The Statfjord Field, Blocks 33/9, 33/12 Norwegian sector, Blocks 211/24, 211/25 UK sector, Northern North Sea

2003 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 335-353 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. A. Gibbons ◽  
C. A. Jourdan ◽  
J. Hesthammer
Keyword(s):  
North Sea ◽  
Water Injection ◽  
Upper Jurassic ◽  
Lower Jurassic ◽  
Oil Field ◽  
Reservoir Properties ◽  
Water Alternating Gas ◽  
Net To Gross ◽  
Northern North Sea ◽  
Dipping Strata

AbstractThe Statfjord Field, the largest oil field in the Northern North Sea, straddles the Norway/UK boundary and is located on the southwestern part of the Tampen Spur within the East Shetland Basin. The accumulation is trapped in a 6-8° W-NW dipping rotated fault block comprised of Jurassic-Triassic strata sealed by Middle to Upper Jurassic and Cretaceous shalesReserves are located in three separate reservoirs: Middle Jurassic deltaic sediments of the Brent Group, Lower Jurassic marine-shelf sandstones and siltstones of the Dunlin Group; and Upper Triassic-lowermost Jurassic fluviatile sediments of the Statfjord Formation. The majority of reserves are contained within the Brent Group; and Statfjord Formation sediments which exhibit good to excellent reservoir properties with porosities ranging from 20-30% permeabilities ranging up to several darcies, and an average net-to-gross of 60-75%. The sandstones and siltstones of the Dunlin Group have poorer reservoir properties where the best reservoir unit exhibits an average porosity of 22%, an average permeability 300 raD and net-to-gross of 45%Structurally, the field is subdivided into a main field area characterized by relatively undeformed W-NW dipping strata, and a heavily deformed east flank area characterized by several phases of 'eastward' gravitational collapseProduction from the field commenced in 1979 and as of January 2000, 176 wells have been drilled. The oil is undersaturated and no natural gas-cap is present. The drainage strategy has been to develop the Brent and Dunlin Group reservoir with pressure maintenance using water injection and the Statfjord Formation reservoir by miscible gas flood. However, a strategy to improve recovery by implementing water alternating gas (WAG) methods is gradually being implemented for both the Brent and Statfjord reservoirs. Current estimates indicate that by 2015 a total of 666 x 106Sm3 (4192 MMBBL) of oil will be recovered and 75 GSm3 (2.66 TCF) gas will be exported from the field

The Murchison Field, Block 211/19a, UK North Sea

1991 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 165-173
Author(s):  
John Warrender
Keyword(s):  
North Sea ◽  
Middle Jurassic ◽  
Upper Jurassic ◽  
Lower Jurassic ◽  
Oil Field ◽  
Medium Size ◽  
Fault Block ◽  
International Boundary ◽  
Northern North Sea ◽  
The Uk

AbstractThe Murchison oil field forms part of the Brent oil province in the East Shetland Basin, northern North Sea. The field, which straddles the UK-Norway international boundary, was discovered in 1975 and began production with Conoco (UK) Ltd as Operator, in 1980. Like many oil accumulations in the East Shetland Basin the trap consists of a northwesterly dipping rotated fault block of Jurassic-Triassic age sourced and sealed by unconformable Upper Jurassic shales. The productive reservoir consists of Middle Jurassic Brent Group sandstones which represent the south to north progradation of a wave/tide influenced delta system. The Brent Group on Murchison has an average thickness of 425 ft with average porosities of 22% and permeabilities in the 500-1000 md range in producing zones. The maximum hydrocarbon column thickness is approximately 600 ft. The oil is undersaturated and no gas cap is present. Recoverable reserves are 340 MMBBL from a total oil in place figure of 790 MMBBL. Oil production which is via a single steel jacket platform peaked at 127 000 BOPD in 1983 and currently averages 45 000 BOPD. Economic field life is expected to be at least 20 years.The Murchison Field is located in the East Shetland Basin, northern North Sea at approximate latitude 61° 23' N, longitude 1° 43.5' E, 120 miles northeast of the Shetland Islands (Fig. 1). The field straddles the UK-Norway international boundary with the greater portion in the UK Block 21 l/19a and the lesser portion in Norway Block 33/9. Water depth is -512 ft BMSL. In the context of the North Sea the field is of medium size with an areal closure of approximately 7 square miles and contains 790 million barrels of oil in place. The productive reservoir consists of coastal deltaic sandstones of the Middle Jurassic Brent Group which lie between the marine shales of the Lower Jurassic Dunlin Group and the marine, organic-rich shales of the Upper Jurassic Humber Group. The trap is structural comprising a single, northwesterly dipping rotated fault block which has been sourced and sealed by the overlying Upper Jurassic shales. The field is named after the Scottish geologist Sir Roderick Impey Murchison (1792-1871), who is best known for his contribution to Palaeozoic stratigraphy.

