scholarly journals Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy DOX and XELOX Regimens for Patients with Resectable Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Yuan Tian ◽  
Qun Zhao ◽  
Yong Li ◽  
Liqiao Fan ◽  
Zhidong Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Aged Patients ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Surgery Group ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose. This paper is aimed at comparing the short-term efficacy of the combination of docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine (DOX) with the combination of oxaliplatin and capecitabine (XELOX) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens for the treatment of patients with resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Methods. A total of 300 patients aged 20-60 years with resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma who were evaluated with cT3/4Nany were randomly assigned into 3 groups: DOX group ( n = 100 , treated with neoadjuvant DOX plus adjuvant XELOX), XELOX group ( n = 100 , treated with perioperative XELOX), and surgery group ( n = 100 , treated with adjuvant XELOX). Results. A total of 93, 92, and 95 patients were enrolled in the DOX, XELOX, and surgery groups, respectively. The pathological complete response (pCR) rate was 16.1% in the DOX group and 4.3% in the XELOX group ( P = 0.008 ). There were 56 (61.3%) patients in the DOX group who presented with surgical complications, 22 (23.9%) patients in the XELOX group, and 37 (38.9%) patients in the surgery group. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events in these three groups were neutropenia (32.3%, 30.4%, and 21.1%), leucopenia (21.5%, 22.8%, and 15.8%), nausea (15.1%, 16.3%, and 12.6%), and fatigue (10.8%, 7.6%, and 8.4%). Conclusions. Neoadjuvant DOX is an effective and feasible regimen and might represent an option for young and middle-aged patients with locally advanced, resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy without Radiation for Rectal Cancer

2015 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 275-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takuya Matsumoto ◽  
Suguru Hasegawa ◽  
Masazumi Zaima ◽  
Naoya Inoue ◽  
Yoshiharu Sakai
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Pathological Complete Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Grade 3

Aim: The efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy without radiation (NAC) in the treatment of rectal cancer remains unclear. This retrospective study was aimed at determining the pathological complete response rate and short-term outcomes of NAC in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Patients and Methods: We collected data on 159 consecutive patients treated for rectal cancer (cT3/cT4a, cN+, and cM0 status) at five tertiary referral hospitals between 2005 and 2010. Pathological complete response (pCR) and safety were assessed as the main outcomes in 124 eligible patients comprising 15 who received NAC (NAC group) and 109 who received no neoadjuvant chemotherapy (non-NAC group). Results: In the NAC group, 2 patients (13.3%) achieved a pCR (95% confidence interval: 1.7-40.5%) and 3 patients (20%) experienced grade 3/4 adverse events. No significant differences were found between the NAC and non-NAC groups in terms of short-term outcomes, including R0 proportion (100 vs. 96.3%, p = 0.45) and postoperative grade 3/4 complications (13.3 vs. 18.4%, p = 0.63). Conclusions: Neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy without radiation appears to be safe, without worsening short-term outcomes, in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. A further study is needed to verify these findings in larger samples.

Induction chemotherapy with S-1 plus cisplatin in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 15501-15501
Author(s):  
J. Chung ◽  
Y. Choi ◽  
H. Shin ◽  
G. Choi ◽  
W. Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Local Treatment ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Adequate Organ Function ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Mild Toxicity

15501 Background: This study was to assess the efficacy and safety profiles of the combination treatment with S-1 and Cisplatin in patients with locally advanced SCCHN. Methods: Eligible patients were defined as histologically confirmed SCCHN, stage III or IV with no evidence of distant metastasis, evaluable lesions, adequate organ function, age of 20–80 years, and performance status 0,1 or 2. Cisplatin was infused over 1 hour on day 1 (75 mg/m2) and S-1 was administered orally for 14 consecutive days (day 2–15). The dosages of S-1 were assigned according to the patients’ body surface area (BSA): 50 mg twice a day (BSA < 1.5m2), 60 mg twice a day (BSA > 1.5m2). Each course was repeated every 3 weeks. After 2 course, tumor response were evaluated by CT scan and laryngoscopy. If the patients achieved a response (complete response: CR, or partial response: PR), they received one more course of chemotherapy before undergoing the radiotherapy or operation as a definitive local treatment. Results: All 22 patients were assessable for response and toxicity. The overall response was 80.9% (CR: 3, PR: 14). The adverse reactions occurred 120 times in 54 courses of 22 cases. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia, which occurred in 8 patients. Non-hematological toxicity of grade 3 and 4 included nausea and vomiting in 4 patients, fever in one patient and, fatigue in one patient. Since the observation period is short, the analysis about survival rate is not obtained so far. Conclusions: S-1 plus Cisplatin combination chemotherapy is effective against locally advanced SCCHN with mild toxicity. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A single-arm, phase II feasibility study of neoadjuvant docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and S-1 (DOS) chemotherapy in potentially resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 96-96
Author(s):  
M. Ryu ◽  
Y. Choi ◽  
B. Kim ◽  
Y. Park ◽  
H. Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Grade 3

