Abstract 15913: Two-year Results of the Getting to an Improved Understanding of Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Dyslipidemia Management (GOULD) Registry of Patients With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD)

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher P Cannon ◽  
James A De Lemos ◽  
Christie M Ballantyne ◽  
Robert S Rosenson ◽  
Shushama Alam ◽  
...  

Background: Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) treatment guidelines recommend intensive statin therapy and adding non-statin therapy if LDL-C ≥70 mg/dL. Methods: We designed the GOULD registry to assess lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) over time: At 120 U.S. centers, 5006 ASCVD patients on any (LLT) were enrolled in 1 of 3 cohorts: 1) currently on PCSK9 inhibitor (PCSK9i), 2) no PCSK9i and LDL-C ≥100 mg/dL, and 3) no PCSK9i and LDL-C 70-99 mg/dL. Results: Over the two years, only 16.8% had some type of LLT intensification, In the cohorts of patients with baseline LDL-C ≥ 100 and 70-99 mg/dL, LLT intensification was present in 21.9% and 14.3% respectively: statin dose was intensified in 6.1% and 6.1%, ezetimibe was added in 6.8% and 4.3% and PCSK9i was added in 6.3% and 2.2% respectively. Conversely, out of the total population, statins were discontinued in 246/4275 (5.8%), ezetimibe in 81/535 (15.1%), and PCSK9i in 47/544 (8.6%). At 24 months, 83.7% were on statin (43.4% high-intensity), with 14.2% on ezetimibe. Lipid panels were measured in 73% by 1 year and 84% by 2 years. Among Pts in the LDL-C ≥100 and 70-99 mg/dL cohorts, 18.6% and 30.4% achieved an LDL-C <70 mg/dL by 1 year, with little further change by 2 years: 21.3% and 33.5% respectively. In the PCSK9 cohort, 53.2% had LDL-C<70 mg/dl. Overall, only 31.7% had LDL-C <70 mg/dL at 2 years (an increase from 6.7% at baseline), while 25.0% had LDL-C >100 mg/dL. Conclusion: Of ASCVD patients with suboptimal LDL-C at baseline, even after 2 years of follow up, strikingly only 16% had LLT intensification, and thus most remained uncontrolled. Further intensive efforts are needed to achieve optimal LDL management in patients with ASCVD.

Author(s):  
Suzanne V. Arnold ◽  
Christopher P. Cannon ◽  
James A. de Lemos ◽  
Robert S. Rosenson ◽  
Christie M. Ballantyne ◽  
...  

Background Because of an increasing number and complexity of treatment options for lipid‐lowering therapy in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, guidelines recommend greater active involvement of patients in shared decision‐making. However, patients' understanding and perceptions of the benefits, risks, and treatment objectives of lipid‐lowering therapy are unknown. Methods and Results Structured questionnaires were conducted in 5006 US outpatients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and suboptimal low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL‐C) control (LDL‐C ≥70 mg/dL) or on a PCSK9 (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9) inhibitor and in 113 physician providers as a part of the GOULD (Getting to an Improved Understanding of Low‐Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Dyslipidemia Management) Registry. Mean age of the patients was 68±10 years, 60% were men, and 86% were White race. Across all patients, 63% believed heart disease was the leading cause of death in men and 46% the leading cause of death in women. Only 28% of patients thought the primary reason they were taking lipid‐lowering medication was to lower the risk of heart attack or stroke, 68% did not know their approximate LDL‐C level, and 69% did not know their LDL‐C goal. Patients on PCSK9 inhibitors (versus LDL‐C cohort), younger patients (versus age ≥65 years), and men (versus women) were somewhat more knowledgeable about their disease and its management. Most physicians (66%) felt that a lack of understanding of the importance and efficacy of statins was the primary factor contributing to nonadherence, as opposed to costs (9%) or side effects (1%). More education was the most commonly used strategy to address patient‐reported side effects. Conclusions A large proportion of patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease remain unaware of their underlying atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk, reasons for taking lipid‐lowering medications, current LDL‐C levels, or treatment goals. These data highlight a large education gap which, if addressed, may improve shared decision‐making and treatment adherence. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.org ; Unique identifier: NCT02993120.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Teterina ◽  
A Geraskin ◽  
P Potapov ◽  
L Babaeva ◽  
A Pisaryuk ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and aim Many genetic studies have been reported about the association between APOE, APOC3 gene polymorphisms and response to statin therapy in myocardial infarction, but results remain controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between SNP rs7412 (APOE), rs2854117 (APOC3), rs2854116 (APOC3) and lipid-lowering effect of atorvastatin and rosuvastatin in patients with myocardial infarction. Methods Polymorphism of genes APOE (rs7412), APOC3 (rs2854117 and rs2854116) was determened. Lipid profile was determined on admission and after 1 year of treatment. Results 78 patients with myocardial infarction treated with maximal tolerated dose of atorvastatin or rosuvastatin were included. More pronounced reduction of lipid levels was associated with of T allele of rs7412 (APOE), p<0,05. ANOVA demonstrated greater low-density lipoprotein and total cholesterol decrease in patients with combination of genes CT/TT (rs7412, APOE) and CC (rs2854117, APOC3) genotypes, CT/TT (rs7412, APOE) and CT (rs2854116, APOC3) genotypes. Conclusion The genetic variants of APOC3 and APOE are useful markers and can be use to predict response to lipid-lowering therapy with statin in myocardial infarction.


