scholarly journals Predicting Soil Organic Carbon Content Using Hyperspectral Remote Sensing in a Degraded Mountain Landscape in Lesotho

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Freddy Bangelesa ◽  
Elhadi Adam ◽  
Jasper Knight ◽  
Inos Dhau ◽  
Marubini Ramudzuli ◽  
...  

Soil organic carbon constitutes an important indicator of soil fertility. The purpose of this study was to predict soil organic carbon content in the mountainous terrain of eastern Lesotho, southern Africa, which is an area of high endemic biodiversity as well as an area extensively used for small-scale agriculture. An integrated field and laboratory approach was undertaken, through measurements of reflectance spectra of soil using an Analytical Spectral Device (ASD) FieldSpec® 4 optical sensor. Soil spectra were collected on the land surface under field conditions and then on soil in the laboratory, in order to assess the accuracy of field spectroscopy-based models. The predictive performance of two different statistical models (random forest and partial least square regression) was compared. Results show that random forest regression can most accurately predict the soil organic carbon contents on an independent dataset using the field spectroscopy data. In contrast, the partial least square regression model overfits the calibration dataset. Important wavelengths to predict soil organic contents were localised around the visible range (400–700 nm). This study shows that soil organic carbon can be most accurately estimated using derivative field spectroscopy measurements and random forest regression.

Water ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Marques ◽  
Ana Álvarez ◽  
Pilar Carral ◽  
Iris Esparza ◽  
Blanca Sastre ◽  
...  

Contents of soil organic carbon (SOC), gypsum, CaCO3, and quartz, among others, were analyzed and related to reflectance features in visible and near-infrared (VIS/NIR) range, using partial least square regression (PLSR) in ParLes software. Soil samples come from a sloping olive grove managed by frequent tillage in a gypsiferous area of Central Spain. Samples were collected in three different layers, at 0–10, 10–20 and 20–30 cm depth (IPCC guidelines for Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme in 2006). Analyses were performed by C Loss-On-Ignition, X-ray diffraction and water content by the Richards plates method. Significant differences for SOC, gypsum, and CaCO3 were found between layers; similarly, soil reflectance for 30 cm depth layers was higher. The resulting PLSR models (60 samples for calibration and 30 independent samples for validation) yielded good predictions for SOC (R2 = 0.74), moderate prediction ability for gypsum and were not accurate for the rest of rest of soil components. Importantly, SOC content was related to water available capacity. Soils with high reflectance features held c.a. 40% less water than soils with less reflectance. Therefore, higher reflectance can be related to degradation in gypsiferous soil. The starting point of soil degradation and further evolution could be established and mapped through remote sensing techniques for policy decision making.


2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tadele Amare ◽  
Christian Hergarten ◽  
Hans Hurni ◽  
Bettina Wolfgramm ◽  
Birru Yitaferu ◽  
...  

Soil spectroscopy was applied for predicting soil organic carbon (SOC) in the highlands of Ethiopia. Soil samples were acquired from Ethiopia’s National Soil Testing Centre and direct field sampling. The reflectance of samples was measured using a FieldSpec 3 diffuse reflectance spectrometer. Outliers and sample relation were evaluated using principal component analysis (PCA) and models were developed through partial least square regression (PLSR). For nine watersheds sampled, 20% of the samples were set aside to test prediction and 80% were used to develop calibration models. Depending on the number of samples per watershed, cross validation or independent validation were used. The stability of models was evaluated using coefficient of determination (R2), root mean square error (RMSE), and the ratio performance deviation (RPD). The R2 (%), RMSE (%), and RPD, respectively, for validation were Anjeni (88, 0.44, 3.05), Bale (86, 0.52, 2.7), Basketo (89, 0.57, 3.0), Benishangul (91, 0.30, 3.4), Kersa (82, 0.44, 2.4), Kola tembien (75, 0.44, 1.9), Maybar (84. 0.57, 2.5), Megech (85, 0.15, 2.6), and Wondo Genet (86, 0.52, 2.7) indicating that the models were stable. Models performed better for areas with high SOC values than areas with lower SOC values. Overall, soil spectroscopy performance ranged from very good to good.


