Radar and Lightning Observations of Normal and Inverted Polarity Multicellular Storms from STEPS

2007 ◽  
Vol 135 (11) ◽  
pp. 3682-3706 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah A. Tessendorf ◽  
Steven A. Rutledge ◽  
Kyle C. Wiens
Keyword(s):  
Los Alamos ◽  
Severe Thunderstorm ◽  
Charge Structure ◽  
Array Data ◽  
Lightning Detection ◽  
Normal Polarity ◽  
Mapping Array ◽  
Intracloud Discharges ◽  
Cg Lightning

Abstract This study discusses radar and lightning observations of two multicellular storms observed during the Severe Thunderstorm Electrification and Precipitation Study. The Lightning Mapping Array data indicated that the charge structure of the 19 June 2000 storm was consistent with a normal polarity tripole, while the 22 June 2000 storm exhibited an overall inverted tripolar charge structure. The 19 June storm consisted of weaker convection and produced little to no hail and moderate total flash rates peaking between 80 and 120 min−1. The cells in the 22 June 2000 storm were much more vigorous, exhibited strong, broad updrafts, and produced large quantities of hail, as well as extraordinary total flash rates as high as 500 min−1. The National Lightning Detection Network (NLDN) indicated that the 19 June storm produced mostly negative cloud-to-ground (CG) lightning, while the 22 June storm produced predominantly positive CG lightning, peaking at 10 min−1 just after two cells merged. However, the Los Alamos Sferic Array indicated that many of the positive CG strokes reported by the NLDN in the 22 June storm were intracloud discharges known as narrow bipolar events. Negative CG lightning was also observed in the 22 June storm, but typically came to ground beneath an inverted dipole in the storm anvil.

The 29 June 2000 Supercell Observed during STEPS. Part II: Lightning and Charge Structure

2005 ◽  
Vol 62 (12) ◽  
pp. 4151-4177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyle C. Wiens ◽  
Steven A. Rutledge ◽  
Sarah A. Tessendorf
Keyword(s):  
Positive Charge ◽  
Lightning Activity ◽  
Structure Evolution ◽  
Severe Thunderstorm ◽  
Charge Structure ◽  
Flash Rate ◽  
Lightning Detection ◽  
Mapping Array ◽  
Total Lightning ◽  
Mexico Tech

Abstract This second part of a two-part study examines the lightning and charge structure evolution of the 29 June 2000 tornadic supercell observed during the Severe Thunderstorm Electrification and Precipitation Study (STEPS). Data from the National Lightning Detection Network and the New Mexico Tech Lightning Mapping Array (LMA) are used to quantify the total and cloud-to-ground (CG) flash rates. Additionally, the LMA data are used to infer gross charge structure and to determine the origin locations and charge regions involved in the CG flashes. The total flash rate reached nearly 300 min−1 and was well correlated with radar-inferred updraft and graupel echo volumes. Intracloud flashes accounted for 95%–100% of the total lightning activity during any given minute. Nearly 90% of the CG flashes delivered a positive charge to ground (+CGs). The charge structure during the first 20 min of this storm consisted of a midlevel negative charge overlying lower positive charge with no evidence of an upper positive charge. The charge structure in the later (severe) phase was more complex but maintained what could be roughly described as an inverted tripole, dominated by a deep midlevel (5–9 km MSL) region of positive charge. The storm produced only two CG flashes (both positive) in the first 2 h of lightning activity, both of which occurred during a brief surge in updraft and hail production. Frequent +CG flashes began nearly coincident with dramatic increases in storm updraft, hail production, total flash rate, and the formation of an F1 tornado. The +CG flashes tended to cluster in or just downwind of the heaviest precipitation, which usually contained hail. The +CG flashes all originated between 5 and 9 km MSL, centered at 6.8 km (−10°C), and tapped LMA-inferred positive charge both in the precipitation core and (more often) in weaker reflectivity extending downwind. All but one of the −CG flashes originated from >9 km MSL and tended to strike near the precipitation core.

scholarly journals Numerically Simulated Electrification and Lightning of the 29 June 2000 STEPS Supercell Storm