2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 265-270 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sinan Sarsam ◽  
Abeer Berry ◽  
George Degheim ◽  
Robby Singh ◽  
Marcel Zughaib

Objective Hyperlipidemia is an important risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Many patients are intolerant to or have limited benefit from statins. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors have been approved for treating hyperlipidemia in these patients. We sought to investigate the impact of these medications in a real-world cardiology practice. Methods This was a retrospective study of 17 patients with either heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia or established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels above the treatment target despite maximally tolerated statins. Baseline lipid profile was compared with a repeat lipid profile obtained 4 to 6 weeks after initiating treatment with a PCSK9 inhibitor. Results The average duration of PCSK9 inhibitor treatment was 10.7 months. Lipid profile comparison showed that total cholesterol decreased from 243 ± 72 to 148 ± 39 (mg/dL) (39% reduction), triglycerides decreased from 185 ± 86 to 149 ± 62 (mg/dL) (19.5% reduction), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol increased from 56 ± 20 to 62 ± 26 (mg/dL) (10.7% increase), and LDL-C decreased from 154 ± 30 to 57 ± 32 (mg/dL) (63% reduction) from baseline. Conclusions PCSK9 inhibitors as add-on therapy to maximally tolerated statins resulted in an approximately 63% reduction in LDL-C.


2020 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aliza Hussain ◽  
Christie M. Ballantyne

Although numerous trials have convincingly shown benefits of statin therapy in both primary and secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), most showed relative risk reductions of 25–40%, and thus many individuals continue to have ASCVD events despite statin therapy. Substantial progress has been made in developing therapies that address the residual risk for ASCVD despite statin therapy. In this review, we summarize progress of currently available therapies along with therapies under development that further reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and apolipoprotein B–containing lipoproteins, reduce lipoprotein(a), reduce ASCVD events in patients with high triglycerides, and directly target inflammation to reduce ASCVD risk. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Medicine, Volume 72 is January 27, 2021. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 1085 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zwol ◽  
Rimbert ◽  
Kuivenhoven

The recent introduction of inhibitors of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 to lower low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol on top of statins or as monotherapy is rapidly changing the landscape of treatment of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). However, existing lipid-lowering drugs have little impact on lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) or plasma triglycerides, two other risk factors for ASCVD. This review summarizes the evidence and the rationale to target Lp(a) and triglycerides and provides an overview of currently tested strategies to lower Lp(a), apolipoprotein C-III and angiopoietin-like protein 3. In addition, it summarizes new findings on the use of omega-3 fatty acids (OM3FA) to fight ASCVD. With the exception of OM3FA supplementation, the promise of the experimental drugs discussed here depends on the long-term safety and efficacy of monoclonal antibodies and/or antisense oligonucleotides Clinical outcome trials will ultimately prove whether these new therapeutic modalities will reduce ASCVD risk.


2019 ◽  
Vol 95 (1120) ◽  
pp. 61-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Farouk Mohamed Elamin ◽  
Ciaran Grafton-Clarke ◽  
Kai Wen Chen ◽  
Toba Obafemi ◽  
Ahai Luvai ◽  
...  

BackgroundProprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors are a major development in the prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and is one of the most significant discoveries since the development of statin therapy. Administration of two human monoclonal antibodies to PCSK9 (alirocumab and evolocumab) can significantly reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) concentrations, thus improving lipid management. Accordingly, guidelines on the specific indications for alirocumab and evolocumab usage have been released. This multicentre study aimed to estimate the proportion of patients treated for an acute myocardial infarction (MI) who could be considered for PCSK9 inhibitors under the current National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) lipid targets criteria.MethodsThe records of 596 patients in two large hospitals in Liverpool, UK were analysed. Information was collected on lipid profiles during and after admission, lipid-lowering therapy and previous CVD.ResultsAt least 2.2% of patients were eligible for PCSK9 inhibitors post-MI under the current NICE guidance. Additionally, 29% of patients failed to achieve LDL-c concentrations <2.0 mmol/L despite maximum statin therapy and failed to meet eligibility for PCSK9 inhibitors as per the NICE criteria. This cohort represents a group of patients ‘in limbo’, in which statin therapy alone is not sufficient to reduce LDL-c.ConclusionsPCSK9 inhibitors are expensive and so their use must be highly selective. At present, in a real-world setting with ezetimibe underprescribing, ~2% of patients are eligible and a further 30% are deprived of benefit and improved outcomes by lack of optimisation and/or potential use of PCSK9 inhibitors.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 886
Author(s):  
Pier Luigi Temporelli ◽  
Marcello Arca ◽  
Laura D’Erasmo ◽  
Raffaele De Caterina

Hyperlipidemia is a powerful risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD). It has been known for a long time that lipid-lowering drugs significantly reduce morbidity from CHD, thus proving a causal role for cholesterol in coronary events. Conversely, the relationship between low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and stroke has been less clear and debated for many years. Recent data conclusively demonstrate not only the inverse epidemiological relationship of blood LDL-C with stroke, but also the efficacy of different strategies to attain cholesterol-lowering on stroke. They also dissipate lingering doubts about the possibility that lipid-lowering is linked to an increase in hemorrhagic stroke. However, despite current international lipid guidelines now strongly recommend aggressive lipid-lowering therapy in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, including CHD and cerebrovascular disease (CeVD), secondary prevention patients are often undertreated with lipid-lowering therapies in routine clinical practice. This review highlights that patients with CHD and concomitant CeVD do not receive aggressive lipid-lowering therapy despite being at very high risk and with clear evidence of benefit from lowering LDL-C levels below current targets.


Kardiologiia ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 27-35
Author(s):  
V. A. Korneva ◽  
T. Yu. Kuznetsova ◽  
G. P. Tihova

Aim: to analyze adherence of FH patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) to the statin therapy and reveal factors, which influence it; to assess the degree of target level of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLCH) achievement by FH patients on statin therapy. Materials and methods. We included in this study 203 FH patients aged >18 years (mean age 50.0±1.1 years, 82 men). Definite FH was diagnosed in 96 persons, in the other patients FH was considered possible. For evaluating the adherence to therapy with statins we used the Morisky-Green questionnaire. Results. Among patients with definite FH 57 % were adherent to lipid-lowering therapy, 16 % were partially adherent, and 27 % – not adherent. Target LDLCH levels were achieved in 22.6 % and 12.5 % of patients with definite and possible FH, respectively. Smoking and gender were not associated with adherence to statin therapy. Factors associated with higher adherence were age (p=0.000003), arterial hypertension (odds ratio [OR] 1.90, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.02 to 3.55], p=0.044), ischemic heart disease (IHD) (OR=2.99, 95 %CI 1.50 to 5.97, p=0.002), history of myocardial infarction (MI) (OR 5.26, 95 %CI 2.03 to 13.60, p=0.0006), history of myocardial revascularization (OR 20.3, 95 %CI 2.64 to 156.11, p=0.004) and the fact of achieving target LDLCH level (OR 19.93, 95 %CI 7.03 to 56.50, p<0.0001). The main reason for the refuse from statin therapy in 87 % of patients was fear of side effects. Main reasons for stopping of ongoing therapy were: myalgia, an increase in transaminases, skin rashes, and high cost in 12, 35, 12, and 6 % of patients, respectively. The decision to withdraw therapy with statins was made by 29 % of patients by themselves. Conclusion. In this study 57 % of patients with definite FH were adherent to statin therapy. Factors associated with increased adherence were age, hypertension, IHD, history of MI, history of myocardial revascularization, achievement of target LDLCH level. Target LDLCH levels were achieved by 22.6 and 12.5 %% of patients with definite and possible FH, respectively.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document