The importance of updating the family history of breast cancer survivors.

Author(s):  
L Madlensky ◽  
L Wasserman ◽  
BA Parker ◽  
JP Pierce
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annie Wang ◽  
Jessica N. Everett ◽  
Jennifer Chun ◽  
Cindy Cen ◽  
Diane M. Simeone ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Changing practice guidelines and recommendations have important implications for cancer survivors. This study investigated genetic testing patterns and outcomes and reported family history of pancreatic cancer (FHPC) in a large registry population of breast cancer (BC) patients. Methods: Variables including clinical and demographic characteristics, FHPC in a first or second-degree relative, and genetic testing outcomes were analyzed for BC patients diagnosed between 2010-2018 in the NYU Langone Health Breast Cancer Database. Results: Among 3334 BC patients, 232 (7%) had a positive FHPC. BC patients with FHPC were 1.68 times more likely to have undergone genetic testing (p<0.001), but 33% had testing for BRCA1/2 only and 44% had no genetic testing. Pathogenic germline variants (PGV) were identified in 15/129 (11.6%) BC patients with FHPC, and in 145/1315 (11.0%) BC patients without FHPC. Across both groups, updates in genetic testing criteria and recommendations could impact up to 80% of this cohort. Conclusions: Within a contemporary cohort of BC patients, 7% had a positive FHPC. The majority of these patients (56%) had no genetic testing, or incomplete testing by current standards, suggesting under-diagnosis of PC risk. This study supports recommendations for survivorship care that incorporate ongoing genetic risk assessment and counseling.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Annie Wang ◽  
Jessica N. Everett ◽  
Jennifer Chun ◽  
Cindy Cen ◽  
Diane M. Simeone ◽  
...  

AbstractChanging practice guidelines and recommendations have important implications for cancer survivors. This study investigated genetic testing patterns and outcomes and reported family history of pancreatic cancer (FHPC) in a large registry population of breast cancer (BC) patients. Variables including clinical and demographic characteristics, FHPC in a first or second-degree relative, and genetic testing outcomes were analyzed for BC patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2018 in the NYU Langone Health Breast Cancer Database. Among 3334 BC patients, 232 (7%) had a positive FHPC. BC patients with FHPC were 1.68 times more likely to have undergone genetic testing (p < 0.001), but 33% had testing for BRCA1/2 only and 44% had no genetic testing. Pathogenic germline variants (PGV) were identified in 15/129 (11.6%) BC patients with FHPC, and in 145/1315 (11.0%) BC patients without FHPC. Across both groups, updates in genetic testing criteria and recommendations could impact up to 80% of this cohort. Within a contemporary cohort of BC patients, 7% had a positive FHPC. The majority of these patients (56%) had no genetic testing, or incomplete testing by current standards, suggesting under-diagnosis of PC risk. This study supports recommendations for survivorship care that incorporate ongoing genetic risk assessment and counseling.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S649-S650
Author(s):  
Giancarlo Pasquini ◽  
Brent J Small ◽  
Jacqueline Mogle ◽  
Martin Sliwinski ◽  
Stacey B Scott

Abstract Breast cancer survivors may experience accelerated decline in cognitive functioning compared to same-aged peers with no cancer history (Small et al., 2015). Survivors may show important differences in mean-level performance or variability in cognitive functioning compared to those without a history of cancer (Yao et al., 2016). This study compared ambulatory cognitive functioning in a sample of breast cancer survivors and an age-matched community sample without a history of cancer (n_cancer=47, n_non-cancer=105, age range: 40-64 years, M=52.13 years). Participants completed three cognitive tasks measuring working memory, executive functioning, and processing speed up to five times per day for 14 days. Results indicated no mean-level differences in cognitive performance on the three tasks between cancer survivors and those without cancer history (p’s&gt;.05). Unexpectedly, women without cancer history showed more variability than survivors on working memory but not on the other two tasks. Across both groups, those without a college education performed worse on executive functioning (B=-0.05, SE=0.03, p&lt;.05) and working memory (B=0.94, SE=0.36, p&lt;.05) compared to those that completed college. Additionally, older age was associated with slower processing speed (B=31.67, SE=7.44, p&lt;.001). In sum, this study did not find mean-level group differences in cognitive functioning between cancer survivors and age-matched women without a history of cancer. Contrary to hypotheses, those without a history of cancer were more variable on working memory. Results suggested similarities in cognitive functioning in the two samples and that education and age are important predictors of cognitive functioning independent of cancer history.