2006 ◽  
Vol 134 (10) ◽  
pp. 2734-2757 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristin M. Kuhlman ◽  
Conrad L. Ziegler ◽  
Edward R. Mansell ◽  
Donald R. MacGorman ◽  
Jerry M. Straka
Keyword(s):  
Mass Flux ◽  
Cloud Model ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Cloud Water ◽  
Severe Thunderstorm ◽  
Charge Structure ◽  
Flash Rate ◽  
Supercell Storm ◽  
Mapping Array ◽  
Cloud To Ground Lightning

Abstract A three-dimensional dynamic cloud model incorporating airflow dynamics, microphysics, and thunderstorm electrification mechanisms is used to simulate the first 3 h of the 29 June 2000 supercell from the Severe Thunderstorm Electrification and Precipitation Study (STEPS). The 29 June storm produced large flash rates, predominately positive cloud-to-ground lightning, large hail, and an F1 tornado. Four different simulations of the storm are made, each one using a different noninductive (NI) charging parameterization. The charge structure, and thus lightning polarity, of the simulated storm is sensitive to the treatment of cloud water dependence in the different NI charging schemes. The results from the simulations are compared with observations from STEPS, including balloon-borne electric field meter soundings and flash locations from the Lightning Mapping Array. For two of the parameterizations, the observed “inverted” tripolar charge structure is well approximated by the model. The polarity of the ground flashes is opposite that of the lowest charge region of the inverted tripole in both the observed storm and the simulations. Total flash rate is well correlated with graupel volume, updraft volume, and updraft mass flux. However, there is little correlation between total flash rate and maximum updraft speed. Based on the correlations found in both the observed and simulated storm, the total flash rate appears to be most representative of overall storm intensity.

Radar and Lightning Observations of the 3 June 2000 Electrically Inverted Storm from STEPS

2007 ◽  
Vol 135 (11) ◽  
pp. 3665-3681 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah A. Tessendorf ◽  
Kyle C. Wiens ◽  
Steven A. Rutledge
Keyword(s):  
Negative Charge ◽  
Positive Charge ◽  
Convective Storm ◽  
Severe Thunderstorm ◽  
Mapping Array ◽  
Total Lack ◽  
Upper Level ◽  
Electrical Bias ◽  
Low Precipitation ◽  
Cg Lightning

Abstract This study addresses the kinematic, microphysical, and electrical evolution of an isolated convective storm observed on 3 June 2000 during the Severe Thunderstorm Electrification and Precipitation Study field campaign. Doppler-derived vertical velocities, radar reflectivity, hydrometeor classifications from polarimetric radar, and Lightning Mapping Array (LMA) charge structures are examined over a nearly 3-h period. This storm, characterized as a low-precipitation supercell, produced modest amounts of hail, determined by fuzzy-logic hydrometeor classification as mostly small (<2 cm) hail, with one surface report of large (≥2 cm) hail. Doppler-derived updraft speeds peaked between 20 and 25 m s−1, and reflectivity was never greater than 60 dBZ. The most striking feature of this storm was its total lack of cloud-to-ground (CG) lightning. Though this storm was electrically active, with maximum flash rates near 30 per minute, no CG flashes of either polarity were detected. The charge structure inferred from the LMA observations was consistent with an inverted dipole, defined as having a midlevel positive charge region below upper-level negative charge. Inverted charge structures have typically been considered conducive to producing positive CG lightning; however, the 3 June storm appeared to lack the lower negative charge layer below the inverted dipole that is thought to provide the downward electrical bias necessary for positive CG lightning.

