International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project: Extending the Record

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-62
Author(s):  
William B. Rossow ◽  
Kenneth R. Knapp ◽  
Alisa H Young
Keyword(s):  
Product Design ◽  
Cloud Amount ◽  
Cloud Microphysics ◽  
Temperature Threshold ◽  
Ancillary Data ◽  
Total Cloud Amount ◽  
High Cloud ◽  
Enso Events ◽  
Cloud Properties ◽  
Low Cloud

AbstractISCCP continues to quantify the global distribution and diurnal-to-interannual variations of cloud properties in a revised version. This paper summarizes assessments of the previous version, describes refinements of the analysis and enhanced features of the product design, discusses the few notable changes in the results, and illustrates the long-term variations of global mean cloud properties and differing high cloud changes associated with ENSO. The new product design includes a global, pixel-level product on a 0.1°?grid, all other gridded products at 1.0°-equivalent equal-area, separate-satellite products with ancillary data for regional studies, more detailed, embedded quality information, and all gridded products in netCDF format. All the data products including all input data), expanded documentation, the processing code and an Operations Guide are available online. Notable changes are: (1) a lowered ice-liquid temperature threshold, (2) a treatment of the radiative effects of aerosols and surface temperature inversions, (3) refined specification of the assumed cloud microphysics, and (4) interpolation of the main daytime cloud information overnight. The changes very slightly increase the global monthly mean cloud amount with a little more high and a little less middle and low cloud. Over the whole period, total cloud amount slowly decreases caused by decreases in cumulus/altocumulus; consequently, average cloud top temperature and optical thickness have increased. The diurnal and seasonal cloud variations are very similar to earlier versions. Analysis of the whole record shows that high cloud variations, but not low clouds, exhibit different patterns in different ENSO events.

scholarly journals Cloud climatologies from the InfraRed Sounders AIRS and IASI: Strengths, Weaknesses and Applications

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia J. Stubenrauch ◽  
Artem G. Feofilov ◽  
Sofia E. Protopapadaki ◽  
Raymond Armante
Keyword(s):  
Cloud Amount ◽  
Co2 Concentration ◽  
Boreal Summer ◽  
Cloud Base ◽  
Cloud Detection ◽  
Ancillary Data ◽  
Total Cloud Amount ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Cloud Properties ◽  
High Level

Abstract. The cloud retrieval scheme developed at the Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique (LMD) can now be easily adapted to any Infrared (IR) sounder: the CIRS (Clouds from IR Sounders) retrieval applies improved radiative transfer, as well as an original method accounting for atmospheric spectral transmissivity changes associated with CO2 concentration. The latter is essential when considering long-term time series of cloud properties. For the 13-year and 8-year global climatologies of cloud properties from observations of the Atmospheric IR Sounder (AIRS) and of the IR Atmospheric Interferometer (IASI), respectively, we used the latest ancillary data (atmospheric profiles, surface emissivities and atmospheric spectral transmissivities). The A-Train active instruments, lidar and radar of the CALIPSO and CloudSat missions, provide a unique opportunity to evaluate the retrieved AIRS cloud properties such as cloud amount and height as well as to explore the vertical structure of different cloud types. CIRS cloud detection agreement with CALIPSO-CloudSat is about 84%–85% over ocean, 79%–82% over land and 70%–73% over ice / snow, depending on atmospheric ancillary data. Global cloud amount has been estimated to 67%–70%. CIRS cloud height coincides with the middle between the cloud top and the apparent cloud base (real base for optically thin clouds or height at which the cloud reaches opacity) independent of cloud emissivity, which is about 1 km below cloud top for low-level clouds and about 1.5 km to 2.5 km below cloud top for high-level clouds, slightly increasing because the apparent vertical cloud extent is slightly larger for large cloud emissivity. IR sounders are in particular advantageous for the retrieval of upper tropospheric cloud properties, with a reliable cirrus identification down to an IR optical depth of 0.1, day and night. Total cloud amount consists of about 40% high-level clouds and about 40% low-level clouds and 20% mid-level clouds, the latter two only detected when not hidden by upper clouds. Upper tropospheric clouds are most abundant in the tropics, where high opaque clouds make out 7.5%, thick cirrus 27.5% and thin cirrus about 21.5% of all clouds. The asymmetry in upper tropospheric cloud amount between Northern and Southern hemisphere with annual mean of 5% has a pronounced seasonal cycle with a maximum of 25% in boreal summer, which can be linked to the shift of the ITCZ peak latitude. Comparing tropical geographical change patterns of high opaque clouds with that of thin cirrus as a function of changing tropical mean surface temperature indicates that their response to climate change may be quite different, with potential consequences on the atmospheric circulation.

scholarly journals Seasonal cycle of cloud cover analyzed using Meteosat images

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 331-341 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Massons ◽  
D. Domingo ◽  
J. Lorente
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Resolution ◽  
Seasonal Cycle ◽  
Cloud Cover ◽  
High Spatial Resolution ◽  
Detection Method ◽  
Cloud Amount ◽  
Cloud Detection ◽  
Total Cloud Amount ◽  
Cloud Parameters ◽  
Cloud Properties

Abstract. A cloud-detection method was used to retrieve cloudy pixels from Meteosat images. High spatial resolution (one pixel), monthly averaged cloud-cover distribution was obtained for a 1-year period. The seasonal cycle of cloud amount was analyzed. Cloud parameters obtained include the total cloud amount and the percentage of occurrence of clouds at three altitudes. Hourly variations of cloud cover are also analyzed. Cloud properties determined are coherent with those obtained in previous studies.Key words. Cloud cover · Meteosat

scholarly journals Cloud climatologies from the infrared sounders AIRS and IASI: strengths and applications

