scholarly journals Applications of the Schwarzschild–Finsler–Randers model

2021 ◽  
Vol 81 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Kapsabelis ◽  
A. Triantafyllopoulos ◽  
S. Basilakos ◽  
P. C. Stavrinos
Keyword(s):  
General Relativity ◽  
Crucial Role ◽  
Lorentz Violation ◽  
Gravitational Redshift ◽  
Small Deviations

AbstractIn this article, we study further applications of the Schwarzschild–Finsler–Randers (SFR) model which was introduced in a previous work Triantafyllopoulos et al. (Eur Phys J C 80(12):1200, 2020). In this model, we investigate curvatures and the generalized Kretschmann invariant which plays a crucial role for singularities. In addition, the derived path equations are used for the gravitational redshift of the SFR-model and these are compared with the GR model. Finally, we get some results for different values of parameters of the generalized photonsphere of the SFR-model and we find small deviations from the classical results of general relativity (GR) which may be ought to the possible Lorentz violation effects.

The Equivalence Principle

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M. Wittman
Keyword(s):  
General Relativity ◽  
Special Relativity ◽  
Equivalence Principle ◽  
Time Dilation ◽  
Gravitational Redshift ◽  
Coordinate Systems ◽  
Spacetime Metric

The equivalence principle is an important thinking tool to bootstrap our thinking from the inertial coordinate systems of special relativity to the more complex coordinate systems that must be used in the presence of gravity (general relativity). The equivalence principle posits that at a given event gravity accelerates everything equally, so gravity is equivalent to an accelerating coordinate system.This conjecture is well supported by precise experiments, so we explore the consequences in depth: gravity curves the trajectory of light as it does other projectiles; the effects of gravity disappear in a freely falling laboratory; and gravitymakes time runmore slowly in the basement than in the attic—a gravitational form of time dilation. We show how this is observable via gravitational redshift. Subsequent chapters will build on this to show how the spacetime metric varies with location.

All classical predictions of general relativity from special relativistic Hamiltonian dynamics

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (29) ◽  
pp. 1850169
Author(s):  
J. H. Field
Keyword(s):  
General Relativity ◽  
Euclidean Space ◽  
Hamiltonian Dynamics ◽  
Gravitational Redshift ◽  
Newtonian Mechanics ◽  
Light Deflection ◽  
Schwarzschild Metric ◽  
Related Literature ◽  
General Relativistic ◽  
Relativistic Hamiltonian Dynamics

Previous special relativistic calculations of gravitational redshift, light deflection and Shapiro delay are extended to include perigee advance. The three classical, order G, post-Newtonian predictions of general relativity as well as general relativistic light-speed-variation are therefore shown to be also consequences of special relativistic Newtonian mechanics in Euclidean space. The calculations are compared to general relativistic ones based on the Schwarzschild metric equation, and related literature is critically reviewed.

Red shift of photon frequency in the gravitational field

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin Tong Wang ◽  
Jiangdi Fan ◽  
Aaron X. Kan
Keyword(s):  
General Relativity ◽  
Quantum Mechanics ◽  
Gravitational Field ◽  
Gravitational Potential ◽  
Schrodinger Equation ◽  
Red Shift ◽  
Relativity Theory ◽  
Gravitational Redshift ◽  
General Relativity Theory ◽  
Photon Frequency

It has been well known that there is a redshift of photon frequency due to the gravitational potential. Scott et al. [Can. J. Phys. 44 (1966) 1639, https://doi.org/10.1139/p66-137 ] pointed out that general relativity theory predicts the gravitational redshift. However, using the quantum mechanics theory related to the photon Hamiltonian and photon Schrodinger equation, we calculate the redshift due to the gravitational potential. The result is exactly the same as that from the general relativity theory.

scholarly journals Modifications to Plane Gravitational Waves from Minimal Lorentz Violation