Lightning Activity in a Hail-Producing Storm Observed with Phased-Array Radar

2011 ◽  
Vol 139 (6) ◽  
pp. 1809-1825 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Emersic ◽  
P. L. Heinselman ◽  
D. R. MacGorman ◽  
E. C. Bruning
Keyword(s):  
Phased Array ◽  
Velocity Structure ◽  
Negative Charge ◽  
Positive Charge ◽  
Lightning Activity ◽  
Mature Stage ◽  
Charge Structure ◽  
Phased Array Radar ◽  
Lightning Detection ◽  
Mapping Array

Abstract This study examined lightning activity relative to the rapidly evolving kinematics of a hail-producing storm on 15 August 2006. Data were provided by the National Weather Radar Testbed Phased-Array Radar, the Oklahoma Lightning Mapping Array, and the National Lightning Detection Network. This analysis is the first to compare the electrical characteristics of a hail-producing storm with the reflectivity and radial velocity structure at temporal resolutions of less than 1 min. Total flash rates increased to approximately 220 min−1 as the storm’s updraft first intensified, leveled off during its first mature stage, and then decreased for 2–3 min despite the simultaneous development of another updraft surge. This reduction in flash rate occurred as wet hail formed in the new updraft and was likely related to the wet growth; wet growth is not conducive to hydrometeor charging and probably contributed to the formation of a “lightning hole” without a mesocyclone. Total flash rates subsequently increased to approximately 450 min−1 as storm volume and inferred graupel volume increased, and then decreased as the storm dissipated. The vertical charge structure in the storm initially formed a positive tripole (midlevel negative charge between upper and lower positive charges). The charge structure in the second updraft surge consisted of a negative charge above a deep midlevel positive charge, a reversal consistent with the effects of large liquid water contents on hydrometeor charge polarity in laboratory experiments. Prior to the second updraft surge, the storm produced two cloud-to-ground flashes, both lowering the usual negative charge to ground. Shortly before hail likely reached ground, the storm produced four cloud-to-ground flashes, all lowering the positive charge. Episodes of high singlet VHF sources were observed at approximately 13–15 km during the initial formation and later intensification of the storm’s updraft.

scholarly journals Lightning in the Anvils of Supercell Thunderstorms

2012 ◽  
Vol 140 (7) ◽  
pp. 2064-2079 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie A. Weiss ◽  
Donald R. MacGorman ◽  
Kristin M. Calhoun
Keyword(s):  
Warm Season ◽  
Opposite Polarity ◽  
Layer Charge ◽  
Supercell Storm ◽  
Lightning Detection ◽  
Supercell Storms ◽  
Mapping Array ◽  
Storm Dynamics ◽  
Supercell Thunderstorms

Abstract This study uses data from the Oklahoma Lightning Mapping Array (OK-LMA), the National Lightning Detection Network, and the Norman, Oklahoma (KOUN), prototype Weather Surveillance Radar-1988 Doppler (WSR-88D) radar to examine the evolution and structure of lightning in the anvils of supercell storms as they relate to storm dynamics and microphysics. Several supercell storms within the domain of the OK-LMA were examined to determine whether they had lightning in the anvil region, and if so, the time and location of the initiation of the anvil flashes were determined. Every warm-season supercell storm had some flashes that were initiated in or near the stronger reflectivities of the parent storm and propagated 40–70 km downstream to penetrate well into the anvil. Some supercell storms also had flashes that were initiated within the anvil itself, 40–100 km beyond the closest 30-dBZ contour of the storm. These flashes were typically initiated in one of three locations: 1) coincident with a local reflectivity maximum, 2) between the uppermost storm charge and a screening-layer charge of opposite polarity near the cloud boundary, or 3) in a region in which the anvils from two adjoining storms intersected. In some storms, anvil flashes struck ground beneath a reflectivity maximum in which reflectivity ≥20 dBZ had extended below the 0°C isotherm, possibly leading to the formation of embedded convection. This relationship may be useful for identifying regions in which there is a heightened risk for cloud-to-ground strikes beneath anvil clouds. In one storm, however, anvil lightning struck ground even though this reflectivity signature was absent.

scholarly journals A Climatology of Thunderstorms across Europe from a Synthesis of Multiple Data Sources

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 1813-1837 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mateusz Taszarek ◽  
John Allen ◽  
Tomáš Púčik ◽  
Pieter Groenemeijer ◽  
Bartosz Czernecki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Central Europe ◽  
Detection System ◽  
Thunderstorm Activity ◽  
Severe Weather ◽  
Data Sources ◽  
Annual Number ◽  
Central Mediterranean ◽  
Severe Thunderstorm ◽  
Lightning Detection ◽  
The Alps