The Emerald Field, Blocks 2/10a, 2/15a, 3/11b, UK North Sea

1991 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. M. Stewart ◽  
A. J. G. Faulkner
Keyword(s):  
North Sea ◽  
Water Injection ◽  
Maximum Flow ◽  
Oil Field ◽  
Injection Wells ◽  
Initial Development ◽  
Flexible Risers ◽  
Northern North Sea ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Gas Lift

AbstractThe Emerald Oil Field lies in Blocks 2/10a, 2/15a and 3/1 lb in the UK sector of the northern North Sea. The field is located on the 'Transitional Shelf, an area on the western flank of the Viking Graben, downfaulted from the East Shetland Platform. The first well was drilled on the structure in 1978. Subsequently, a further seven wells have been drilled to delineate the field.The Emerald Field is an elongate dip and fault closed structure subparallel to the local NW-SE regional structural trend. the 'Emerald Sandstone' forms the main reservoir of the field and comprises a homogeneous transgressive unit of Callovian to Bathonian age, undelain by tilted Precambrian and Devonian Basement Horst blocks. Sealing is provided by siltstones and shales of the overlying Healther and Kimmeridge Clay Formations. The reservoir lies at depths between 5150-5600 ft, and wells drilled to date have encountered pay thicknesses of 42-74 ft. Where the sandstone is hydrocarbon bearing, it has a 100% net/ gross ratio. Porosities average 28% and permeabilities lie in the range 0-1 to 1.3 darcies. Wireline and test data indicate that the field contains a continouous oil column of 200 ft. Three distinct structural culminations exist on and adjacent to the field, which give rise to three separate gas caps, centred around wells 2/10a-4, 2/10a-7 and 2/10a-6 The maximum flow rate achieved from the reservoir to date is 6822 BOPD of 24° API oil with a GOR of 300 SCF/STBBL. In-place hydrocarbons are estimated to be 216 MMBBL of oil and 61 BCF of gas, with an estimated 43 MMBBL of oil recoverable by the initial development plan. initial development drilling began in Spring 1989 and the development scheme will use a floating production system. Production to the facility, via flexible risers, is from seven pre-drilled deviated wells with gas lift. An additional four pre-drilled water injection wells will provide reservoir pressure support.

The Beryl Field, Block 9/13, UK North Sea

1991 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. A. Knutson ◽  
I. C. Munro
Keyword(s):  
North Sea ◽  
Middle Jurassic ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Upper Jurassic ◽  
Lower Jurassic ◽  
Gas Production ◽  
Upper Triassic ◽  
Oil Field ◽  
Oil And Gas Production ◽  
The North

