scholarly journals Thermodynamic and Dynamic Mechanisms for Large-Scale Changes in the Hydrological Cycle in Response to Global Warming*

2010 ◽  
Vol 23 (17) ◽  
pp. 4651-4668 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Seager ◽  
Naomi Naik ◽  
Gabriel A. Vecchi
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Hydrological Cycle ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Hadley Cell ◽  
Specific Humidity ◽  
Intergovernmental Panel ◽  
Projected Change ◽  
Intercomparison Project ◽  
Mean Circulation ◽  
Hadley Cells

Abstract The mechanisms of changes in the large-scale hydrological cycle projected by 15 models participating in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 3 and used for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s Fourth Assessment Report are analyzed by computing differences between 2046 and 2065 and 1961 and 2000. The contributions to changes in precipitation minus evaporation, P − E, caused thermodynamically by changes in specific humidity, dynamically by changes in circulation, and by changes in moisture transports by transient eddies are evaluated. The thermodynamic and dynamic contributions are further separated into advective and divergent components. The nonthermodynamic contributions are then related to changes in the mean and transient circulation. The projected change in P − E involves an intensification of the existing pattern of P − E with wet areas [the intertropical convergence zone (ITCZ) and mid- to high latitudes] getting wetter and arid and semiarid regions of the subtropics getting drier. In addition, the subtropical dry zones expand poleward. The accentuation of the twentieth-century pattern of P − E is in part explained by increases in specific humidity via both advection and divergence terms. Weakening of the tropical divergent circulation partially opposes the thermodynamic contribution by creating a tendency to decreased P − E in the ITCZ and to increased P − E in the descending branches of the Walker and Hadley cells. The changing mean circulation also causes decreased P − E on the poleward flanks of the subtropics because the descending branch of the Hadley Cell expands and the midlatitude meridional circulation cell shifts poleward. Subtropical drying and poleward moistening are also contributed to by an increase in poleward moisture transport by transient eddies. The thermodynamic contribution to changing P − E, arising from increased specific humidity, is almost entirely accounted for by atmospheric warming under fixed relative humidity.

scholarly journals Thermodynamic and Dynamic Mechanisms for Hydrological Cycle Intensification over the Full Probability Distribution of Precipitation Events

2019 ◽  
Vol 76 (2) ◽  
pp. 497-516 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gang Chen ◽  
Jesse Norris ◽  
J. David Neelin ◽  
Jian Lu ◽  
L. Ruby Leung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Probability Distribution ◽  
Moisture Transport ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Hydrological Cycle ◽  
Dynamic Effect ◽  
Hadley Cell ◽  
Precipitation Extremes ◽  
Specific Humidity ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Full Probability

Abstract Precipitation changes in a warming climate have been examined with a focus on either mean precipitation or precipitation extremes, but changes in the full probability distribution of precipitation have not been well studied. This paper develops a methodology for the quantile-conditional column moisture budget of the atmosphere for the full probability distribution of precipitation. Analysis is performed on idealized aquaplanet model simulations under 3-K uniform SST warming across different horizontal resolutions. Because the covariance of specific humidity and horizontal mass convergence is much reduced when conditioned onto a given precipitation percentile range, their conditional averages yield a clear separation between the moisture (thermodynamic) and circulation (dynamic) effects of vertical moisture transport on precipitation. The thermodynamic response to idealized climate warming can be understood as a generalized “wet get wetter” mechanism, in which the heaviest precipitation of the probability distribution is enhanced most from increased gross moisture stratification, at a rate controlled by the change in lower-tropospheric moisture rather than column moisture. The dynamic effect, in contrast, can be interpreted by shifts in large-scale atmospheric circulations such as the Hadley cell circulation or midlatitude storm tracks. Furthermore, horizontal moisture advection, albeit of secondary role, is important for regional precipitation change. Although similar mechanisms are at play for changes in both mean precipitation and precipitation extremes, the thermodynamic contributions of moisture transport to increases in high percentiles of precipitation tend to be more widespread across a wide range of latitudes than increases in the mean, especially in the subtropics.

scholarly journals The Hadley and Walker Circulation Changes in Global Warming Conditions Described by Idealized Atmospheric Simulations

2009 ◽  
Vol 22 (14) ◽  
pp. 3993-4013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillaume Gastineau ◽  
Laurent Li ◽  
Hervé Le Treut
Keyword(s):  
Global Warming ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Hydrological Cycle ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Hadley Circulation ◽  
Hadley Cell ◽  
Coupled Models ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Sst Anomalies ◽  
Atmospheric Simulations

