scholarly journals Generalized Phenomenological Models of Dark Energy

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Prasenjit Paul ◽  
Rikpratik Sengupta
Keyword(s):  
General Relativity ◽  
Dark Energy ◽  
Energy Density ◽  
Cosmological Constant ◽  
Phenomenological Models ◽  
Einstein Field Equations ◽  
Field Equations ◽  
Free Parameters ◽  
The Universe ◽  
Matter Energy

It was first observed at the end of the last century that the universe is presently accelerating. Ever since, there have been several attempts to explain this observation theoretically. There are two possible approaches. The more conventional one is to modify the matter part of the Einstein field equations, and the second one is to modify the geometry part. We shall consider two phenomenological models based on the former, more conventional approach within the context of general relativity. The phenomenological models in this paper consider a Λ term firstly a function of a¨/a and secondly a function of ρ, where a and ρ are the scale factor and matter energy density, respectively. Constraining the free parameters of the models with the latest observational data gives satisfactory values of parameters as considered by us initially. Without any field theoretic interpretation, we explain the recent observations with a dynamical cosmological constant.

scholarly journals CAN THE EXISTENCE OF DARK ENERGY BE DIRECTLY DETECTED?

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (18n19) ◽  
pp. 3426-3436 ◽  
Author(s):  
MARTIN L. PERL
Keyword(s):  
General Relativity ◽  
Dark Energy ◽  
Energy Density ◽  
Total Mass ◽  
Mass Density ◽  
Mass Energy ◽  
Dark Energy Density ◽  
Astronomical Observations ◽  
Expansion Of The Universe ◽  
The Universe

Over the last decade, astronomical observations show that the acceleration of the expansion of the universe is greater than expected from our understanding of conventional general relativity, the mass density of the visible universe, the size of the visible universe and other astronomical measurements. The additional expansion has been attributed to a variety of phenomenon that have been given the general name of dark energy. Dark energy in the universe seems to comprise a majority of the energy in the visible universe amounting to about three times the total mass energy. But locally the dark energy density is very small. However it is not zero. In this paper I describe the work of others and myself on the question of whether dark energy density can be directly detected. This is a work-in-progress and I have no answer at present.

scholarly journals CONSTRAINING THE RUNAWAY DILATON AND QUINTESSENTIAL DARK ENERGY

2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (03) ◽  
pp. 367-394 ◽  
Author(s):  
ISHWAREE P. NEUPANE ◽  
HOLLY TROWLAND
Keyword(s):  
Dark Energy ◽  
Energy Density ◽  
Cosmological Constant ◽  
Cosmological Parameters ◽  
Scalar Fields ◽  
Current Data ◽  
Gravity Models ◽  
Model Parameters ◽  
Dilaton Field ◽  
The Universe

Dark energy is some of the weirdest and most mysterious stuff in the universe that tends to increase the rate of expansion of the universe. Two commonly known forms of dark energy are the cosmological constant, a constant energy density filling space homogeneously, and scalar fields such as quintessence or moduli whose energy density can vary with time. We explore one particular model for dynamic dark energy: quintessence driven by a scalar dilaton field. We propose an ansatz for the form of the dilaton field, |ϕ(a)|mP ≡ α1 ln t + α2tn = α ln a + βa2ζ, where a is the scale factor and α and ζ are parameters of the model. This phenomenological ansatz for ϕ can be motivated by generic solutions of a scalar dilaton field in many effective string theory and string-inspired gravity models in four dimensions. Most of the earlier discussions in the literature correspond to the choice that ζ = 0 so that ϕ(t) ∝ ln t or ϕ(t) ∝ ln a(t). Using a compilation of current data including type Ia supernovae, we impose observational constraints on the slope parameters like α and ζ and then discuss the relation of our results to analytical constraints on various cosmological parameters, including the dark energy equation of state. Some useful constraints are imposed on model parameters like α and ζ as well as on the dark energy/dark matter couplings using results from structure formation. The constraints of this model are shown to encompass the cosmological constant limit within 1σ error bars.

