Abstract 15762: Intensive Weight Management Improves Functional Capacity in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Milad El Hajj ◽  
Elia El Hajj ◽  
Brandon Sykes ◽  
Renee Baxley ◽  
Melissa Lamicq ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Weight Loss ◽  
Body Weight ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Weight Management ◽  
Racial Differences ◽  
Management Program ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Primary Endpoints

Background: Obesity is associated with incident heart failure (HF), particularly HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Weight loss is difficult to achieve in patients with limited physical capacity and the benefits remain uncertain in established HF. Methods: Patients with EF > 50% and at least 1 objective criteria for HFpEF (BNP 200 pg/ml, elevated resting or exercise wedge pressure (15 or 25 mmHg) or pulmonary edema on CXR) and BMI 30 kg/m2 were enrolled in a 15-week weight management program that entailed weekly counseling, weight checks, and meal replacement (twice daily weeks 1-8, once daily weeks 9-12). Primary endpoints were change from baseline to 15-weeks for weight, Minnesota Living With HF (MLWHF) score and 6 minute walk (6MW). Paired t-test was used to test for differences from baseline to the 15 week clinical endpoint, and one-way ANOVA was used to evaluate if these differences persisted at 26 week follow up. Results: 65 patients signed consent, 41 completed the 15-week program and 37 had 26-week follow up. Mean age was 67±9 years, BMI 41±6 kg/m 2 , 65% were female, and 43% black. Mean weight decreased by 8.1±6.6 kg at the 15-week endpoint (p<0.001) and persisted at 26-week follow up (p<0.001). 74% of patients lost more than 5% of their baseline body weight at week 15. Blacks lost a mean of 6±6% body weight compared to 9±4% in Caucasians (p<0.05). At 15 weeks, mean 6MW distance increased from 221±111 m to 286±99 m (p<0.001) and then fell to 275±144 m at 26 weeks (p=0.043). MLWHF score improved from 60±24 to 38±27 (p<0.001) and 38±26 (p<0.001) at 15 and 26 weeks, respectively. BNP did not change (109 to 114 pg/ml). E/e’ decreased significantly from 13.9±6.8 to 11.9±5.6 at 26 weeks follow up (p<0.01). BNP levels decreased by 39±103 pg/ml in blacks vs. an increase of 17±53 mg/dl in Caucasians (p<0.05) at 15-week follow up. Conclusions: Clinically relevant weight loss is possible in patients with established HFpEF and when it occurs, this is associated with significant improvements in quality of life and exercise capacity. There may be racial differences in the biochemical response to weight management in this population.

scholarly journals Pragmatic Weight Management Program for Patients With Obesity and Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elia C. El Hajj ◽  
Milad C. El Hajj ◽  
Brandon Sykes ◽  
Melissa Lamicq ◽  
Michael R. Zile ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Weight Loss ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Management Program ◽  
Weight Management Program ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Walk Distance ◽  
Minute Walk Distance ◽  
Minute Walk

Background Obesity is associated with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Weight loss can improve exercise capacity in HFpEF. However, previously reported methods of weight loss are impractical for widespread clinical implementation. We tested the hypothesis that an intensive lifestyle modification program would lead to relevant weight loss and improvement in functional status in patients with HFpEF and obesity. Methods and Results Patients with ejection fraction >45%, at least 1 objective criteria for HFpEF, and body mass index ≥30 kg/m 2 were offered enrollment in an established 15‐week weight management program that included weekly visits for counseling, weight checks, and provision of meal replacements. At baseline, 15 weeks, and 26 weeks, Minnesota Living With Heart Failure score, 6‐minute walk distance, echocardiography, and laboratory variables were assessed. A total of 41 patients completed the study (mean body mass index, 40.8 kg/m 2 ), 74% of whom lost >5% of their baseline body weight following the 15‐week program. At 15 weeks, mean 6‐minute walk distance increased from 223 to 281 m ( P =0.001) and then decreased to 267 m at 26 weeks. Minnesota Living With Heart Failure score improved from 59.9 to 37.3 at 15 weeks ( P <0.001) and 37.06 at 26 weeks. Changes in weight correlated with change in Minnesota Living With Heart Failure score ( r =0.452; P =0.000) and 6‐minute walk distance ( r =−0.388; P <0.001). Conclusions In a diverse population of patients with obesity and HFpEF, clinically relevant weight loss can be achieved with a pragmatic 15‐week program. This is associated with significant improvements in quality of life and exercise capacity. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02911337.