Author(s):  
Helena Carreira ◽  
Rachael Williams ◽  
Harley Dempsey ◽  
Susannah Stanway ◽  
Liam Smeeth ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose There is limited high-quality evidence on quality of life, anxiety, and depressive symptoms in breast cancer survivors and women with no history of cancer. We aimed to address this by comparing patient-reported outcomes between breast cancer survivors and women with no history of breast cancer. Methods Breast cancer survivors and women with no prior cancer were selected from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink GOLD primary care database, which includes population-based primary care electronic health record data. Breast cancer survivors and controls were frequency matched by age and primary care practice. Outcomes were assessed with validated instruments via postal questionnaire. Linear and logistic regression models were fitted to estimate adjusted associations between breast cancer survivorship and outcomes. Results A total of 356 breast cancer survivors (8.1 years post diagnosis) and 252 women with no prior cancer participated in the study. Compared with non-cancer controls, breast cancer survivors had poorer QoL in the domains of cognitive problems (adjusted β (aβ) = 1.4, p = 0.01), sexual function (aβ = 1.7, p = 0.02) and fatigue (aβ = 1.3, p = 0.01), but no difference in negative feelings, positive feelings, pain, or social avoidance. Breast cancer survivors had higher odds of borderline-probable anxiety (score ≥ 8) (adjusted OR = 1.47, 95%CI:1.15–1.87), but no differences in depression. Advanced stage at diagnosis and chemotherapy treatment were associated with poorer QoL. Conclusions Compared with women with no history of cancer, breast cancer survivors report more problems with cognition, sexual function, fatigue, and anxiety, particularly where their cancer was advanced and/or treated with chemotherapy. Implications for Cancer Survivors Breast cancer survivors with more advanced disease and/or treated with chemotherapy should be closely monitored and, when possible, offered evidence-based intervention for fatigue, cognitive dysfunction, and sexual problems.


In this study we gathered data in July 2016 by means of questionnaires from breast cancer survivors following initial consult in a naturopathic clinic. Most patients surveyed had previously or concurrently had total surgical resection of their tumor burden, followed by at least 36 treatments of intravenous nutrients, including water -soluble vitamins and minerals. We compare those having a history of surgery with those not having that history. We also compare outcomes among those having a history of radiation therapy and those without, as well as those having a history of chemotherapy and those without. Some of those in remission chose to return for follow-up intravenous nutrients once per month after achieving remission from their cancers. We compare the different cohorts, among the various stages of cancer, for treatment choices and disease status. 97 total cancer survivors responded fully and promptly to the questionnaires. 37 of those were breast cancer patients.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12588-e12588
Author(s):  
Yen Yen Tan ◽  
Daniela Muhr ◽  
Christine Rappaport-Fuerhauser ◽  
Daphne Gschwantler-Kaulich ◽  
Christoph Grimm ◽  
...  