scholarly journals Acceleration in Friedmann cosmology with torsion

2019 ◽  
Vol 79 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
S. H. Pereira ◽  
R. de C. Lima ◽  
J. F. Jesus ◽  
R. F. L. Holanda
Keyword(s):  
Energy Density ◽  
Critical Density ◽  
Spin Vector ◽  
Torsion Function ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Expansion Of The Universe ◽  
Cosmological Data ◽  
Free Parameters ◽  
The Universe ◽  
Matter Energy

AbstractA Friedmann like cosmological model in Einstein–Cartan framework is studied when the torsion function is assumed to be proportional to a single $$\phi (t)$$ϕ(t) function coming just from the spin vector contribution of ordinary matter. By analysing four different types of torsion function written in terms of one, two and three free parameters, we found that a model with $$\phi (t)=- \alpha H(t) \big ({\rho _{m}(t)}/{\rho _{0c}}\big )^n$$ϕ(t)=-αH(t)(ρm(t)/ρ0c)n is totally compatible with recent cosmological data, where $$\alpha $$α and n are free parameters to be constrained from observations, $$\rho _m$$ρm is the matter energy density and $$\rho _{0c}$$ρ0c the critical density. The recent accelerated phase of expansion of the universe is correctly reproduced by the contribution coming from torsion function, with a deceleration parameter indicating a transition redshift of about 0.65.

scholarly journals Revisiting the Cosmological Constant Problem within Quantum Cosmology

Universe ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (8) ◽  
pp. 108
Author(s):  
Vesselin Gueorguiev ◽  
Andre Maeder
Keyword(s):  
Energy Density ◽  
Cosmological Constant ◽  
Quantum Cosmology ◽  
Vacuum Energy ◽  
Planck Scale ◽  
Vacuum Energy Density ◽  
Characteristic Scale ◽  
Einstein Field Equations ◽  
Field Equations ◽  
Cosmological Constant Problem

A new perspective on the Cosmological Constant Problem (CCP) is proposed and discussed within the multiverse approach of Quantum Cosmology. It is assumed that each member of the ensemble of universes has a characteristic scale a that can be used as integration variable in the partition function. An averaged characteristic scale of the ensemble is estimated by using only members that satisfy the Einstein field equations. The averaged characteristic scale is compatible with the Planck length when considering an ensemble of solutions to the Einstein field equations with an effective cosmological constant. The multiverse ensemble is split in Planck-seed universes with vacuum energy density of order one; thus, Λ˜≈8π in Planck units and a-derivable universes. For a-derivable universe with a characteristic scale of the order of the observed Universe a≈8×1060, the cosmological constant Λ=Λ˜/a2 is in the range 10−121–10−122, which is close in magnitude to the observed value 10−123. We point out that the smallness of Λ can be viewed to be natural if its value is associated with the entropy of the Universe. This approach to the CCP reconciles the Planck-scale huge vacuum energy–density predicted by QFT considerations, as valid for Planck-seed universes, with the observed small value of the cosmological constant as relevant to an a-derivable universe as observed.

Dark matter (energy) may be indistinguishable from modified gravity (MOND)

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (12) ◽  
pp. 1743010 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Sivaram
Keyword(s):  
General Relativity ◽  
Dark Matter ◽  
Dark Energy ◽  
Modified Gravity ◽  
Observational Evidence ◽  
Negative Results ◽  
Newtonian Dynamics ◽  
Special Cases ◽  
The Universe ◽  
Matter Energy

For Newtonian dynamics to hold over galactic scales, large amounts of dark matter (DM) are required which would dominate cosmic structures. Accounting for the strong observational evidence that the universe is accelerating requires the presence of an unknown dark energy (DE) component constituting about 70% of the matter. Several ingenious ongoing experiments to detect the DM particles have so far led to negative results. Moreover, the comparable proportions of the DM and DE at the present epoch appear unnatural and not predicted by any theory. For these reasons, alternative ideas like MOND and modification of gravity or general relativity over cosmic scales have been proposed. It is shown in this paper that these alternate ideas may not be easily distinguishable from the usual DM or DE hypotheses. Specific examples are given to illustrate this point that the modified theories are special cases of a generalized DM paradigm.