Do Patients With Acute Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction Have Heart Failure at Follow-Up: Implications of the Framingham Criteria

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (8) ◽  
pp. 673-684
Author(s):  
CAMILLA HAGE ◽  
ULRIKA LÖFSTRÖM ◽  
ERWAN DONAL ◽  
EMMANUEL OGER ◽  
AGNIESZKA KAPŁON-CIEŚLICKA ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Acute Heart Failure ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction

Long-term systolic blood pressure and all-cause mortality in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: an analysis of the TOPCAT trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
P Huang ◽  
C Liu
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Risk Of Mortality ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
History Of

Abstract Background Lower systolic blood pressure (SBP) at admission or discharge was associated with poor outcomes in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, the optimal long-term SBP for HFpEF was less clear. Purpose To examine the association of long-term SBP and all-cause mortality among patients with HFpEF. Methods We analyzed participants from the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist (TOPCAT) study. Participants had at least two SBP measurements of different times during the follow-up were included. Long-term SBP was defined as the average of all SBP measurements during the follow-up. We stratified participants into four groups according to long-term SBP: &lt;120mmHg, ≥120mmHg and &lt;130mmHg, ≥130mmHg and &lt;140mmHg, ≥140mmHg. Multivariable adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for all-cause mortality associated with SBP level. To assess for nonlinearity, we fitted restricted cubic spline models of long-term SBP. Sensitivity analyses were conducted by confining participants with history of hypertension or those with left ventricular ejection fraction≥50%. Results The 3338 participants had a mean (SD) age of 68.5 (9.6) years; 51.4% were women, and 89.3% were White. The median long-term SBP was 127.3 mmHg (IQR 121–134.2, range 77–180.7). Patients in the SBP of &lt;120mmHg group were older age, less often female, less often current smoker, had higher estimated glomerular filtration rate, less often had history of hypertension, and more often had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and atrial fibrillation. After multivariable adjustment, long-term SBP of 120–130mmHg and 130–140mmHg was associated with a lower risk of mortality during a mean follow-up of 3.3 years (HR 0.65, 95% CI: 0.49–0.85, P=0.001; HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.50–0.88, P=0.004, respectively); long-term SBP of &lt;120mmHg had similar risk of mortality (HR 1.03, 95% CI: 0.78–1.36, P=0.836), compared with long-term SBP of ≥140mmHg. Findings from restricted cubic spline analysis demonstrate that there was J-shaped association between long-term SBP and all-cause mortality (P=0.02). These association was essentially unchanged in sensitivity analysis. Conclusions Among patients with HFpEF, long-term SBP showed a J-shaped pattern with all-cause mortality and a range of 120–140 mmHg was significantly associated with better outcomes. Future randomized controlled trials need to evaluate optimal long-term SBP goal in patients with HFpEF. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Foundation. Main funding source(s): China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Grant (2019M660229 and 2019TQ0380)

scholarly journals Trends in cause-specific readmissions in heart failure with preserved versus reduced and mid-range ejection fraction

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
X.T Cui ◽  
E Thunstrom ◽  
U Dahlstrom ◽  
J.M Zhou ◽  
J.B Ge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Temporal Trend ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Readmission Rates ◽  
P Values ◽  
National Board ◽  
Over Time

Abstract Background It remains unclear whether the readmission of heart failure (HF) patients has decreased over time and how it differs among HF with preserved ejection fraction (EF) (HFpEF) versus reduced EF (HFrEF) and mid-range EF (HFmrEF). Methods We evaluated HF patients index hospitalized from January 2004 to December 2011 in the Swedish Heart Failure Registry with 1-year follow-up. Outcome measures were the first occurring all-cause, cardiovascular (CV) and HF readmissions. Results Totally 20,877 HF patients (11,064 HFrEF, 4,215 HFmrEF, 5,562 HFpEF) were included in the study. All-cause readmission was highest in patients with HFpEF, whereas CV and HF readmissions were highest in HFrEF. From 2004 to 2011, HF readmission rates within 6 months (from 22.3% to 17.3%, P=0.003) and 1 year (from 27.7% to 23.4%, P=0.019) in HFpEF declined, and the risk for 1-year HF readmission in HFpEF was reduced by 7% after adjusting for age and sex (P=0.022). Likewise, risk factors for HF readmission in HFpEF changed. However, no significant changes in cause-specific readmissions were observed in HFrEF. Time to the first readmission did not change significantly from 2004 to 2011, regardless of EF subgroup (all P-values&gt;0.05). Conclusions Although the burden of all-cause readmission remained highest in HFpEF versus HFrEF and HFmrEF, a declining temporal trend in 6-month and 1-year HF readmission rates was found in patients with HFpEF, suggesting that non-HF-related readmission represents a big challenge for clinical practice. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Foundation. Main funding source(s): The SwedeHF was funded by the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare, the Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions.

