scholarly journals Investigation of Lipid Profile and Clinical Manifestations in SCA Children

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Caroline Conceição da Guarda ◽  
Sètondji Cocou Modeste Alexandre Yahouédéhou ◽  
Rayra Pereira Santiago ◽  
Camila Felix de Lima Fernandes ◽  
Joelma Santana dos Santos Neres ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Cholesterol ◽  
Previous History ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Lipoprotein Cholesterol ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Clinical Complications ◽  
Lipid Parameters

Introduction. Clinical complications in sickle cell anemia (SCA) are heterogeneous and involve several molecules. It has been suggested that SCA individuals present a dyslipidemic phenotype and that lipid parameters are associated with severe clinical complications, such as pulmonary hypertension. We sought to investigate associations between lipid parameters and clinical manifestations, as well as other laboratory parameters in a population of pediatric SCA patients. Methods. Our cross-sectional evaluation included 126 SCA patients in steady state and who were not undergoing lipid-lowering therapy. Hematological and biochemical parameters were characterized, and previous clinical manifestations were investigated. Results. Total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels were increased in patients with a previous history of pneumonia, which also positively correlated with HbS levels. Decreased LDL-C levels were also associated with leg ulcers and anemia. Elevated high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels were associated with pain crises, increased viscosity, and decreased hemolysis. Several studies have determined that lipids play a role in the vascular impairment seen in SCA, which was corroborated by our findings. Conclusions. In sum, our results suggest that total cholesterol, HDL-C, and LDL-C levels are associated with hemolysis and anemia markers and, most importantly, with clinical complications related to vasculopathy in SCA.

scholarly journals Cholesterol-lowering therapy and the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme: a population study

2009 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 325
Author(s):  
Robert J Adams ◽  
Sarah Appleton ◽  
David H Wilson ◽  
Anne W Taylor ◽  
Catherine Chittleborough ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Cholesterol ◽  
Population Sample ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
Cvd Risk ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Lowering Therapy ◽  
Low Incomes ◽  
Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme

Objective: The Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) expanded the criteria for eligibility for subsidised lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) in 2006. The aim of this study was to determine the use of LLT in a representative Australian population in relation to cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, and the effectiveness of the therapy in meeting target levels. Design: Cross-sectional biomedical study with telephone interviews, questionnaires, clinical measurements, and PBS dispensing data. Subjects: Representative population sample of 4060 urban adults aged 18 years attending for the biomedical examination in 2001. Results: Of the 406 who qualified for PBS-subsidised LLT at that time, only 88 (21.5%) were actually on LLT. National Heart Foundation of Australia (NHF) recommended low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels of < 2.5 mmol/L were recorded in only 13% (528) of the population, and in 46.8% of those on LLT. Of those on LLT, 76% had total cholesterol < 5.5 mmol/L, but over 80% had total cholesterol levels above NHF-recommended levels of 4.0 mmol/L. Of the 842 classified at the highest CVD risk, only 26% were using LLT. Those aged > 60 years and on low incomes were significantly more likely to use LLT. The new PBS criteria will expand eligibility to include nearly 20% of adults. Conclusions: The majority of people at high risk of CVD were not receiving LLT, and LLT is not being used to its full effectiveness. People with low incomes or on government benefits or pensions were not less likely to use LLT than others under the PBS scheme. Whether higher copayments for those on low incomes who do not qualify for concessional payments is a significant barrier to LLT use needs further research.

Triglyceride to high density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio, total cholesterol to high density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio and low ankle brachial index in an elderly population

VASA ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 189-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yiqiang Zhan ◽  
Jinming Yu ◽  
Rongjing Ding ◽  
Yihong Sun ◽  
Dayi Hu
Keyword(s):  
High Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Total Cholesterol ◽  
High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol ◽  
Ankle Brachial Index ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
High Density ◽  
Lipoprotein Cholesterol ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Cholesterol Ratio ◽  
Potential Biomarker

