Air velocity influences thermoregulation and endurance exercise capacity in the heat

2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hidenori Otani ◽  
Mitsuharu Kaya ◽  
Akira Tamaki ◽  
Phillip Watson ◽  
Ronald J. Maughan
Keyword(s):  
Skin Temperature ◽  
Heat Loss ◽  
Exercise Capacity ◽  
Core Temperature ◽  
Endurance Exercise ◽  
Temperature Rise ◽  
Time To Exhaustion ◽  
Evaporative Heat Loss ◽  
Air Velocity ◽  
Hot Environment

This study examined the effects of variations in air velocity on time to exhaustion and thermoregulatory and perceptual responses to exercise in a hot environment. Eight male volunteers completed stationary cycle exercise trials at 70% peak oxygen uptake until exhaustion in an environmental chamber maintained at 30 °C and 50% relative humidity. Four air velocity conditions, 30, 20, 10, and 0 km/h, were tested, and the headwind was directed at the frontal aspect of the subject by 2 industrial fans, with blade diameters of 1 m and 0.5 m, set in series and positioned 3 m from the subject’s chest. Mean ± SD time to exhaustion was 90 ± 17, 73 ± 16, 58 ± 13, and 41 ± 10 min in 30-, 20-, 10-, and 0-km/h trials, respectively, and was different between all trials (P < 0.05). There were progressive elevations in the rate of core temperature rise, mean skin temperature, and perceived thermal sensation as airflow decreases (P < 0.05). Core temperature, heart rate, cutaneous vascular conductance, and perceived exertion were higher and evaporative heat loss was lower without airflow than at any given airflow (P < 0.05). Dry heat loss and plasma volume were similar between trials (P > 0.05). The present study demonstrated a progressive reduction in time to exhaustion as air velocity decreases. This response is associated with a faster rate of core temperature rise and a higher skin temperature and perceived thermal stress with decreasing airflow. Moreover, airflow greater than 10 km/h (2.8 m/s) might contribute to enhancing endurance exercise capacity and reducing thermoregulatory, cardiovascular, and perceptual strain during exercise in a hot environment.

No dynamic effector responses to fast changes of core temperature at constant skin temperature

1987 ◽  
Vol 65 (6) ◽  
pp. 1339-1346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrike Roos ◽  
Claus Jessen
Keyword(s):  
Skin Temperature ◽  
Heat Loss ◽  
Core Temperature ◽  
Heat Production ◽  
Control Level ◽  
Time Derivative ◽  
Rate Of Change ◽  
Dynamic Responses ◽  
Evaporative Heat Loss ◽  
Blood Temperature

Experiments in conscious goats were done to see whether heat production and respiratory evaporative heat loss show dynamic responses to changing core temperature at constant skin temperature. Core temperature was altered by external heat exchangers acting on blood temperature, while skin temperature was maintained constant by immersing the animals up to the neck in a rapidly circulating water bath. Core temperature was altered at various rates up to 0.9 °C/min. Step deviations of core temperature from control values were always followed by a positive time derivative of effector response, but never by a negative time derivative during sustained displacement of core temperature. Ramp experiments showed that the slopes at which heat production or heat loss rose with core temperature deviating from its control level grew smaller at higher rates of change of core temperature. It is concluded that neither heat production nor respiratory evaporative heat loss respond to the rate of change of core temperature. At constant skin temperature, thermoregulatory effector responses appear to be proportional to the degree to which core temperature deviates from its set level.

