Limit States Design—An Innovation in Design Standards for Steel Structures

1974 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. Laurie Kennedy
Keyword(s):  
Design Method ◽  
Steel Structures ◽  
Probability Of Failure ◽  
Simple Design ◽  
Design Standards ◽  
Limit States ◽  
Working Stress ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Ultimate Resistance ◽  
Two Sides

The greater rationality of limit states design as compared to working stress design is developed to show that limit states design leads to a more consistent probability of failure and that neither overly safe and therefore uneconomic structures nor structures with insufficient safety should result from this design methodology.This rationality is extended in the limit states design method in that the performance of the structure and its components is checked against the various limit states at the appropriate load levels. Thus the limit states of serviceability are checked at specified load levels and of strength and stability at the factored load levels.Functions are presented for the two sides of the inequality:[Formula: see text]A comparative design of a 20-storey structure selected to provide a wide range of variables shows that limit states design as proposed results in a structure comparable to that designed by working stress method with a moderate saving in the weight of steel. Some simple design examples are worked out to show the basic similarities between working stress design and limit states design and that the two methods are of about equal complexity or simplicity. It is believed, because the designer will have to check the ultimate resistance against the effect of the factored loads, that he will develop a greater awareness of the behavior of the material and members with which he is working.

Target Reliability Levels for Pipeline Limit States Design

1996 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. J. E. Zimmerman ◽  
Q. Chen ◽  
M. D. Pandey
Keyword(s):  
Reliability Analysis ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Design Method ◽  
Risk Level ◽  
Design Standards ◽  
Limit States ◽  
Working Stress ◽  
Partial Safety Factors ◽  
Pipeline Design ◽  
Design Factors

The limit states design appendix currently being developed for inclusion in the Canadian Standards Association pipeline design code, Z662, Oil and Gas Pipeline Systems contains preliminary partial safety factors that were selected on the basis that they result in designs similar to those produced using the existing working stress design standards. This paper suggests an approach for selecting partial factors for limit states design of pipelines based on formal reliability analysis. Such an approach recognizes that consistent safety levels can be achieved for different pipeline sections by varying the target reliability as a function of the severity of failure consequences, where consequences are measured in terms of public safety, economic costs, and damage to the environment. Where the consequences of failure are more severe, higher reliability is required. Where the consequences are less severe, lower reliability can be tolerated, with the same risk level being achieved. This paper reviews the limit states design method and discusses the selection of target reliability levels and the reliability analysis procedures used to calibrate partial design factors.

DESIGN OF BOLTED CONNECTIONS SUBJECT TO TORSION AND SHEAR IN THE ULTIMATE LIMIT STRESS STATE

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed S. Abu-Yosef ◽  
Ezzeldin Y. Sayed-Ahmed ◽  
Emam A. Soliman
Keyword(s):  
Failure Modes ◽  
Focal Point ◽  
Design Method ◽  
Limit State ◽  
Bending Moment ◽  
Steel Structures ◽  
Ultimate Limit State ◽  
Shear Forces ◽  
Limit States ◽  
Ultimate Limit

Steel connections transferring axial and shear forces in addition to bending moment and/or torsional moment are widely used in steel structures. Thus, design of such eccentric connections has become the focal point of any researches. Nonetheless, behavior of eccentric connections subjected to shear forces and torsion in the ultimate limit state is still ambiguous. Most design codes of practice still conservatively use the common elastic analysis for design of the said connections even in the ultimate limit states. Yet, there are some exceptions such as the design method proposed by CAN/CSA-S16-14 which gives tabulated design aid for the ultimate limit state design of these connections based on an empirical equation that is derived for ¾ inch diameter A325 bearing type bolts and A36 steel plates. It was argued that results can also be used with a margin of error for other grade bolts of different sizes and steel of other grades. As such, in this paper, the performance of bolted connection subject to shear and torsion is experimentally investigated. The behavior, failure modes and factors affecting both are scrutinized. Twelve connections subject to shear and torsion with different bolts configurations and diameters are experimentally tested to failure. The accuracy of the currently available design equations proposed is compared to the outcomes of these tests.

Partial and total factors of safety in anchored sheet pile design

1991 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 812-817 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. J. Valsangkar ◽  
A. B. Schriver
Keyword(s):  
Design Method ◽  
Water Pressure ◽  
Design Approach ◽  
Foundation Engineering ◽  
Sheet Pile ◽  
Depth Of Penetration ◽  
Limit States ◽  
Working Stress ◽  
Conventional Methods ◽  
Sheet Pile Wall

Recently, the limit states design approach has been recommended in geotechnical design. The Canadian Foundation Engineering Manual (1985) details the new approach for design of foundations, slopes, and retaining structures. Some recent research has indicated that the use of the limit states design approach leads to conservative designs when compared with conventional methods of design. Results of a parametric study are presented in this paper. The study investigated the influence of sheet pile wall geometry, type of water-pressure distribution considered, and different methods of analysis on the required depth of penetration of an anchored sheet pile wall. Modifications are suggested to make the new design method compatible with the conventional methods of design. Key words: factor of safety, working stress design, ultimate limit states design, anchored sheet pile wall.