Background: The associations of triglyceride (TG) to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (HDL‑C) and total cholesterol (TC) to HDL‑C ratio and low ankle brachial index (ABI) were seldom investigated. Patients and methods: A population based cross-sectional survey was conducted and 2982 participants 60 years and over were recruited. TG, TC, HDL‑C, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) were assessed in all participants. Low ABI was defined as ABI ≤ 0.9 in either leg. Multiple logistic regression models were applied to study the association between TG/HDL‑C ratio, TC/HDL‑C ratio and low ABI. Results: The TG/HDL‑C ratios for those with ABI > 0.9 and ABI ≤ 0.9 were 1.28 ± 1.20 and 1.48 ± 1.13 (P < 0.0001), while the TC/HDL‑C ratios were 3.96 ± 1.09 and 4.32 ± 1.15 (P < 0.0001), respectively. After adjusting for age, gender, body mass index, obesity, current drinking, physical activity, hypertension, diabetes, lipid-lowering drugs, and cardiovascular disease history, the odds ratios (ORs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) of low ABI for TG/HDL‑C ratio and TC/HDL‑C ratio were 1.10 (0.96, 1.26) and 1.34 (1.14, 1.59) in non-smokers. When TC was further adjusted, the ORs (95 % CIs) were 1.40 (0.79, 2.52) and 1.53 (1.21, 1.93) for TG/HDL‑C ratio and TC/HDL‑C ratio, respectively. Non-linear relationships were detected between TG/HDL‑C ratio and TC/HDL‑C ratio and low ABI in both smokers and non-smokers. Conclusions: TC/HDL‑C ratio was significantly associated with low ABI in non-smokers and the association was independent of TC, TG, HDL‑C, and LDL-C. TC/HDL‑C might be considered as a potential biomarker for early peripheral arterial disease screening.

scholarly journals Normal Non-HDL Cholesterol, Low Total Cholesterol, and HDL Cholesterol Levels in Sickle Cell Disease Patients in the Steady State: A Case-Control Study of Tema Metropolis

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard K. D. Ephraim ◽  
Patrick Adu ◽  
Edem Ake ◽  
Hope Agbodzakey ◽  
Prince Adoba ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Steady State ◽  
Sickle Cell Disease ◽  
Total Cholesterol ◽  
Sickle Cell ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Hdl Cholesterol ◽  
Lipoprotein Cholesterol ◽  
Cell Disease ◽  
Cross Sectional

Background.Abnormal lipid homeostasis in sickle cell disease (SCD) is characterized by defects in plasma and erythrocyte lipids and may increase the risk of cardiovascular disease. This study assessed the lipid profile and non-HDL cholesterol level of SCD patients.Methods.A hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted in 50 SCD patients, in the steady state, aged 8–28 years, attending the SCD clinic, and 50 healthy volunteers between the ages of 8–38 years. Serum lipids were determined by enzymatic methods and non-HDL cholesterol calculated by this formula: non-HDL-C = TC-HDL-C.Results.Total cholesterol (TC) (p=0.001) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (p<0.0001) were significantly decreased in cases compared to controls. The levels of non-HDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and triglyceride (TG) were similar among the participants. The levels of decrease in TC and HDL were associated with whether a patient was SCD-SS or SCD-SC. Systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure were each significantly associated with increased VLDL [SBP,p=0.01, OR: 0.74 (CI: 0.6–0.93); DBP,p=0.023, OR: 1.45 (CI: 1.05–2.0)].Conclusion.Dyslipidemia is common among participants in this study. It was more pronounced in the SCD-SS than in SCD-SC. This dyslipidemia was associated with high VLDL as well as increased SBP and DBP.

scholarly journals FAMILIAL HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA: DIAGNOSTIC ISSUES AND THERAPEUTIC POSSIBILITIES

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 175-186
Author(s):  
Vitalii K. Zafiraki ◽  
Alim M. Namitokov ◽  
Elena D. Kosmacheva
Keyword(s):  
Familial Hypercholesterolemia ◽  
Conflict Of Interest ◽  
Screening Program ◽  
Genetic Defect ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Premature Death ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Monogenic Disease ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FHC) is a common monogenic disease that occurs with a frequency of ~1:250 and is characterised by a high content of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) in the blood. This disease leads to the early development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ACVD). Although the screening and diagnostics issues concerned with FHC are well developed and the modern lipid-lowering therapy can significantly improve the prognosis, the detectability of this disease remains extremely low. In recent years, the concept of FHC has undergone significant changes under the influence of large epidemiological studies, including verification of the FHC diagnosis using genetic tests. The article is aimed at discussing the clinical manifestations of FHC, as well as modern medical and extracorporal approaches to its treatment.Conclusion.Until the advent of modern lipid-lowering drugs, FHC had remained to be a disease with a poor prognosis due to early ACVD and the associated premature death. Today, the diseases is amenable to successful treatment, which, though not eliminating the genetic defect, allows almost the same life duration as in the general population to be achieved. However, all the possibilities of modern approaches to the treatment of this serious disease can be realized provided that a state-level screening program for such patients has been implemented.Conflict of interest: the authors declare no conflict of interest.

