GEOLOGY OF BARROW ISLAND OIL FIELD

1973 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith Crank

The Barrow Island oil field, which was discovered by the drilling of Barrow 1 in 1964, was declared commercial in 1966. Since then 520 wells have been drilled in the development of this field which has resulted in 309 Windalia Sand oil producers (from about 2200 feet), eight Muderong Greensand oil wells (2800 feet), five Neocomian/Upper Jurassic gas and oil producers (6200 to 6700 feet), eight Barrow Group water source wells and 157 water injection wells.Production averages 41,200 barrels of oil per day, and 98% of this comes from the shallow Windalia Sand Member of Cretaceous (Aptian to Albian) age. These reserves are contained in a broad north-plunging nose truncated to the south by a major down-to-the-south fault. The anticline is thought to have been formed initially from a basement uplift during Late Triassic to Early Jurassic time. Subsequent periods of deposition, uplift and erosion have continued into the Tertiary and modified the structure to its present form. The known sedimentary section on Barrow Island ranges from Late Jurassic to Miocene.The Neocomian/Jurassic accumulations are small and irregular and are not thought to be commercial in themselves. The Muderong Greensand pool is also a limited, low permeability reservoir. Migration of hydrocarbons is thought to have occurred mainly in the Tertiary as major arching did not take place until very late in the Cretaceous or early in the Palaeocene.The Windalia Sand reservoir is a high porosity, low permeability sand which is found only on Barrow Island. One of the most unusual features of this reservoir is the presence of a perched gas cap. Apparently the entire sand was originally saturated with oil, and gas subsequently moved upstructure from the north, displacing it. This movement was probably obstructed by randomly-located permeability barriers.

1999 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 158 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.K. Ellis ◽  
A. Pitchford ◽  
R.H. Bruce

The Barrow Island Field in the Barrow Sub-basin of the Carnarvon Basin was discovered in 1964 by West Australian Petroleum Pty Limited. It is the largest oil field in Western Australia. Appraisal drilling has defined in-place oil of 200 GL (1,250 MMBBL) and in-place gas of 16.5 Gm3 (580 BCF) primarily in the Lower Cretaceous Windalia Sand Member of the Muderong Shale and in- place gas of 14.5 Gm3 (515 BCF) in Middle Jurassic Biggada Formation. Additional hydrocarbon reservoirs have been discovered, including oil and gas in the Upper Jurassic Dupuy Formation, the Lower Cretaceous Malouet Formation, Flacourt Formation and Tunney Member, Mardie Greensand Member and M zones of the Muderong Shale and in the Upper Cretaceous Gearle Siltstone. Approximately 850 wells have been drilled to appraise and develop these accumulations, and to provide water source and water injection wells to enhance recovery. Production commenced in December 1966, with the first shipment of oil in April 1967. Although numerous hydrocarbon reservoirs have been developed, 95% of the 44 GL (278 MMBBL) of produced oil has been from the Windalia Sand.Structural development of the Barrow Island anticline occurred initially during the Middle Jurassic and continued intermittently during the Cretaceous and Tertiary. Initial charging of the Dupuy and Malouet formations with oil from the Upper Jurassic Dingo Claystone occurred in the Early Cretaceous prior to the development of the shallower closures. Periodic wrench- related movement on the Barrow Fault during the Early to Late Cretaceous produced closures at the Lower Cretaceous reservoirs and provided a catalyst for oil migration and charging of these closures. Significant amounts of an extremely biodegraded component, and several less biodegraded phases are present in the oil in the Windalia Sand, indicating several phases of oil charging of the Barrow structure from Middle and Upper Jurassic sediments. In the Tertiary, gas sourced from Triassic and Jurassic sediments migrated into the Barrow structure via a dilated Barrow Fault, charged the Middle Jurassic Biggada Formation and displaced some of the oil in the Lower Cretaceous reservoirs.


