Abstract 15749: Sex-differences in Coronary Heart Disease Between Individuals With Familial Hypercholesterolemia and Controls in Norway During 1992-2017

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Karianne Svendsen ◽  
Jannicke Igland ◽  
Henriette W Krogh ◽  
Grethe S Tell ◽  
Liv J Mundal ◽  
...  

Introduction: During the last 30 years, treatment of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) has been revolutionized, but it is not known if both sexes equally benefit in these advances, and whether this could have affected the sex difference in risk of coronary heart disease (CHD). We aimed to study sex difference in the risk of CHD between men and women with FH compared to non-FH men and women. Methods: We obtained data on CHD hospitalization and death from Norwegian health registries in 4,525 individuals diagnosed with FH between 1992 and 2014 and an age and sex matched control population of 88,892. The sex distribution was about 50/50 between women and men, and the mean age at start of follow-up was 36 years. Results: The cumulative incidence of CHD (FH vs. non-FH controls) in women and men are shown in Figure 1 with a clear increased risk in FH compared to controls. The cumulative incidence starts to increase at a younger age in men compared with women, both in FH and non-FH controls. This corresponds to an age adjusted 2.6-fold higher risk of CHD in men compared with women in both the FH and control population. In the FH population, men aged 20-39 years had a hazard ratio (HR) of 5.3 (95% CI: 2.6-10.9) compared with women, whereas the corresponding HR between women and men in non-FH controls was 3.7 (95% CI: 2.6-5.3). There was no significant interaction between sex and FH status, indicating that the excess risk in men was similar in FH and non-FH controls. Stratified by sex and adjusted for age, we found that both men and women with FH had a 2-fold higher risk of CHD than controls. The highest excess risk was observed in ages 20-30 years with a of HR= 4.5 (95% CI: 2.2-9.2) and a HR of= 5.5 (95%CI: 4.60-9.34) in women and men, respectively. Conclusions: The risk of CHD among individuals with FH was higher in men than in women in all age groups presented, with no differences between the FH sample and the non-FH controls. However, the relative risk in FH compared with controls was similar for both sexes.

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 129 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanne A Peters ◽  
Rachel R Huxley ◽  
Mark Woodward

Introduction: A previous pooled analysis suggested that women with diabetes are at substantially increased risk of fatal coronary heart disease (CHD) compared with affected men. Additional findings from larger and more contemporary studies have since published on the sex-specific associations between diabetes and incident CHD. We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis so as to provide the most reliable evidence of any sex difference in the effect of diabetes on subsequent risk of CHD. Methods: PubMed MEDLINE was systematically searched for prospective population-based cohort studies published between on January 1, 1966 and February 13, 2013. Eligible studies had to have reported sex-specific estimates of the relative risk (RR) for incident CHD associated with diabetes, and its associated variability. Random effects meta-analyses with inverse variance weighting were used to obtain sex-specific RRs and their ratio (RRR). Results: Data from 64 cohorts including 858,507 individuals and 28,203 incident CHD events were included. The RR for incident CHD associated with diabetes compared with no diabetes was 2.83 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.37, 3.38) in women and 2.11 (95% CI: 1.79, 2.50) in men. The multiple-adjusted RRR for incident CHD was 44% greater in women with diabetes than it was in men with diabetes (95% CI: 27; 63) with no significant heterogeneity between studies (I2=20%). Conclusions: Women with diabetes have more than a 40% greater risk of incident CHD compared with men with diabetes. Sex disparities in pharmacotherapy are unlikely to explain the excess risk in women. Instead, a greater deterioration in cardiovascular risk profile combined with more prolonged exposure to adverse levels of cardiovascular risk factors among pre-diabetic women compared with their male equivalents may be responsible for the excess risk of diabetes-related CHD in women. Future studies are warranted elucidate the mechanisms responsible for the substantial sex-difference in diabetes-related risk of CHD.


Heart ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 104 (19) ◽  
pp. 1600-1607 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liv J Mundal ◽  
Jannicke Igland ◽  
Marit B Veierød ◽  
Kirsten Bjørklund Holven ◽  
Leiv Ose ◽  
...  

ObjectiveThe primary objective was to study the risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and coronary heart disease (CHD) in patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) and compare with the risk in the general population.MethodsPatients with an FH mutation but without prior AMI (n=3071) and without prior CHD (n=2795) were included in the study sample during 2001–2009. We obtained data on all AMI and CHD hospitalisations in Norway. We defined incident cases as first time hospitalisation or out-of-hospital death due to AMI or CHD. We estimated standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) with 95% CIs with indirect standardisation using incidence rates for the total Norwegian population stratified by sex, calendar year and 1 year age groups as reference rates.ResultsSIRs for AMI (95% CIs) were highest in the age group 25–39 years; 7.5 (3.7 to 14.9) in men and 13.6 (5.1 to 36.2) in women and decreased with age to 0.9 (0.4 to 2.1) in men and 1.8 (0.9 to 3.7) in women aged 70–79 years. Similarly, SIRs for CHD were highest among patients 25–39 years old; 11.1 (7.1–17.5) in men and 17.3 (9.6–31.2) in women and decreased 2.4 (1.4–4.2) in men and 3.2 (1.5–7.2) in women at age 70–79. For all age groups, combined SIRs for CHD were 4.2 (3.6–5.0) in men and 4.7 (3.9–5.7) in women.ConclusionPatients with FH are at severely increased risk of AMI and CHD compared with the general population. The highest excess risk was in the youngest group aged 25–39 years, in both sexes.