AbstractThe Beryl Field, the sixth largest oil field in the UK sector of the North Sea, is located within Block 9/13 in the west-central part of the Viking Graben. The block was awarded in 1971 to a Mobil operated partnership and the 9/13-1 discovery well was drilled in 1972. The Beryl A platform was emplaced in 1975 and the Beryl B platform in 1983. To date, ninety-five wells have been drilled in the field, and drilling activity is anticipated into the mid-1990s.Commercial hydrocarbons occur in sandstone reservoirs ranging in age from Upper Triassic to Upper Jurassic. Structurally, the field consists of a NNE orientated horst in the Beryl A area and westward tilted fault blocks in the Beryl B area. The area is highly faulted and complicated by two major and four minor unconformities. The seal is provided by Upper Jurassic shales and Upper Cretaceous marls.There are three prospective sedimentary sections in the Beryl Field ranked in importance as follows: the Middle Jurassic coastal deltaic sediments, the Upper Triassic to Lower Jurassic continental and marine sediments, and the Upper Jurassic turbidites. The total ultimate recovery of the field is about 800 MMBBL oil and 1.6 TCF gas. As of December 1989, the field has produced nearly 430 MMBBL oil (primarily from the Middle Jurassic Beryl Formation), or about 50% of the ultimate recovery. Gas sales are scheduled to begin in the early 1990s. Oil and gas production is forecast until licence expiration in 2018.The Beryl Fields is located 215 miles northeast of Aberdeen, about 7 miles from the United Kingdom-Norwegian boundary. The field lies within Block 9/13 and covers and area of approximately 12 000 acres in water depths ranging from 350-400 ft. Block 9/13 contains several hydrocarbon-bearing structures, of which the Beryl Fields is the largest (Fig. 1). The field is subdivided into two producing areas: the Beryl Alpha area which includes the initial discovery well, and the Beryl Bravo area located to the north. The estimated of oil originally in place is 1400 MMBBL for Beryl A and 700 MMBBL for Beryl B. The fiel has combined gas in place of 2.8 TCF, consisting primarily of solution gas. Hydrocarbon accumulations occur in six reservoir horizons ranging in age from Upper Triassic to Upper Jurassic. The Middle Jurassic (Bathonian to Callovian) age Beryl Formation is the main reservoir unit and contains 78% of the total ultimate recovery.The field was named after Beryl Solomon, the wife of Charles Solomon, who was president of Mobil Europe in 1972 when the field was discovered. The satellite fields in Block 9/13 (Nevis, Ness and Linnhe) are named after Scottish lochs.

The Maureen Field, Block 16/29a, UK North Sea

1991 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 347-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. L. Cutts
Keyword(s):  
North Sea ◽  
Water Injection ◽  
Upper Jurassic ◽  
Reservoir Properties ◽  
Injection Wells ◽  
The North ◽  
Clay Shales ◽  
Gravity Flows ◽  
Production Wells ◽  
The Uk

AbstractThe Maureen Oilfield is located on a fault-bounded terrace in Block 16/29a of the UK Sector of the North Sea, at the intersection of the South Viking Graben and the eastern Witch Ground Graben. The field was discovered in late 1972 by the 16/29-1 well, and was confirmed by three further appraisal wells. The reservoir consists of submarine fan sandstones of the Palaeocene Maureen Formation, deposited by sediment gravity flows sourced from the East Shetland Platform. The Palaeocene sandstones, ranging from 140 to 400 ft in thickness, have good reservoir properties, with porosities ranging from 18-25% and permeabilities ranging from 30-3000 md. Hydrocarbons are trapped in a simple domal anticline, elongated NW-SE, which was formed at the Palaeocene level by Eocene/Oligocene-aged movement of underlying Permian salt. The reservoir sequence is sealed by Lista Formation claystones. Geochemical analysis suggests Upper Jurassic Kimmeridge Clay shales have been the source of Maureen hydrocarbons. Estimated recoverable reserves are 210 MMBBL. Twelve production wells have been drilled on the Maureen Field. A further seven water injection wells have been drilled to maintain reservoir pressure.

The Arbroath and Montrose Fields, Blocks 22/17, 18, UK North Sea

1991 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 211-217 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Crawford ◽  
R. W. Littlefair ◽  
L. G. Affleck
Keyword(s):  
North Sea ◽  
Water Injection ◽  
Oil Field ◽  
Mooring System ◽  
Submarine Fan ◽  
Recovery Mechanism ◽  
Average Porosity ◽  
Reservoir Sandstones ◽  
Northern North Sea ◽  
Commercial Oil

AbstractThe Arbroath Field was discovered by the Amoco operated group comprising Amoco (UK) Exploration Company, Gas Council (Exploration), Amerada Hess Ltd and Texas Eastern (UK) Ltd with the 22/18-1 well in May 1969 and was the first commercial oil field to be discovered in any sector of the northern North Sea. Two years later in 1971, the adjacent Montrose Field was discovered. Both Arbroath and Montrose are located 130 miles east of Aberdeen towards the northern end of the Central Graben area. The two fields have simple non-faulted, anticlinal structures separated by a structural saddle with only 15 ft of relief. The structures are a product of Alpine tectonism combined with differential compaction of the reservoir section. The hydrocarbons have a Kimmeridge Clay source and occur wholly within the Forties Sandstone interval. The oil is trapped by mudstones of the Sele Formation. The reservoir sandstones were deposited in a prograding submarine fan complex and have maintained an average porosity of 23% and a permeability of 80 md.To date only the Montrose Field has been produced. The main recovery mechanism is natural bottom water drive supplemented by water injection. First oil was produced in 1976 via a tanker mooring system, replaced by a dedicated pipeline in 1984. The Arbroath Field is under development and first oil was produced in April 1990.