Abstract Sea surface temperature (SST) changes constitute a major indicator and driver of climate changes induced by greenhouse gas increases. The objective of the present study is to investigate the role played by the detailed structure of the SST change on the large-scale atmospheric circulation and the distribution of precipitation. For that purpose, simulations from the Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace Coupled Model, version 4 (IPSL-CM4) are used where the carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration is doubled. The response of IPSL-CM4 is characterized by the same robust mechanisms affecting the other coupled models in global warming simulations, that is, an increase of the hydrological cycle accompanied by a global weakening of the large-scale circulation. First, purely atmospheric simulations are performed to mimic the results of the coupled model. Then, specific simulations are set up to further study the underlying atmospheric mechanisms. These simulations use different prescribed SST anomalies, which correspond to a linear decomposition of the IPSL-CM4 SST changes in global, longitudinal, and latitudinal components. The simulation using a globally uniform increase of the SST is able to reproduce the modifications in the intensity of the hydrological cycle or in the mean upward mass flux, which also characterize the double CO2 simulation with the coupled model. But it is necessary (and largely sufficient) to also take into account the zonal-mean meridional structure of the SST changes to represent correctly the changes in the Hadley circulation strength or the zonal-mean precipitation changes simulated by the coupled model, even if these meridional changes by themselves do not change the mean thermodynamical state of the tropical atmosphere. The longitudinal SST anomalies of IPSL-CM4 also have an impact on the precipitation and large-scale tropical circulation and tend to introduce different changes over the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans. The longitudinal SST changes are demonstrated to have a smaller but opposite effect from that of the meridional anomalies on the Hadley cell circulations. Results indicate that the uncertainties in the simulated meridional patterns of the SST warming may have major consequences on the assessment of the changes of the Hadley circulation and zonal-mean precipitation in future climate projections.

scholarly journals Large-scale features and evaluation of the PMIP4-CMIP6 <i>midHolocene</i> simulations

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 1847-1872 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris M. Brierley ◽  
Anni Zhao ◽  
Sandy P. Harrison ◽  
Pascale Braconnot ◽  
Charles J. R. Williams ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Hydrological Cycle ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Current Phase ◽  
Model Intercomparison ◽  
Global Mean Temperature ◽  
Intercomparison Project

Abstract. The mid-Holocene (6000 years ago) is a standard time period for the evaluation of the simulated response of global climate models using palaeoclimate reconstructions. The latest mid-Holocene simulations are a palaeoclimate entry card for the Palaeoclimate Model Intercomparison Project (PMIP4) component of the current phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) – hereafter referred to as PMIP4-CMIP6. Here we provide an initial analysis and evaluation of the results of the experiment for the mid-Holocene. We show that state-of-the-art models produce climate changes that are broadly consistent with theory and observations, including increased summer warming of the Northern Hemisphere and associated shifts in tropical rainfall. Many features of the PMIP4-CMIP6 simulations were present in the previous generation (PMIP3-CMIP5) of simulations. The PMIP4-CMIP6 ensemble for the mid-Holocene has a global mean temperature change of −0.3 K, which is −0.2 K cooler than the PMIP3-CMIP5 simulations predominantly as a result of the prescription of realistic greenhouse gas concentrations in PMIP4-CMIP6. Biases in the magnitude and the sign of regional responses identified in PMIP3-CMIP5, such as the amplification of the northern African monsoon, precipitation changes over Europe, and simulated aridity in mid-Eurasia, are still present in the PMIP4-CMIP6 simulations. Despite these issues, PMIP4-CMIP6 and the mid-Holocene provide an opportunity both for quantitative evaluation and derivation of emergent constraints on the hydrological cycle, feedback strength, and potentially climate sensitivity.

scholarly journals CAS-FGOALS Datasets for the Two Interglacial Epochs of the Holocene and the Last Interglacial in PMIP4

2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (10) ◽  
pp. 1034-1044
Author(s):  
Weipeng Zheng ◽  
Yongqiang Yu ◽  
Yihua Luan ◽  
Shuwen Zhao ◽  
Bian He ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Hydrological Cycle ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Global Ocean ◽  
Last Interglacial ◽  
Proxy Data ◽  
Intercomparison Project ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Two versions of the Chinese Academy of Sciences Flexible Global Ocean-Atmosphere-Land System model (CAS-FGOALS), version f3-L and g3, are used to simulate the two interglacial epochs of the mid-Holocene and the Last Interglacial in phase 4 of the Paleoclimate Modelling Intercomparison Project (PMIP4), which aims to study the impact of changes in orbital parameters on the Earth’s climate. Following the PMIP4 experimental protocols, four simulations for the mid-Holocene and two simulations for the Last Interglacial have been completed, and all the data, including monthly and daily outputs for the atmospheric, oceanic, land and sea-ice components, have been released on the Earth System Grid Federation (ESGF) node. These datasets contribute to PMIP4 and CMIP6 (phase 6 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project) by providing the variables necessary for the two interglacial periods. In this paper, the basic information of the CAS-FGOALS models and the protocols for the two interglacials are briefly described, and the datasets are validated using proxy records. Results suggest that the CAS-FGOALS models capture the large-scale changes in the climate system in response to changes in solar insolation during the interglacial epochs, including warming in mid-to-high latitudes, changes in the hydrological cycle, the seasonal variation in the extent of sea ice, and the damping of interannual variabilities in the tropical Pacific. Meanwhile, disagreements within and between the models and the proxy data are also presented. These datasets will help the modeling and the proxy data communities with a better understanding of model performance and biases in paleoclimate simulations.