Slenderness ratio of main members between interconnectors of built-up compression members

1996 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 1295-1304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Murray C. Temple ◽  
Ghada M. Elmahdy
Keyword(s):  
Slenderness Ratio ◽  
Steel Structures ◽  
Imperfection Sensitivity ◽  
Design Standards ◽  
Limit States ◽  
Compression Members ◽  
Equivalent Slenderness Ratio ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Compressive Resistance ◽  
Steel Design

Many steel design standards, including CAN/CSA-S16.1-M89 "Limit states design of steel structures," specify maximum slenderness ratios for the individual main members between the interconnectors of built-up compression members. Previous research on which these requirements are based is reviewed. It is shown that the imperfection sensitivity due to coupled instabilities is measured from bifurcation critical loads. However, steel standards are based on a compressive resistance determined for a member with an initial out-of-straightness and a suitable residual stress pattern. It is shown that the use of an equivalent slenderness ratio equation is sufficient to predict the compressive resistance of these built-up members. Further restrictions on the slenderness ratio of built-up members between interconnectors are not warranted. Thus, the elimination of these requirements from S16.1-94 is justified. Key words: built-up members, codes, compressive resistance, coupled instabilities, equivalent slenderness ratio, interconnectors.

Limit States Design and Assessment of Onshore Pipelines

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maher Nessim
Keyword(s):  
Natural Gas ◽  
Development Stage ◽  
Simple Design ◽  
Safety Factors ◽  
Limit States ◽  
Natural Gas Pipelines ◽  
Reliability Based Design ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Assessment Standard ◽  
Expected Outcomes

In 2005, guidelines for the application of reliability-based design and assessment (RBDA) to natural gas pipelines were developed under PRCI sponsorship. The methodology underlying these guidelines has since been adopted as a non-mandatory Annex in the CSA Z662 standard (Annex O). The benefits of reliability-based methods include consistent safety levels, optimized solutions that make best use of available resources and flexibility in addressing non-standard problems. The key limitations of the methodology are that it requires specialized expertise, good data and a significant analysis effort. One approach that has been successfully used to simplify the application of reliability-based methods is to develop simple design and assessment rules that are designed to meet specified safety levels. In this approach, which is referred to here as limit states design and assessment, the checking rules incorporate safety factors that are “calibrated” to meet pre-selected reliability targets, within a specified tolerance, over a wide range of possible design and assessment cases. Probabilistic analyses are performed as part of the development stage, but the resulting checks are deterministic. The basic elements required to calibrate limit states design and assessment checks have been developed as part of the RBDA methodology, making the development of a limit states approach feasible. This paper provides an overview of an ongoing Joint Industry Project to develop a limit states design and assessment standard that addresses the key threats to the safety of onshore pipelines. The benefits and limitations of this approach are discussed in comparison to the full RBDA approach, and the expected outcomes of the project are described.

scholarly journals Limit states design of antenna towers

1994 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 913-923 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yohanna M. F. Wahba ◽  
Murty K. S. Madugula ◽  
Gerard R. Monforton
Keyword(s):  
Direct Interaction ◽  
Steel Structures ◽  
Ice Accretion ◽  
Structural Behaviour ◽  
Limit States ◽  
Working Stress ◽  
Load Factors ◽  
Partial Load ◽  
Wind Pressures ◽  
Supporting Structures

The Canadian Standard CAN/CSA-S37-M86 “Antennas, towers and antenna supporting structures” follows a quasi-limit states approach in which the member forces determined for specified loads are multiplied by a unified factor and compared with factored resistances given in CAN3-S16.1-M84. This results in designs basically the same as those resulting from a working stress design with a factor of safety of 5/3. Such structures exhibit a non-linear structural behaviour even under service loads. Thus the effect of ice accretion and direct interaction between wind and ice does not permit the load factors specified in CAN/CSA-S16.1-M89 “Limit states design of steel structures” to be directly applied to antenna supporting structures.In this study, 41 different towers (representing various heights and designed for different ice classes and wind pressures) were analyzed under specified loads and then under a set of factored loads. From the comparison of the design forces in the towers with those calculated according to the existing standard, a set of partial load factors was derived. The new load factors to be used in the 1993 edition of S37 are presented and justified. Key words: antenna towers, guyed towers, ice and wind loads, limit states design, self-supporting towers, working stress design.

Developments in the design of welded HSS truss joints with RHS chords

1983 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 92-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey A. Packer
Keyword(s):  
Design Method ◽  
Simple Procedure ◽  
Steel Structures ◽  
Design Code ◽  
Limit States ◽  
Hollow Section ◽  
Recent Developments

Recent developments in design proposals for rectangular hollow section truss joints are reviewed for statically loaded, single chord, planar truss connections having one compression bracing member and one tension bracing member welded to the chord face, with either a small gap or an overlap at the connection. After comparison with the results of many joint tests, undertaken both in isolation and in complete trusses in other countries, a relatively simple procedure for the design of such joints is advocated. The design method is presented in a format compatible with the Canadian Standards Association Limit States Design Code for Steel Structures.

DOMEX 550MC

Alloy Digest ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Properties ◽  
Hsla Steel ◽  
Steel Structures ◽  
High Strength ◽  
Heat Treating ◽  
Bend Strength ◽  
Cold Forming ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Hot Rolled ◽  
Earthmoving Machines

Abstract Domex 550MC is a hot-rolled, high-strength low-alloy (HSLA) steel for cold forming operations. It is available in thicknesses of 2.00-12.80 mm. The alloy meets or exceeds the requirements of S550MC in EN 10149-2. Applications include a wide range of fabricated components and steel structures, including truck chassis, crane booms, and earthmoving machines. This datasheet provides information on composition, physical properties, tensile properties, and bend strength as well as fatigue. It also includes information on forming, heat treating, and joining. Filing Code: SA-594. Producer or source: SSAB Swedish Steel Inc.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document