scholarly journals U-Shaped Relationship of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol With Risk of Severe COVID-19 From a Multicenter Pooled Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiao Gong ◽  
Yaqiong Chen ◽  
Yusheng Jie ◽  
Mingkai Tan ◽  
Zhaofang Jiang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Low Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Lipoprotein Cholesterol ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
Low Density ◽  
Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol ◽  
Odds Ratios ◽  
Lowering Therapy ◽  
Severe Group

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is a well-known risk factor for coronary heart disease but protects against infection and sepsis. We aimed to disclose the exact association between LDL-C and severe 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Baseline data were retrospectively collected for 601 non-severe COVID-19 patients from two centers in Guangzhou and one center in Shenzhen, and patients on admission were medically observed for at least 15 days to determine the final outcome, including the non-severe group (n = 460) and the severe group (severe and critical cases) (n = 141). Among 601 cases, 76 (12.65%) received lipid-lowering therapy; the proportion of patients taking lipid-lowering drugs in the severe group was higher than that in the non-severe group (22.7 vs. 9.6%). We found a U-shaped association between LDL-C level and risk of severe COVID-19 using restricted cubic splines. Using univariate logistic regression analysis, odds ratios for severe COVID-19 for patients with LDL-C ≤1.6 mmol/L (61.9 mg/dL) and above 3.4 mmol/L (131.4 mg/dL) were 2.29 (95% confidence interval 1.12–4.68; p = 0.023) and 2.02 (1.04–3.94; p = 0.039), respectively, compared to those with LDL-C of 2.81–3.40 mmol/L (108.6–131.4 mg/dL); following multifactorial adjustment, odds ratios were 2.61 (1.07–6.37; p = 0.035) and 2.36 (1.09–5.14; p = 0.030). Similar results were yielded using 0.3 and 0.5 mmol/L categories of LDL-C and sensitivity analyses. Both low and high LDL-C levels were significantly associated with higher risk of severe COVID-19. Although our findings do not necessarily imply causality, they suggest that clinicians should pay more attention to lipid-lowering therapy in COVID-19 patients to improve clinical prognosis.

Comparison of LDL-C calculation by friedewald and martin/hopkins methods in 12,243 adults from the United States of America

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
P Penson ◽  
S.S Martin ◽  
N.C Henney ◽  
M Banach
Keyword(s):  
Low Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Threshold Value ◽  
The United States ◽  
Lipoprotein Cholesterol ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
Low Density ◽  
Strongly Correlated ◽  
Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol

Abstract Background Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is an established risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD), and a target for lipid-lowering therapy. LDL-C is typically not measured directly but is estimated using the Friedewald formula, which assumes a fixed factor for the ratio of triglycerides (TG) to very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL-C). However this assumption is sometimes not valid. The Martin/Hopkins (M/H) formula estimates LDL-C using an adjustable factor for the TG:VLDL-C ratio and is expected to improve upon Friedewald when predicting measured LDL-C, and apolipoprotein B (ApoB), one molecule of which is associated with each LDL particle. Purpose We compared values of LDL-C calculated by the Friedewald and M/H methods with respect to their correlation with non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) and ApoB, and their classification of individuals based upon attainment of the threshold value of 70 mg/dl (1.8 mmol/l) of LDL-C. This cut-point is a treatment target for individuals at high risk of CVD in the 2019 ESC guidelines for lipid modification, and a threshold for initiating statin therapy in the 2019 ACC/AHA guidelines. Methods In this analysis we included participants in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 2005–2016, age ≥18, &lt;80 years who had measurements for total cholesterol (TC), TG and HDL-C. LDL-C was calculated using Friedewald and M/H. We correlated LDL-C (calculated using the two methods) with non-HDL-C and ApoB. We identified individuals with LDL-C &lt;70 mg/dl using both methods. When LDL-C (Friedewald) was &lt;70, but LDL-C (M/H) was &gt;70, we classified these participants as discordant. Statistical analyses were performed in IBM SPSS for Windows v26. Results 12,243 individuals were included. 51.8% were female, mean (±SD) age was 45.5±17.4, 15.3% were treated with statins, ApoB was available for 2179 participants. Mean lipid concentrations (mg/dl) were: TC: 191.5±41.0, TG: 120.0±67.0, HDL-C: 54.1±15.7, LDL-C (Friedewald): 113.3±35.4; LDL-C (M/H): 114.9±35.2. In the whole population, LDL-C (M/H) was more strongly correlated than LDL-C (Friedewald) with ApoB (r=0.935 v 0.894) and non-HDL-C (r=0.981 v 0.944). In statin-treated participants, LDL-C (M/H) was also more strongly correlated with ApoB (r=0.951 v 0.914) and non-HDL-C (r=0.979 v 0.928). 1139 participants had LDL-C (Friedewald) &lt;70 mg/dl. Of these, 206 individuals (18.1%) were discordant, having LDL-C (M/H) &gt;70 mg/dl. Amongst statin-treated patients, 22.9% were discordant. Only 5.5% of individuals with LDL-C (M/H) &lt;70 mg/dl showed reverse discordance (LDL-C (Friedewald) &gt;70 mg/dl). Conclusions The M/H method of calculating LDL-C correlates more strongly with non-HDL-C and ApoB than Friedewald. Importantly the discordant results confirm previous observations that Friedewald underestimates LDL-C at low concentrations. This may result in under-use of lipid-lowering therapies. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of Monascus purpureus Went rice in subjects with hyperlipidemia

