department Visits After Elective Spine Surgery

Neurosurgery ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 85 (2) ◽  
pp. E258-E265 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey M Hills ◽  
Inamullah Khan ◽  
Ahilan Sivaganesan ◽  
Benjamin Weisenthal ◽  
Joshua Daryoush ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Spine Surgery ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disorder ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Ed Visits ◽  
Prospective Longitudinal

Abstract BACKGROUND Emergency department (ED) overuse is a costly and often neglected source of postdischarge resource utilization after spine surgery. Failing to investigate drivers of ED visits represents a missed opportunity to improve the value of care in spine patients. OBJECTIVE To identify the prevalence, drivers, and timing of ED visits following elective spine surgery. METHODS Patients undergoing elective spine surgery for degenerative disease at a major medical center were enrolled in a prospective longitudinal registry. Patient and surgery characteristics, and patient-reported outcomes were recorded at baseline and 3 mo after surgery, along with self-reported 90-d ED visits. A multivariable regression model was used to identify independent factors associated with 90-d ED visits. For a sample of patients presenting to our institution's ED, charts were reviewed to identify the reason and time to ED postdischarge. RESULTS Of 2762 patients, we found a 90-d ED visit rate of 9.4%. One-third of patients presented to our institution's ED and of these, 70% presented due to pain or medical concerns at 9 and 7 d postdischarge, respectively, with 60% presenting outside normal clinic hours. Independent risk factors for 90-d ED visits included younger age, preoperative opioid use, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, and more vertebral levels involved. CONCLUSION Nearly 10% of elective spine patients had 90-d ED visits not requiring readmission. Pain and medical concerns accounted for 70% of visits at our center, occurring within 10 d of discharge. This study provides the clinical details and a timeline necessary to guide individualized interventions to prevent unnecessary, costly ED visits after spine surgery.

Retrospective analysis on the effect of spinal cord stimulation on opioid consumption

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Awinita Barpujari ◽  
Michael A Erdek
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
Spinal Cord Stimulation ◽  
Alternative Therapy ◽  
Opioid Consumption ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Chronic Pain Conditions ◽  
Post Trial

Aim: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is used to clinically manage and/or treat several chronic pain etiologies. A limited amount is known about the influence on patients' use of opioid pain medication. This retrospective analysis evaluated SCS effect on opioid consumption in patients presenting with chronic pain conditions. Materials & methods: Sixty-seven patients underwent a temporary trial device, permanent implant or both. Patients were divided for assessment based on the nature of their procedure(s). Primary outcome was change in morphine equivalent dose (MED), ascertained from preoperative and postoperative medication reports. Results: Postoperative MED was significantly lower in patients who received some form of neuromodulation therapy. Pretrial patients reported an average MED of 41.01 ± 10.23 mg per day while post-trial patients reported an average of 13.30 ± 5.34 mg per day (p < 0.001). Pre-implant patients reported an average MED of 39.14 ± 13.52 mg per day while post-implant patients reported an average MED of 20.23 ± 9.01 mg per day (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between pre-trial and pre-implant MED, nor between post-trial and post-implant MED. Of the 42 study subjects who reported some amount of pre-intervention opioid use, 78.57% indicated a lower MED (n = 33; p < 0.001), 16.67% indicated no change (n = 7) and 4.76% (n = 2) indicated a higher MED, following intervention. Moreover, SCS therapy resulted in a 26.83% reduction (p < 0.001) in the number of patients with MED >50 mg per day. Conclusion: Spinal cord stimulation may reduce opioid use when implemented appropriately. Neuromodulation may represent alternative therapy for alleviating chronic pain which may avoid a number of deleterious side effects commonly associated with opioid consumption.

Opioid Consumption Patterns and Prolonged Opioid Use Among Opioid-Naïve Ankle Fracture Patients

2021 ◽  
pp. 193864002199292
Author(s):  
Hope Skibicki ◽  
Sundeep Saini ◽  
Ryan Rogero ◽  
Kristen Nicholson ◽  
Rachel J. Shakked ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ankle Fracture ◽  
Monitoring Program ◽  
Opioid Consumption ◽  
Consumption Patterns ◽  
Utilization Rate ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Index Procedure ◽  
Postoperative Visit ◽  
Fracture Surgery

Introduction Previous literature has demonstrated an association between acute opioid exposure and the risk of long-term opioid use. Here, the investigators assess immediate postoperative opioid consumption patterns as well as the incidence of prolonged opioid use among opioid-naïve patients following ankle fracture surgery. Methods Included patients underwent outpatient open reduction and internal fixation of an ankle or tibial plafond fracture over a 1-year period. At patients’ first postoperative visit, opioid pills were counted and standardized to the equivalent number of 5-mg oxycodone pills. Prolonged use was defined as filling a prescription for a controlled substance more than 90 days after the index procedure, tracked by the New Jersey Prescription Drug Monitoring Program up to 1 year postoperatively. Results At the first postoperative visit, 173 patients consumed a median of 24 out of 40 pills prescribed. The initial utilization rate was 60%, and 2736 pills were left unused. In all, 32 (18.7%) patients required a narcotic prescription 90 days after the index procedure. Patients with a self-reported history of depression (P = .11) or diabetes (P = .07) demonstrated marginal correlation with prolonged narcotic use. Conclusion Our study demonstrated that, on average, patients utilize significantly fewer opioid pills than prescribed and that many patient demographics are not significant predictors of continued long-term use following outpatient ankle fracture surgery. Large variations in consumption rates make it difficult for physicians to accurately prescribe and predict prolonged narcotic use. Level of Evidence: Level III