1991 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. A. Knutson ◽  
I. C. Munro

AbstractThe Beryl Field, the sixth largest oil field in the UK sector of the North Sea, is located within Block 9/13 in the west-central part of the Viking Graben. The block was awarded in 1971 to a Mobil operated partnership and the 9/13-1 discovery well was drilled in 1972. The Beryl A platform was emplaced in 1975 and the Beryl B platform in 1983. To date, ninety-five wells have been drilled in the field, and drilling activity is anticipated into the mid-1990s.Commercial hydrocarbons occur in sandstone reservoirs ranging in age from Upper Triassic to Upper Jurassic. Structurally, the field consists of a NNE orientated horst in the Beryl A area and westward tilted fault blocks in the Beryl B area. The area is highly faulted and complicated by two major and four minor unconformities. The seal is provided by Upper Jurassic shales and Upper Cretaceous marls.There are three prospective sedimentary sections in the Beryl Field ranked in importance as follows: the Middle Jurassic coastal deltaic sediments, the Upper Triassic to Lower Jurassic continental and marine sediments, and the Upper Jurassic turbidites. The total ultimate recovery of the field is about 800 MMBBL oil and 1.6 TCF gas. As of December 1989, the field has produced nearly 430 MMBBL oil (primarily from the Middle Jurassic Beryl Formation), or about 50% of the ultimate recovery. Gas sales are scheduled to begin in the early 1990s. Oil and gas production is forecast until licence expiration in 2018.The Beryl Fields is located 215 miles northeast of Aberdeen, about 7 miles from the United Kingdom-Norwegian boundary. The field lies within Block 9/13 and covers and area of approximately 12 000 acres in water depths ranging from 350-400 ft. Block 9/13 contains several hydrocarbon-bearing structures, of which the Beryl Fields is the largest (Fig. 1). The field is subdivided into two producing areas: the Beryl Alpha area which includes the initial discovery well, and the Beryl Bravo area located to the north. The estimated of oil originally in place is 1400 MMBBL for Beryl A and 700 MMBBL for Beryl B. The fiel has combined gas in place of 2.8 TCF, consisting primarily of solution gas. Hydrocarbon accumulations occur in six reservoir horizons ranging in age from Upper Triassic to Upper Jurassic. The Middle Jurassic (Bathonian to Callovian) age Beryl Formation is the main reservoir unit and contains 78% of the total ultimate recovery.The field was named after Beryl Solomon, the wife of Charles Solomon, who was president of Mobil Europe in 1972 when the field was discovered. The satellite fields in Block 9/13 (Nevis, Ness and Linnhe) are named after Scottish lochs.


GeoArabia ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 367-430 ◽  
Author(s):  
David R.D. Boote ◽  
Duenchien Mou

