scholarly journals EULAR portfolio for Rheumatology training: a EULAR School of Rheumatology initiative

RMD Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. e001684
Author(s):  
Marloes van Onna ◽  
Sofia Ramiro ◽  
Catherine Haines ◽  
Mette Holland-Fischer ◽  
Jose Antonio Pereira da Silva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Personal Development ◽  
Portfolio Assessment ◽  
Clinical Work ◽  
Multisource Feedback ◽  
Reflective Writing ◽  
Learning Goals ◽  
Moderate Risk ◽  
Research Activities ◽  
Curriculum Vitae ◽  
Personal Reflections

ObjectiveAbout half of the rheumatology trainees do not use a portfolio. This project was established to reach consensus about the content of a EULAR portfolio for Rheumatology training and subsequently develop portfolio assessment forms.MethodsAfter establishing a portfolio working group (WG), including nine rheumatologists and one educationalist, a systematic literature review (SLR) on the content and structure of portfolios for postgraduate learning was conducted (November 2018). This was followed by a survey among WG members and members of the EMerging EUlar NETwork, inquiring about the content and structure of existing national portfolios. The portfolio WG selected the key components of the portfolio, taking previous experience and feasibility into account. Assessment forms (eg, case-based discussion) were developed and pilot-tested.Results13/2034 articles were included in the SLR (12 high/1 moderate risk of bias). Information on procedural skills, personal reflections, learning goals and multisource feedback was most often included a portfolio. Twenty-five respondents completed the survey (response≈50%). Feedback from assessors, reflective writing and formulation of learning goals were considered important dimensions to be covered in a portfolio. Six key components of the portfolio were established: curriculum vitae, personal development plan, clinical work, professional behaviours, education and research activities. Suggested minimal content for each component was formulated. Four assessment forms were successfully pilot-tested by 11 rheumatologists and their trainees.ConclusionA EULAR portfolio for Rheumatology training and assessment forms were developed. Portfolio implementation, particularly in countries without an existing portfolio, may promote a higher standard of rheumatology training across Europe.

scholarly journals THU0586 ESTABLISHING THE KEY COMPONENTS OF A EULAR PORTFOLIO FOR TRAINING IN RHEUMATOLOGY: A EULAR SCHOOL OF RHEUMATOLOGY INITIATIVE

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 535.1-535
Author(s):  
M. Van Onna ◽  
S. Ramiro ◽  
C. Haines ◽  
M. Holland-Fischer ◽  
J. A. P. Da Silva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Personal Development ◽  
Clinical Training ◽  
Action Plan ◽  
Continuing Professional Development ◽  
Clinical Work ◽  
Multisource Feedback ◽  
European Countries ◽  
Learning Goals ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Personal Reflections

