Association of Dyskalemias with Ischemic Stroke in Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease Patients Transitioning to Dialysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Ankur A. Dashputre ◽  
Keiichi Sumida ◽  
Fridtjof Thomas ◽  
Justin Gatwood ◽  
Oguz Akbilgic ◽  
...  

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Hypo- and hyperkalemia are associated with a higher risk of ischemic stroke. However, this association has not been examined in an advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) population. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> From among 102,477 US veterans transitioning to dialysis between 2007 and 2015, 21,357 patients with 2 pre-dialysis outpatient estimated glomerular filtration rates &#x3c;30 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> 90–365 days apart and at least 1 potassium (K) each in the baseline and follow-up period were identified. We separately examined the association of both baseline time-averaged K (chronic exposure) and time-updated K (acute exposure) treated as categorized (hypokalemia [K &#x3c;3.5 mEq/L] and hyperkalemia [K &#x3e;5.5 mEq/L] vs. referent [3.5–5.5 mEq/L]) and continuous exposure with time to the first ischemic stroke event prior to dialysis initiation using multivariable-adjusted Cox regression models. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 2,638 (12.4%) ischemic stroke events (crude event rate 41.9 per 1,000 patient years; 95% confidence interval [CI] 40.4–43.6) over a median (Q<sub>1</sub>–Q<sub>3</sub>) follow-up time of 2.56 (1.59–3.89) years were observed. The baseline time-averaged K category of hypokalemia (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 95% CI: 1.35, 1.01–1.81) was marginally associated with a significantly higher risk of ischemic stroke. However, time-updated hyperkalemia was associated with a significantly lower risk of ischemic stroke (aHR, 95% CI: 0.82, 0.68–0.98). The exposure-outcome relationship remained consistent when using continuous K levels for both the exposures. <b><i>Discussion/Conclusion:</i></b> In patients with advanced CKD, hypokalemia (chronic exposure) was associated with a higher risk of ischemic stroke, whereas hyperkalemia (acute exposure) was associated with a lower risk of ischemic stroke. Further studies in this population are needed to explore the mechanisms underlying these associations.

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Edouard L Fu ◽  
Catherine M Clase ◽  
Marie Evans ◽  
Bengt Lindholm ◽  
Joris Rotmans ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and Aims There is a lack of data that could help to guide the choice of antihypertensive agents in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). We evaluated whether initiating treatment with a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (RASi) is superior to calcium channel blockers (CCB) in preventing mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) or kidney replacement therapy (KRT) in patients with advanced CKD. Method Observational study from the Swedish Renal Register, 2007-2017. We identified all nephrologist-referred patients in Sweden who initiated RASi or CCB treatment and had non-dialysis dependent advanced CKD (eGFR &lt;30 ml/min/1.73m2). The associations between RASi vs CCB initiation, mortality, MACE and KRT were assessed by Cox regression. Analyses were adjusted with propensity score weighting for a wide range of confounders, including demographics, blood pressure, laboratory measures, comorbidities and medications. As a positive control we evaluated new use of the same drugs in patients with CKD G3 (N = 2608; eGFR between 30-60 ml/min/1.73m2). Furthermore subgroup, as-treated and competing risk analyses were performed. Results The propensity-score weighted cohort included 2479 RASi and 2327 CCB initiators who were well-matched for baseline confounders (all standardized differences &lt;0.1). Median follow-up was 4.1 years, with a maximum follow-up of over 10 years. Compared to CCB, initiation of RASi was associated with a similar risk of mortality (adjusted HR 0.94; 95% CI 0.85-1.03) and MACE (0.99; 0.87-1.13), but with a lower risk of KRT (0.87; 0.78-0.98). Results were consistent across subgroups, in as-treated analyses and after accounting for the competing risk of death. In the control cohort of patients with CKD G3, initiation of RASi (versus CCB) was associated with lower KRT risk (adjusted HR 0.67; 0.47-0.96), and similar risk of mortality (0.91; 0.76-1.08) and MACE (1.06; 0.82-1.35). Conclusion Compared with CCB, initiation of RASi in patients with advanced CKD was associated with a lower risk of KRT, but no different risk of mortality or MACE.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaowei Lou ◽  
Shizhu Yuan ◽  
Wei Shen ◽  
Yueming Liu ◽  
Juan Jin ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The effect of renal biopsy on the prognosis of elderly patients with chronic kidney disease remains unclear. Thus, in this study, we aimed to evaluate the relationship between renal biopsy and renal survival in this population.Methods In this multi-centre retrospective study, the baseline characteristics among three groups were balanced by propensity matching. All patients were divided into three groups according to age and renal biopsy. The clinicopathological features at biopsy and renal outcomes during the follow-up were collected and analysed. Renal outcomes were defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate < 15 mL/min/1.73 m2, dialysis, renal transplantation, or death. The prognostic effects of renal biopsy were evaluated using Cox regression models. Results A total of 1313 patients were identified. After propensity matching, 390 patients were selected and divided into three groups. After a total follow-up period of 55 months, 20 (13.3%) patients (47.6% group 1 vs 7.41% group 2 vs 39.1% group 3) reached renal outcomes. No significant differences were found in renal outcomes among aged patients whether they underwent renal biopsy or not. Cox regression analysis revealed risk factors in aged patients including low albumin and high levels of proteinuria and serum creatinine (P < 0.05). Platelet count was significant only in aged patients who underwent renal biopsy (hazard ratio: 0.642, P < 0.05). Conclusion In conclusion, renal biopsy in the elderly has not shown benefits in terms of renal survival, conservative treatment appears to be a viable therapeutic option in the management of those people.