ABSTRACT The Safah oil field was discovered in 1983 on the north-plunging Lekhwair Arch of northwest Oman. The arch lacks any significant structural closure and the accumulation is stratigraphically trapped within chalky high porosity-low permeability Upper Shu’aiba carbonates of mid-late Aptian age. The complexity of its trapping geometry, internal reservoir architecture, reservoir quality and hydrocarbon charge history precluded easy explanation and geological models used to describe the field evolved quite significantly over time to accommodate new data and changing regional perspectives. These had a profound influence, first upon the decision to test what was a speculative new concept exploration prospect and later during appraisal and development, in defining an optimum static reservoir model, history matching and efficient field management strategies. The original play concept developed out of a loosely constrained regional structural and stratigraphic synthesis. Early isopach mapping had identified an enormous paleohigh on the North Lekhwair Arch, which appeared well placed to receive charge in the later Cretaceous and early Tertiary. This was tilted northward during the late Miocene, when any structurally trapped oil or gas must have been spilled to the south. However, nearby analogs suggested that the northeastern margin of the Upper Shu’aiba intraplatform Bab Basin crossed the arch in the vicinity of the paleohigh and it seemed possible that remigrating hydrocarbons might have been stratigraphically trapped against the impermeable basinal facies equivalents of Shu’aiba platform carbonates. Safah-1x was drilled to test this hypothesis, just to the north of the weakly defined Upper Shu’aiba shelf break. It encountered a thin pay zone at the northern end of what proved to be a more than 1 billion barrels STIIOP accumulation. The complexity of the field became increasingly apparent during appraisal drilling. Both differentiated shelf-to-basin and layered mid-shelf ramp depositional models were proposed to describe its unexpectedly heterogeneous internal reservoir architecture. Independent petrographic, fluid property and oil isotope analyses seemingly contradicted more likely stratigraphic correlations and consensus on a static reservoir model proved difficult to reach. As a result, geologically simple layered reservoir descriptions were favored during the early development of the field. However, as the regional perspective improved with better local analogs and increasing amounts of well and seismic data, attention eventually refocused back toward a more sophisticated stratigraphic explanation. The reservoir is now interpreted to be a low-energy mid-Shu’aiba highstand composite sequence with younger lowstand shales and offlapping carbonate shoals to the south. The updip trapping mechanism is far more complex than originally anticipated, formed by discontinuities between the porous lowstand shoals. The enigmatic relationship between stratigraphic architecture and in-reservoir PVT fluid properties and d13C isotope gradients appear to reflect dual charging by a high GOR Jurassic-sourced oil during the late Cretaceous-early Tertiary and low GOR Silurian oils in the Miocene. Internal stratigraphic baffles prevented complete homogenization and the PVT and isotope gradients remain as geochemical palimpsests. This resolution of initially rather contradictory observations was achieved by synthesizing data into a coherent narrative logic, most consistent with the available geological information at all scales, from the regional and general to the local and specific. Although more advanced seismic, petrographic and geochemical technologies certainly encouraged increasingly precise interpretations, the issues they raised were still geological and so still most effectively utilized within the context of such narratives. Ultimately, it was only by assessing these against broader geological perspectives that it proved possible to judge the validity of in-field interpretations with any confidence.


1985 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 235 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.F. Williams ◽  
D.J. Poynton

The South Pepper field, discovered in 1982, is located 30 km southwest of Barrow Island in the offshore portion of the Barrow Sub-basin, Western Australia. The oil and gas accumulation occurs in the uppermost sands of the Lower Cretaceous Barrow Group and the overlying low permeability Mardie Greensand Member of the Muderong Shale.The hydrocarbons are trapped in one of several fault closed anticlines which lie on a high trend that includes the North Herald, Pepper and Barrow Island structures. This trend is postulated to have formed during the late Valanginian as the result of differential compaction and drape over a buried submarine fan sequence. During the Turonian the trend acted as a locus for folding induced by right-lateral wrenching along the sub-basin edge. Concurrent normal faulting dissected the fold into a number of smaller anticlines. This essentially compressional tectonic phase contrasted with the earlier extensional regime which was associated with rift development during the Callovian. A compressional tectonic event in the Middle Miocene produced apparent reverse movement on the South Pepper Fault but only minor changes to the structural closure.Geochemical and structural evidence indicates at least two periods of hydrocarbon migration into the top Barrow Group - Mardie Greensand reservoir. The earlier occurred in the Turonian subsequent to the period of wrench tectonics and involved the migration of oil from Lower Jurassic Dingo Claystone source rocks up the South Pepper Fault. This oil was biodegraded before the second episode of migration occurred after the Middle Miocene tectonism. The later oil is believed to have been sourced by the Middle to Upper Jurassic Dingo Claystone. Biodegradation at this stage ceased or became insignificant due to temperature increase and reduction of meteoric water flow. Gas-condensate, sourced from Triassic or Lower Jurassic sediments may have migrated into the structure with this second oil although a more recent migration cannot be ruled out.The proposed structural and hydrocarbon migration history fits regional as well as local geological observations for the Barrow Sub-basin. Further data particularly from older sections of the stratigraphic column within the area are needed to refine the interpretation.