2007 ◽  
Vol 48 (8) ◽  
pp. 894-899 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Soljanlahti ◽  
R. Raininko ◽  
L. Hyttinen ◽  
K. Lauerma ◽  
P. Keto ◽  
...  

Background: Clinically silent brain lesions detected with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are associated with increased risk for stroke, while stroke risk is controversial in familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). Purpose: To determine whether the occurrence and size of clinically silent brain lesions in FH patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) is higher than in neurologically healthy controls without CHD. Material and Methods: Brain MRI (1.5T) was performed on 19 DNA-test-verified FH patients with CHD and on 29 cardiovascularly and neurologically healthy controls, all aged 48 to 64 years. All patients were on cardiovascular medication. Intracranial arteries were evaluated by MR angiography. Infarcts, including lacunas, and white matter T2 hyperintensities (WMHI), considered as signs of small vessel disease, were recorded. A venous blood sample was obtained for assessment of risk factors. Carotid and femoral intima-media thicknesses (IMT), assessed with ultrasound, were indicators of overall atherosclerosis. Results: On intracranial MR angiography, three patients showed irregular walls or narrowed lumens in intracranial carotid arteries. No silent infarcts appeared, and no differences in numbers or sizes of WMHIs between groups were recorded. Patients had greater carotid and femoral IMTs, and a greater number of carotid and femoral plaques. Cholesterol-years score, level of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and level of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) of the FH-North Karelia patients were higher than those of the controls, while the level of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol in controls was higher. Conclusion: FH patients with CHD and adequate cardiovascular risk-factor treatment showed no difference in the amount or size of clinically silent brain lesions compared to controls, despite patients' more severe atherosclerosis.


2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (11) ◽  
pp. 1178-1186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aline Meirhaeghe ◽  
Michèle Montaye ◽  
Katia Biasch ◽  
Samantha Huo Yung Kai ◽  
Marie Moitry ◽  
...  

Background Over the past few decades decreases in coronary heart disease morbidity and mortality rates have been observed throughout the western world. We sought to determine whether the acute coronary event rates had decreased between 2006 and 2014 among French adults, and whether there were sex and age-specific differences. Methods We examined the French MONICA population-based registries monitoring the Lille urban area in northern France, the Bas-Rhin county in north-eastern France and the Haute Garonne county in south-western France. All acute coronary events among men and women aged 35–74 were collected. Results Over the study period, the age-standardised attack rates decreased in both men (annual percentage change −1.5%, P = 0.0006) and women (annual percentage change −2.1%, P = 0.002). Also, the age-standardised incidence rates decreased in both men (annual percentage change −0.9%, P = 0.03) and women (annual percentage change −1.8%, P = 0.002) due to decreases in the 65–74 year age group. In men, age-standardised mortality rates decreased by 3.5% per year ( P = 0.0004), especially in the 55–64 and 65–74 year age groups. In women, these rates decreased by 4.3% per year ( P = 0.0009), particularly in the 35–44 and 65–74 year age groups. We also observed significant decreases in case fatality among both men (annual percentage change −1.7%, P < 0.0001) and women (annual percentage change −1.9%, P = 0.009). Conclusions Downward trends in acute coronary event attack, incidence and mortality rates were observed between 2006 and 2014 in men and women. This effect was age dependent and was primarily due to decreases in the 65–74 year age group. There were no substantial declines in the younger age groups except for mortality in young women. Prevention measures still need to be strengthened, particularly in young adults.


2021 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Panagiotis Anagnostis ◽  
Christos V. Rizos ◽  
Ioannis Skoumas ◽  
Loukianos Rallidis ◽  
Konstantinos Tziomalos ◽  
...  

Aims: Despite the established link between familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and increased risk of coronary heart disease (CHD), its association with other common atherosclerotic and metabolic diseases has not been extensively studied. The aim of this study was to report the prevalence of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) [i.e. common carotid artery disease (CCAD) and lower extremity arterial disease (LEAD)], aortic valve stenosis, chronic kidney disease (CKD) and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in patients with FH. Materials& Methods: This was a cross-sectional study retrieving data from the Hellenic Familial Hypercholesterolemia Registry (HELLAS-FH). Results: A total of 1,633 adult patients (850 males) with heterozygous FH (HeFH) were included (mean age 51.3±14.6 years at registration and 44.3±15.9 years at diagnosis). Any common carotid artery stenosis (CCAS) was diagnosed in 124 out of 569 patients with available related data (21.8%), while the prevalence of CCAD (defined as a CCAS ≥50%) was 4.2%. The median (interquartile range - IQR) CCAS was 30% (20-40), whereas the median (IQR) carotid intima media thickness (CIMT) was 0.7 (0.1-1.4) mm. LEAD was reported in 44 patients (prevalence 2.7%). The prevalence of aortic valve stenosis and CKD was 2.0% and 6.4%, respectively. NAFLD was present in 24% of study participants. Conclusions: HeFH is associated with a relatively high prevalence of any CCAS and CCAD. The prevalence of LEAD, CKD and aortic valve stenosis was relatively low, whereas the prevalence of NAFLD was similar to that of the general population.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document