Abstract The climatology of (severe) thunderstorm days is investigated on a pan-European scale for the period of 1979–2017. For this purpose, sounding measurements, surface observations, lightning data from ZEUS (a European-wide lightning detection system) and European Cooperation for Lightning Detection (EUCLID), ERA-Interim, and severe weather reports are compared and their respective strengths and weaknesses are discussed. The research focuses on the annual cycles in thunderstorm activity and their spatial variability. According to all datasets thunderstorms are the most frequent in the central Mediterranean, the Alps, the Balkan Peninsula, and the Carpathians. Proxies for severe thunderstorm environments show similar patterns, but severe weather reports instead have their highest frequency over central Europe. Annual peak thunderstorm activity is in July and August over northern, eastern, and central Europe, contrasting with peaks in May and June over western and southeastern Europe. The Mediterranean, driven by the warm waters, has predominant activity in the fall (western part) and winter (eastern part) while the nearby Iberian Peninsula and eastern Turkey have peaks in April and May. Trend analysis of the mean annual number of days with thunderstorms since 1979 indicates an increase over the Alps and central, southeastern, and eastern Europe with a decrease over the southwest. Multiannual changes refer also to changes in the pattern of the annual cycle. Comparison of different data sources revealed that although lightning data provide the most objective sampling of thunderstorm activity, short operating periods and areas devoid of sensors limit their utility. In contrast, reanalysis complements these disadvantages to provide a longer climatology, but is prone to errors related to modeling thunderstorm occurrence and the numerical simulation itself.

scholarly journals The European lightning location system EUCLID – Part 2: Observations

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 607-616 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dieter Roel Poelman ◽  
Wolfgang Schulz ◽  
Gerhard Diendorfer ◽  
Marina Bernardi
Keyword(s):  
Diurnal Cycle ◽  
Lightning Activity ◽  
European Continent ◽  
Peak Current ◽  
Location System ◽  
European Cooperation ◽  
Lightning Detection ◽  
Lightning Location System ◽  
Cg Lightning

Abstract. Cloud-to-ground (CG) lightning data from the European Cooperation for Lightning Detection (EUCLID) network over the period 2006–2014 are explored. Mean CG flash densities vary over the European continent, with the highest density of about 6 km−2 yr−1 found at the intersection of the borders between Austria, Italy and Slovenia. The majority of lightning activity takes place between May and September, accounting for 85 % of the total observed CG activity. Furthermore, the thunderstorm season reaches its highest activity in July, while the diurnal cycle peaks around 15:00 UTC. A difference between CG flashes over land and sea becomes apparent when looking at the peak current estimates. It is found that flashes with higher peak currents occur in greater proportion over sea than over land.

scholarly journals Characterization of Multitermination CG Flashes Using a 3D Lightning Mapping System (FALMA)

Atmosphere ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 625 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gao ◽  
Wang ◽  
Shi ◽  
Wu ◽  
Takagi
Keyword(s):  
High Probability ◽  
Arithmetic Mean ◽  
Time Difference ◽  
Return Stroke ◽  
Mapping System ◽  
Mapping Array ◽  
Cg Lightning

We characterized 205 multiple-termination negative cloud-to-ground (CG) lightning flashes that were imaged by the Fast Antenna Lightning Mapping Array (FALMA) in Japan during the summer of 2017. The parameters we used included termination number, termination distance, fork height, return stroke (RS) number, the interval between the first RS of each termination, the shortest time difference between the strokes at different terminations, and the first RS intensities separated by termination occurrence orders. It was found that the multiple-termination flashes (MTFs) had a termination number ranging from 2 to 5, with the majority (148/205) at 2. The termination distance (with high probability) was between 2 and 4 km, with 10 out of 359 MTF termination distances being longer than 10 km. For most MTFs (146/205), their leader forks for different terminations occurred at a height between 4 and 6 km, indicating that the fork process mainly occurred inside the cloud. The RS number of the MTFs ranged from 2 to 18, with an arithmetic mean (AM) value of 5.8. The interval between the first RS of each termination in the MTFs ranged from 0.5 to 965.3 ms, with an AM value of 225.6 ms, while the shortest time difference between the strokes at different terminations had an AM value of 189.6 ms. The intensity of the first stroke in each termination tended to decrease with increasing termination occurrence orders.