e12588 Background: We assessed the prevalence of family history and its association with germline BRCA1/2mutation status/location and age at onset in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients. Methods: 266 patients with TNBC < 60 years unselected for family history of cancer were enrolled and germline DNA was sequenced to identify mutations. Family pedigrees were prospectively collected from these patients. Logistic regression was used to investigate family history and its association with mutation type/location and age at onset. ROC curves were constructed to determine good predictors of BRCAmutations. Results: BRCA mutations were identified in 18.0% of all patients (15.0% BRCA1, 3.0% BRCA2). BRCA1 carriers have a significantly earlier age at onset than non-mutation carriers (40 vs 49 years; p < .001). While 39/124 (31.4%) patients with family history of cancer carried a BRCA1/2 mutation, 9/142 (6.3%) BRCA carriers had no family history of cancer. BRCA1 carriers with ≥1BC in the family are commonly identified in the breast cancer cluster regions (53.1%). BRCA2 carriers more commonly cluster within the ovarian cancer regions. Of note, this difference was not statistically significant. Women with mutations in BRCA1 OCCR are diagnosed at a younger age. TNBC diagnosed ≤45 years with ≥1BC and ≥1OC in the family are good predictors of BRCA1 mutation (AUC 0.867). Conclusions: Young women with TNBC and a family history of BC and OC are likely to have a BRCA mutation. Specific BRCA mutation locations may add to the identification of a subgroup of TNBC patients with a relatively higher risk of subsequent ovarian cancer. Identification of high-risk TNBC patients with BRCA1 mutation will enable clinicians to optimize cancer management for this phenotype, but will require further validation in larger studies.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1564-1564
Author(s):  
Helena Carreira ◽  
Rachael Williams ◽  
Garth Funston ◽  
Susannah Jane Stanway ◽  
Krishnan Bhaskaran

1564 Background: Breast cancer survivors are the largest group of cancer survivors in the United Kingdom (UK). Having had a breast cancer diagnosis may adversely affect the patient’s mental health. We aimed to estimate the long-term risk of anxiety and depression in women with history of breast cancer compared to those who have never had cancer. Methods: We conducted a matched population-based cohort study, using data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) GOLD primary care database. The exposed cohort included all adult women diagnosed with breast cancer between 1987 and 2018; the unexposed group included women with no cancer history, matched to exposed women in a 4:1 ratio on primary care practice and age. Cox regression models stratified on matched set were used to estimate hazard ratios of the association between breast cancer survivorship and anxiety and depression. Results: 59,972 women (mean 62 years; standard deviation (SD) 14.0) had history of breast cancer. The median follow-up time was 3.0 years (SD 4.4), which amounted to 256,186 person-years under observation. The comparison group included 240,387 women followed up over 3.5 years (SD 4.5) (1,163,819 person-years). The incidence of anxiety in breast cancer survivors was 0.08 (95% confidence interval (95%) 0.07-0.08) per 1000 person-years, and the incidence of depression was 70 (95%CI 68-71) per 1000 person-years. The risks of both depression and anxiety were raised in breast cancer survivors compared with controls, and this appeared to be driven by the first 3 years following diagnosis (Table). Conclusions: Breast cancer survivors in the UK had significantly higher risk anxiety and depression diagnosed in primary care for three years following diagnosis than women who never had cancer. Risk of anxiety and depression in breast cancer survivors compared to women who did not have cancer by time since diagnosis. [Table: see text]


2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (26) ◽  
pp. 3133-3140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather Greenlee ◽  
Zaixing Shi ◽  
Christine L. Sardo Molmenti ◽  
Andrew Rundle ◽  
Wei Yann Tsai