2005 ◽  
Vol 153 (5) ◽  
pp. 679-686 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng-Chieh Lin ◽  
Tsai-Chung Li ◽  
Ming-May Lai
Keyword(s):  
Total Cholesterol ◽  
Apolipoprotein B ◽  
Clinical Laboratory ◽  
Low Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Lipoprotein Cholesterol ◽  
Monascus Purpureus ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Double Blind

Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the lipid-lowering effect of Monascus purpureus Went rice on serum lipids in patients with hyperlipidemia, and to assess its safety by reporting adverse events and clinical laboratory measurements. Design and methods: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. In all, 79 patients (aged 23–65 years) with a mean baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level of 5.28 mmol/l (203.9 mg/dl) received a twice daily dose of placebo or Monascus purpureus Went rice (600 mg) for 8 weeks. Results: At week 8, Monascus purpureus Went rice therapy reduced LDL-C by 27.7%, total cholesterol by 21.5%, triglycerides by 15.8% and apolipoprotein B by 26.0%. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol and apolipoprotein A-I levels were increased by 0.9 and 3.4% respectively (not significant). No patient in the Monascus purpureus Went rice treatment group had an alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or creatine phosphokinase (CPK) measurement that was ≥ 3 times the upper limit of normal at week 4 and week 8. Conclusion: Monascus purpureus Went rice significantly reduced LDL-C, total cholesterol, triglycerides and apolipoprotein B levels, and was well tolerated in patients with hyperlipidemia. However, this study only provides data from an 8-week trial and long-term safety and efficacy data are needed.

scholarly journals Non-HDL Cholesterol Versus LDL Cholesterol as a CVD Risk Factor in Diabetic Subjects

2014 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 199-203
Author(s):  
M Saiedullah ◽  
S Begum ◽  
S Hayat ◽  
SM Kamahuddin ◽  
MR Rahman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Ldl Cholesterol ◽  
Low Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Hdl Cholesterol ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
Upward Trend ◽  
Cvd Risk ◽  
Cross Sectional

Objective: Serum low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol is considered as the primary target of lipid lowering therapy and non-high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol is the recommended second target. Recent studies claimed that non-HDL cholesterol is a better predictor of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) than LDL cholesterol. In this study we aimed to compare non-HDL cholesterol and LDL cholesterol as a CVD risk factor in confirmed diabetic subjects. Materials and methods: In this cross-sectional observational study, 1042 confirmed diabetic subjects selected randomly were included. HbA1cResults: In the total subjects, 767 (74%) subjects had LDL cholesterol > 100 mg/dL and 822 (79%) subjects had non- HDL cholesterol > 130 mg/dL. HbA1c values were different (p<0.02) in five groups and showed upward trend (p<0.01). All the lipid parameters studied were significantly different in five groups (p<0.0001) and TC, TG and non-HDL cholesterol showed upward trend (p<0.0001), but HDL cholesterol and LDL cholesterol showed downward trend (p<0.0001). Odds ratio (OR) of likelihood of risk individuals regarding non-HDL cholesterol compared to LDL cholesterol were 0.50 (p<0.001), 1.32 (p>0.05), 2.96 (p<0.001), 6.49 (p<0.001) and 9.37 (p<0.001) for TG concentrations of up to 150 mg/dL, 151-200 mg/dL, 201-250 mg/dL, 251-300 mg/dL and 301-400 mg/dL respectively with relative risk of 0.60, 1.24, 2.43, 4.83, 5.10. Conclusion: LDL cholesterol is a better tool for the detection of high-risk individuals than non-HDL cholesterol at TG concentration up to 150 mg/dL, whereas non-HDL cholesterol is better than LDL cholesterol at TG concentration above 200 mg/dL as a CVD risk factor. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/jbcps.v31i4.21004 J Bangladesh Coll Phys Surg 2013; 31: 199-203

