scholarly journals FOXA1 plays a role in regulating secretoglobin 1a1 expression in the absence of CCAAT/enhancer binding protein activities in lung in vivo

2011 ◽  
Vol 300 (3) ◽  
pp. L441-L452 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taketomo Kido ◽  
Takeshi Tomita ◽  
Minoru Okamoto ◽  
Yan Cai ◽  
Yoshimi Matsumoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
Dominant Negative ◽  
Clara Cell ◽  
Small Molecular Weight ◽  
Dominant Negative Form

Secretoglobin (SCGB) 1A1, also called Clara cell secretor protein (CCSP) or Clara cell-specific 10-kDa protein (CC10), is a small molecular weight secreted protein mainly expressed in lung, with anti-inflammatory/immunomodulatory properties. Previous in vitro studies demonstrated that CCAAT/enhancer-binding proteins (C/EBPs) are the major transcription factors for the regulation of Scbg1a1 gene expression, whereas FOXA1 had a minimum effect on the transcription. To determine the in vivo role of C/EBPs in the regulation of SCGB1A1 expression, experiments were performed in which A-C/EBP, a dominant-negative form of C/EBP that interferes with DNA binding activities of all C/EBPs, was specifically expressed in lung. Surprisingly, despite the in vitro findings, expression of SCGB1A1 mRNA was not decreased in vivo in the absence of C/EBPs. This may be due to a compensatory role assumed by FOXA1 in the regulation of Scgb1a1 gene expression in lung in the absence of active C/EBPs. This disconnect between in vitro and in vivo results underscores the importance of studies using animal models to determine the role of specific transcription factors in the regulation of gene expression in intact multicellular complex organs such as lung.

scholarly journals A Retinoid-Resistant Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia Subclone Expresses a Dominant Negative PML-RARα Mutation

Blood ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 89 (12) ◽  
pp. 4282-4289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenlin Shao ◽  
Laura Benedetti ◽  
William W. Lamph ◽  
Clara Nervi ◽  
Wilson H. Miller
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Retinoic Acid ◽  
Ligand Binding ◽  
Cell Line ◽  
Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
Promyelocytic Leukemia ◽  
Dominant Negative

Abstract The unique t(15; 17) of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) fuses the PML gene with the retinoic acid receptor α (RARα) gene. Although retinoic acid (RA) inhibits cell growth and induces differentiation in human APL cells, resistance to RA develops both in vitro and in patients. We have developed RA-resistant subclones of the human APL cell line, NB4, whose nuclear extracts display altered RA binding. In the RA-resistant subclone, R4, we find an absence of ligand binding of PML-RARα associated with a point mutation changing a leucine to proline in the ligand-binding domain of the fusion PML-RARα protein. In contrast to mutations in RARα found in retinoid-resistant HL60 cells, in this NB4 subclone, the coexpressed RARα remains wild-type. In vitro expression of a cloned PML-RARα with the observed mutation in R4 confirms that this amino acid change causes the loss of ligand binding, but the mutant PML-RARα protein retains the ability to heterodimerize with RXRα and thus to bind to retinoid response elements (RAREs). This leads to a dominant negative block of transcription from RAREs that is dose-dependent and not relieved by RA. An unrearranged RARα engineered with this mutation also lost ligand binding and inhibited transcription in a dominant negative manner. We then found that the mutant PML-RARα selectively alters regulation of gene expression in the R4 cell line. R4 cells have lost retinoid-regulation of RXRα and RARβ and the RA-induced loss of PML-RARα protein seen in NB4 cells, but retain retinoid-induction of CD18 and CD38. Thus, the R4 cell line provides data supporting the presence of an RARα-mediated pathway that is independent from gene expression induced or repressed by PML-RARα. The high level of retinoid resistance in vitro and in vivo of cells from some relapsed APL patients suggests similar molecular changes may occur clinically.