Background:In clinical training, a portfolio is expected to stimulate learning and encourage critical reflection. Some, but not all, European countries use a portfolio in rheumatology training, and their scope varies widely. A EULAR portfolio for Rheumatology trainees could contribute to improve overall training, raise educational standards, foster the setting of common goals and harmonize rheumatology training across countries.Objectives:Develop key components that should be included in a EULAR portfolio of Rheumatology.Methods:A working group (WG) composed of 9 rheumatologists and 1 educationalist was established. A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted in November 2018, according to the PIM structure: Population: trainees; Instrument of interest: portfolio; Measurement of properties of interest: content portfolio. A survey was disseminated among the WG group and WG members of the EMerging EUlar NETwork (EMEUNET), inquiring about the content and structure of existing national portfolios. Portfolio materials of selected countries were reviewed. Last, the WG elected the key components of the portfolio.Results:13/2,034 articles were included in the SLR (12 high/1 moderate risk of bias). Information on direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS) (9/13), personal reflections (8/13), learning goals (5/13) and multisource feedback (5/13) were most often included in the portfolio. Twenty-five respondents filled out the survey (response rate ≈ 50%). Reflective writing (n=7), learning goals (n=4) and feedback (n=4) were considered the most useful components of a portfolio. About half indicated that a portfolio was a bureaucratic burden; 4 respondents mentioned lack of feedback by supervisors as a barrier. Portfolio materials of 7 European countries were reviewed. Several portfolios (Germany, Italy, Greece and Spain) were logbooks, i.e. a record of clinical activities. Other portfolios (UK, Denmark, The Netherlands) also included information on workplace-based assessments, learning goals, and personal reflections. The proposed key components of the portfolio are included in Table 1.Table 1.Key components of the EULAR portfolio of Rheumatology.Key componentContentCurriculum vitaePersonal record of achievements, experiences, knowledge and skillsPersonal Development PlanLearning goals and action planClinical workInformation on managing patients (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis)Skills (e.g. joint aspiration)Assessments (summative and formative)Personal reflectionsProfessional behaviourMultisource feedbackPersonal reflectionsEducationContinuing professional development, list of formal and non-formal learning activitiesAssessments (e.g. teaching assessment, evidence based medicine assignment)Personal reflectionsResearchList of abstracts, published articlesInformation on research funding, scholarships, bursaries, academic postsConclusion:This initiative resulted in the establishment of a list of key components to be included in a EULAR portfolio of Rheumatology. Assessment forms for each key portfolio component are currently being developed. Portfolio implementation, particularly in countries that do not use it yet, may contribute significantly to promote a higher standard of patient care across Europe.Disclosure of Interests:Marloes van Onna: None declared, Sofia Ramiro Grant/research support from: MSD, Consultant of: Abbvie, Lilly, Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme, Speakers bureau: Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Catherine Haines: None declared, M. Holland-Fischer: None declared, José Antonio P. da Silva Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Abbvie, Consultant of: Pfizer, AbbVie, Roche, Lilly, Novartis, Jean Dudler: None declared, Christopher Edwards Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Biogen, Roche, Consultant of: Abbvie, Samsung, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, BMS, Biogen, Celgene, Fresenius, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Mundipharma, Pfizer, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Samsung, Sanofi, UCB,Alessia Alunno: None declared, Elena Nikiphorou: None declared, L. Falzon: None declared, Francisca Sivera: None declared

scholarly journals Challenges and solutions to returning to clinical training after research: a multidisciplinary survey of integrated academic trainees in West Yorkshire, United Kingdom

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
C. L. Downey ◽  
J. Bentley ◽  
H. Pandit
Keyword(s):  
United Kingdom ◽  
Clinical Training ◽  
Clinical Work ◽  
Survey Study ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Clinical Supervisors ◽  
Research Activities ◽  
Time Out ◽  
Rapid Transition ◽  
The University

Abstract Background Time out of clinical training can impact medical trainees’ skills, competence and confidence. Periods of Out of Programme for Research (OOPR) are often much longer than other approved mechanisms for time of out training. The aim of this survey study was to explore the challenges of returning to clinical training following OOPR, and determine potential solutions. Methods All current integrated academic training (IAT) doctors at the University of Leeds (United Kingdom) and previous IAT trainees undertaking OOPR in the local region (West Yorkshire, United Kingdom)(n = 53) were invited to complete a multidisciplinary survey. Results The survey was completed by 33 participants (62% response rate). The most relevant challenges identified were completing the thesis whilst transitioning back to clinical work, the rapid transition between full-time research and clinical practice, a diminished confidence in clinical abilities and isolation from colleagues. Potential solutions included dedicated funds allocated for the renewal of lapsed skills, adequate notice of the clinical rotation to which trainees return, informing clinical supervisors about the OOPR trainee returning to practice and a mandatory return to standard clinical days. Conclusions Addressing these issues has the potential to improve the trainee experience and encourage future trainees to take time out of training for research activities.

scholarly journals Using a Learning Coach to Develop Family Medicine Residents' Goal-Setting and Reflection Skills

2013 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 289-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul George ◽  
Shmuel Reis ◽  
Margaret Dobson ◽  
Melissa Nothnagle
Keyword(s):  
Family Medicine ◽  
Rhode Island ◽  
Goal Setting ◽  
Personal Development ◽  
Junior Faculty ◽  
Learning Goals ◽  
Junior Faculty Member ◽  
Self Directed Learning ◽  
Protected Time ◽  
Learning Coach