Symmetry ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 1318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui Xu
Keyword(s):  
General Relativity ◽  
Gravitational Wave ◽  
Gravitational Waves ◽  
Lorentz Invariance ◽  
Lorentz Violation ◽  
First Order ◽  
Test Particles ◽  
Violation Of Lorentz Invariance ◽  
Plane Gravitational Waves ◽  
Wave Modes

General Relativity predicts two modes for plane gravitational waves. When a tiny violation of Lorentz invariance occurs, the two gravitational wave modes are modified. We use perturbation theory to study the detailed form of the modifications to the two gravitational wave modes from the minimal Lorentz-violation coupling. The perturbation solution for the metric fluctuation up to the first order in Lorentz violation is discussed. Then, we investigate the motions of test particles under the influence of the plane gravitational waves with Lorentz violation. First-order deviations from the usual motions are found.

scholarly journals On galaxy rotation curves from a continuum mechanics approach to modified gravity

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (02) ◽  
pp. 1850007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian G. Böhmer ◽  
Nicola Tamanini ◽  
Matthew Wright
Keyword(s):  
General Relativity ◽  
Dark Matter ◽  
Continuum Mechanics ◽  
Modified Gravity ◽  
Galactic Rotation ◽  
Dark Matter Halos ◽  
Additional Structure ◽  
Rotation Curves ◽  
Small Deviations ◽  
Galaxy Rotation Curves

We consider a modification of General Relativity motivated by the treatment of anisotropies in Continuum Mechanics. The Newtonian limit of the theory is formulated and applied to galactic rotation curves. By assuming that the additional structure of spacetime behaves like a Newtonian gravitational potential for small deviations from isotropy, we are able to recover the Navarro–Frenk–White profile of dark matter halos by a suitable identification of constants. We consider the Burkert profile in the context of our model and also discuss rotation curves more generally.

scholarly journals Gravitational Redshifts and the Mass-Radius Relation

1989 ◽  
Vol 114 ◽  
pp. 401-407
Author(s):  
Gary Wegner
Keyword(s):  
General Relativity ◽  
Gravitational Field ◽  
Solar System ◽  
White Dwarf ◽  
Sufficient Accuracy ◽  
Gravitational Redshift ◽  
Principle Of Equivalence ◽  
Field Equations ◽  
Tests Of General Relativity ◽  
Gravitational Field Equations

The gravitational redshift is one of Einstein’s three original tests of General Relativity and derives from time’s slowing near a massive body. For velocities well below c, this is represented with sufficient accuracy by:As detailed by Will (1981), Schiff’s conjecture argues that the gravitational redshift actually tests the principle of equivalence rather than the gravitational field equations. For low redshifts, solar system tests give highest accuracy. LoPresto & Pierce (1986) have shown that the redshift at the Sun’s limb is good to about ±3%. Rocket experiments produce an accuracy of ±0.02% (Vessot et al. 1980), while for 40 Eri B the best white dwarf, the observed and predicted VRS agree to only about ±_5% (Wegner 1980).

scholarly journals Relativistic redshift of the star S0-2 orbiting the Galactic Center supermassive black hole

Science ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 365 (6454) ◽  
pp. 664-668 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tuan Do ◽  
Aurelien Hees ◽  
Andrea Ghez ◽  
Gregory D. Martinez ◽  
Devin S. Chu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
General Relativity ◽  
Black Hole ◽  
General Theory ◽  
Galactic Center ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Gravitational Redshift ◽  
Theory Of Relativity ◽  
General Theory Of Relativity ◽  
Supermassive Black Hole ◽  
Newtonian Model

The general theory of relativity predicts that a star passing close to a supermassive black hole should exhibit a relativistic redshift. In this study, we used observations of the Galactic Center star S0-2 to test this prediction. We combined existing spectroscopic and astrometric measurements from 1995–2017, which cover S0-2’s 16-year orbit, with measurements from March to September 2018, which cover three events during S0-2’s closest approach to the black hole. We detected a combination of special relativistic and gravitational redshift, quantified using the redshift parameter ϒ. Our result, ϒ = 0.88 ± 0.17, is consistent with general relativity (ϒ = 1) and excludes a Newtonian model (ϒ = 0) with a statistical significance of 5σ.