Solid Earth ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 1375-1397 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi Ni Wang ◽  
Wen Liang Xu ◽  
Feng Wang ◽  
Xiao Bo Li

Abstract. To investigate the timing of deposition and provenance of early Mesozoic strata in the northeastern North China Craton (NCC) and to understand the early Mesozoic paleotectonic evolution of the region, we combine stratigraphy, U–Pb zircon geochronology, and Hf isotopic analyses. Early Mesozoic strata include the Early Triassic Heisonggou, Late Triassic Changbai and Xiaoyingzi, and Early Jurassic Yihe formations. Detrital zircons in the Heisonggou Formation yield  ∼ 58 % Neoarchean to Paleoproterozoic ages and  ∼ 42 % Phanerozoic ages and were sourced from areas to the south and north of the basins within the NCC, respectively. This indicates that Early Triassic deposition was controlled primarily by the southward subduction of the Paleo-Asian oceanic plate beneath the NCC and collision between the NCC and the Yangtze Craton (YC). Approximately 88 % of the sediments within the Late Triassic Xiaoyingzi Formation were sourced from the NCC to the south, with the remaining  ∼ 12 % from the Xing'an–Mongolia Orogenic Belt (XMOB) to the north. This implies that Late Triassic deposition was related to the final closure of the Paleo-Asian Ocean during the Middle Triassic and the rapid exhumation of the Su–Lu Orogenic Belt between the NCC and YC. In contrast,  ∼ 88 % of sediments within the Early Jurassic Yihe Formation were sourced from the XMOB to the north, with the remaining  ∼ 12 % from the NCC to the south. We therefore infer that rapid uplift of the XMOB and the onset of the subduction of the Paleo-Pacific Plate beneath Eurasia occurred in the Early Jurassic.


Author(s):  
V.N. Melikhov ◽  
N.A. Krylov ◽  
I.V. Shevchenko ◽  
V.L. Shuster

Regarding the South Caspian oil and gas province, it is concluded that the Pliocene productivity prevails in the western part of the province, and that the gas and oil prospects of the eastern land side in the Mesozoic are prioritized. A retrospective analytical review of geological and geophysical data and publications on the Mesozoic of Southwestern Turkmenistan was carried out, which showed the low efficiency of the performed seismic and drilling operations in the exploration and evaluation of very complex Mesozoic objects. A massive resumption of state-of-the-art seismic exploration and appraisal drilling in priority areas and facilities performed by leading Russian companies is proposed. For some areas, a new, increased estimate of the projected gas resources is given. An example of modern high-efficiency additional exploration of the East Cheleken, a small Pliocene gas and oil field, which turned this field into a large one in terms of reserves, is given.


2009 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 273-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. D. Sokolov ◽  
G. Ye. Bondarenko ◽  
A. K. Khudoley ◽  
O. L. Morozov ◽  
M. V. Luchitskaya ◽  
...  

Abstract. A long tectonic zone composed of Upper Jurassic to Lower Cretaceous volcanic and sedimentary rocks is recognized along the Asian continent margin from the Mongol-Okhotsk fold and thrust belt on the south to the Chukotka Peninsula on the north. This belt represents the Uda-Murgal arc, which was developed along the convergent margin between Northeast Asia and Northwest Meso-Pacific. Several segments are identified in this arc based upon the volcanic and sedimentary rock assemblages, their respective compositions and basement structures. The southern and central parts of the Uda-Murgal arc were a continental margin belt with heterogeneous basement represented by metamorphic rocks of the Siberian craton, the Verkhoyansk terrigenous complex of Siberian passive margin and the Koni-Taigonos Late Paleozoic to Early Mesozoic island arc with accreted oceanic terranes. At the present day latitude of the Pekulney and Chukotka segments there was an ensimatic island arc with relicts of the South Anyui oceanic basin in a backarc basin. Accretionary prisms of the Uda-Murgal arc and accreted terranes contain fragments of Permian, Triassic to Jurassic and Jurassic to Cretaceous (Tithonian–Valanginian) oceanic crust and Jurassic ensimatic island arcs. Paleomagnetic and faunal data show significant displacement of these oceanic complexes and the terranes of the Taigonos Peninsula were originally parts of the Izanagi oceanic plate.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdelwahab Noufal ◽  
Gaisoni Nasreldin ◽  
Faisal Al-Jenaibi ◽  
Joel Wesley Martin ◽  
Julian Guerra ◽  
...  