Abstract Background Self-directed learning (SDL) skills, such as self-reflection and goal setting, facilitate learning throughout a physician's career. Yet, residents do not often formally engage in these activities during residency. Intervention To develop resident SDL skills, we created a learning coach role for a junior faculty member to meet with second-year residents monthly to set learning goals and promote reflection. Methods The study was conducted from 2008–2010 at the Brown Family Medicine Residency in Pawtucket, Rhode Island. During individual monthly meetings with the learning coach, residents entered their learning goals and reflections into an electronic portfolio. A mixed-methods evaluation, including coach's ratings of goal setting and reflection, coach's meeting notes, portfolio entries, and resident interviews, was used to assess progress in residents' SDL abilities. Results Coach ratings of 25 residents' goal-setting ability increased from a mean of 1.9 to 4.6 (P < .001); ratings of reflective capacity increased from a mean of 2.0 to 4.7 (P < .001) during each year. Resident portfolio entries showed a range of domains for goal setting and reflection. Resident interviews demonstrated progressive independence in setting goals and appreciation of the value of reflection for personal development. Conclusions Introducing a learning coach, use of a portfolio, and providing protected time for self-reflected learning allowed residents to develop SDL skills at their own pace. The learning coach model may be applicable to other residency programs in developing resident lifelong learning skills.

OPTIONAL TRAINING AS A RESOURCE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF RESEARCH COMPETENCE OF STUDENTS IN GRADES 6-7

2021 ◽  
Vol 72 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-96
Author(s):  
K. Askarbekova ◽  
◽  
Z. Kanayeva ◽  
O. Yaroshenko ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Secondary Education ◽  
General Education ◽  
Goal Setting ◽  
Personal Development ◽  
Learning Goals ◽  
Educational Standards ◽  
Research Skills ◽  
Research Competence ◽  
The World

This article examines the essence of the research abilities of students formed in elective classes in biology as a category and factor of personal development. The content of the curriculum in biology is also considered, and activities aimed at achieving learning goals that are related to the development of skills are included. In modern secondary education of Kazakhstan, modernization processes successfully implemented in recent years, is carried out with the aim of its integration into the world educational space and approximation to international educational standards on the approval of standard rules of activity by types of general education organizations for the purposeful formation of research skills of students, which is determined at the legislative level "Research competence in the classification of A.V. Khutorsky is considered as an integral part of cognitive competence, which includes elements of methodological, supra-subject, logical activities, methods of organizing goal-setting, planning, analysis, reflection.

OPTIONAL TRAINING AS A RESOURCE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OFRESEARCHCOMPETENCEOFSTUDENTSIN GRADES6-7

2021 ◽  
Vol 67 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Askarbekova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Secondary Education ◽  
General Education ◽  
Goal Setting ◽  
Personal Development ◽  
Learning Goals ◽  
Educational Standards ◽  
Research Skills ◽  
Research Competence ◽  
The World

This article examines the essence of the research abilities of students formed in elective classes in biology as a category and factor of personal development. The content of the curriculum in biology is also considered, and activities aimed at achieving learning goals that are related to the development of skills are included. In modern secondary education of Kazakhstan, modernization processes successfully implemented in recent years, is carried out with the aim of its integration into the world educational space and approximation to international educational standards on the approval of standard rules of activity by types of general education organizations for the purposeful formation of research skills of students, which is determined at the legislative level "Research competence in the classification of A.V. Khutorsky is considered as an integral part of cognitive competence, which includes elements of methodological, supra-subject, logical activities, methods of organizing goal-setting, planning, analysis, reflection.

scholarly journals The most important things I have learnt in my career as a psychiatrist

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-55
Author(s):  
Julian Leff
Keyword(s):  
Psychiatric Symptoms ◽  
Clinical Work ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Dropping Out ◽  
Solid Base ◽  
Careful Observation ◽  
Somatic Condition ◽  
Research Activities

SummaryThis paper is something of a patchwork, incorporating many issues that have intrigued me during 34 years of research. I have included the importance of maintaining a solid base in clinical work, alongside research activities, and being alert to the possibility of a somatic condition contributing to psychiatric symptoms. I stress the value of careful observation of patients, their response to treatments and reasons for dropping out. In addition, I have included 14 more lessons, learned from my experience of research, which I hope will be of use to those readers who aspire to become researchers.