Emergent constraints on the large scale atmospheric circulation and regional hydroclimate: do they still work in CMIP6 and how much can they actually constrain the future?

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-62
Author(s):  
Isla R. Simpson ◽  
Karen A. McKinnon ◽  
Frances V. Davenport ◽  
Martin Tingley ◽  
Flavio Lehner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Internal Variability ◽  
Stationary Wave ◽  
Meridional Wind ◽  
Least Squares Regression ◽  
Enso Teleconnections ◽  
Projected Change ◽  
Out Of Sample ◽  
The Relationship

AbstractAn ‘emergent constraint’ (EC) is a statistical relationship, across a model ensemble, between a measurable aspect of the present day climate (the predictor) and an aspect of future projected climate change (the predictand). If such a relationship is robust and understood, it may provide constrained projections for the real world. Here, Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 6 (CMIP6) models are used to revisit several ECs that were proposed in prior model intercomparisons with two aims: (1) to assess whether these ECs survive the partial out-of-sample test of CMIP6 and (2) to more rigorously quantify the constrained projected change than previous studies. To achieve the latter, methods are proposed whereby uncertainties can be appropriately accounted for, including the influence of internal variability, uncertainty on the linear relationship, and the uncertainty associated with model structural differences, aside from those described by the EC. Both least squares regression and a Bayesian Hierarchical Model are used. Three ECs are assessed: (a) the relationship between Southern Hemisphere jet latitude and projected jet shift, which is found to be a robust and quantitatively useful constraint on future projections; (b) the relationship between stationary wave amplitude in the Pacific-North American sector and meridional wind changes over North America (with extensions to hydroclimate), which is found to be robust but improvements in the predictor in CMIP6 result in it no longer substantially constrains projected change in either circulation or hydroclimate; and (c) the relationship between ENSO teleconnections to California and California precipitation change, which does not appear to be robust when using historical ENSO teleconnections as the predictor.

scholarly journals Global streamflow and flood response to stratospheric aerosol geoengineering

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liren Wei ◽  
Duoying Ji ◽  
Chiyuan Miao ◽  
John C. Moore
Keyword(s):  
Return Period ◽  
Flood Risk ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Hydrological Cycle ◽  
Stratospheric Aerosol ◽  
Model Intercomparison ◽  
Geographic Pattern ◽  
Solar Geoengineering ◽  
Intercomparison Project ◽  
Future Warming

Abstract. Flood risk is projected to increase under projections of future warming climates due to an enhanced hydrological cycle. Solar geoengineering is known to reduce precipitation and slowdown the hydrological cycle, and may be therefore be expected to offset increased flood risk. We examine this hypothesis using streamflow and river discharge responses to the representative concentration pathway RCP4.5 and Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) G4 experiments. We also calculate changes in 30, 50, 100-year flood return periods relative to the historical (1960–1999) period under the RCP4.5 and G4 scenarios. Similar spatial patterns are produced for each return period, although those under G4 are closer to historical values than under RCP4.5. Under G4 generally lower streamflows are produced on the western sides of Eurasia and North America, with higher flows on their eastern sides. In the southern hemisphere northern parts of the land masses have lower streamflow under G4, and southern parts increases relative to RCP4.5. So in general solar geoengineering does appear to reduce flood risk in most regions, but the relative effects are largely determined by this large scale geographic pattern. Both streamflow and return period show increased drying of the Amazon under both RCP4.5 and G4 scenarios, with more drying under G4.

scholarly journals Global streamflow and flood response to stratospheric aerosol geoengineering

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (21) ◽  
pp. 16033-16050 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liren Wei ◽  
Duoying Ji ◽  
Chiyuan Miao ◽  
Helene Muri ◽  
John C. Moore
Keyword(s):  
Return Period ◽  
Flood Risk ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Hydrological Cycle ◽  
Stratospheric Aerosol ◽  
Model Intercomparison ◽  
Geographic Pattern ◽  
Solar Geoengineering ◽  
Intercomparison Project ◽  
Future Warming