BULK VISCOUS BRANS–DICKE COSMOLOGICAL MODELS AND LATE-TIME ACCELERATION OF THE UNIVERSE

2003 ◽  
Vol 12 (05) ◽  
pp. 925-939 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. K. MAK ◽  
T. HARKO
Keyword(s):  
Energy Density ◽  
Momentum Tensor ◽  
Physical Parameters ◽  
Late Time ◽  
Field Equations ◽  
Bulk Viscous ◽  
Order Of Magnitude ◽  
Viscous Pressure ◽  
The Universe ◽  
Matter Energy

We consider the dynamics of a causal bulk viscous cosmological fluid filled flat homogeneous Universe in the framework of the Brans–Dicke theory. Three classes of exact solutions of the field equations are obtained and the behavior of the physical parameters is considered in detail. In this model the energy density associated to the Brans–Dicke scalar field is of the same order of magnitude as the matter energy density. The inclusion of the bulk viscous pressure term in the matter energy-momentum tensor leads to a non-decelerating evolution of the Universe.

scholarly journals Quantum Mechanical Explanation for Dark energy, Cosmic Coincidence, Flatness, Age and Size of Universe

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Biswaranjan Dikshit
Keyword(s):  
Dark Energy ◽  
Energy Density ◽  
Vacuum Energy ◽  
Quantum Mechanical ◽  
Coincidence Problem ◽  
Dark Energy Density ◽  
Astronomical Observations ◽  
The Universe ◽  
Matter Energy ◽  
Cosmic Coincidence Problem

Although general relativity has been successful in explaining many astronomical phenomena, few problems about the contents and evolution of the universe have remained mysterious since last century. Most important of them is the cosmological constant problem in which conventional calculation of vacuum (or dark) energy density using quantum mechanics leads to a value ~10114 J/m3 which is ~10123 times more than the vacuum energy (5.3×10-10 J/m3) estimated from astronomical observations of expanding universe. Similarly, cosmic coincidence problem questions why the matter energy density (ordinary plus dark matter) is of the same order as the vacuum energy density at present time. Finally, the mechanism responsible for spatial flatness and expansion of the universe are not clearly understood. In this paper, by taking the vacuum as a finite and closed quantum oscillator, we solve all of the above-mentioned problems. At first, by using purely quantum mechanical approach, we predict that the dark energy density is c4/(GR2) = 5.27×10-10 J/m3 (where R is radius of 3-sphere of universe) and matter energy density is c4/(2GR2) = 2.6×10-10 J/m3 which match well with astronomical observations. We also prove that the dark energy has always been ~66.7% and matter energy has been ~33.3% of total energy and hence, the so called cosmic coincidence problem doesn’t exist. Next, we show how flatness of space could be maintained since the early stage of universe. Finally, using our model, we derive the expression for age and radius of universe which match well with the astronomical data.

scholarly journals Quantum Mechanical Explanation for Dark Energy, Cosmic Coincidence, Flatness, Age, and Size of the Universe

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 220-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Biswaranjan Dikshit
Keyword(s):  
Dark Energy ◽  
Energy Density ◽  
Vacuum Energy ◽  
Vacuum Energy Density ◽  
Quantum Mechanical ◽  
Coincidence Problem ◽  
Astronomical Observations ◽  
The Universe ◽  
Matter Energy ◽  
Cosmic Coincidence Problem