Nanotechnology Helps Decrease Pressure, Increase Injection in Offshore China Oil Field

2021 ◽  
Vol 73 (09) ◽  
pp. 58-59
Author(s):  
Chris Carpenter
Keyword(s):  
Water Injection ◽  
Injection Pressure ◽  
Gas Production ◽  
Oil Field ◽  
Water Flooding ◽  
Injection System ◽  
Bohai Bay ◽  
Reservoir Properties ◽  
Positive Effects ◽  
Offshore Technology

This article, written by JPT Technology Editor Chris Carpenter, contains highlights of paper OTC 30407, “Case Study of Nanopolysilicon Materials’ Depressurization and Injection-Increasing Technology in Offshore Bohai Bay Oil Field KL21-1,” by Qing Feng, Nan Xiao Li, and Jun Zi Huang, China Oilfield Services, et al., prepared for the 2020 Offshore Technology Conference Asia, originally scheduled to be held in Kuala Lumpur, 2–6 November. The paper has not been peer reviewed. Copyright 2020 Offshore Technology Conference. Reproduced by permission. Nanotechnology offers creative approaches to solve problems of oil and gas production that also provide potential for pressure-decreasing application in oil fields. However, at the time of writing, successful pressure-decreasing nanotechnology has rarely been reported. The complete paper reports nanopolysilicon as a new depressurization and injection-increasing agent. The stability of nanopolysilicon was studied in the presence of various ions, including sodium (Na+), calcium (Ca2+), and magnesium (Mg2+). The study found that the addition of nanomaterials can improve porosity and permeability of porous media. Introduction More than 600 water-injection wells exist in Bohai Bay, China. Offshore Field KL21-1, developed by water-flooding, is confronted with the following challenges: - Rapid increase and reduction of water-injection pressure - Weak water-injection capacity of reservoir - Decline of oil production - Poor reservoir properties - Serious hydration and expansion effects of clay minerals To overcome injection difficulties in offshore fields, conventional acidizing measures usually are taken. But, after multiple cycles of acidification, the amount of soluble substances in the rock gradually decreases and injection performance is shortened. Through injection-performance experiments, it can be determined that the biological nanopolysilicon colloid has positive effects on pressure reduction and injection increase. Fluid-seepage-resistance decreases, the injection rate increases by 40%, and injection pressure decreases by 10%. Features of Biological Nanopolysilicon Systems The biological nanopolysilicon-injection system was composed of a bioemulsifier (CDL32), a biological dispersant (DS2), and a nanopolysilicon hydrophobic system (NP12). The bacterial strain of CDL32 was used to obtain the culture colloid of biological emulsifier at 37°C for 5 days. DS2 was made from biological emulsifier CDL32 and some industrial raw materials described in Table 1 of the complete paper. Nanopolysilicon hydrophobic system NP12 was composed of silicon dioxide particles. The hydrophobic nanopolysilicons selected in this project featured particle sizes of less than 100 nm. In the original samples, a floc of nanopolysilicon was fluffy and uniform. But, when wet, nanopolysilicon will self-aggregate and its particle size increases greatly. At the same time, nanopolysilicon features significant agglomeration in water. Because of its high interface energy, nanopolysilicon is easily agglomerated, as shown in Fig. 1.

Samarium-neodymium isotope stratigraphy of the Lunde and Statfjord Formations of Snorre Oil Field, northern North Sea

1989 ◽  
Vol 146 (2) ◽  
pp. 217-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. W. MEARNS ◽  
R. KNARUD ◽  
N. RÆSTAD ◽  
K. O. STANLEY ◽  
C. P. STOCKBRIDGE
Keyword(s):  
North Sea ◽  
Oil Field ◽  
Isotope Stratigraphy ◽  
Northern North Sea

Sedimentology and sequence stratigraphy of the Middle–Upper Jurassic Krossfjord and Fensfjord formations, Troll Field, northern North Sea