scholarly journals A Little Quantum Help for Cosmic Censorship and a Step Beyond All That

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Nikolaos Pappas
Keyword(s):  
General Relativity ◽  
Event Horizon ◽  
Crucial Role ◽  
Naked Singularity ◽  
Cosmic Censorship ◽  
Usual Sense ◽  
Naked Singularities ◽  
Open Question ◽  
Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle ◽  
The Universe

The hypothesis of cosmic censorship (CCH) plays a crucial role in classical general relativity, namely, to ensure that naked singularities would never emerge, since it predicts that whenever a singularity is formed an event horizon would always develop around it as well, to prevent the former from interacting directly with the rest of the Universe. Should this not be so, naked singularities could eventually form, in which case phenomena beyond our understanding and ability to predict could occur, since at the vicinity of the singularity both predictability and determinism break down even at the classical (e.g., nonquantum) level. More than 40 years after it was proposed, the validity of the hypothesis remains an open question. We reconsider CCH in both its weak and strong versions, concerning point-like singularities, with respect to the provisions of Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle. We argue that the shielding of the singularities from observers at infinity by an event horizon is also quantum mechanically favored, but ultimately it seems more appropriate to accept that singularities never actually form in the usual sense; thus no naked singularity danger exists in the first place.

Gravitational “Doppler Boosting / De-boosting” Effect within the Framework of General Relativity

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Zilberman ◽  
Keyword(s):  
General Relativity ◽  
Gravitational Field ◽  
Special Relativity ◽  
Spectral Index ◽  
Equivalence Principle ◽  
Relativistic Effect ◽  
Gravitational Redshift ◽  
Astronomical Observations ◽  
Complete Set ◽  
Einstein's Equivalence Principle

The “Doppler boosting / de-boosting” relativistic effect increases / decreases the apparent luminosity of approaching / receding sources of radiation. This effect was analyzed in detail within the Special Relativity framework and was confirmed in many astronomical observations. It is however not clear if “Doppler boosting / de-boosting” exists in the framework of General Relativity as well, and if it exists, which equations describe it. The “Einstein’s elevator” and Einstein’s “Equivalence principle” allow to obtain the formula for “Doppler boosting / de-boosting” for a uniform gravitational field within the vicinity of the emitter/receiver. Under these simplified conditions, the ratio ℳ between apparent (L) and intrinsic (Lo) luminosity can be conveniently represented using source’s spectral index α and gravitational redshift z as ℳ(z, α) ≡ L/Lo=(z+1)^(α-3). This is the first step towards the complete set of equations that describe the gravitational "Doppler boosting / de-boosting" effect within the General Relativity framework including radial gravitational field and arbitrary values of distance h between emitter and receiver.

scholarly journals Einstein's redshift derivations: its history from 1907 to 1921

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Mário Bacelar Valente
Keyword(s):  
General Relativity ◽  
Gravitational Redshift ◽  
Work In Progress ◽  
Interdependent Network ◽  
Conceptual Difficulties ◽  
Made In

Einstein's gravitational redshift derivation in his famous 1916 paper on general relativity seems to be problematic, being mired in what looks like conceptual difficulties or at least contradictions or gaps in his exposition.  Was this derivation a blunder? To answer this question, we will consider Einstein’s redshift derivations from his first one in 1907 to the 1921 derivation made in his Princeton lectures on relativity. This will enable to see the unfolding of an interdependent network of concepts and heuristic derivations in which previous ideas inform and condition later developments. The resulting derivations and views on coordinates and clocks are in fact not without inconsistencies. However, we can see these difficulties as an aspect of an evolving network understood as a “work in progress”.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document