Subnuclear compartmentalization of sequence-specific transcription factors and regulation of eukaryotic gene expression

2005 ◽  
Vol 83 (4) ◽  
pp. 535-547 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gareth N Corry ◽  
D Alan Underhill
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Nuclear Architecture ◽  
Subnuclear Localization ◽  
Modular Structures

To date, the majority of the research regarding eukaryotic transcription factors has focused on characterizing their function primarily through in vitro methods. These studies have revealed that transcription factors are essentially modular structures, containing separate regions that participate in such activities as DNA binding, protein–protein interaction, and transcriptional activation or repression. To fully comprehend the behavior of a given transcription factor, however, these domains must be analyzed in the context of the entire protein, and in certain cases the context of a multiprotein complex. Furthermore, it must be appreciated that transcription factors function in the nucleus, where they must contend with a variety of factors, including the nuclear architecture, chromatin domains, chromosome territories, and cell-cycle-associated processes. Recent examinations of transcription factors in the nucleus have clarified the behavior of these proteins in vivo and have increased our understanding of how gene expression is regulated in eukaryotes. Here, we review the current knowledge regarding sequence-specific transcription factor compartmentalization within the nucleus and discuss its impact on the regulation of such processes as activation or repression of gene expression and interaction with coregulatory factors.Key words: transcription, subnuclear localization, chromatin, gene expression, nuclear architecture.

scholarly journals Histone lactylation drives oncogenesis by facilitating m6A reader protein YTHDF2 expression in ocular melanoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Yu ◽  
Peiwei Chai ◽  
Minyue Xie ◽  
Shengfang Ge ◽  
Jing Ruan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Macrophage Polarization ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
Metabolic Stress ◽  
Ocular Melanoma ◽  
Rna Modifications ◽  
M1 Macrophage ◽  
Melanoma Therapy

Abstract Background Histone lactylation, a metabolic stress-related histone modification, plays an important role in the regulation of gene expression during M1 macrophage polarization. However, the role of histone lactylation in tumorigenesis remains unclear. Results Here, we show histone lactylation is elevated in tumors and is associated with poor prognosis of ocular melanoma. Target correction of aberrant histone lactylation triggers therapeutic efficacy both in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, histone lactylation contributes to tumorigenesis by facilitating YTHDF2 expression. Moreover, YTHDF2 recognizes the m6A modified PER1 and TP53 mRNAs and promotes their degradation, which accelerates tumorigenesis of ocular melanoma. Conclusion We reveal the oncogenic role of histone lactylation, thereby providing novel therapeutic targets for ocular melanoma therapy. We also bridge histone modifications with RNA modifications, which provides novel understanding of epigenetic regulation in tumorigenesis.

scholarly journals c-Jun N-Terminal Kinase Activation of Activator Protein-1 Underlies Homologous Regulation of the Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor Gene in αT3-1 Cells

Endocrinology ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 144 (3) ◽  
pp. 839-849 ◽  
Author(s):  
Buffy S. Ellsworth ◽  
Brett R. White ◽  
Ann T. Burns ◽  
Brian D. Cherrington ◽  
Annette M. Otis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Protein Kinase ◽  
Cell Model ◽  
Receptor Gene ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Dominant Negative ◽  
Activator Protein 1 ◽  
Activator Protein

Reproductive function is dependent on the interaction between GnRH and its cognate receptor found on gonadotrope cells of the anterior pituitary gland. GnRH activation of the GnRH receptor (GnRHR) is a potent stimulus for increased expression of multiple genes including the gene encoding the GnRHR itself. Thus, homologous regulation of the GnRHR is an important mechanism underlying gonadotrope sensitivity to GnRH. Previously, we have found that GnRH induction of GnRHR gene expression in αT3-1 cells is partially mediated by protein kinase C activation of a canonical activator protein-1 (AP-1) element. In contrast, protein kinase A and a cAMP response element-like element have been implicated in mediating the GnRH response of the GnRHR gene using a heterologous cell model (GGH3). Herein we find that selective removal of the canonical AP-1 site leads to a loss of GnRH regulation of the GnRHR promoter in transgenic mice. Thus, an intact AP-1 element is necessary for GnRH responsiveness of the GnRHR gene both in vitro and in vivo. Based on in vitro analyses, GnRH appeared to enhance the interaction of JunD, FosB, and c-Fos at the GnRHR AP-1 element. Although enhanced binding of cFos reflected an increase in gene expression, GnRH appeared to regulate both FosB and JunD at a posttranslational level. Neither overexpression of a constitutively active Raf-kinase nor pharmacological blockade of GnRH-induced ERK activation eliminated the GnRH response of the GnRHR promoter. GnRH responsiveness was, however, lost in αT3-1 cells that stably express a dominant-negative c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) kinase, suggesting a critical role for JNK in mediating GnRH regulation of the GnRHR gene. Consistent with this possibility, we find that the ability of forskolin and membrane-permeable forms of cAMP to inhibit the GnRH response of the GnRHR promoter is associated with a loss of both JNK activation and GnRH-mediated recruitment of the primary AP-1-binding components.