BMJ ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. l1516 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonas H Kristensen ◽  
Saima Basit ◽  
Jan Wohlfahrt ◽  
Mette Brimnes Damholt ◽  
Heather A Boyd

ABSTRACTObjectiveTo investigate associations between pre-eclampsia and later risk of kidney disease.DesignNationwide register based cohort study.SettingDenmark.PopulationAll women with at least one pregnancy lasting at least 20 weeks between 1978 and 2015.Main outcome measureHazard ratios comparing rates of kidney disease between women with and without a history of pre-eclampsia, stratified by gestational age at delivery and estimated using Cox regression.ResultsThe cohort consisted of 1 072 330 women followed for 19 994 470 person years (average 18.6 years/woman). Compared with women with no previous pre-eclampsia, those with a history of pre-eclampsia were more likely to develop chronic renal conditions: hazard ratio 3.93 (95% confidence interval 2.90 to 5.33, for early preterm pre-eclampsia (delivery <34 weeks); 2.81 (2.13 to 3.71) for late preterm pre-eclampsia (delivery 34-36 weeks); 2.27 (2.02 to 2.55) for term pre-eclampsia (delivery ≥37 weeks). In particular, strong associations were observed for chronic kidney disease, hypertensive kidney disease, and glomerular/proteinuric disease. Adjustment for cardiovascular disease and hypertension only partially attenuated the observed associations. Stratifying the analyses on time since pregnancy showed that associations between pre-eclampsia and chronic kidney disease and glomerular/proteinuric disease were much stronger within five years of the latest pregnancy (hazard ratio 6.11 (3.84 to 9.72) and 4.77 (3.88 to 5.86), respectively) than five years or longer after the latest pregnancy (2.06 (1.69 to 2.50) and 1.50 (1.19 to 1.88). By contrast, associations between pre-eclampsia and acute renal conditions were modest.Conclusions Pre-eclampsia, particularly early preterm pre-eclampsia, was strongly associated with several chronic renal disorders later in life. More research is needed to determine which women are most likely to develop kidney disease after pre-eclampsia, what mechanisms underlie the association, and what clinical follow-up and interventions (and in what timeframe post-pregnancy) would be most appropriate and effective.


2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina Vodošek Hojs ◽  
Robert Ekart ◽  
Sebastjan Bevc ◽  
Nejc Piko ◽  
Radovan Hojs