scholarly journals Weight loss early after discharge predicts the risk of rehospitalization in non-obese patients with heart failure preserved ejection fraction

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
K Kamisaka ◽  
K Kamiya ◽  
K Iwatsu ◽  
N Iritani ◽  
Y Iida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Weight Loss ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Associated Factors ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Obese Patients ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Worse Prognosis

Abstract Background Weight loss (WL) has been considered as a prognostic factor in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, the prognosis and associated factors of WL in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) have remained unclear. Purpose This study aimed to examine the prevalence, prognosis, and clinical characteristics of worse prognosis based on the identified WL after discharge in HFpEF. Methods The study was conducted as a part of a multicenter cohort study (Flagship). The cohort study enrolled ambulatory HF who hospitalized due to acute HF or exacerbation of chronic HF. Patients with severe cognitive, psychological disorders or readmitted within 6-month after discharge were excluded in the study. WL was defined as ≥5% weight loss in 6-month after discharge and HFpEF was defined as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥50% at discharge. Age, gender, etiology, prior HF hospitalization, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) or N-terminal-proBNP (NT-proBNP), anemia (hemoglobin; male &lt;13g/dL, female &lt;12g/dL), serum albumin, Geriatric Depression Scale, hand grip strength and comorbidities were collected at discharge. Patients were stratified according to their body mass index (BMI) at discharge as non-obese (BMI &lt;25) or obese (BMI ≥25). We analyzed the association between WL and HF rehospitalization from 6 month to 2 years after discharge using Kaplan-Meier curve analysis and Cox regression analysis adjusted for age and gender, and clinical characteristics associated to worse prognosis in WL using logistic regression analysis adjusted for potential confounders in HFpEF. Results A total of 619 patients with HFpEF were included in the analysis. The prevalence of WL was 12.9% in 482 non-obese and 15.3% in 137 obese patients. During 2 years, 72 patients were readmitted for HF (non-obese: 48, obese: 24). WL in non-obese independently associated with poor prognosis (hazard ratio: 2.2: 95% confidence interval: 1.13–4.25) after adjustment for age and sex, while WL in obese patients did not. Logistic regression analysis chose age (odds ratio 1.02 per 1 year; 1.00–1.05), anemia (2.14; 1.32–3.48), and BNP ≥200pg/mL or NT-proBNP ≥900pg/mL (1.83; 1.18–2.86) as independent associated factors for worse prognosis of WL in non-obese patients. Conclusion In HFpEF, WL in early after discharge in non-obese elderly patients may be a prognostic indicator for HF rehospitalization. HF management including WL prevention along with controlling anemia is likely to improve prognosis in this population. Kaplan Meier survival curves Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): A Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

scholarly journals Left ventricular fibrosis and hypertrophy are associated with mortality in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pankaj Garg ◽  
Hosamadin Assadi ◽  
Rachel Jones ◽  
Wei Bin Chan ◽  
Peter Metherall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
T1 Mapping ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Native T1 ◽  
Lv Mass ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Ventricular Fibrosis

AbstractCardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is emerging as an important tool in the assessment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). This study sought to investigate the prognostic value of multiparametric CMR, including left and right heart volumetric assessment, native T1-mapping and LGE in HFpEF. In this retrospective study, we identified patients with HFpEF who have undergone CMR. CMR protocol included: cines, native T1-mapping and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). The mean follow-up period was 3.2 ± 2.4 years. We identified 86 patients with HFpEF who had CMR. Of the 86 patients (85% hypertensive; 61% males; 14% cardiac amyloidosis), 27 (31%) patients died during the follow up period. From all the CMR metrics, LV mass (area under curve [AUC] 0.66, SE 0.07, 95% CI 0.54–0.76, p = 0.02), LGE fibrosis (AUC 0.59, SE 0.15, 95% CI 0.41–0.75, p = 0.03) and native T1-values (AUC 0.76, SE 0.09, 95% CI 0.58–0.88, p < 0.01) were the strongest predictors of all-cause mortality. The optimum thresholds for these were: LV mass > 133.24 g (hazard ratio [HR] 1.58, 95% CI 1.1–2.2, p < 0.01); LGE-fibrosis > 34.86% (HR 1.77, 95% CI 1.1–2.8, p = 0.01) and native T1 > 1056.42 ms (HR 2.36, 95% CI 0.9–6.4, p = 0.07). In multivariate cox regression, CMR score model comprising these three variables independently predicted mortality in HFpEF when compared to NTproBNP (HR 4 vs HR 1.65). In non-amyloid HFpEF cases, only native T1 > 1056.42 ms demonstrated higher mortality (AUC 0.833, p < 0.01). In patients with HFpEF, multiparametric CMR aids prognostication. Our results show that left ventricular fibrosis and hypertrophy quantified by CMR are associated with all-cause mortality in patients with HFpEF.