Abstract A mature field located in a gently dipping structure onshore Abu Dhabi has multiple stacked oil and gas reservoirs experiencing different levels of depletion. The average reservoir pressure in some of these intervals had declined from the early production years to the present day by more than 2000 psi. Coupled geomechanical modelling is, therefore, of the greatest value to predict the stress paths in producing reservoir units, using the concept of effective stress. This paper examines the implications for long-term field management—focusing primarily on estimating the potential for reservoir compaction and predicting field subsidence. This paper takes the work reported in Noufal et al. (2020) one step further by integrating the results of a comprehensive geomechanical laboratory characterization study designed to assess the potential geomechanical changes in the stacked reservoirs from pre-production conditions to abandonment. This paper adopts a geomechanical modelling approach integrating a wide array of data—including prestack seismic inversion outputs and dynamic reservoir simulation results. This study comprised four phases. After the completion of rock mechanics testing, the first modelling phase examined geomechanics on a fine scale around individual wells. The goal of the second phase was to build 4D mechanical earth models (4D MEMs) by incorporating 14 reservoir models—resulting in one of the largest 4D MEMs ever built worldwide. The third phase involved determining the present-day stress state—matching calibrated post-production 1D MEMs and interpreted stress features. Lastly, the resulting model was used for field management and formation stimulation applications. The 4D geomechanical modelling results indicated stress changes in the order of several MPa in magnitude compared with the pre-production stress state, and some changes in stress orientations, especially in the vicinity of faults. This was validated using well images and direct stress measurements, indicating the ability of the 4D MEM to capture the changes in stress magnitudes and orientations caused by depletion. In the computed results, the 4D MEM captures the onset of pore collapse and its accelerating response as observed in the laboratory tests conducted on cores taken from different reservoir units. Pore collapse is predicted in later production years in areas with high porosity, and it is localized. The model highlights the influence of stress changes on porosity and permeability changes over time, thus providing insights into the planning of infill drilling and water injection. Qualitatively, the results provide invaluable insights into delineating potential sweet spots for stimulation by hydraulic fracturing.


1962 ◽  
Vol S7-IV (1) ◽  
pp. 87-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernand Touraine

Abstract Results of a stratigraphic and tectonic study of the Mourotte syncline, Provence, France, divide the structure into three parts. The northern part is composed of Hauterivian littoral beds containing Danian dinosaur eggs. The Danian limestone-sandstone series disappears at La Neuve while the marly upper Danian beds continue to the extreme northern limit of the syncline. In the central part the Hauterivian wedges out, and toward its southern limit the substratum is entirely upper Jurassic. In the southern part, the Danian limestones are only visible on the northeast border. Bird eggs collected in the area assign the southern part of the syncline to the Thanetian. Overturning is less noticeable in the north, becoming acute toward the south where the syncline is tightly overturned.


Author(s):  
Sorin Alexandru Gheorghiu ◽  
Cătălin Popescu

The present economic model is intended to provide an example of how to take into consideration risks and uncertainties in the case of a field that is developed with water injection. The risks and uncertainties are related, on one hand to field operations (drilling time, delays due to drilling problems, rig failures and materials supply, electric submersible pump [ESP] installations failures with the consequences of losing the well), and on the other hand, the second set of uncertainties are related to costs (operational expenditures-OPEX and capital expenditures-CAPEX, daily drilling rig costs), prices (oil, gas, separation, and water injection preparation), production profiles, and discount factor. All the calculations are probabilistic. The authors are intending to provide a comprehensive solution for assessing the business performance of an oil field development.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document