Abstract Background and Aims Cardiovascular mortality is high in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. Recognizing patients with higher cardiovascular risk might help in their treatment. CHA2DS2-VASc score was originally used to predict cerebral infarction in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, it is also useful in predicting outcome in different cardiovascular conditions, independent of the presence of AF. Therefore, the aim of our research was to assess the role of CHA2DS2-VASc score in cardiovascular mortality in CKD patients. Method Eighty-seven non-dialysis CKD patients from our outpatient clinic were included. At the time of inclusion, medical history data and standard blood results were collected and CHA2DS2-VASc score was calculated. Patients were followed for assigned time or until their death. Mean follow-up time was 1696.45±564.60 days. Results Descriptive statistics of our patients are presented in table 1. During follow-up 11 patients suffered from cardiovascular death. Univariate Cox regression analysis showed that CHA2DS2-VASc score is a significant predictor of cardiovascular mortality (HR: 2.19, CI: 1.42-3.37, p=0.001). In multivariate Cox regression analysis in which CHA2DS2-VASc score, serum creatinine, urinary albumin/creatinine, haemoglobin, high sensitivity CRP and intact PTH were included, CHA2DS2-VASc score was an independent predictor of cardiovascular mortality (HR: 2.04, CI: 1.20-3.45, p=0.008) (table 2). Conclusion CHA2DS2-VASc score is a simple and quick way to identify cardiovascular risk in CKD patients.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 3463-3463
Author(s):  
Tatsunori Shimoi ◽  
Minoru Ando ◽  
Takeshi Kobayashi ◽  
Kazuhiko Kakihana ◽  
Takuya Yamashita ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3463 Introduction: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is common in survivors of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT). However, evolution over time of kidney dysfunction and its association with post-SCT acute kidney injury (AKI) are unclear. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed in 86 myeloablative allogenic SCT patients who received SCT between 1990 and 1999 and lived without relapse for 10 years or more. CKD was defined as a sustained decrease in estimated GFR less than 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 at least for a period more than 3 months. Post-SCT AKI was classified into three stages according to the acute kidney injury network (AKIN) criteria within 100 days after SCT. Incidence of new-onset CKD was studied by 1-year interval along the course of follow-up. Cumulative CKD incidence was evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier analysis. The factors associated with CKD at the time of 10 years after SCT were examined using Cox regression analysis. Results: The incident of new CKD was the highest (10.5%) at the first year after SCT and then remained almost constant (2.3 to 3.5%) (Figure 1). The prevalence of CKD increased along the follow-up time (Table 1). The cumulative incidence of CKD increased according to increasing AKI stages with significant difference between stages ≥1 and no AKI (Figure 2). Cox regression showed that each AKIN stage was a significant predictor of CKD: stage 3: hazard ratio (HR) 12.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.42–97.6; stage 2: HR 7.75, 95% CI 1.83–53.6; and stage 1: HR 4.36, 95% CI 1.06–29.5. Other predictors included total body irradiation (TBI) (HR, 4.00; 95% CI, 1.63–10.5) and age on SCT (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.03–1.13). Conclusions: CKD accumulated among long-term survivors receiving myeloablative allogenic SCT. Post-SCT AKI, regardless of the AKIN stages, is the most significant risk of CKD in such SCT population. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. e047774
Author(s):  
Qiuxia Zhang ◽  
Jingyi Zhang ◽  
Li Lei ◽  
Hongbin Liang ◽  
Yun Li ◽  
...  

AimsTo develop a nomogram for incident chronic kidney disease (CKD) risk evaluation among community residents with high cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk.MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study, 5730 non-CKD residents with high CVD risk participating the National Basic Public Health Service between January 2015 and December 2020 in Guangzhou were included. Endpoint was incident CKD defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 during the follow-up period. The entire cohorts were randomly (2:1) assigned to a development cohort and a validation cohort. Predictors of incident CKD were selected by multivariable Cox regression and stepwise approach. A nomogram based on these predictors was developed and evaluated with concordance index (C-index) and area under curve (AUC).ResultsDuring the median follow-up period of 4.22 years, the incidence of CKD was 19.09% (n=1094) in the entire cohort, 19.03% (727 patients) in the development cohort and 19.21% (367 patients) in the validation cohort. Age, body mass index, eGFR 60–89 mL/min/1.73 m2, diabetes and hypertension were selected as predictors. The nomogram demonstrated a good discriminative power with C-index of 0.778 and 0.785 in the development and validation cohort. The 3-year, 4-year and 5-year AUCs were 0.817, 0.814 and 0.834 in the development cohort, and 0.830, 0.847 and 0.839 in the validation cohort.ConclusionOur nomogram based on five readily available predictors is a reliable tool to identify high-CVD risk patients at risk of incident CKD. This prediction model may help improving the healthcare strategies in primary care.


Author(s):  
Alexander Marschall ◽  
Alexander Marschall ◽  
Andrea Rueda Liñares ◽  
Belen Biscotti Rodil ◽  
Montserrat Torres Lopez ◽  
...  