96 Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate feasibility and safety of neoadjuvant docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and S-1 (DOS) chemotherapy in patients with potentially resectable adenocarcinoma of stomach or gastroesophageal junction. Methods: Forty-one patients with clinical stage T3-4N0M0 or T2-4N+M0 determined by CT, endoscopic ultrasonography, and laparoscopy were enrolled between DEC 2008 and MAR 2010. Gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection was conducted after 3 cycles of DOS chemotherapy. DOS chemotherapy consists of docetaxel 50 mg/m2 iv (day1), oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 iv (day1), and S-1 40 mg/m2 po bid (days1-14) at 3 weeks interval. After curative gastrectomy, the patients were given 1 year of adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 (40 mg/m2 D1-28, every 6 weeks). Results: All patients finished the planned neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Twenty-three (56%) patients achieved a partial response, and the remaining 18 patients had stable disease by CT scan after 3 cycles of DOS chemotherapy. No disease progression was observed during the neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A median 4.7 weeks (range, 4.0-7.6) after the start of the 3rd cycle of DOS chemotherapy, 39 (95%) patients underwent R0 resection with no pathologic residual disease in 4 (10%) patients. Hematologic toxicities were common including grade 4 neutropenia (32%), grade 3 thrombocytopenia (17%), and febrile neutropenia (10%). However, hematologic toxicities were generally transient and manageable. There were no grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicities with frequency > 5% of patients. With all toxicities taken together, 21 (51%) patients experienced grade 3 or 4 toxicities (except grade 3 neutropenia). There was no treatment-related death, and surgical complications included only mild wound problem in 4 (10%) patients. Conclusions: In this study, neoadjuvant DOS chemotherapy could induce a sufficient down-staging and R0 resection of locally advanced gastric cancer with mild and manageable toxicities. A phase III randomized trial is planned for evaluating the benefit of neoadjuvant DOS chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Concurrent Chemo-Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Gastro-Esophageal and Gastric Carcinoma

2021 ◽  
pp. 35-44
Author(s):  
Nora Shaband ◽  
Niveen Abo-Touk ◽  
Mohamed Elawadi ◽  
Saleh Ta-Ema
Keyword(s):  
Induction Chemotherapy ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Esophageal Stenosis ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma

Aims: To assess the safety and efficacy of chemo-radiotherapy before radical surgery in locally advanced gastric and gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. Study Design: This was a prospective phase Ⅱ single arm study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Mansoura University Hospital, Mansoura, Egypt, between May 2017 and June 2019. Methodology: Patients with pathologically proven gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma are included. They received one cycle of induction chemotherapy paclitaxel-carboplatin, [paclitaxel dose of 175 mg/m2, carboplatin dose of (AUC: 5)], followed by CCRT [RT 45 Gy over 25 fractions over 5 weeks concurrent with weekly paclitaxel at a dose of 50 mg/m2, carboplatin at a dose of (AUC: 2)], followed by surgery and 2 cycles of paclitaxel-carboplatin for responders. Results: The study included 24 patients. Most of the patients were diagnosed at stage III (83.3%). There were no major side effects of the induction chemotherapy cycle. There were no reported grade 3 or 4 toxicities for the CCRT. Only two patients suffered from late radiation toxicities (distal esophageal stenosis). Pathological complete response was achieved in seven patients (31.8%). Twenty-two patients had surgical resection with a 95% resection margin zero. The median follow-up time was 22.5 months. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 23, 23.5 months, respectively. Conclusion: The preliminary data suggested good efficacy of the studied treatment design with acceptable adverse-event rates, however a larger multicentric phase 3 trial with a longer follow-up duration is recommended.

scholarly journals Neoadjuvant Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin Before Concurrent Capecitabine and Radiation in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancers: Experience of a Cancer Hospital in Pakistan

2021 ◽  
pp. 790-796
Author(s):  
Muhammad Atif Mansha ◽  
Asmara Waheed ◽  
Tabinda Sadaf ◽  
Asma Rashid ◽  
Nabia Irfan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Circumferential Resection Margin ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Resection Margin ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Grade 3