scholarly journals Cytomegalovirus Replicon-Based Regulation of Gene Expression In Vitro and In Vivo

2012 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. e1002728 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hermine Mohr ◽  
Christian A. Mohr ◽  
Marlon R. Schneider ◽  
Laura Scrivano ◽  
Barbara Adler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression

Regulation of Hox target genes by a DNA bound Homothorax/Hox/Extradenticle complex

Development ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 126 (22) ◽  
pp. 5137-5148 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.D. Ryoo ◽  
T. Marty ◽  
F. Casares ◽  
M. Affolter ◽  
R.S. Mann
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Localization ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Dominant Negative ◽  
Homeodomain Protein ◽  
Hox Proteins ◽  
Trimeric Complex ◽  
Binding Residue ◽  
Dominant Negative Form

To regulate their target genes, the Hox proteins of Drosophila often bind to DNA as heterodimers with the homeodomain protein Extradenticle (EXD). For EXD to bind DNA, it must be in the nucleus, and its nuclear localization requires a third homeodomain protein, Homothorax (HTH). Here we show that a conserved N-terminal domain of HTH directly binds to EXD in vitro, and is sufficient to induce the nuclear localization of EXD in vivo. However, mutating a key DNA binding residue in the HTH homeodomain abolishes many of its in vivo functions. HTH binds to DNA as part of a HTH/Hox/EXD trimeric complex, and we show that this complex is essential for the activation of a natural Hox target enhancer. Using a dominant negative form of HTH we provide evidence that similar complexes are important for several Hox- and exd-mediated functions in vivo. These data suggest that Hox proteins often function as part of a multiprotein complex, composed of HTH, Hox, and EXD proteins, bound to DNA.

Mutants of cubitus interruptus that are independent of PKA regulation are independent of hedgehog signaling

Development ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 126 (16) ◽  
pp. 3607-3616 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Chen ◽  
J.R. Cardinaux ◽  
R.H. Goodman ◽  
S.M. Smolik
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Target Gene ◽  
Ectopic Expression ◽  
Proteolytic Processing ◽  
Dominant Negative ◽  
Cubitus Interruptus ◽  
Target Gene Expression ◽  
Exogenous Expression

Hedgehog (HH) is an important morphogen involved in pattern formation during Drosophila embryogenesis and disc development. cubitus interruptus (ci) encodes a transcription factor responsible for transducing the hh signal in the nucleus and activating hh target gene expression. Previous studies have shown that CI exists in two forms: a 75 kDa proteolytic repressor form and a 155 kDa activator form. The ratio of these forms, which is regulated positively by hh signaling and negatively by PKA activity, determines the on/off status of hh target gene expression. In this paper, we demonstrate that the exogenous expression of CI that is mutant for four consensus PKA sites [CI(m1-4)], causes ectopic expression of wingless (wg) in vivo and a phenotype consistent with wg overexpression. Expression of CI(m1-4), but not CI(wt), can rescue the hh mutant phenotype and restore wg expression in hh mutant embryos. When PKA activity is suppressed by expressing a dominant negative PKA mutant, the exogenous expression of CI(wt) results in overexpression of wg and lethality in embryogenesis, defects that are similar to those caused by the exogenous expression of CI(m1-4). In addition, we demonstrate that, in cell culture, the mutation of any one of the three serine-containing PKA sites abolishes the proteolytic processing of CI. We also show that PKA directly phosphorylates the four consensus phosphorylation sites in vitro. Taken together, our results suggest that positive hh and negative PKA regulation of wg gene expression converge on the regulation of CI phosphorylation.

scholarly journals Identifying genetic modulators of the connectivity between transcription factors and their transcriptional targets

2016 ◽  
Vol 113 (13) ◽  
pp. E1835-E1843 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mina Fazlollahi ◽  
Ivor Muroff ◽  
Eunjee Lee ◽  
Helen C. Causton ◽  
Harmen J. Bussemaker
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Gene Regulatory Networks ◽  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
Nonsynonymous Mutation ◽  
Gene Regulatory ◽  
Genetic Modulators

