Abstract WP330: Protocol Approaches Negate the “Weekend Effect” for Endovascular Stroke Treatment

Stroke ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott B Raymond ◽  
Feras Akbik ◽  
Joshua A Hirsch ◽  
Christopher J Stapleton ◽  
Ramon G Gonzalez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Therapy ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Working Hours ◽  
Weekend Effect ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Stroke Treatment ◽  
Therapeutic Procedures ◽  
The Impact

Background: Endovascular management of stroke from acute large vessel occlusion (LVO) requires complex, emergent diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. The “weekend effect” (worsened outcomes from stroke presenting on weekends or evenings) is a recognized phenomenon, attributed to non-uniform availability of services throughout the week. We assessed the impact of institutional protocols for stroke patients undergoing endovascular therapy during off hours. Methods: We analyzed a prospective observational stroke database for consecutive patients with anterior circulation stroke undergoing endovascular therapy between 6/2012 and 10/2015. Patients were grouped and analyzed based on day of the week and time of presentation to the emergency department. Off-hours were considered between 1900hrs and 0700hrs on weekdays and 1900hrs on Friday to 0700hrs on Mondays for weekends. Functional outcome was assessed prospectively by 3 month modified Rankin scale (mRS), dichotomized into good (mRS 0-2) versus poor (mRS 3-6). Results: In a cohort of 129 patients, 75 (58%) patients were treated off-hours. Patients treated off-hours demonstrated equivalent imaging to groin puncture times (78 vs 72 min, p = 0.4) and procedure durations (75 vs 68 min, p = 0.3). Reperfusion rates (TICI 2b or 3) were 68% off hours and 76% during working hours (p = 0.4). Complication rates were similar between the two groups. Outcome at 90 days was no different in the patients treated off hours, with 35 of 75 treated off-hours achieving a good outcome (mRS 0-2) compared to 22 of 54 treated during working hours (p = 0.6). With protocol adherence, temporal improvement was noted in imaging to groin times. Discussion/Conclusions: Following recent evidence of benefit from endovascular therapy for LVOs there is increased attention to care delivery. Our findings demonstrate that under the guidance of protocols, the “weekend effect” was negated. Evaluation and treatment times, and 90 day outcomes were equivalent in patients treated off- vs business hours, with improving treatment times as familiarity with protocols increased. Our findings highlight the importance of establishing institutional and regional protocols in the optimized management of these patients.

Abstract W MP60: Atrial Fibrillation is Associated with Worse Collaterals in Acute Stroke: Angiography in the ENDOSTROKE Registry

Stroke ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
David S Liebeskind ◽  
Christian H Nolte ◽  
Georg Bohner ◽  
Tobias Neumann-Haefelin ◽  
Erich Hofmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Endovascular Therapy ◽  
Cardioembolic Stroke ◽  
Baseline Risk ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Stroke Treatment ◽  
Stroke Etiology ◽  
The Impact

Background: Risk factors for stroke may alter hemodynamics or invoke ischemic preconditioning, yet the impact of such factors on response to acute stroke treatment and the potential relationship with collateral circulation remains unknown. Methods: Consecutive cases enrolled in the International Multicenter Registry for Mechanical Recanalization Procedures in Acute Stroke (ENDOSTROKE) were analyzed with respect to collateral status on baseline angiography before endovascular therapy. ASITN/SIR collateral grade (0-1/2/3-4) was scored by the core lab, blind to all other data. Collateral grade was analyzed with respect to numerous baseline risk factors, demographics and outcomes after endovascular intervention. Results: 109 patients (median age 69 years (25 th , 75 th percentiles: 56, 77); 51% women; median baseline NIHSS 15 (13, 18)) with complete (TICI 0) anterior circulation occlusions (M1, n=71; ICA, n=28; M2, n=10) at baseline were evaluated based on collateral grade (0-1, n=12; 2, n=41; 3-4, n=56). Worse collaterals were noted in patients with atrial fibrillation (ASITN grades 0-1/2/3-4: 21%/30%/49%) as compared to patients without atrial fibrillation (5%/42%/53%, p=0.024), yet cardioembolic stroke etiology was unrelated. Other baseline features such as age, gender, time to presentation, other co-morbidities and labs were unrelated to collateral grade. Post-procedure reperfusion (TICI 2b-3) was significantly associated with better collaterals (OR 2.58 (1.343-4.957, p=0.004). Similarly, final infarct size was significantly smaller in those with better collaterals. Good clinical outcomes (mRS 0-2 at day 90) were less frequent in those with poorer collaterals (OR 0.403 (0.199-0.813, p=0.011). Conclusions: Atrial fibrillation, but not cardioembolic stroke etiology, is associated with worse collaterals. Hemodynamic implications, such as diminished cardiac output due to atrial fibrillation, may result in less favorable outcomes after endovascular therapy for acute stroke.