SOIL ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 275-288
Author(s):  
Monja Ellinger ◽  
Ines Merbach ◽  
Ulrike Werban ◽  
Mareike Ließ

Abstract. Soil organic carbon (SOC) plays a major role concerning chemical, physical, and biological soil properties and functions. To get a better understanding of how soil management affects the SOC content, the precise monitoring of SOC on long-term field experiments (LTFEs) is needed. Visible and near-infrared (Vis–NIR) reflectance spectrometry provides an inexpensive and fast opportunity to complement conventional SOC analysis and has often been used to predict SOC. For this study, 100 soil samples were collected at an LTFE in central Germany by two different sampling designs. SOC values ranged between 1.5 % and 2.9 %. Regression models were built using partial least square regression (PLSR). In order to build robust models, a nested repeated 5-fold group cross-validation (CV) approach was used, which comprised model tuning and evaluation. Various aspects that influence the obtained error measure were analysed and discussed. Four pre-processing methods were compared in order to extract information regarding SOC from the spectra. Finally, the best model performance which did not consider error propagation corresponded to a mean RMSEMV of 0.12 % SOC (R2=0.86). This model performance was impaired by ΔRMSEMV=0.04 % SOC while considering input data uncertainties (ΔR2=0.09), and by ΔRMSEMV=0.12 % SOC (ΔR2=0.17) considering an inappropriate pre-processing. The effect of the sampling design amounted to a ΔRMSEMV of 0.02 % SOC (ΔR2=0.05). Overall, we emphasize the necessity of transparent and precise documentation of the measurement protocol, the model building, and validation procedure in order to assess model performance in a comprehensive way and allow for a comparison between publications. The consideration of uncertainty propagation is essential when applying Vis–NIR spectrometry for soil monitoring.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klara Dvorakova ◽  
Bas van Wesemael

<p>Pilot studies have demonstrated the potential for remote sensing techniques for soil organic carbon  (SOC) mapping in exposed croplands. However, the use of remote sensing for SOC prediction is often hindered by disturbing factors at the soil surface such as photosynthetic active and nonphotosynthetic active vegetation, variation in soil moisture or surface roughness. With the increasing amount of freely available satellite data, many studies have focused on stabilizing the soil reflectance by building image composites that are generated using a set of criteria. These composites tend to minimize and cancel out the disturbing effects. Here we aim to develop a robust method that allows selecting Sentinel-2 (S-2) pixels that are not affected by the following disturbing factors: crop residues, surface roughness and soil moisture. We selected all S-2 cloud-free images covering the Loam Belt of Belgium from January 2019 to December 2020 (in total 38 images). We then built four exposed soil composites based on four sets of criteria: (1) NDVI < 0.25, (2) NDVI < 0.25 & Normalized Burn Ratio (NBR2) < 0.07, (3) the ‘greening-up’ period of a crop and (4) the ‘greening-up’ period of a crop & NBR2 < 0.07. The ‘greening-up’ period was selected based on the NDVI timeline, where ‘greening-up’ is considered as the last date of acquisition where the soil is bare (NDVI < 0.25) before the crop develops (NDVI > 0.6).,We then built a partial least square regression (PLSR) model with 10-fold cross-validation to estimate the SOC content based on 137 georeferenced calibration samples on the four above described composites. We obtained a non-satisfactory result for composites (1) to (3): R² = 0.22, RMSE = 3.46 g C kg<sup>-1</sup> and RPD 1.12 for (1), R² = 0.19, RMSE = 3.43 g C kg<sup>-1</sup> and RPD 1.10 for (2) and R² = 0.15, RMSE = 2.74 g C kg<sup>-1</sup> and RPD 1.06 for (3). We, however, obtained a satisfactory result for composite (4): R² = 0.54, RMSE = 2.09 g C kg<sup>-1</sup> and RPD 1.68. Hence, the ‘greening-up’ method combined with a strict NBR2 threshold allows selecting the purest exposed soil pixels suitable for SOC prediction. The limit of this method might be the surface coverage, which for a two-year period reached 47% of croplands, compared to 89% exposure if only the NDVI threshold is applied.</p>