PURPOSE To report the toxicity and pathologic response rates after adding neoadjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) followed by concurrent radiation and capecitabine (CAPRT) and surgery in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed medical records of 301 patients between January 2007 and December 2014. Patients were treated with four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy comprising CAPOX, followed by radiotherapy at doses of 45-54 Gy in 25-30 fractions with concurrent capecitabine. A response assessment scan was performed at 4-6 weeks postradiation followed by surgical evaluation at 6-8 weeks. Pathologic tumor and nodal response rates as well as circumferential resection margin were assessed on surgical specimens. RESULTS The median age of the patients was 43 years (range, 16-78). Overall, 227 (75.4%) patients were able to complete four cycles of CAPOX. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was well-tolerated with no serious adverse effects. The most common toxicity was diarrhea (grade 2, n = 108; 35.8%; grade 3, n = 57; 18.9%; grade 4, n = 25; 8.3%) followed by neuropathy (grade 2, n = 132; 43.8%; grade 3, n = 54; 17.9%) and oral mucositis (grade 2, n = 108; 35.8%; grade 3, n = 47; 15.6%; grade 4, n = 9; 2.99%). A total of 229 (76.1%) patients underwent surgery. Pathologic complete response was seen in 52 (22.7%; 95% CI, 13 to 28), whereas 200 (87.3%; 95% CI, 82 to 99) patients had a negative circumferential resection margin on pathology. CONCLUSION Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with CAPOX before CAPRT and planned total mesorectal excision surgery result in good tumor regression and substantial pathologic complete response rates with acceptable toxicity. With growing interest in organ preservation in rectal cancer, the strategy of completing all chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy before planned surgery offers a favorable paradigm. However, further randomized clinical trials are needed to support this evidence.

Use of carboplatinum as neoadjuvant setting for patients affected by locally advanced cervical cancer.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15553-e15553
Author(s):  
Carlo De Cicco Nardone ◽  
Francesco Plotti ◽  
Michela Angelucci ◽  
Roberto Montera ◽  
Patrizio Damiani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
World Health ◽  
Advanced Cervical Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Health Organization

e15553 Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients affected by locally advanced cervical cancer. Methods: Between June 2007 to May 2009, all patients with diagnosis of IB2-IIB cervical cancer were considered eligible for this protocol. All enrolled patients received 3 cycles of carboplatin (AUC6) and paclitaxel at 175 mg/mq in neadjuvant setting. The chemotherapy induced toxicity and response to the treatment were evaluated according to World Health Organization criteria. Results: We have enrolled 23 patients with diagnosis of locally advanced cervical cancer. A total of 22 patients completed planned 3 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. After 3 cycles of chemotherapy 9 out of 23 patients (42%) showed a complete response, 7 patients (35%) partial response, 5 patients (16%) stable disease and 2 patients (11%) showed disease progression. The most common toxicity was haematologic (43%), extra haematologic toxicities were nausea/vomiting, neuropathy and alopecia, that occurred in 45%, 13% and 25% respectively. No renal and grade 3 and 4 haematologic toxicities were registered. Conclusions: Our results suggest that the use of carboplatin, in neadjuvant setting, is a well tolerated drug, produces manageable toxicity with a response rate similar to standard cisplatin. Then, it rappresents a valid alternative in patients affected by locally advanced cervical cancer.

Camrelizumab combined with FOLFOX as neoadjuvant therapy for resectable locally advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4536-4536
Author(s):  
Ying Liu ◽  
Guangsen Han ◽  
Hongle Li ◽  
Yuzhou Zhao ◽  
Jing Zhuang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Radical Gastrectomy ◽  
Imaging Evaluation ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Ecog Ps