scholarly journals GASS Trial study protocol: a multicentre, single-blind, randomised clinical trial comparing general anaesthesia and sedation during intra-arterial treatment for stroke

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. e024249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Axelle Maurice ◽  
Jean-Christophe Ferré ◽  
Thomas Ronzière ◽  
Jean-Michel Devys ◽  
Aurelie Subileau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multicentre Study ◽  
General Anaesthesia ◽  
Endovascular Therapy ◽  
Conscious Sedation ◽  
Randomised Clinical Trial ◽  
Primary Outcome Measure ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Single Blind

IntroductionTreatment of acute stroke has drastically changed in the last 10 years. Endovascular therapy is now the standard of care for patients with a stroke caused by a large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation. The impact of the type of anaesthesia (general anaesthesia or conscious sedation) during endovascular therapy on the outcome of the patients is still a matter of debate. Previous studies are mostly retrospective and/or focused on the early postprocedure outcome and/or without blood pressure goals and/or single-centre small size studies. We therefore designed a multicentre study hypothesising that conscious sedation is associated with a better functional outcome 3 months after endovascular therapy for the treatment of stroke compared with general anaesthesia.Methods/analysisThe General Anesthesia vs Sedation for Stroke (GASS) Trial is a randomised, parallel, single-blind, multicentre study of 350 patients undergoing endovascular therapy for the treatment of stroke. Patients will be randomly allocated to receive either a general anaesthesia or a conscious sedation. The primary outcome measure is the modified Rankin score assessed 3 months after the treatment. Data will be analysed on the intention-to-treat principle.Ethics/disseminationThe GASS Trial has been approved by an independent ethics committee for all study centres. Participant recruitment begins in September 2016. Results will be published in international peer-reviewed medical journals.Trial registration numberNCT02822144.

scholarly journals Impact of onset-to-groin puncture time within three hours on functional outcomes in mechanical thrombectomy for acute large-vessel occlusion

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 162-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takahiro Ota ◽  
Yasuhiro Nishiyama ◽  
Satoshi Koizumi ◽  
Tomonari Saito ◽  
Masayuki Ueda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Scale Score ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Multivariable Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Stroke Treatment ◽  
The Impact

Introduction Endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke with acute large-vessel occlusion (ALVO) has established benefits, and rapid treatment is vital for mechanical thrombectomy in ALVO. Time from onset of stroke to groin puncture (OTP) is a practical and useful clinical marker, and OTP should be shortened to obtain the maximum benefit of thrombectomy. Objective The aim of the present study was to assess the impact of early treatment of anterior circulation stroke within three hours after symptom onset and to evaluate the role of OTP in determining outcomes after endovascular therapy. Methods Consecutive patients with acute stroke due to major artery (internal carotid or middle cerebral arteries) occlusion who underwent endovascular recanalization between March 2014 and January 2017 were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were stratified by OTP into three categories: 0–≤3 h, >3–≤6 h, and >6 h. The primary outcome measure was a 90-day modified Rankin scale score of 0–2 (good outcome). Results Data were analyzed from 100 patients (mean age, 76.6 years; mean National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, 17). Groin puncture occurred within 0–≤3 h in 51 patients, >3–≤6 h in 28, and >6 h in 21. Median OTP in each group was 126 min (range, 57–168 min), 238 min (range, 186–360 min) and 728 min (range, 365–1492 min), respectively. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, category of OTP represented an independent predictor of patient outcome (adjusted odds ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.25–0.93; p = 0.029). Conclusions OTP is a prehospital and in-hospital workflow-based indicator. In this single-center study, OTP was found to independently affect functional outcomes after endovascular stroke treatment.