Background: The number of elderly patients undergoing pacemaker (PM) implantation is constantly growing. However, information on survival and prognostic factors of this particular patient group is scarce. The objective of this study was to determine the survival of elderly and very elderly patients undergoing PM implantation, as well as to investigate prognostic factors of mortality. Methods: This is a retrospective observational study of a single center. Patients ≥ 80 years of age, that underwent PM implantation between January 2017 and December 2018 in our center, were included for chart review. Very elderly patients were defined as those with ≥ 90 years of age. Results: A total of 269 patients were included in the study with a mean age of 85 (±4.1) years. 53 patients were ≥ 90 years of age. 52% of the patients were male. 24.5% of the elderly patients and 41.5% of the very elderly patients received a single chamber PM. Median follow-up time was 28 (14-30) months, with no significant differences between the two groups of patients. The mortality rate for elderly patients was 15.7% for the elderly and 32.1% for the very elderly (p = 0.002). Generating multivariate Cox regression models, the following parameters showed to be significant predictors of all-cause mortality: Age (1.37 (1.02-1.29), p = 0.005), chronic kidney disease (5.57 (2.47-12.56), p<0.001), COPD (3.74 (1.19-11.55), p = 0.023) and cancer (3.57 (1.02-12.51), p = 0.046). In the group of the very elderly only age (1.58 (1.10-2.27), p = 0.014) and cancer (3.76 (2.38-4.18), p = 0.003) significantly predicted mortality. Conclusion: Our study shows a good life expectancy of elderly and very elderly patients that underwent PM implantation, with a survival rate that is comparable to the general population. The primary prognostic factors were non-cardiological and comorbidities, such as chronic kidney disease, cancer and COPD, had a stronger association with mortality than age.


EP Europace ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
HA Del Castillo-Carnevali ◽  
A Marschall ◽  
M Torres-Lopez ◽  
E Basabe-Velasco ◽  
I Gomez-Sanchez ◽  
...  

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background The number of elderly patients undergoing pacemaker (PM) implantation is constantly growing. However, information on survival and prognostic factors of this particular patient group is scarce. Objective The objective of this study was to determine the survival of elderly and very elderly patients undergoing PM implantation, as well as to investigate prognostic factors of mortality. Methods This is a retrospective observational study of a single centre. Patients ≥ 80 years of age, that underwent PM implantation between January 2017 and December 2018 in our centre, were included for chart review. Very elderly patients were defined as those with ≥ 90 years of age. Results A total of 269 patients were included in the study with a mean age of 85 (±4.1) years. 53 patients were ≥ 90 years of age. 52% of the patients were male. 24.5% of the elderly patients and 41.5% of the very elderly patients received a single chamber PM. Median follow-up time was 28 (14-30) months, with no significant differences between the two groups of patients. The mortality rate for elderly patients was 15.7% for the elderly and 32.1% for the very elderly (p = 0.002). Generating multivariate Cox regression models, the following parameters showed to be significant predictors of all-cause mortality: Age (1.37 (1.02-1.29), p = 0.005), chronic kidney disease (5.57 (2.47-12.56), p &lt; 0.001), COPD (3.74 (1.19-11.55), p = 0.023) and cancer (3.57 (1.02-12.51), p = 0.046). In the group of the very elderly only age (1.58 (1.10-2.27), p = 0.014) and cancer (3.76 (2.38-4.18), p = 0.003) significantly predicted mortality. Conclusions Our study shows a good life expectancy of elderly and very elderly patients, that underwent PM implantation, with a survival rate that is comparable to the general population. The primary prognostic factors were non-cardiological and co-morbidities, such as chronic kidney disease, cancer and COPD, had a stronger association with mortality than age.


2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (11) ◽  
pp. 1078-1084 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph H. Schafer ◽  
Ashley L. Casey ◽  
Kristina A. Dupre ◽  
Britta A. Staubes

Background: Because of a lack of comparative data on anticoagulant use in the advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) population, guidelines recommend warfarin for atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment in these patients. However, apixaban has specific dosing recommendations in CKD leading to use in clinical practice. Objective: To evaluate major bleeding, stroke, and thromboembolism rates in patients with CKD stage 4, stage 5, and dialysis on apixaban or warfarin therapy. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with advanced CKD receiving apixaban or warfarin. The primary outcome was the occurrence of major bleeding at 3 months after enrollment. Secondary outcomes included occurrence of major bleeding, occurrence of ischemic stroke, and recurrence of VTE at 3 to 6 and 6 to 12 months. Results: A total of 604 patients were included in the analysis. The percentage of apixaban and warfarin patients with a major bleed at 0 to 3, 3 to 6, and 6 to 12 months were 8.3% versus 9.9% ( P=0.48), 1.4% versus 4% ( P=0.07), and 1.5% versus 8.4% ( P<0.001), respectively. There were no differences in rates of ischemic stroke or recurrent VTE at any time period. Conclusion and Relevance: Patients with advanced CKD taking apixaban had similar bleeding rates at 3 months compared with those taking warfarin. However, those who continued therapy had higher major bleeding rates with warfarin between 6 and 12 months. This study provides knowledge on the effects of a direct oral anticoagulant in a population that was excluded from all major trials.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document