4536 Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been demonstrated to improve the pathological complete response(pCR) and 5-year survival rate of patients with locally advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GC/GEJC). Immunotherapy has become a new promising treatment for advanced GC/GEJC. Therefore, we intended to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Camrelizumab (anti-PD-1 antibody) combined with FOLFOX as the neoadjuvant therapy for patients with locally advanced GC/GEJC. Methods: Eligiblepatients were locally advanced GC/GEJC with clinical stage≥T2 and/or positive lymphoglandula confirmed by endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and imaging. They received 4 cycles neoadjuvant therapy which including Camrelizumab(200mg ivgtt D1), FOLFOX(Oxaliplatin 85mg/m2 ivgtt D1, 5-Fu 400mg/m2 iv D1, LV 200mg/m2 ivgtt D1, 5-Fu 2.4mg/m2 CIV 46 hours) every 14 days. Imaging evaluation was performed in 2-4 weeks after neoadjuvant therapy. Patients without progression disease (PD) received D2 radical gastrectomy. The primary endpoint was pCR, the secondary endpoints were R0 resection rate and safety. Results: From July 24 2019 to January 31 2020, 16 patients were eligible. The median age was 57 years (29-72 years). A total of 11(69%) males and 5(31%) females, ECOG PS 0 (n=9, 56%), ECOG PS 1 (n=7, 44%). All the patients completed 4 cycles treatment and none of them was confirmed PD by image. One of the patients refused gastrectomy and withdraw from the study. The other 15 patients underwent operation. Unfortunately, intraperitoneal metastases were confirmed in 2 patients during operation. 13 patients received D2 radical gastrectomy and all of them experienced R0 resection. Among the 13 evaluable patients, 1 patient (8%) was observed pCR, 3 patients (23%) experienced TRG1, 10 patients (77%) achieved stage reduction. Notably, 8 patients (62%) had lymphonodus pCR. The grade 3-4 treatment-related AEs were neutropenia (n=3, 19%), leukopenia (n=2, 13%) and anorexia (n=1, 6%). No serious AEs resulted in termination of treatment. Either severe immune-related AEs or treatment-related death was not observed. Conclusions: Camrelizumab combined with FOLFOX as neoadjuvant regimen in patients with locally advanced GC/GEJC showed promising pCR with good tolerance. Clinical trial information: NCT03939962 . [Table: see text]

KEYlargo: A phase II study of first-line pembrolizumab (P), capecitabine (C), and oxaliplatin (O) in HER2-negative gastroesophageal (GE) adenocarcinoma.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 228-228
Author(s):  
Hope Elizabeth Uronis ◽  
Christel Rushing ◽  
Gerard C. Blobe ◽  
Shiaowen David Hsu ◽  
Niharika B. Mettu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
First Line ◽  
Tumor Biopsy ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma

228 Background: Gastric and esophageal adenocarcinomas are a leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Many of these patients (pts) present with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic disease and are treated with combination cytotoxic chemotherapy. Single agent P is FDA approved for patients with recurrent locally advanced or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GEJ) whose tumors have a combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 1 after disease progression on or after two lines of therapy including fluoropyrimidine and platinum and her2/neu-targeted therapy (if indicated). More effective therapy is needed earlier in the disease trajectory. We conducted a single-arm phase II trial to establish the safety and efficacy of first-line C and O + P. Methods: Pts with previously untreated metastatic GE adenocarcinoma regardless of PDL-1 status received intravenous (IV) P 200mg with IV O 130mg/m2 every three weeks and oral C 850mg/m2 twice daily for 14 days on/7 days off. After the 6 patient safety cohort, pts first completed a biomarker cycle that included fresh tumor biopsy before P and one week after P before chemotherapy started. Archived FFPE tumor samples were also obtained from all pts with available tissue. The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints included response rate (RR) and overall survival (OS). Results: 36 pts were enrolled and 34 pts were evaluable for efficacy (1 pt withdrew for personal reasons before end of cycle 1 and 1 pt had immune-related toxicity during cycle 1 and was taken off study before any efficacy assessment). 9 pts (26%) had an esophageal primary, 18 pts (53%) had a GEJ primary and 7 pts (21%) had a gastric primary. Median PFS was 7.6 months [95% CI: 5.8 to 12.2], RR was 72.7% [95% CI: 57% to 88%], and median OS was 15.8 months [95% CI: 11.6 to NE]. 27 patients (81.8%) had decrease in disease burden (ranging from -19% to -100%). After > 18 months of follow-up, 5 patients remained in durable complete response (CR). Immune-mediated treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) included thyroid disorders (n=5; 14%), colitis (n=4; 11%), adrenal insufficiency (n=2; 5%), and type 1 diabetes (n=1). Sixteen patients (44%) experienced grade 3 or 4 TRAEs. There were no grade 5 TRAEs. Conclusions: The combination of C and O + P had acceptable safety and significant clinical activity. These promising results indicate that C and O + P merits further study as a first line option for patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic GE adenocarcinoma. Updated survival and correlative data will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT03342937.