Severe carotid stenosis and delay of reperfusion in endovascular stroke treatment: an Interventional Management of Stroke-III study

2018 ◽  
Vol 128 (1) ◽  
pp. 94-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven L. Gogela ◽  
Yair M. Gozal ◽  
Bin Zhang ◽  
Thomas A. Tomsick ◽  
Andrew J. Ringer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Stenosis ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Severe Stenosis ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Stroke Treatment ◽  
Interventional Management ◽  
Symptomatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage ◽  
Ica Stenosis ◽  
The Impact

OBJECTIVEThe impact of extracranial carotid stenosis on interventional revascularization of acute anterior circulation stroke is unknown. The authors examined the effects of high-grade carotid stenosis on the results of endovascular treatment of patients in the Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS)-III trial.METHODSThe 278 patients in the endovascular arm of the IMS-III trial were categorized according to the degree of carotid stenosis as determined by angiography. In comparing patients with severe stenosis or occlusion (≥ 70%) to those without severe stenosis (< 70%), the authors evaluated the time to endovascular reperfusion, modified Thrombolysis in Cerebrovascular Infarction (mTICI) scores, 24-hour mean infarct volumes, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage rates, and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at 90 days.RESULTSCompared with the 249 patients with less than 70% stenosis, patients with severe stenosis (n = 29) were found to have a significantly longer mean time to reperfusion (105.7 vs 77.7 minutes, p = 0.004); differences in mTICI scores, infarct volumes, hemorrhage rates, and mRS scores at 90 days did not reach statistical significance. Multiple regression analysis revealed that severe carotid stenosis (p < 0.0001) and higher baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores (p = 0.004) were associated with an increase in time to reperfusion. Older age (p < 0.0001), higher NIHSS score (p < 0.0001), and the absence of reperfusion (p = 0.001) were associated with worse clinical outcomes.CONCLUSIONSSevere ipsilateral ICA stenosis was associated with a significantly longer time to reperfusion in the IMS-III trial. Although these findings may not translate directly to modern devices, this 28-minute delay in reperfusion has significant implications, raising concern over the treatment of tandem ICA stenosis and downstream large-vessel occlusion.

scholarly journals Hemodynamic Status During Endovascular Stroke Treatment: Association of Blood Pressure with Functional Outcome

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min Chen ◽  
Dorothea Kronsteiner ◽  
Johannes Pfaff ◽  
Simon Schieber ◽  
Laura Jäger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Scale Score ◽  
Endovascular Therapy ◽  
National Institutes Of Health ◽  
Modified Rankin Scale ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Stroke Treatment ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background Optimal blood pressure (BP) management during endovascular stroke treatment in patients with large-vessel occlusion is not well established. We aimed to investigate associations of BP during different phases of endovascular therapy with reperfusion and functional outcome. Methods We performed a post hoc analysis of a single-center prospective study that evaluated a new simplified procedural sedation standard during endovascular therapy (Keep Evaluating Protocol Simplification in Managing Periinterventional Light Sedation for Endovascular Stroke Treatment). BP during endovascular therapy in patients was managed according to protocol. Data from four different phases (baseline, pre-recanalization, post recanalization, and post intervention) were obtained, and mean BP values, as well as changes in BP between different phases and reductions in systolic BP (SBP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) from baseline to pre-recanalization, were used as exposure variables. The main outcome was a modified Rankin Scale score of 0–2 three months after admission. Secondary outcomes were successful reperfusion and change in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score after 24 h. Multivariable linear and logistic regression models were used for statistical analysis. Results Functional outcomes were analyzed in 139 patients with successful reperfusion (defined as thrombolysis in cerebral infarction grade 2b–3). The mean (standard deviation) age was 76 (10.9) years, the mean (standard deviation) National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 14.3 (7.5), and 70 (43.5%) patients had a left-sided vessel occlusion. Favorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0–2) was less likely with every 10-mm Hg increase in baseline (odds ratio [OR] 0.76, P = 0.04) and pre-recanalization (OR 0.65, P = 0.011) SBP. This was also found for baseline (OR 0.76, P = 0.05) and pre-recanalization MAP (OR 0.66, P = 0.03). The maximum Youden index in a receiver operating characteristics analysis revealed an SBP of 163 mm Hg and MAP of 117 mm Hg as discriminatory thresholds during the pre-recanalization phase to predict functional outcome. Conclusions In our protocol-based setting, intraprocedural pre-recanalization BP reductions during endovascular therapy were not associated with functional outcome. However, higher intraprocedural pre-recanalization SBP and MAP were associated with worse functional outcome. Prospective randomized controlled studies are needed to determine whether BP is a feasible treatment target for the modification of outcomes.