Effects of solar radiation on endurance exercise capacity in a hot environment

2016 ◽  
Vol 116 (4) ◽  
pp. 769-779 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hidenori Otani ◽  
Mitsuharu Kaya ◽  
Akira Tamaki ◽  
Phillip Watson ◽  
Ronald J. Maughan
Keyword(s):  
Solar Radiation ◽  
Exercise Capacity ◽  
Endurance Exercise ◽  
Hot Environment

scholarly journals Thermal behavior alleviates thermal discomfort during steady-state exercise without affecting whole body heat loss

2019 ◽  
Vol 127 (4) ◽  
pp. 984-994 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole T. Vargas ◽  
Christopher L. Chapman ◽  
Blair D. Johnson ◽  
Rob Gathercole ◽  
Matthew N. Cramer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Light Intensity ◽  
Thermal Behavior ◽  
Skin Temperature ◽  
Heat Loss ◽  
Core Temperature ◽  
Upper Body ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Mean Skin Temperature ◽  
Thermal Discomfort ◽  
Body Heat

We tested the hypothesis that thermal behavior resulting in reductions in mean skin temperature alleviates thermal discomfort and mitigates the rise in core temperature during light-intensity exercise. In a 27 ± 0°C, 48 ± 6% relative humidity environment, 12 healthy subjects (6 men, 6 women) completed 60 min of recumbent cycling. In both trials, subjects wore a water-perfused suit top continually perfusing 34 ± 0°C water. In the behavior trial, subjects maintained their upper body thermally comfortable by pressing a button to perfuse cool water (2.2 ± 0.5°C) through the top for 2 min per button press. Metabolic heat production (control: 404 ± 52 W, behavior: 397 ± 65 W; P = 0.44) was similar between trials. Mean skin temperature was reduced in the behavior trial (by −2.1 ± 1.8°C, P < 0.01) because of voluntary reductions in water-perfused top temperature ( P < 0.01). Whole body ( P = 0.02) and local sweat rates were lower in the behavior trial ( P ≤ 0.05). Absolute core temperature was similar ( P ≥ 0.30); however, the change in core temperature was greater in the behavior trial after 40 min of exercise ( P ≤ 0.03). Partitional calorimetry did not reveal any differences in cumulative heat storage (control: 554 ± 229, behavior: 544 ± 283 kJ; P = 0.90). Thermal behavior alleviated whole body thermal discomfort during exercise (by −1.17 ± 0.40 arbitrary units, P < 0.01). Despite lower evaporative cooling in the behavior trial, similar heat loss was achieved by voluntarily employing convective cooling. Therefore, thermal behavior resulting in large reductions in skin temperature is effective at alleviating thermal discomfort during exercise without affecting whole body heat loss. NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of thermal behavior in maintaining thermal comfort during exercise by allowing subjects to voluntarily cool their torso and upper limbs with 2°C water throughout a light-intensity exercise protocol. We show that voluntary cooling of the upper body alleviates thermal discomfort while maintaining heat balance through convective rather than evaporative means of heat loss.

Heat loss responses in rats acclimated to heat loaded intermittently

1990 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Shido ◽  
T. Nagasaka
Keyword(s):  
Skin Temperature ◽  
Heat Loss ◽  
Core Temperature ◽  
Thermal Conductance ◽  
Heat Acclimation ◽  
The Body ◽  
Body Core Temperature ◽  
Acclimation Temperature ◽  
Hypothalamic Temperature ◽  
Direct Body

The present study examined the heat loss response of heat-acclimated rats to direct body heating with an intraperitoneal heater or to indirect warming by elevating the ambient temperature (Ta). The heat acclimation of the rats was attained through exposure to Ta of 33 or 36 degrees C for 5 h daily during 15 consecutive days. Control rats were kept at Ta of 24 degrees C for the same acclimation period. Heat acclimation lowered the body core temperature at Ta of 24 degrees C, and the core temperature level was lowered as acclimation temperature increased. When heat was applied by direct body heating, the threshold hypothalamic temperature (Thy) for the tail skin vasodilation was also lower in heat-acclimated rats than in the control rats. However, the amount of increase in Thy from the resting level to the threshold was the same in all three groups. When heat was applied by indirect warming, threshold Thy was slightly higher in heat-acclimated than in control rats. The amount of increase in Thy from the resting level to the threshold was significantly greater in heat-acclimated rats. In addition, Ta and the skin temperature at the onset of skin vasodilation were significantly higher in heat-acclimated rats. The results indicate that heat-acclimated rats were less sensitive to the increase in skin temperature in terms of threshold Thy. The gain constant of nonevaporative heat loss response was assessed by plotting total thermal conductance against Thy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

scholarly journals Thermal Behavior Augments Heat Loss Following Low Intensity Exercise