Detecting Multiple Ground Contacts in Cloud-to-Ground Lightning Flashes

2009 ◽  
Vol 26 (11) ◽  
pp. 2392-2402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina A. Stall ◽  
Kenneth L. Cummins ◽  
E. Philip Krider ◽  
John A. Cramer
Keyword(s):  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Rise Time ◽  
Random Errors ◽  
Peak Current ◽  
Video Recordings ◽  
Lightning Detection ◽  
Cloud To Ground Lightning ◽  
The U.S ◽  
Good Agreement ◽  
Cg Lightning

Abstract Video recordings of cloud-to-ground (CG) lightning flashes have been analyzed in conjunction with correlated stroke reports from the U.S. National Lightning Detection Network (NLDN) to determine whether the NLDN is capable of identifying the different ground contacts in CG flashes. For 39 negative CG flashes that were recorded on video near Tucson, Arizona, the NLDN-based horizontal distances between the first stroke and the 62 subsequent strokes remaining in a preexisting channel had a mean and standard deviation of 0.9 ± 0.8 km and a median of 0.7 km. The horizontal distances between the first stroke and the 59 new ground contacts (NGCs) had a mean and standard deviation of 2.3 ± 1.7 km and a median of 2.1 km. These results are in good agreement with prior measurements of the random errors in NLDN positions in southern Arizona as well as video- and thunder-based measurements of the distances between all ground contacts in Florida. In cases where the distances between ground contacts are small and obscured by random errors in the NLDN locations, measurements of the stroke rise time, estimated peak current, and stroke order can be utilized to enhance the ability of the NLDN to identify strokes that produce new ground terminations.

Automated Lightning Flash Detection in Nighttime Visible Satellite Data

2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 399-408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard L. Bankert ◽  
Jeremy E. Solbrig ◽  
Thomas F. Lee ◽  
Steven D. Miller
Keyword(s):  
Satellite System ◽  
Lightning Strike ◽  
False Alarms ◽  
Lightning Flash ◽  
Infrared Imager ◽  
Defense Meteorological Satellite Program ◽  
Lightning Detection ◽  
Mapping Array ◽  
Automated Technique ◽  
Spectral Channels

Abstract The Defense Meteorological Satellite Program (DMSP) Operational Linescan System (OLS) nighttime visible channel was designed to detect earth–atmosphere features under conditions of low illumination (e.g., near the solar terminator or via moonlight reflection). However, this sensor also detects visible light emissions from various terrestrial sources (both natural and anthropogenic), including lightning-illuminated thunderstorm tops. This research presents an automated technique for objectively identifying and enhancing the bright steaks associated with lightning flashes, even in the presence of lunar illumination, derived from OLS imagery. A line-directional filter is applied to the data in order to identify lightning strike features and an associated false color imagery product enhances this information while minimizing false alarms. Comparisons of this satellite product to U.S. National Lightning Detection Network (NLDN) data in one case as well as to a lightning mapping array (LMA) in another case demonstrate general consistency to within the expected limits of detection. This algorithm is potentially useful in either finding or confirming electrically active storms anywhere on the globe, particularly those occurring in remote areas where surface-based observations are not available. Additionally, the OLS nighttime visible sensor provides heritage data for examining the potential usefulness of the Visible-Infrared Imager-Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) Day/Night Band (DNB) on future satellites including the National Polar-orbiting Operational Environmental Satellite System (NPOESS) Preparatory Project (NPP). The VIIRS DNB will offer several improvements to the legacy OLS nighttime visible channel, including full calibration and collocation with 21 narrowband spectral channels.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document