Abstract 202: Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke With Distal Large Vessel Occlusion in the Anterior Circulation

Stroke ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amrou Sarraj ◽  
Navdeep Sangha ◽  
Muhammad Shazam Hussain ◽  
Dolora Wisco ◽  
Nirav Vora ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Therapy ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Good Outcome ◽  
Baseline Characteristics ◽  
Iv Tpa

Introduction: Five RCTs demonstrated the superiority of endovascular therapy (EVT) over best medical management (MM) for acute ischemic strokes (AIS) with large vessel occlusion (LVO) in the anterior circulation. Patients with M2 occlusions, however, were underrepresented (95 randomized; 51 EVT treated). Evidence from RCTs of the benefit of EVT for M2 occlusions is lacking, as reflected in the recent AHA guidelines. Methods: A retrospective cohort was pooled from 10 academic centers from 1/12 to 4/15 of AIS patients with LVO isolated to M2 presenting within 8 hours from last known normal (LKN). Patients were divided into EVT and MM groups. Primary outcome was 90 day mRS (good outcome 0-2); secondary outcome was sICH. Logistic regression compared the 2 groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses evaluated predictors of good outcome in the EVT group. Results: Figure 1 shows participating centers, 522 patients (288 EVT and 234 MM) were identified. Table (1) shows baseline characteristics. MM treated patients were older and had higher IV tPA treatment rates, otherwise the 2 groups were balanced. 62.7 % EVT patients had mRS 0-2 at 90 days compared to 35.4 % MM (figure 2). EVT patients had 3 times the odds of good outcome as compared to MM patients (OR: 3.1, 95% CI:2.1-4.4, P <0.001) even after adjustment for age, NIHSS, ASPECTS, IV tPA and LKN to door time (OR: 3.2, 95%CI: 2-5.2, P<0.001). sICH rate was 5.6 %, which was not statistically different than the MM group (table 1, P=0.1). Age, NIHSS, good ASPECTS, LKN to reperfusion time and successful reperfusion mTICI ≥ 2b were independent predictors of good outcome in EVT patients. There was a linear relationship between good outcome and time LKN to reperfusion (Figure 3). Conclusion: Despite inherent limitations of its retrospective design, our study suggests that EVT may be effective and safe for distal LVO (M2) relative to best MM. A trial randomizing M2 occlusions to EVT vs. MM is warranted to confirm these findings.

Weekend effect in endovascular stroke treatment: do treatment decisions, procedural times, and outcome depend on time of admission?

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 336-339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omid Nikoubashman ◽  
Thomas Probst ◽  
Kolja Schürmann ◽  
Ahmed E Othman ◽  
Oliver Matz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Treatment Decision ◽  
Working Hours ◽  
Epidemiologic Studies ◽  
Weekend Effect ◽  
Out Of Hours ◽  
Stroke Treatment ◽  
Decision Bias ◽  
Angiography Suite ◽  
Time Of Admission