scholarly journals Socioeconomic status and education level are associated with dyslipidemia in adults not taking lipid-lowering medication: a population-based study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luçandra R Espírito Santo ◽  
Thaís O Faria ◽  
Carla Silvana O Silva ◽  
Lorena A Xavier ◽  
Vivianne C Reis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Developing Countries ◽  
Total Cholesterol ◽  
Blood Lipids ◽  
Smoking Habit ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Education Level ◽  
Lipoprotein Cholesterol ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Population Based Study

Abstract Background Socio-economic disparities account for changes in the lipid profile in developing countries. We aimed to investigate the association between blood lipids and socio-economic and educational strata in adults not taking lipid-lowering medications. Methods A cross-sectional, population-based study enrolled 1614 individuals not taking lipid-lowering medications. Sociodemographic characteristics, monthly income, education level and the number of consumer goods available at home were obtained and individuals were classified into five socio-economic categories. Blood lipids were obtained in fasting participants. Results In men, the higher the socio-economic or educational stratum, the higher the total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) and triglyceride (TG) levels and the lower the high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c), after controlling for age, body mass index, hypertension, smoking habit and physical activity. In women, the higher socio-economic strata were associated with elevated total cholesterol and HDL-c, while lower total cholesterol, LDL-c and TG levels were found in those with higher education levels. Also, individuals in the upper socio-economic strata had higher levels of total cholesterol and LDL-c, showing more than two times higher odds of having multiple alterations in blood lipids (men: OR 2.99 [95% CI 1.23 to 5.07]; women: OR 2.31 [95% CI 1.09 to 5.83]). Conclusions Dyslipidemia is highly prevalent in developing countries. Individuals in the highest socio-economic category are the ones at higher risk for dyslipidemia. This phenomenon calls for strategies to stimulate healthy diet habits and a physically active lifestyle to minimize health problems.

scholarly journals Angiopoietin-Like Protein 3 (ANGPTL3) Modulates Lipoprotein Metabolism and Dyslipidemia

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (14) ◽  
pp. 7310
Author(s):  
Pei-Yi Chen ◽  
Wan-Yun Gao ◽  
Je-Wen Liou ◽  
Ching-Yen Lin ◽  
Ming-Jiuan Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Studies ◽  
Plasma Levels ◽  
Low Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Lipoprotein Metabolism ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Lipoprotein Cholesterol ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
Loss Of Function ◽  
Potential Strategy

Dyslipidemia is characterized by increasing plasma levels of low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C), triglycerides (TGs) and TG-rich lipoproteins (TGRLs) and is a major risk factor for the development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disorders (ASCVDs). It is important to understand the metabolic mechanisms underlying dyslipidemia to develop effective strategies against ASCVDs. Angiopoietin-like 3 (ANGPTL3), a member of the angiopoietin-like protein family exclusively synthesized in the liver, has been demonstrated to be a critical regulator of lipoprotein metabolism to inhibit lipoprotein lipase (LPL) activity. Genetic, biochemical, and clinical studies in animals and humans have shown that loss of function, inactivation, or downregulated expression of ANGPTL3 is associated with an obvious reduction in plasma levels of TGs, LDL-C, and high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C), atherosclerotic lesions, and the risk of cardiovascular events. Therefore, ANGPTL3 is considered an alternative target for lipid-lowering therapy. Emerging studies have focused on ANGPTL3 inhibition via antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) and monoclonal antibody-based therapies, which have been carried out in mouse or monkey models and in human clinical studies for the management of dyslipidemia and ASCVDs. This review will summarize the current literature on the important role of ANGPTL3 in controlling lipoprotein metabolism and dyslipidemia, with an emphasis on anti-ANGPTL3 therapies as a potential strategy for the treatment of dyslipidemia and ASCVDs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document