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole T. Vargas ◽  
Christopher L. Chapman ◽  
Blair D. Johnson ◽  
Rob Gathercole ◽  
Matthew N. Cramer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Thermal Behavior ◽  
Skin Temperature ◽  
Heat Loss ◽  
Core Temperature ◽  
Sweat Rate ◽  
Upper Body ◽  
Mean Skin Temperature ◽  
Thermal Discomfort ◽  
Low Intensity ◽  
Low Intensity Exercise

We tested the hypothesis that thermal behavior alleviates thermal discomfort and accelerates core temperature recovery following low intensity exercise. Methods: In a 27 ± 0 °C, 48 ± 6% relative humidity environment, 12 healthy subjects (six females) completed 60 min of exercise followed by 90 min of seated recovery on two occasions. Subjects wore a suit top perfusing 34 ± 0 °C water during exercise. In the control trial, this water continually perfused throughout recovery. In the behavior trial, the upper body was maintained thermally comfortable by pressing a button to receive cool water (3 ± 2 °C) perfusing through the top for 2 min per button press. Results: Physiological variables (core temperature, p ≥ 0.18; mean skin temperature, p = 0.99; skin wettedness, p ≥ 0.09; forearm skin blood flow, p = 0.29 and local axilla sweat rate, p = 0.99) did not differ between trials during exercise. Following exercise, mean skin temperature decreased in the behavior trial in the first 10 min (by −0.5 ± 0.7 °C, p < 0.01) and upper body skin temperature was reduced until 70 min into recovery (by 1.8 ± 1.4 °C, p < 0.05). Core temperature recovered to pre-exercise levels 17 ± 31 min faster (p = 0.02) in the behavior trial. There were no differences in skin blood flow or local sweat rate between conditions during recovery (p ≥ 0.05). Whole-body thermal discomfort was reduced (by −0.4 ± 0.5 a.u.) in the behavior trial compared to the control trial within the first 20 min of recovery (p ≤ 0.02). Thermal behavior via upper body cooling resulted in augmented cumulative heat loss within the first 30 min of recovery (Behavior: 288 ± 92 kJ; Control: 160 ± 44 kJ, p = 0.02). Conclusions: Engaging in thermal behavior that results in large reductions in mean skin temperature following exercise accelerates the recovery of core temperature and alleviates thermal discomfort by promoting heat loss.

Temperature regulation by hypothalamic proportional control with an adjustable set point

1963 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 1146-1154 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. T. Hammel ◽  
D. C. Jackson ◽  
J. A. J. Stolwijk ◽  
J. D. Hardy ◽  
S. B. Stromme
Keyword(s):  
Heat Loss ◽  
Core Temperature ◽  
Temperature Regulation ◽  
Thermal Response ◽  
Hypothalamic Temperature ◽  
Set Point ◽  
Cold Environments ◽  
Hot Environment ◽  
Skin Temperatures