2013 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 237-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas E. Holgate ◽  
Christopher A.-L. Jackson ◽  
Gary J. Hampson ◽  
Tom Dreyer
Keyword(s):  
Sequence Stratigraphy ◽  
North Sea ◽  
Upper Jurassic ◽  
Northern North Sea

GEOLOGY OF BARROW ISLAND OIL FIELD

1973 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith Crank
Keyword(s):  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Water Injection ◽  
Water Source ◽  
Upper Jurassic ◽  
Oil Field ◽  
Late Triassic ◽  
Low Permeability ◽  
High Porosity ◽  
The South ◽  
The North

The Barrow Island oil field, which was discovered by the drilling of Barrow 1 in 1964, was declared commercial in 1966. Since then 520 wells have been drilled in the development of this field which has resulted in 309 Windalia Sand oil producers (from about 2200 feet), eight Muderong Greensand oil wells (2800 feet), five Neocomian/Upper Jurassic gas and oil producers (6200 to 6700 feet), eight Barrow Group water source wells and 157 water injection wells.Production averages 41,200 barrels of oil per day, and 98% of this comes from the shallow Windalia Sand Member of Cretaceous (Aptian to Albian) age. These reserves are contained in a broad north-plunging nose truncated to the south by a major down-to-the-south fault. The anticline is thought to have been formed initially from a basement uplift during Late Triassic to Early Jurassic time. Subsequent periods of deposition, uplift and erosion have continued into the Tertiary and modified the structure to its present form. The known sedimentary section on Barrow Island ranges from Late Jurassic to Miocene.The Neocomian/Jurassic accumulations are small and irregular and are not thought to be commercial in themselves. The Muderong Greensand pool is also a limited, low permeability reservoir. Migration of hydrocarbons is thought to have occurred mainly in the Tertiary as major arching did not take place until very late in the Cretaceous or early in the Palaeocene.The Windalia Sand reservoir is a high porosity, low permeability sand which is found only on Barrow Island. One of the most unusual features of this reservoir is the presence of a perched gas cap. Apparently the entire sand was originally saturated with oil, and gas subsequently moved upstructure from the north, displacing it. This movement was probably obstructed by randomly-located permeability barriers.

scholarly journals Shale volume and permeability of the Miocene unconsolidated turbidite sands of Bonga oil field, Niger delta, Nigeria

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inyang Namdie ◽  
Idara Akpabio ◽  
Agbasi Okechukwu .E.
Keyword(s):  
Niger Delta ◽  
Gamma Ray ◽  
Water Saturation ◽  
Strong Dependence ◽  
Water Injection ◽  
Oil Field ◽  
Reservoir Properties ◽  
Injection Wells ◽  
Log Data ◽  
Shale Volume

Bonga oil field is located 120km (75mi) southeast of the Niger Delta, Nigeria. It is a subsea type development located about 3500ft water depth and has produced over 330 mmstb of hydrocarbon till date with over 16 oil producing and water injection wells. The producing formation is the Middle to Late Miocene unconsolidated turbidite sandstones with lateral and vertical homogeneities in reservoir properties. This work, analysis the petrophysical properties of the reservoir units for the purpose of modeling the effect of shale content on permeability in the reservoir. Turbidite sandstones are identified by gamma-ray log signatures as intervals with 26-50 API, while sonic, neutron, resistivity, caliper and other log data are applied to estimate volume of shale ranging between 0.972 v/v for shale intervals and 0.0549 v/v for turbidite sands, water saturation of 0.34 v/v average in most sand intervals, porosity range from 0.010 for shale intervals to 0.49 v/v for clean sands and permeability values for the send interval 11.46 to2634mD, for intervals between 7100 to 9100 ft., Data were analyzed using the Interactive Petrophysical software that splits the whole curve into sand and shale zones and estimates among other petrophysical parameters the shale contents of the prospective zones. While Seismic data revealed reservoir thickness ranging from 25ft to over 140ft well log data within the five wells have identified sands of similar thickness and estimated average permeability of700mD. Within the sand units across the five wells, cross plots of estimated porosity, volume of shale and permeability values reveal strong dependence of permeability on shale volume and a general decrease in permeability in intervals with shale volume. It is concluded that sand units with high shale contents that are from0.500 to0.900v/v will not provide good quality reservoir in the field.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document