Multicenter, randomized phase II study of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy in esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4005-4005
Author(s):  
Manish A. Shah ◽  
Khaldoun Almhanna ◽  
Syma Iqbal ◽  
Prashant Thakkar ◽  
Bryan J. Schneider ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Type I ◽  
Immune Microenvironment ◽  
Tumor Immune Microenvironment ◽  
Grade 3

4005 Background: Recent transformative studies in the treatment of EAC support adjuvant nivolumab for patients with residual disease following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) (Checkmate 577) and pembrolizumab (P) with chemotherapy in untreated metastatic disease (Keynote 590). We hypothesized that pre-operative P combined with CRT can further improve outcomes in patients with locally advanced EAC. Methods: Patients with cT3-4Nx or T2N1 M0 EAC or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma eligible for curative surgery were randomized (1:1) to receive either full-dose paclitaxel (T)/ carboplatin (C) or T/C + P induction therapy. All patients then received CRT with weekly T/C, RT 41.4Gy in 23 fractions, and P every 3 weeks. Following resection, patients received P for one year. The primary endpoint is rate of major pathologic response (MPR), defined as pathologic complete response or near complete response ( < 10% residual cancer), with 80% power and 0.1 one-sided significance level to detect the difference between a MPR proportion of 30% (historical control) and an alternative hypothesis of 47% (with preoperative P). Tissue was collected for tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) analysis including bulk and single cell RNA(scRNA) expression analysis, DNA sequencing, and flow cytometry. Results: From 8/4/17 to 10/26/20, 40 patients were enrolled: median age 68 [38-81], male 32, esophagus/GEJ type I (n = 16), GEJ II/III (n = 24). CRT was well tolerated, with no grade 3-4 adverse events attributed to P. Notable toxicity included grade 3-4 pneumonitis (13%), anastomotic leak (13%), infection (35%). In 31 evaluable patients to date, the MPR rate was 50.0% (95% CI, 32.7%-67.3%). 1-yr disease free survival was 100% for patients with MPR vs. 31.8% without MPR, p = 0.002. Esophageal/GEJ type I cancers had a significantly higher MPR rate when compared with GEJ type II/III (76.9% vs 37.5%, p = 0.03). scRNA seq on > 100,000 tumor cells revealed EAC/GEJ type I had higher infiltration of activated dendritic cells (p = 0.12), whereas GEJ tumors have significantly higher infiltration of activated B cells (p = 0.02). Conclusions: The addition of P to preoperative CRT for EAC is safe and associated with a significantly higher MPR rate compared to historical data. We found MPR to be significantly enriched in EAC/GEJ type I tumors compared with GEJ II/III, associated with important differences in the baseline tumor immune microenvironment. Clinical trial information: NCT02998268.

Camrelizumab combined with FLOFOX as neoadjuvant therapy for resectable locally advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: Updated results of efficacy and safety.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4036-4036
Author(s):  
Ying Liu ◽  
Guangsen Han ◽  
Hongle Li ◽  
Yuzhou Zhao ◽  
Zhi Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
D2 Lymph Node Dissection ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Therapy Strategy ◽  
Grade 3

4036 Background: Although anti-PD-1 antibody in combination with chemotherapy has shown promising antitumor activity in advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GC/GEJC), the evidence of neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced GC/GEJC is limited. Camrelizumab combined FOLFOX as neoadjuvant therapy for resectable locally advanced GC/GEJC was a prospective, single-arm, phase 2 study we conducted. Here, we updated the results of efficacy and safety of this study. Methods: Patients confirmed by endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and imaging with clinical stage≥T2 and/or positive lymph nodes were enrolled. They received 4 cycles of camrelizumab (200mg ivgtt on day1, q2w) plus FOLFOX (oxaliplatin 85mg/m2 ivgtt, LV 200mg/m2 ivgtt, 5-Fu 400mg/m2 iv followed by 2.4mg/m2 CIV 46 hours on day 1, q2w) as neoadjuvant therapy. Then patients without disease progression evaluated by imaging underwent gastrectomy of D2 lymph node dissection. The primary endpoint was pCR, the secondary endpoints were R0 resection rate and safety. Results: Between Jul 24 2019 and Nov 30 2020, 49 patients were enrolled. The median age was 57 years (29-72 years). All patients completed 4 cycles treatment. Unfortunately, 2 of them were confirmed PD by imaging. In addition, two patients refused gastrectomy and withdrew from the study. Eventually, 45 patients underwent gastrectomy, of which 3 patients had intraperitoneal metastases during the operation. A total of 42 patients were evaluable, all of them gained R0 resection (100%), 4 patients (10%) achieved pCR and 10 patients (24%) reached TRG1. Among the patients experienced pCR, one of them was Her-2 positive, one was MSI-H, the rest two of them were PD-L1-positive (CPS≥10). The most common ≥grade 3 adverse events (AEs) were neutropenia (35%) and leukopenia (16%). Only 1 patient (2%) experienced grade 3 immune-related AEs of alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase increase. No serious AEs resulted in termination of treatment or death. Conclusions: Camrelizumab combined with FOLFOX was an effective and safe neoadjuvant therapy strategy for patients with resectable locally advanced GC/GEJC. Furthermore, the analysis of biomarkers with clinical benefits is undergoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03939962. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document