Implementation of a patient-specific tapering protocol at discharge decreases total opioid dose prescribed for 6 weeks after elective primary spine surgery

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 474-478
Author(s):  
Sarah S Joo ◽  
Oluwatobi O Hunter ◽  
Mallika Tamboli ◽  
Jody C Leng ◽  
T Kyle Harrison ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spine Surgery ◽  
Joint Replacement ◽  
Oral Morphine ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Opioid Consumption ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Opioid Dose ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Primary Spine

Background and objectivesAt our institution, we developed an individualized discharge opioid prescribing and tapering protocol for joint replacement patients and implemented the same protocol for neurosurgical spine patients. We then tested the hypothesis that this protocol will decrease the oral morphine milligram equivalent (MME) dose of opioid prescribed postdischarge after elective primary spine surgery.MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study, we identified all consecutive elective primary spine surgery cases 1 year before and after introduction of the protocol. This protocol used the patient’s prior 24-hour inpatient opioid consumption to determine discharge opioid pill count and tapering schedule. The primary outcome was total opioid dose prescribed in oral MME from discharge through 6 weeks. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital opioid consumption in MME, hospital length of stay, MME prescribed at discharge, opioid refills, and rates of minor and major adverse events.ResultsEighty-three cases comprised the final sample (45 preintervention and 38 postintervention). There were no differences in baseline characteristics. The total oral MME (median (IQR)) from discharge through 6 weeks postoperatively was 900 (420–1440) preintervention compared with 300 (112–806) postintervention (p<0.01, Mann-Whitney U test), and opioid refill rates were not different between groups. There were no differences in other outcomes.ConclusionsThis patient-specific prescribing and tapering protocol effectively decreases the total opioid dose prescribed for 6 weeks postdischarge after elective primary spine surgery. Our experience also demonstrates the potential generalizability of this protocol, which was originally designed for joint replacement patients, to other surgical populations.

scholarly journals Inadequacy of 3-month Oswestry Disability Index outcome for assessing individual longer-term patient experience after lumbar spine surgery

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 170-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony L. Asher ◽  
Silky Chotai ◽  
Clinton J. Devin ◽  
Theodore Speroff ◽  
Frank E. Harrell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Experience ◽  
Spine Surgery ◽  
Oswestry Disability Index ◽  
Absolute Difference ◽  
Lumbar Spine Surgery ◽  
Substantial Clinical Benefit ◽  
Degenerative Lumbar Disease ◽  
Spine Care ◽  
The Absolute ◽  
Prospective Longitudinal

OBJECTIVE Prospective longitudinal outcomes registries are at the center of evidence-driven health care reform. Obtaining real-world outcomes data at 12 months can be costly and challenging. In the present study, the authors analyzed whether 3-month outcome measurements sufficiently represent 12-month outcomes for patients with degenerative lumbar disease undergoing surgery. METHODS Data from 3073 patients undergoing elective spine surgery for degenerative lumbar disease were entered into a prospective multicenter registry (N2QOD). Baseline, 3-month, and 12-month follow-up Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were recorded. The absolute differences between actual 12- and 3-month ODI scores was evaluated. Additionally, the authors analyzed the absolute difference between actual 12-month ODI scores and a model-predicted 12-month ODI score (the model used patients' baseline characteristics and actual 3-month scores). The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for ODI of 12.8 points and the substantial clinical benefit (SCB) for ODI of 18.8 points were used based on the previously published values. The concordance rate of achieving MCID and SCB for ODI at 3-and 12-months was computed. RESULTS The 3-month ODI scores differed from 12-month scores by an absolute difference of 11.9 ± 10.8, and predictive modeling estimations of 12-month ODI scores differed from actual 12-month scores by a mean (± SD) of 10.7 ± 9.0 points (p = 0.001). Sixty-four percent of patients (n = 1982) achieved an MCID for ODI at 3 months in comparison with 67% of patients (n = 2088) by 12 months; 51% (n = 1731) and 61% (n = 1860) of patients achieved SCB for ODI at 3 months and 12 months, respectively. Almost 20% of patients had ODI scores that varied at least 20 points (the point span of an ODI functional category) between actual 3- and 12-month values. In the aggregate analysis of achieving MCID, 77% of patients were concordant and 23% were discordant in achieving or not achieving MCID at 3 and 12 months. The discordance rates of achieving or not achieving MCID for ODI were in the range of 19% to 27% for all diagnoses and treatments (decompression with and without fusion). The positive and negative predictive value of 3-months ODI to predict 12-month ODI was 86% and 60% for MCID and 82% and 67% for SCB. CONCLUSIONS Based on their findings, the authors conclude the following: 1) Predictive methods for functional outcome based on early patient experience (i.e., baseline and/or 3-month data) should be used to help evaluate the effectiveness of procedures in patient populations, rather than serving as a proxy for long-term individual patient experience. 2) Prospective longitudinal registries need to span at least 12 months to determine the effectiveness of spine care at the individual patient and practitioner level.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document