BackgroundEpidemiologic studies identified a ‘weekend effect’ or ‘out-of-hours effect’, which implies that procedural and clinical outcomes of patients with stroke, who are admitted out-of-hours, are less favorable than for patients admitted during working-hours.ObjectiveTo determine (1) whether our procedural times and clinical outcome were affected by an out-of-hours effect and (2) whether the decision in favor of, or against, endovascular stroke treatment (EST) depends on the time of admission.MethodsBetween February 2010 and January 2015, 6412 consecutive patients presenting with symptoms of acute ischemic stroke were evaluated for EST eligibility according to established local protocols and generally accepted consensus criteria, and dichotomized into working-hours and out-of-hours cohorts according to admission times. Within both groups, patients given EST were identified and the rate of treatment decision, procedural times, and clinical outcome were compared and analyzed.ResultsClinical and radiological features of patients admitted in working-hours and out-of-hours did not differ significantly. Procedural times and clinical outcome were not affected by an out-of-hours effect (p≥0.054). 221/240 (92.1%) out-of-hours patients and 154/166 (92.8%) working-hours patients who were eligible for EST were transferred to the angiography suite for EST (p=0.798). The rationale not to treat patients who were eligible for EST did not differ between working-hours and out-of-hours admission (p=0.756).ConclusionsIt is possible to produce competitive procedural times regardless of the time of admission and to prevent a treatment decision bias when standard operating procedures are applied consistently.

Abstract TP10: Selection Criteria, Is The Clue To Successful Thrombectomy?

Stroke ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 44 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pedro Cardona ◽  
Helena Quesada ◽  
Luis Cano ◽  
Lucia Aja ◽  
De Miquel MA. ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Selection Criteria ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Correct Selection ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Exclusion Criteria ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Stroke Treatment

In our comprehensive stroke center we analyze correct selection criteria to use self-expandable retrievable intracranial stents for acute stroke treatment. The criteria for intervention were the onset of neurological symptoms, a National Institute of Health Stroke Scale Score (NIHSS) ≥9 at presentation, large vessel occlusion stroke demonstrated by angio-CT, and failure of intravenous thrombolysis or exclusion criteria to administrate it. METHODS: We performed an retrospective analysis of 512 consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke candidates for thrombectomy, from April of 2010 to June of 2012, that met inclusion criteria for intervention. Experienced vascular neurologists selected 171 patients to undergoing endovascular therapy using retrievable stents (Solitaire,Trevo). Successful recanalization results were assessed by follow-up angiography immediately after the procedure (TIMI 2-3/TICI 2b-3 score), and good functional outcome was considered when ≤2 mRankin score (mRS) was achieved at 90 days. RESULTS: A total of 171 patients were treated, 87% with anterior circulation stroke. The mean age was 67.5 years (range 32-87); 58% men. The median NIHSS at presentation was 17 (range 6-26). Recanalization (TICI 2b-3) was achieved in 73% of patients. Symptomatic hemorrhage occurred in 8%. Ninety-day mortality was 19, 5% and good 90-day functional outcome (mRS ≤2) was achieved by 45%. Unsuccessful recanalization (TICI 0-2a) was a significant predictor of poor outcome (mRS≤2: 9%). When we analyzed these patients according to inclusion criteria of IMS trial, 101 patients who met strict criteria achieved good neurological outcome more frequently (51% versus 34%) and significant lower mortality rates (17% vs 28%) compared with the group of 70 patients with IMS exclusion criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy in recanalization, safety of thrombectomy and its consequent good clinical outcome is sufficiently established. It is important an experienced vascular neurologist to select possible candidates (proportion of evaluated/treated patients 3:1). Inclusion criteria for acute stroke trials do not always represent real population of stroke patients as well as their clinical results.

Abstract TP74: Aspects Scoring Applied to CTA Source Images is Predictive of Final Infarct Volume and Good Functional Outcome

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph F Carrera ◽  
Joseph H Donahue ◽  
Prem P Batchala ◽  
Andrew M Southerland ◽  
Bradford B Worrall
Keyword(s):  
Linear Regression ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Infarct Volume ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Good Outcome ◽  
The Impact