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
O.M Aldaas ◽  
F Lupercio ◽  
C.L Malladi ◽  
P.S Mylavarapu ◽  
D Darden ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
One Year

Abstract Background Catheter ablation improves clinical outcomes in symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, the role of catheter ablation in HF patients with a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is less clear. Purpose To determine the efficacy of catheter ablation of AF in patients with HFpEF relative to those with HFrEF. Methods We performed an extensive literature search and systematic review of studies that compared AF recurrence at one year after catheter ablation of AF in patients with HFpEF versus those with HFrEF. Risk ratio (RR) 95% confidence intervals were measured using the Mantel-Haenszel method for dichotomous variables, where a RR&lt;1.0 favors the HFpEF group. Results Four studies with a total of 563 patients were included, of which 312 had HFpEF and 251 had HFrEF. All patients included were undergoing first time catheter ablation of AF. Patients with HFpEF experienced similar recurrence of AF one year after ablation on or off antiarrhythmic drugs compared to those with HFrEF (RR 0.87; 95% CI 0.69–1.10, p=0.24), as shown in Figure 1. Recurrence of AF was assessed with electrocardiography, Holter monitoring, and/or event monitoring at scheduled follow-up visits and final follow-up. Conclusion Based on the results of this meta-analysis, catheter ablation of AF in patients with HFpEF appears as efficacious in maintaining sinus rhythm as in those with HFrEF. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Abstract 13497: Prognostic Value of the Combination of the Echocardiographic Derived Pulmonary Artery Wedge Pressure and Body Mass Index in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Insights From PURSUIT-HFpEF Registry

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kumpei Ueda ◽  
Shungo Hikoso ◽  
Daisaku D Nakatani ◽  
Shunsuke Tamaki ◽  
Masamichi Yano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Pulmonary Artery Wedge Pressure ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
Wedge Pressure

Background: An elevated pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP), a surrogate of left ventricular filling pressure, is associated with poor outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF). In addition, obesity paradox is well recognized in HF patients and body mass index (BMI) also provides a prognostic information. However, there is little information available on the prognostic value of the combination of the echocardiographic derived PAWP and BMI in patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Methods and Results: Patients data were extracted from The Prospective mUlticenteR obServational stUdy of patIenTs with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (PURSUIT HFpEF) study, which is a prospective multicenter observational registry for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) patients with HFpEF. We analyzed 548 patients after exclusion of patients undergoing hemodialysis, patients with in-hospital death, missing follow-up data, or missing data to calculate PAWP or BMI. Body weight measurement and echocardiography were performed just before discharge. PAWP was calculated using the Nagueh formula [PAWP = 1.24* (E/e’) + 1.9] with e’ = [(e’ septal + e’ lateral ) /2]. During a mean follow up period of 1.5±0.8 years, 86 patients had all-cause death (ACD). Multivariate Cox analysis showed that both PAWP (p=0.020) and BMI (p=0.0001) were significantly associated with ACD, independently of age and previous history of HF hospitalization, after the adjustment with gender, left ventricular ejection fraction, NT-proBNP and estimated glomerular filtration rate. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis revealed that there was a significant difference in the risk of ACD when patients were stratified into 3 groups based on the median values of PAWP (17.3) and BMI (21.4). Conclusions: The combination of the echocardiographic derived PAWP and BMI might be useful for stratifying ADHF patients with HFpEF at risk for the total mortality.