The role of the hypothalamic and skin temperatures in controlling the thermal response of a resting animal was studied by measurements of 1) hypothalamic, rectal, ear skin, and trunk skin temperatures on the resting dog and rhesus monkey in hot, neutral, and cold environments; and 2) the thermal and metabolic responses of a dog in neutral and cold environments during and immediately after holding the hypothalamus at approximately 39.0 C by means of six thermodes surrounding the hypothalamus and perfused with water. The results indicate that 1) a resting animal shivers in a cold environment with the same or higher hypothalamic temperature as the same animal in a neutral environment; 2) a resting animal pants in a hot environment with the same or lower hypothalamic temperature as the same animal in a neutral environment; 3) the hypothalamus is nonetheless strongly responsive to an increase or decrease of 1 C; 4) the rate of heat loss increases at the onset of sleep while the hypothalamic temperature is falling; 5) the hypothalamic temperature is 1–2 C lower during sleep even though thermoregulatory responses are the same as when awake; 6) the rate of heat loss decreases upon awakening while the hypothalamic temperature is rising. The discussion of these results includes a suggestion that the set point for temperature regulation is 1) decreased by a rising or elevated skin and extrahypothalamic core temperature, 2) increased by a falling or lowered skin and extrahypothalamic core temperature, 3) decreased upon entering and during sleep and is increased upon awakening. hypothalamic temperature; temperature set point; hypothalamic stimulation; dog temperature regulation; monkey temperature regulation Submitted on October 15, 1962

scholarly journals Yeast culture increased plasma niacin concentration, evaporative heat loss, and feed efficiency of dairy cows in a hot environment

2018 ◽  
Vol 101 (7) ◽  
pp. 5924-5936 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia D.L. Dias ◽  
Rayana B. Silva ◽  
Tatiane Fernandes ◽  
Eugenio F. Barbosa ◽  
Larissa E.C. Graças ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dairy Cows ◽  
Heat Loss ◽  
Feed Efficiency ◽  
Evaporative Heat Loss ◽  
Yeast Culture ◽  
Hot Environment

Exercise-rest cycles do not alter local and whole body heat loss responses

2011 ◽  
Vol 300 (4) ◽  
pp. R958-R968 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Gagnon ◽  
Glen P. Kenny
Keyword(s):  
Heat Loss ◽  
Core Temperature ◽  
Intermittent Exercise ◽  
Sweat Rate ◽  
Heat Content ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Evaporative Heat Loss ◽  
Esophageal Temperature ◽  
Direct Calorimetry ◽  
Body Heat

Previous studies have suggested that greater core temperatures during intermittent exercise (Ex) are due to attenuated sweating [upper back sweat rate (SR)] and skin blood flow (SkBF) responses. We evaluated the hypothesis that heat loss is not altered during exercise-rest cycles (ER). Ten male participants randomly performed four 120-min trials: 1) 60-min Ex and 60-min recovery (60ER); 2) 3 × 20-min Ex separated by 20-min recoveries (20ER); 3) 6 × 10-min Ex separated by 10-min recoveries (10ER), or 4) 12 × 5-min Ex separated by 5-min recoveries (5ER). Exercise was performed at a workload of 130 W at 35°C. Whole body heat exchange was determined by direct calorimetry. Core temperature, SR (by ventilated capsule), and SkBF (by laser-doppler) were measured continuously. Evaporative heat loss (EHL) progressively increased with each ER, such that it was significantly greater ( P ≤ 0.05) at the end of the last compared with the first Ex for 5ER (299 ± 39 vs. 440 ± 41 W), 10ER (425 ± 51 vs. 519 ± 45 W), and 20ER (515 ± 63 vs. 575 ± 74 W). The slope of the EHL response against esophageal temperature significantly increased from the first to the last Ex within the 10ER (376 ± 56 vs. 445 ± 89 W/°C, P ≤ 0.05) and 20ER (535 ± 85 vs. 588 ± 28 W/°C, P ≤ 0.05) conditions, but not during 5ER (296 ± 96 W/°C vs. 278 ± 95 W/°C, P = 0.237). In contrast, the slope of the SkBF response against esophageal temperature did not significantly change from the first to the last Ex (5ER: 51 ± 23 vs. 54 ± 19%/°C, P = 0.848; 10ER: 53 ± 8 vs. 56 ± 21%/°C, P = 0.786; 20ER: 44 ± 20 vs. 50 ± 27%/°C, P = 0.432). Overall, no differences in body heat content and core temperature were observed. These results suggest that altered local and whole body heat loss responses do not explain the previously observed greater core temperatures during intermittent exercise.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document