Purpose Obesity after a diagnosis of specific cancers has been associated with worse prognosis. We examined the trend in obesity prevalence among cancer survivors in the United States in the past two decades and compared trends with those of adults without a history of cancer. Patients and Methods This was a population-based nationally representative sample of 538,969 noninstitutionalized US adults 18 to 85 years old with and without a history of cancer who participated in annual cross-sectional National Health Interview Surveys from 1997 to 2014. Obesity was defined as body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2 for non-Asians and body mass index ≥ 27.5 kg/m2 for Asians. Results Among 32,447 cancer survivors identified, the most common cancer diagnoses were breast (n = 6,948), prostate (n = 3,984), and colorectal (n = 2,546). From 1997 to 2014, the prevalence of obesity increased from 22.4% to 31.7% in cancer survivors and from 20.9% to 29.5% in adults without a history of cancer (P for trend < .001, both groups). Over this period, the estimated rate of annual increase in obesity prevalence was higher in women and men with a history of cancer compared with those without a history of cancer (all P for interaction < .001). The estimated rate of annual increase in obesity prevalence was 3.1% in female and 3.7% in male colorectal cancer survivors, 3.0% in breast cancer survivors, and 2.1% in prostate cancer survivors (all P < .001). In subgroup analyses, populations with the highest rates of increasing obesity burden were colorectal cancer survivors, breast cancer survivors, and non-Hispanic blacks. Conclusion From 1997 to 2014, obesity increased more rapidly among adult cancer survivors compared with the general population. Colorectal and breast cancer survivors and non-Hispanic blacks were identified as being at the highest risk for obesity.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Polly A Newcomb ◽  
Scott V Adams ◽  
Sophie Mayer ◽  
Michael N Passarelli ◽  
Lesley Tinker ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Postmenopausal bone fracture's have been proposed as a marker of lifetime estrogen exposure and have been associated with decreased risk of breast and endometrial cancer. It is plausible that prediagnostic fractures may be related to survival of estrogen-sensitive cancers. Methods We evaluated a cohort of breast (n = 6411), endometrial (n = 1127), and ovarian (n = 658) cancer cases diagnosed between 1992 and 2010 while participating in the Women’s Health Initiative. Postmenopausal fracture history was assessed from baseline reports of fractures after age 55 years and incident fractures that occurred at least one year prior to cancer diagnosis during study follow-up. Using Cox regression, we compared women with and without a history of fractures with respect to overall and cancer-specific survival. Estimates were adjusted for participant factors, including hormone therapy use; hormone receptor status was not included in our analysis. Results Among women with breast cancer, a history of prediagnostic fractures at any site was associated with poorer overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.05 to 1.43). A history of hip, forearm, or spine fractures, or hip fracture alone, was associated with increased risk of mortality (HR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.58, and HR = 2.05, 95% CI = 1.27 to 3.32, respectively). Fracture history was associated neither with cancer-specific survival among breast cancer survivors, nor with overall or disease-specific mortality among endometrial and ovarian cancer survivors. Conclusions Postmenopausal breast cancer patients with a history of fractures, especially of the hip, are more likely to die of any cause than breast cancer survivors without a fracture history. Identifying and intervening in fracture risk factors should be standard of care for all women diagnosed with breast cancer.


2022 ◽  
pp. 000313482110472
Author(s):  
Sara Jiwani ◽  
Anees B. Chagpar

Background Breast cancer survivors may experience sleep disturbances that can affect their physical and mental well-being. We sought to determine the association, if any, between yoga and sleep among breast cancer survivors in a population-based cohort. Methods The National Health Interview Survey is designed to be representative of the US civilian non-institutionalized population. We evaluated breast cancer survivors in the 2017 cohort to determine the association between yoga and self-reported quality of sleep. Results Of the 25,905 people surveyed, representing 238,738,039 in the population, 1.59% reported a previous history of breast cancer. Breast cancer survivors were less likely to report having practiced yoga in the preceding 12 months, compared to those without a history of breast cancer (9.98% vs 13.78%, P = .011). In addition, they were more likely to report having had trouble falling asleep (44.64% vs 36.32%, P = .002), staying asleep (53.72% vs 39.43%, P < .001), and using sleep medication on at least 1 day within the previous week (23.80% vs 13.49%, P < .001) than those without breast cancer. Among breast cancer survivors, there were no significant differences in difficulty falling asleep (39.16% vs 44.98%, P = .482), difficulty staying asleep (61.17% vs 52.70%, P = .305), and needing sleep medication (19.03% vs 24.53%, P = .395) between those who practiced yoga and those who did not. Controlling for sociodemographic factors, there remained no association between yoga and difficulty falling or staying asleep among breast cancer survivors. Conclusion There is no direct association between yoga and sleep quality in breast cancer survivors.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document