Abstract 12849: Changes in N-terminal Pro Brain Natriuretic Peptide Levels Predicts Mortality and Heart Failure Hospitalization in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianluigi Savarese ◽  
Camilla Hage ◽  
Ulf Dahlström ◽  
Pasquale Perrone-Filardi ◽  
Lars H Lund
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Brain Natriuretic Peptide ◽  
Natriuretic Peptide ◽  
Total Mortality ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
The Impact

Introduction: Changes in N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) have been demonstrated to correlate with outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced ejection fraction (EF). However the prognostic value of a change in NT-proBNP in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF) is unknown. Hypothesis: To assess the impact of changes in NT-proBNP on all-cause mortality, HF hospitalization and their composite in an unselected population of patients with HFPEF. Methods: 643 outpatients (age 72+12 years; 41% females) with HFPEF (ejection fraction ≥40%) enrolled in the Swedish Heart Failure Registry between 2005 and 2012 and reporting NT-proBNP levels assessment at initial registration and at follow-up were prospectively studied. Patients were divided into 2 groups according the median value of NT-proBNP absolute change that was 0 pg/ml. Median follow-up from first measurement was 2.25 years (IQR: 1.43 to 3.81). Adjusted Cox’s regression models were performed using total mortality, HF hospitalization (with censoring at death) and their composite as outcomes. Results: After adjustments for 19 baseline variables including baseline NT-proBNP, as compared with an increase in NT-proBNP levels at 6 months (NT-proBNP change>0 pg/ml), a reduction in NT-proBNP levels (NT-proBNP change<0 pg/ml) was associated with a 45.2% reduction in risk of all-cause death (HR: 0.548; 95% CI: 0.378 to 0.796; p:0.002), a 50.1% reduction in risk of HF hospitalization (HR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.362 to 0.689; p<0.001) and a 42.6% reduction in risk of the composite outcome (HR: 0.574; 95% CI: 0.435 to 0.758; p<0.001)(Figure). Conclusions: Reductions in NT-proBNP levels over time are independently associated with an improved prognosis in HFPEF patients. Changes in NT-proBNP could represent a surrogate outcome in phase 2 HFPEF trials.

Abstract 13570: Diabetes is Probably Associated With Larger Fluid Retention in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Katsuomi IWAKURA ◽  
Toshinari Onishi ◽  
Koichi Inoue ◽  
Masato Okada ◽  
Yasushi Koyama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Body Weight ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Diastolic Pressure ◽  
Fluid Retention ◽  
Repeated Measure ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure

Introduction: Diabetes is observed in about third of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), and it is not well elucidated how it would affect the clinical conditions of HFpEF. We investigated the physical and echocardiographic characteristics of diabetes patients in a large-scale, registration study of HFpEF. Methods: We analyzed clinical and echocardiography data obtained at admission and just before hospital discharge in the PURSUIT-HFpEF (Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Study of Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction), which is a multicenter registration study of patients who were hospitalized for HFpEF. Results: We enrolled 862 patients who were hospitalized for HFpEF between June, 2016 and December, 2019 (Age 81±9 years, male gender 44.5%) for the present study. Diabetes was observed in 287 patients (33.3%), and their age was higher (82±8 years vs. 80±9 years, p=0.003) and body mass index before discharge was larger (23.2±4.7 kg/m2 vs. 21.1±4.6 kg/m2, p<0.0001) than those without diabetes. Diabetic patients had higher body weight at admission (63.2±14.9 kg vs. 55.9±13.4 kg, p<0.0001) and before discharge (56.8±13.3 vs. 50.7±12.1 kg, p<0.0001) than non-diabetic patients. Reduction of body weight during hospital stay was higher in diabetic patients (6.4±4.5 kg) than in non-diabetic patients (5.2±4.0 kg) even after correction of body weight discharge or estimated GFR (p<0.001 by ANCOVA). Body weight reduction was significantly associated with HbA1c (p=0.01). There was no difference in use of intravenous diuretics (69.3% vs. 66.6%, p=0.44) and in hospital stay (21.4±15.3 days vs. 19.9±13.7 days, p=0.14) between diabetic- and non-diabetic patients. Whereas no differences were observed in echocardiographic parameters at admission and before discharge between two arms, the diabetic arm showed significantly higher reduction in septal E/e’ ratio during hospital stay (19.0±8.7 to 17.1±7.6) than non-diabetic arm (16.6±8.3 to 16.4±8.2)(p=0.01 by repeated measure ANOVA). Conclusions: The present study implied that diabetic patients with HFpEF have more fluid retention before hospitalization than non-diabetic ones, which could affect the changes in diastolic pressure.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document