Online Learning, Innovation and Knowledge Management

2000 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 327-339
Author(s):  
Ian Roffe
Keyword(s):  
Professional Development ◽  
Knowledge Management ◽  
Online Learning ◽  
Personal Development ◽  
Development Planning ◽  
Educational Institutions ◽  
Staff Appraisal ◽  
Curriculum Vitae ◽  
Optimum Response ◽  
Professional Self

Online learning, innovation and knowledge management are examined as emerging tools for both enterprises and educational organizations. The value of developing intellectual capital is highlighted, as are the conceptual and practical issues for developing expertise. The author argues that educational institutions have certain inherent advantages and some disadvantages for the professional development of their employees, and that the optimum response lies in the integration of well tested techniques: self-profiling, personal development planning, the development of an individual curriculum vitae and systematic staff appraisal. To secure support for development, it is suggested that the focus for professional self-development should be on building competencies that are aligned with the institutional or industrial need, since this will bring the organization key benefits such as more students, improved quality, greater financial contributions, etc. In those circumstances in which support is not achievable, the opportunities offered by access to the Internet mean that professional development can continue through online learning and electronic networking.

scholarly journals Getting the measure of reflection: considering matters of definition and depth

2007 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 191-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenny Moon
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Professional Development ◽  
Personal Development ◽  
Development Planning ◽  
Reflective Writing ◽  
Reflective Learning ◽  
Simple Description ◽  
Reflective Process ◽  
Generic Framework ◽  
Definition Of

AbstractReflection, reflective learning, reflective writing and reflective practice are used increasingly in higher education and professional development–but we do not work to one definition and there are considerable differences in the views of educationists on issues of definition. Such discrepancies can exist between the staff working with the same student group. The situation can lead to difficulties in indicating to students how to reflect, and what reflective writing ‘should look like’. Once students do manage to represent their reflection broadly in the required manner (usually writing), there is frequently observed to be a further problem because their reflection is superficial and descriptive. A consequence is that their learning from the reflective process is restricted.This paper addresses the issue of definition of reflection initially through clarifying the different words used around the notion of reflection (e.g., reflection, reflective learning, reflective writing) and providing some suggested definitions. It then addresses the matters both of how we should help students to start with reflection, and with the problem of the superficiality of much of their work. The ‘depth’ of reflection is a concept that has not been much discussed in the literature of reflection and yet it seems to be closely related to the quality of reflective work. The paper discusses the concept of depth and then introduces a style of exercise in which a scenario is reproduced at progressively deeper levels of reflection. The exercise is related to a generic framework for reflective writing. The rationale and justification for the exercise and the framework are discussed and suggestions are made for its manner of use. The exercise and the generic framework for reflective writing are in Appendices 1 and 2.The use of reflection to enhance formal learning has become increasingly common in the past 7 years. From the principle beginnings of its use in the professional development of nurses and teachers, its use has spread through other professions. Now, in the form of personal development planning (PDP), there is an expectation that all students in higher education will be deliberately engaging in reflection in the next 2 years.1 In addition, there are examples of the use of reflective learning journals and other reflective techniques in most, if not all, disciplines.2Reflection is not, however, a clearly defined and enacted concept. People hold different views of its nature, which only become revealed at stages such as assessment. For example, what is it that differentiates reflective writing from simple description? There are difficulties not only with the definition itself but also in conveying to learners what it is that we require them to do in reflection and in encouraging reflection that is deeper than description. In this paper, we consider some issues of definition and then focus on the means of encouraging learners to produce a reflective output of good-enough quality for the task at hand. The latter is presented as an exercise for staff and learners (Appendix 1) with a framework that underpins it (Appendix 2).

scholarly journals СОВРЕМЕННЫЕ ТРЕБОВАНИЯ К ОРГАНИЗАЦИИ СОВМЕСТНОЙ ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛЬНОЙ ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТИ В УСЛОВИЯХ ДОШКОЛЬНОГО ОБРАЗОВАНИЯ: НЕОБХОДИМОСТЬ И РЕАЛЬНОСТЬ