Introduction: CTP and MRI are increasingly used to assess endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) candidacy in large vessel occlusion stroke. Unfortunately, availability of these advanced neuroimaging techniques is not widespread and this can lead to over-triage to EVT-capable centers. Hypothesis: ASPECTS scoring applied to computed tomography angiography source images (CTA-SI) will be predictive of final infarct volume (FIV) and functional outcome. Methods: We reviewed data from consecutive patients undergoing EVT at our institution for anterior circulation occlusion between 01/14 - 01/19. We recorded demographics, comorbidities, NIHSS, treatment time parameters, and outcomes as defined by mRS (0-2 = good outcome). Cerebrovascular images were assessed by outcome-blinded raters and collateral score, TICI score, FIV, and both CT and CTA-SI ASPECTS scores were noted. Patients were grouped by ASPECTS score into low (0-4), intermediate (5-7), and high (8-10) for some analyses. FIV was predicted using a linear regression with NIHSS, good reperfusion (TICI 2b/3), collateral score, CT to groin puncture, CT and CTA-SI ASPECTS as independent variables. After excluding those with baseline mRS≥2, a binary logistic regression was performed including covariates of age, NIHSS, good reperfusion, and diabetes (factors significant at p<0.05 on univariate analysis) to assess the impact of CTA-SI ASPECTS group on outcome. Results: Analysis included 137 patients for FIV and 102 for outcome analysis (35 excluded for baseline mRS≥ 2). Linear regression found CTA-SI ASPECTS (Beta -10.8, p=0.002), collateral score (Beta -42.9, p=0.001) and good reperfusion (Beta 72.605, p=0.000) were independent predictors of FIV. Relative to the low CTA-SI ASPECTS group, the high CTA-SI ASPECTS group was more likely to have good outcome (OR 3.75 [95% CI 1.05-13.3]; p=0.41). CT ASPECTS was not predictive of FIV or good outcome. Outcomes: In those undergoing EVT for anterior circulation occlusion, CTA-SI ASPECTS is predictive of both FIV and functional outcome, while CT ASPECTS predicts neither. CTA-SI ASPECTS holds promise as a lower-cost, more widely available option for triage of patients with large vessel occlusion. Further study is needed comparing CTA-SI ASPECTS to CTP parameters.

Abstract WP26: Validation of Predictive Scales of Functional Outcome After Endovascular Therapy Using the REVASCAT Data

Stroke ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalia Perez de la Ossa ◽  
Srikant Rangaraju ◽  
Tudor Jovin ◽  
Anoni Dávalos ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Endovascular Therapy ◽  
Predictive Accuracy ◽  
Functional Independence ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Good Outcome ◽  
Best Medical Treatment

Introduction: Various scales have been developed to predict long-term clinical outcome after endovascular therapy (EVT) in stroke patients. The objective of this study was to validate and compare five well-validated scales in terms of predictive accuracy for functional independence in a recent endovascular stroke trial (REVASCAT). Hypothesis: We hypothesize that predictive scales (PRE, THRIVE, HIAT2, SPAN-100, FAR) have good-excellent (AUC>0.7) predictive accuracy for good functional outcome and can predict the beneficial effect of EVT demonstrated in randomized clinical trials. Methods: REVASCAT (Randomized Trial of Revascularization with Solitaire-FR Device versus Best Medical Therapy in the Treatment of Acute Stroke Due to Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion Presenting within Eight Hours of Symptom Onset) enrolled 206 patients who were randomized to receive EVT or best medical treatment. Five scores (PRE-score, THRIVE, HIAT2, SPAN-100 and FAR-score) were retrospectively calculated on patients who received EVT. Receiver-operator characteristics (ROC) for good outcome (mRS 0-2 at 90 days) for each scale were compared. Using the highest predictive scales, the proportion of patients with good outcome by the score categorized in quartiles was analyzed. Results: 103 patients received EVT in the REVASCAT trial (mean age 65.7, median NIHSS 17). Baseline NIHSS, baseline CT-ASPECTS, age and atrial fibrillation, but not previous iv tPA or DM, were associated with good outcome in multivariable analysis. AUC for good outcome was ≥0.70 for FAR (0.74) and PRE (0.70) scores while SPAN-100 (0.67), HIAT2 (0.65) and THRIVE (0.64) had lower AUCs although differences were not statistically significant. The higher the score on the PRE and FAR scores, the lower the proportion of patients with good outcome (PRE-score: 1QT 44.4%, 2QT 24.4%, 3QT 22.2%, 4 QT 8.9%; FAR-score: 1QT 57.8%, 2QT 22.2%, 3QT 6.7%, 4QT 3.3%). Benefit of EVT accordingly to the score on the different scales will be also presented. Conclusions: Of the 5 stroke scales, FAR and PRE had better predictive accuracy for functional independence after EVT. These tools may facilitate decision making for EVT in anterior circulation large vessel occlusion stroke.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document