scholarly journals Unlocking Access to Broad Molecular Profiling: Benefits, Barriers, and Policy Solutions

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
David M. Thomas ◽  
Joanne M. Hackett ◽  
Stjepko Plestina

<b><i>Objectives:</i></b> “Personalized healthcare” is generating new approaches to disease management by considering inter-individual variability in genes, environment, and lifestyle. Technologies such as comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) are drivers of this shift. Here, we address the significant hurdles to the equitable implementation of CGP into routine clinical practice. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This article draws on published evidence on the value of genomic profiling, as well as interviews with nine academic and clinical experts from six different countries to validate findings and test policy proposals for reforms. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The potential benefits of CGP extend beyond direct patient outcomes, to healthcare systems with societal and economic impacts. Among key barriers impeding integration into routine clinical practice are the lack of infrastructure to ensure reliable clinical testing and the limited understanding of genomics among healthcare personnel. In addition, the absence of health economic evidence supporting broader use of CGP is creating concerns for payers regarding the systemic benefits and affordability of this technology. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Policy proposals that aim to improve equitable patient access to CGP will need to consider new funding models, health technology assessment processes that capture both patient and systemic benefits, and appropriate regulatory standards to determine the quality of genomic profiling tests.

BMC Cancer ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Talal Hilal ◽  
Mary Nakazawa ◽  
Jacob Hodskins ◽  
John L. Villano ◽  
Aju Mathew ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 57-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamie Cathleen Riches ◽  
Nikolaus Schultz ◽  
Geoffrey Yuyat Ku ◽  
Tooba Imtiaz ◽  
David Paul Kelsen ◽  
...  

57 Background: Esophagogastric (EG) cancer is a phenotypically heterogeneous disease. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) identified four distinct subsets: 1) Epstein Barr Virus (EBV) tumors with PIK3CA mutations, PD-L1/2 amplification (amp), 2) Tumors with Microsatellite instability (MSI-H), 3) chromosomally unstable (CIN) tumors with frequent amplifications, 4) chromosomally stable/diffuse type tumors with RHOA mutations. We explore the utility/feasibility of genomic profiling of EG tumors in routine clinical practice. Methods: Patients (pts) with metastatic EG adenocarcinoma undergoing treatment at MSKCC were consented for molecular testing under institutional protocol. Archival formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) samples were analyzed using an on-site 341 cancer-associated gene bait capture, next generation sequencing (NGS) assay. Results: Of 70 analyzed EG tumors, 66 (94%) harbored at least one genomic alteration, the most frequent being TP53 mutations (77%), HER2 amp (30%) and EGFR amp (10%). Alterations in PI3K/AKT/mTOR (9%) and G1-S1 cell cycle regulators (CDK12 (11%), CDKN2A (10%)) were also observed. A comparison with the TCGA results revealed an over-representation of the CIN subtype (65% vs 50% in TCGA). We found very few EBV or MSI tumors (3% each), with the remaining 29% being chromosomally stable. Data is reported in the clinical medical record and maintained in the MSKCC-internal cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics ( http://cbioportal.org ) (Gao, et al.). The portal is a web resource for exploring, visualizing, and analyzing multidimensional cancer genomics data and when available, to link these data to therapeutic interventions and clinical outcomes. Conclusions: CIN tumors with frequent amplifications represent majority of metastatic EG cancer at our institution. Optimal development of target-specific therapy for EG tumors will require genomic characterization. Comprehensive molecular profiling is feasible in routine clinical practice and has created a roadmap for pt stratification and genome-guided trial development.


2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (3.5) ◽  
pp. CGE19-064
Author(s):  
Kristi Maxwell ◽  
Eric A. Severson ◽  
Meagan Montesion ◽  
Ingrid Marino ◽  
Rachel Anhorn ◽  
...  

Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) for patients with advanced solid tumors is on the trajectory of becoming standard of care through incorporation into clinical practice, professional society guidelines, availability of an FDA-approved assay, and a national coverage determination from Medicare. For hematologic malignancies, the clinical utility of CGP can be diagnostic, prognostic, or predictive depending on the type of malignancy. Molecular testing has been standard of care for many years for hematologic malignancies, and payer coverage of the CGP approach must now be considered to keep pace with advances in the field of hematology-oncology. Based on American Medical Association CPT coding definitions, molecular testing for hematologic malignancies is categorized as testing for individual genes and gene panels of 5–50 genes or >50 genes. Our review of payer coverage policies from the Policy Reporter database in October 2018 demonstrated that payer coverage for >50 genes in hematologic malignancies is limited. As an example of coverage limitations, a recently updated Medicare Local Coverage Determination limits coverage to 50 genes or less. Coverage decisions such as these are being made during a time of increasing demand for an expanded approach. Data from the Foundation Medicine, Inc. database shows that as of April 2018, over 3,600 patients with AML, MDS, and MPN have undergone clinical testing with FoundationOne Heme, a CGP assay for hematologic malignancies. In an analysis of over 1,300 AML cases tested with FoundationOne Heme, 62% had an alteration that is included in the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines), and 91% had a clinically relevant alteration identified that could inform diagnosis, prognosis, or treatment selection. In an analysis of over 1,300 MDS cases tested, 70% had at least one clinically relevant alteration identified. In an analysis of over 200 MPN cases tested, 48% were triple negative for CALR, JAK2, and MPL, and of those triple negative cases, 55% had another clinically relevant alteration. These data demonstrate that FoundationOne Heme is a clinically important assay for patients with hematologic malignancies including AML, MDS, and MPN, and stakeholders within the system must now come together to further refine the clinical utility, improve payer coverage, and ensure patient access to this impactful testing as the field advances.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles C. Guo ◽  
Jolanta Bondaruk ◽  
Hui Yao ◽  
Ziqiao Wang ◽  
Li Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract Genomic profiling studies have demonstrated that bladder cancer can be divided into two molecular subtypes referred to as luminal and basal with distinct clinical behaviors and sensitivities to frontline chemotherapy. We analyzed the mRNA expressions of signature luminal and basal genes in bladder cancer tumor samples from publicly available and MD Anderson Cancer Center cohorts. We developed a quantitative classifier referred to as basal to luminal transition (BLT) score which identified the molecular subtypes of bladder cancer with 80–94% sensitivity and 83–93% specificity. In order to facilitate molecular subtyping of bladder cancer in primary care centers, we analyzed the protein expressions of signature luminal (GATA3) and basal (KRT5/6) markers by immunohistochemistry, which identified molecular subtypes in over 80% of the cases. In conclusion, we provide a tool for assessment of molecular subtypes of bladder cancer in routine clinical practice.


2021 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dora Čerina ◽  
Višnja Matković ◽  
Kristina Katić ◽  
Ingrid Belac Lovasić ◽  
Robert Šeparović ◽  
...  

Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) is gradually becoming an inevitable part of the everyday oncology clinical practice. The interpretation and optimal implementation of the results is one of the hot topics of modern-day oncology. According to the recent findings, uterine cancer harbors a high level of gene alterations but is still insufficiently explored. The primary goal of this project was to assess the proportion of patients with targetable mutations. Also, the aim was to define and emphasize potential opportunities as well as the problems we have faced in the first year of testing on the national level. We performed a multicentric, retrospective, nested cross-sectional analysis on the total population of Croatian patients with advanced/metastatic uterine cancer where the tumor CGP was performed during 2020. CGP of the tumor tissue of 32 patients revealed clinically relevant genomic alterations (CRGA) in 27 patients (84%) with a median of 3 (IQR 1-4) CRGA per patient. The most common CRGAs were those of phosphatide-inositol-3 kinases (PIK3) in 22 patients (69%), with 13/22 (59%) of those patients harboring PIK3CA mutation. The next most common CGRAs were ARID1A and PTEN mutations in 13 (41%) and 11 (34%) patients, respectively. Microsatellite status was determined as stable in 21 patients (66%) and highly unstable in 10 patients (31%). A high tumor mutational burden (≥10Muts/Mb) was reported in 12 patients (38%). CGP analysis reported some kind of targeted therapy for 28 patients (88%). CGP determined clinically relevant genomic alterations in the significant majority of patients with metastatic uterine cancer, defining it as a rich ground for further positioning and development of precision oncology.


2021 ◽  
pp. 084653712110252
Author(s):  
Supriya Kulkarni ◽  
Vivianne Freitas ◽  
Derek Muradali

Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) is gradually being implemented in routine clinical breast imaging practice. The technique of image acquisition reduces the confounding effect of overlapping breast tissue, which substantially affects cancer detection, abnormal recall, and interval cancer rates in a screening/ surveillance setting. In a diagnostic setting, tomosynthesis also allows for improved lesion localization and characterization over conventional imaging, which potentially improves the accuracy and improved workflow efficiency. To optimize the utility of tomosynthesis, imagers should be aware of the pertinent aspects of image acquisition as it relates to interpretation, the appearance of benign and malignant pathologies, and sources of possible misinterpretation. This article aims to provide a practical knowledge base of DBT and demonstrate its potential benefits when incorporated into routine clinical practice.


2011 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 225
Author(s):  
Gianfranco Sinagra ◽  
Michele Moretti ◽  
Giancarlo Vitrella ◽  
Marco Merlo ◽  
Rossana Bussani ◽  
...  

In recent years, outstanding progress has been made in the diagnosis and treatment of cardiomyopathies. Genetics is emerging as a primary point in the diagnosis and management of these diseases. However, molecular genetic analyses are not yet included in routine clinical practice, mainly because of their elevated costs and execution time. A patient-based and patient-oriented clinical approach, coupled with new imaging techniques such as cardiac magnetic resonance, can be of great help in selecting patients for molecular genetic analysis and is crucial for a better characterisation of these diseases. This article will specifically address clinical, magnetic resonance and genetic aspects of the diagnosis and management of cardiomyopathies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document