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatyana Tokareva
Keyword(s):  
Personal Development ◽  
Preschool Education ◽  
Educational Programs ◽  
Federal State ◽  
Joint Activities ◽  
Educational Standard ◽  
Research Activities ◽  
Open Joint ◽  
Questionnaire Surveys ◽  
State Educational

Описана проблема готовности педагогов дошкольных образовательных организаций к работе по новому федеральному государственному образовательному стандарту дошкольного образования, который уделяет большое внимание организации совместной образовательной деятельности педагога с детьми. Приведены результаты двух анкетных опросов воспитателей детских садов, в процессе которых выяснилось следующее: во-первых, уровень вовлеченности педагогов в разработку образовательных программ; во-вторых, понимание ими результатов дошкольного образования; в-третьих, определение приоритетных направлений развития ребенка-дошкольника. Обнаружено, что большинство педагогов занимают исполнительскую позицию в отношении образовательных программ, акцентированы не на личностном развитии ребенка, а на формировании у него знаний, умений и навыков, недооценивают ценность игры и исследовательской деятельности для детского развития. Описаны реальные образовательные ситуации организации совместной деятельности педагога с детьми, иллюстрирующие, что педагоги не всегда понимают, как сделать ребенка активным участником взаимодействия со взрослым и как уйти от тотального использования авторитарной модели совместной деятельности в сторону лидерства и партнерства. Делается вывод о том, что существует взаимосвязь между уровнем методического сопровождения в дошкольном образовательном учреждении, в том числе позицией старшего воспитателя, и умением педагога организовывать образовательные ситуации обращенного и открытого совместного действия с детьми.The article raises the problem of the readiness of teachers of preschool educational organizations to work on the new Federal State Educational Standard, which pays great attention to the organization of the joint educational activities of a teacher with children. The results of two questionnaire surveys of kindergarten teachers are given, in the course of which it was found out, firstly, the level of the involvement of teachers in the development of educational programs, secondly, their understanding of the results of preschool education, and thirdly, the identification of priority areas for the development of a preschool child. It was found that the majority of teachers take an executive position in relation to educational programs, they are focused not on the personal development of children, but on the formation of their knowledge, skills, teachers underestimate the value of the game and research activities for children’s development. Real educational situations of the organization of the teacher’s joint activities with children are described, illustrating that teachers do not always understand how to make a child an active participant in interacting with an adult and how to get away from the total use of the authoritarian model of joint activity towards leadership and partnership. It is concluded that there is a relationship between the level of the methodological support in the kindergarten, including the position of the senior educator, and the ability of the teacher to organize educational situations of reversed and open joint action with children.

scholarly journals Improved levels of critical reflection in Pharmacy Technician student work-placement assessments through emphasising graduate attributes

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Julie Dunne
Keyword(s):  
Research Group ◽  
Personal Development ◽  
Critical Reflection ◽  
Reflective Writing ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Graduate Attributes ◽  
Pharmacy Technician ◽  
Work Placement ◽  
The Impact

This study investigated the effect of activities to promote awareness of specific prioritised graduate attributes on the quality of reflection displayed in work-placement reflective blog assessments for Pharmacy-technician students. Previous related research showed an increased tendency to frame placement experiences in terms of graduate attributes when they are made more explicit in the curriculum. Now, a thematic analysis of reflective writing from control and research groups, using a priori codes of ‘reflection’ and ‘graduate attributes’ explored the impact on the depth of critical reflection, and its relationship to explicit discussion of graduate attributes. The findings show an improvement in the quality of reflection, with significantly higher levels of critical reflection in the research group (37%), compared to the control group (20%), and lower levels of the non-reflective categories of thinking such as thoughtful action. Furthermore, in 62% of research group cases, there is overlap between critical reflection references and explicit graduate attributes references. Overall, the quality of reflective writing has improved through framing experiences in terms both of graduate attributes, as well as core theoretical knowledge, leading to increased focus on personal development and consequences for future action.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document