Regulation of gene expression by transcription factors (TFs) is highly dependent on genetic background and interactions with cofactors. Identifying specific context factors is a major challenge that requires new approaches. Here we show that exploiting natural variation is a potent strategy for probing functional interactions within gene regulatory networks. We developed an algorithm to identify genetic polymorphisms that modulate the regulatory connectivity between specific transcription factors and their target genes in vivo. As a proof of principle, we mapped connectivity quantitative trait loci (cQTLs) using parallel genotype and gene expression data for segregants from a cross between two strains of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We identified a nonsynonymous mutation in the DIG2 gene as a cQTL for the transcription factor Ste12p and confirmed this prediction empirically. We also identified three polymorphisms in TAF13 as putative modulators of regulation by Gcn4p. Our method has potential for revealing how genetic differences among individuals influence gene regulatory networks in any organism for which gene expression and genotype data are available along with information on binding preferences for transcription factors.

scholarly journals PRMT5 Is Required for Bovine Leukemia Virus Infection In Vivo and Regulates BLV Gene Expression, Syncytium Formation, and Glycosylation In Vitro

Viruses ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 650 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wlaa Assi ◽  
Tomoya Hirose ◽  
Satoshi Wada ◽  
Ryosuke Matsuura ◽  
Shin-nosuke Takeshima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Small Molecule ◽  
Bovine Leukemia Virus ◽  
Proviral Load ◽  
Leukemia Virus ◽  
Syncytium Formation ◽  
High Proviral Load

Bovine leukemia virus (BLV) is the causative agent of enzootic bovine leukosis, which is the most common neoplastic disease of cattle and is closely related to human T-cell leukemia viruses. We investigated the role of a new host protein, PRMT5, in BLV infection. We found that PRMT5 is overexpressed only in BLV-infected cattle with a high proviral load, but not in those with a low proviral load. Furthermore, this upregulation continued to the lymphoma stage. PRMT5 expression was upregulated in response to experimental BLV infection; moreover, PRMT5 upregulation began in an early stage of BLV infection rather than after a long period of proviral latency. Second, siRNA-mediated PRMT5 knockdown enhanced BLV gene expression at the transcript and protein levels. Additionally, a selective small-molecule inhibitor of PRMT5 (CMP5) enhanced BLV gene expression. Interestingly, CMP5 treatment, but not siRNA knockdown, altered the gp51 glycosylation pattern and increased the molecular weight of gp51, thereby decreasing BLV-induced syncytium formation. This was supported by the observation that CMP5 treatment enhanced the formation of the complex type of N-glycan more than the high mannose type. In conclusion, PRMT5 overexpression is related to the development of BLV infection with a high proviral load and lymphoma stage and PRMT5 inhibition enhances BLV gene expression. This is the first study to investigate the role of PRMT5 in BLV infection in vivo and in vitro and to reveal a novel function for a small-molecule compound in BLV-gp51 glycosylation processing.

scholarly journals In vivo analysis of the role of aberrant histone deacetylase recruitment and RARα blockade in the pathogenesis of acute promyelocytic leukemia

2006 ◽  
Vol 203 (4) ◽  
pp. 821-828 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiromichi Matsushita ◽  
Pier Paolo Scaglioni ◽  
Mantu Bhaumik ◽  
Eduardo M. Rego ◽  
Lu Fan Cai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retinoic Acid ◽  
Fusion Protein ◽  
Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia ◽  
Histone Deacetylases ◽  
Retinoic Acid Receptor ◽  
Promyelocytic Leukemia ◽  
Dominant Negative

The promyelocytic leukemia–retinoic acid receptor α (PML-RARα) protein of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is oncogenic in vivo. It has been hypothesized that the ability of PML-RARα to inhibit RARα function through PML-dependent aberrant recruitment of histone deacetylases (HDACs) and chromatin remodeling is the key initiating event for leukemogenesis. To elucidate the role of HDAC in this process, we have generated HDAC1–RARα fusion proteins and tested their activity and oncogenicity in vitro and in vivo in transgenic mice (TM). In parallel, we studied the in vivo leukemogenic potential of dominant negative (DN) and truncated RARα mutants, as well as that of PML-RARα mutants that are insensitive to retinoic acid. Surprisingly, although HDAC1-RARα did act as a bona fide DN RARα mutant in cellular in vitro and in cell culture, this fusion protein, as well as other DN RARα mutants, did not cause a block in myeloid differentiation in vivo in TM and were not leukemogenic. Comparative analysis of these TM and of TM/PML−/− and p53−/− compound mutants lends support to a model by which the RARα and PML blockade is necessary, but not sufficient, for leukemogenesis and the PML domain of the fusion protein provides unique functions that are required for leukemia initiation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document