Abstract One of the most important problems in astronomy is the cosmological constant problem in which conventional calculation of vacuum energy density using quantum mechanics leads to a value which is ~10123 times more than the vacuum energy estimated from astronomical observations of expanding universe. The cosmic coincidence problem questions why matter energy density is of the same order of magnitude as the vacuum energy density at present time. Finally, the mechanism responsible for spatial flatness is not clearly understood. In this paper, by taking the vacuum as a finite and closed quantum oscillator, we solve all of the above-mentioned problems. At first, by using the purely quantum mechanical approach, we predict that the dark energy density is c4/(GR2) = 5.27×10−10 J/m3 (where R is radius of 3-sphere of the universe) and matter energy density is c4/(2GR2) = 2.6×10−10 J/m3 which match well with astronomical observations. We also prove that dark energy has always been ~66.7% and matter energy has been ~33.3% of the total energy and thus solve the cosmic coincidence problem. Next, we show how flatness of space could be maintained since the early stage of the universe. Finally, using our model, we derive the expression for age and radius of the universe which match well with the astronomical data.

scholarly journals EFFECTS OF ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD ON THE DYNAMICS OF BIANCHI TYPE VI0UNIVERSE WITH ANISOTROPIC DARK ENERGY

2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (12) ◽  
pp. 1957-1972 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. SHARIF ◽  
M. ZUBAIR
Keyword(s):  
Electromagnetic Field ◽  
Dark Energy ◽  
Bianchi Type ◽  
Anisotropic Fluid ◽  
Einstein Field Equations ◽  
Anisotropic Behavior ◽  
Field Equations ◽  
Future Evolution ◽  
Anisotropic Dark Energy ◽  
The Universe

Spatially homogeneous and anisotropic Bianchi type VI0cosmological models with cosmological constant are investigated in the presence of anisotropic dark energy. We examine the effects of electromagnetic field on the dynamics of the universe and anisotropic behavior of dark energy. The law of variation of the mean Hubble parameter is used to find exact solutions of the Einstein field equations. We find that electromagnetic field promotes anisotropic behavior of dark energy which becomes isotropic for future evolution. It is concluded that the isotropic behavior of the universe model is seen even in the presence of electromagnetic field and anisotropic fluid.

scholarly journals Cosmological test on viscous bulk models using Hubble parameter measurements and type Ia supernovae data

2019 ◽  
Vol 79 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Hernández-Almada
Keyword(s):  
Hubble Parameter ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Type Ia Supernovae ◽  
Einstein Field Equations ◽  
Field Equations ◽  
Type Ia ◽  
Free Parameters ◽  
Ia Supernovae ◽  
The Universe ◽  
Phenomenological Point

Abstract From a phenomenological point of view, we analyze the dynamics of the Universe at late times by introducing a polynomial and hyperbolic bulk viscosity into the Einstein field equations respectively. We constrain their free parameters using the observational Hubble parameter data and the Type Ia Supernovae dataset to reconstruct the deceleration q and the jerk j parameters within the redshift region $$0<z<2.5$$0<z<2.5. At current epochs, we obtain $$q_0 = -\,0.680^{+0.085}_{-0.102}$$q0=-0.680-0.102+0.085 and $$j_0 = 2.782^{+1.198}_{-0.741}$$j0=2.782-0.741+1.198 for the polynomial model and $$q_0 = -\,0.539^{+0.040}_{-0.038}$$q0=-0.539-0.038+0.040 ($$-\,0.594^{+0.056}_{-0.056}$$-0.594-0.056+0.056) and $$j_0 = 0.297^{+0.051}_{-0.050}$$j0=0.297-0.050+0.051 ($$1.124^{+0.196}_{-0.178}$$1.124-0.178+0.196) for the tanh (cosh) model. Furthermore, we explore the statefinder diagnostic that gives us evident differences with respect to the concordance model (LCDM). According to our results this kind of models is not supported by the data over LCDM.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document