Abstract. Flood risk is projected to increase under future warming climates due to an enhanced hydrological cycle. Solar geoengineering is known to reduce precipitation and slow down the hydrological cycle and may therefore be expected to offset increased flood risk. We examine this hypothesis using streamflow and river discharge responses to Representative Concentration Pathway 4.5 (RCP4.5) and the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) G4 scenarios. Compared with RCP4.5, streamflow on the western sides of Eurasia and North America is increased under G4, while the eastern sides see a decrease. In the Southern Hemisphere, the northern parts of landmasses have lower streamflow under G4, and streamflow of southern parts increases relative to RCP4.5. We furthermore calculate changes in 30-, 50-, and 100-year flood return periods relative to the historical (1960–1999) period under the RCP4.5 and G4 scenarios. Similar spatial patterns are produced for each return period, although those under G4 are closer to historical values than under RCP4.5. Hence, in general, solar geoengineering does appear to reduce flood risk in most regions, but the overall effects are largely determined by this large-scale geographic pattern. Although G4 stratospheric aerosol geoengineering ameliorates the Amazon drying under RCP4.5, with a weak increase in soil moisture, the decreased runoff and streamflow leads to an increased flood return period under G4 compared with RCP4.5.

scholarly journals Setup of the PMIP3 paleoclimate experiments conducted using an Earth System Model, MIROC-ESM

2012 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 2527-2569 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Sueyoshi ◽  
R. Ohgaito ◽  
A. Yamamoto ◽  
M. O. Chikamoto ◽  
T. Hajima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Climate Model ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Earth System Model ◽  
Future Climate ◽  
System Model ◽  
Climate Feedback ◽  
Climate Projections ◽  
Earth System ◽  
Intergovernmental Panel ◽  
Intercomparison Project

Abstract. The importance of climate model evaluation using paleoclimate simulations for better future climate projections has been recognized by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In recent years, Earth System Models (ESMs) were developed to investigate carbon-cycle climate feedback, as well as to project the future climate. Paleoclimate events, especially those associated with the variations in atmospheric CO2 level or land vegetation, provide suitable benchmarks to evaluate ESMs. Here we present implementations of the paleoclimate experiments proposed by the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 5/Paleoclimate Modelling Intercomparison Project phase 3 (CMIP5/PMIP3) using an Earth System Model, MIROC-ESM. In this paper, experimental settings and procedures of the mid-Holocene, the Last Glacial Maximum, and the Last Millennium experiments are explained. The first two experiments are time slice experiments and the last one is a transient experiment. The complexity of the model requires various steps to correctly configure the experiments. Several basic outputs are also shown.

Challenges in Constraining Future Change of Global Land Precipitation in CMIP6 Models

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
June-Yi Lee ◽  
Kyung-Sook Yun ◽  
Arjun Babu ◽  
Young-Min Yang ◽  
Eui-Seok Chung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Global Warming ◽  
Emission Scenario ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Precipitation Change ◽  
Cmip5 Models ◽  
Model Intercomparison ◽  
Projected Change ◽  
Global Land ◽  
Intercomparison Project ◽  
Global Mean

&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;The Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) models have showed substantial inter-model spread in estimating annual global-mean precipitation change per one-degree greenhouse-gas-induced warming (precipitation sensitivity), ranging from -4.5&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;#8211;4.2&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;%&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;o&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;C&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;in the Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 2.6, the lowest emission scenario, to 0.2&amp;#8211;4.0&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;%&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;o&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span&gt;C&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;in the RCP 8.5, the highest emission scenario. The observed-based estimations in the global-mean land precipitation sensitivity during last few decades even show much larger spread due to the considerable natural interdecadal variability, role of anthropogenic aerosol forcing, and uncertainties in observation. This study tackles to better quantify and constrain global land precipitation change in response to global warming by analyzing the new range of Shared Socio-economic Pathway (SSP) scenarios in the &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) compared with RCP scenarios in the CMIP5. We show that the range of projected change in annual global-mean land (ocean) precipitation by the end of the 21&lt;sup&gt;st&lt;/sup&gt;century relative to the recent past (1995-2014) in the 23 CMIP6 models is over 50% (20%) larger than that in corresponding scenarios of the 40 CMIP5 models. The estimated ranges of precipitation sensitivity in four Tier-1 SSPs are also larger than those in corresponding CMIP5 RCPs. The large increase in projected precipitation change in the highest quartile over ocean is mainly due to the increased number of high equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) models in CMIP6 compared to CMIP5, but not over land due to different response of thermodynamic moisture convergence and dynamic processes to global warming. We further discuss key challenges in constraining future precipitation change and source of uncertainties in land precipitation change.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document