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taciara Zborowski Horst-Heinen ◽  
Ricardo Simão Diniz Dalmolin ◽  
Alessandro Samuel-Rosa ◽  
Sabine Grunwald

<p>The relationship between visible-near-infrared (Vis-NIR-SWIR) spectra and soil organic carbon (SOC) and the effects of preprocessing techniques on SOC predictive models have been shown in several studies. However, little attention has been given to the effect of analytical methods used to produce the SOC data used to calibrate those models. The predictive performance of Vis-NIR spectral models depends not only on the preprocessing technique and machine learning method but also on the analytical method employed to produce the SOC data. Our hypothesis is that some combinations of preprocessing and models may be more sensitive to laboratory (measurement) error than others. To test this hypothesis, we evaluated the leave-one-out cross-validation performance of three predictive models (Random Forest (RF), Cubist, and Partial Least Square Regression (PLSR)) calibrated using SOC data produced via three analytical methods (dry combustion (DC) and wet combustion with quantification by titration (WCt) and colorimetry (WCc)) and three Vis-NIR spectra preprocessing techniques (smoothing (SMO), continuum removal (CRR), and Savitzky-Golay first derivative (SGD)). The prediction performance varied among the models. DC and WCt provided a higher correlation between SOC and spectra than WCc, and thus, resulted in higher accuracy. The Cubist+CRR was ranked the best performing model, with an average of R2 = 0.81 and RMSE = 0.81% among analytical methods. Cubist+CRR also minimized the accuracy differences resulting from SOC analytical methods employed. The RF model had low accuracy and was unable to explain more than 46% of the variance. Overall, the analytical method significantly affects SOC predictions, and its impact may be larger than the preprocessing. </p>


Author(s):  
Chandan Goswami ◽  
Naorem Janaki Singh ◽  
Bijoy Krishna Handique

Soil analysis is required for efficient use of inputs viz. seeds, fertilizers, irrigation water and other agricultural planning. However, there are several disadvantages of soil analysis such as they are time consuming, expensive and labour intensive. Many approaches are developed to overcome these difficulties. Hyperspectral spectroscopy is emerging as a promising tool for studying soil, water and vegetation. Therefore, an attempt has been made to review the scope of using hyperspectral reflectance spectroscopy for estimation of soil properties as an alternative to traditional laboratory soil analysis methods. Spectral signature of soil can be used for fast and non destructive estimation of soil properties. Diffuse reflectance in 350-2500 nm range of electromagnetic spectra forms the basis of hyperspectral spectroscopy. An object is characterized by the characteristic absorptions and peaks in the electromagnetic spectra. A number of calibration techniques are applied for establishing relationship between reflectance spectra and soil properties. Multiple Linear Regression (MLR), Principal Component Regression (PCR) and Partial Least Square Regression (PLSR) are most commonly used techniques. MLR, PCR and PLSR are also used for prediction of several soil properties such as pH, soil organic carbon content, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, calcium, magnesium, sodium, iron, manganese, zinc, copper, boron, molybdenum, sand silt, clay and soil moisture. Some commonly used spectral indices are also applied for prediction of soil properties. Some of the soil physical properties viz. sand, silt and clay as well as chemical properties viz. pH and organic carbon could be estimated with good to very good prediction using pure spectra of soil. However, contrasting results of prediction of soil properties using multivariate analysis techniques have also been reported. The content of this review article will be helpful for researchers who are working on alternate methods of estimation of soil properties.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document