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (22) ◽  
pp. 13625-13644 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia J. Stubenrauch ◽  
Artem G. Feofilov ◽  
Sofia E. Protopapadaki ◽  
Raymond Armante
Keyword(s):  
Surface Temperature ◽  
Cloud Amount ◽  
Co2 Concentration ◽  
Boreal Summer ◽  
Ancillary Data ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Geographical Patterns ◽  
Cloud Properties ◽  
The Mean ◽  
High Level

Abstract. Global cloud climatologies have been built from 13 years of Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) and 8 years of Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer (IASI) observations, using an updated Clouds from Infrared Sounders (CIRS) retrieval. The CIRS software can handle any infrared (IR) sounder data. Compared to the original retrieval, it uses improved radiative transfer modelling, accounts for atmospheric spectral transmissivity changes associated with CO2 concentration and incorporates the latest ancillary data (atmospheric profiles, surface temperature and emissivities). The global cloud amount is estimated to be 0.67–0.70, for clouds with IR optical depth larger than about 0.1. The spread of 0.03 is associated with ancillary data. Cloud amount is partitioned into about 40 % high-level clouds, 40 % low-level clouds and 20 % mid-level clouds. The latter two categories are only detected in the absence of upper clouds. The A-Train active instruments, lidar and radar of the CALIPSO and CloudSat missions, provide a unique opportunity to evaluate the retrieved AIRS cloud properties. CIRS cloud height can be approximated either by the mean layer height (for optically thin clouds) or by the mean between cloud top and the height at which the cloud reaches opacity. This is valid for high-level as well as for low-level clouds identified by CIRS. IR sounders are particularly advantageous to retrieve upper-tropospheric cloud properties, with a reliable cirrus identification, day and night. These clouds are most abundant in the tropics, where high opaque clouds make up 7.5 %, thick cirrus 27.5 % and thin cirrus about 21.5 % of all clouds. The 5 % annual mean excess in high-level cloud amount in the Northern compared to the Southern Hemisphere has a pronounced seasonal cycle with a maximum of 25 % in boreal summer, in accordance with the moving of the ITCZ peak latitude, with annual mean of 4° N, to a maximum of 12° N. This suggests that this excess is mainly determined by the position of the ITCZ. Considering interannual variability, tropical cirrus are more frequent relative to all clouds when the global (or tropical) mean surface gets warmer. Changes in relative amount of tropical high opaque and thin cirrus with respect to mean surface temperature show different geographical patterns, suggesting that their response to climate change might differ.

scholarly journals Arctic cloud annual cycle biases in climate models

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick C. Taylor ◽  
Robyn C. Boeke ◽  
Ying Li ◽  
David W. J. Thompson
Keyword(s):  
Influencing Factors ◽  
Annual Cycle ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Cloud Amount ◽  
Thermodynamic Characteristics ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Total Cloud Amount ◽  
Air Temperatures ◽  
Low Cloud ◽  
Cloud Ice

Abstract. Arctic clouds exhibit a robust annual cycle with maximum cloudiness in fall and minimum in winter. These variations affect energy flows in the Arctic with a large influence on the surface radiative fluxes. Contemporary climate models struggle to reproduce the observed Arctic cloud amount annual cycle and significantly disagree with each other. The goal of this analysis is to quantify the cloud influencing factors that contribute to winter-summer cloud amount differences, as these seasons are primarily responsible for the model discrepancies with observations. We find that differences in the total cloud amount annual cycle are primarily caused by differences in low, not high, clouds; the largest differences occur between the surface and 950 hPa. Stratifying cloud amount by cloud influencing factors, we find that model groups disagree most under strong lower tropospheric stability, weak to moderate mid-tropospheric subsidence, and cold lower tropospheric air temperatures. Inter-group differences in low cloud amount are found to be a function of the dependence of low cloud amount on the lower tropospheric thermodynamic characteristics. We find that models with a larger low cloud amount in winter produce more cloud ice, whereas models with a larger low cloud amount in summer produce more cloud liquid. Thus, the parameterization of ice microphysics, specifically the ice formation mechanism (deposition vs. immersion freezing) and cloud liquid and ice partitioning, contributes to the inter-model differences in the Arctic cloud annual cycle and provides further evidence of the important role that cloud ice microphysical processes play in the evolution and modeling of the Arctic climate system.

scholarly journals Arctic cloud annual cycle biases in climate models

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (13) ◽  
pp. 8759-8782 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick C. Taylor ◽  
Robyn C. Boeke ◽  
Ying Li ◽  
David W. J. Thompson
Keyword(s):  
Influencing Factors ◽  
Annual Cycle ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Cloud Amount ◽  
Thermodynamic Characteristics ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Condensate Fraction ◽  
Total Cloud Amount ◽  
Low Cloud ◽  
Cloud Ice

Abstract. Arctic clouds exhibit a robust annual cycle with maximum cloudiness in fall and minimum cloudiness in winter. These variations affect energy flows in the Arctic with a large influence on the surface radiative fluxes. Contemporary climate models struggle to reproduce the observed Arctic cloud amount annual cycle and significantly disagree with each other. The goal of this analysis is to quantify the cloud-influencing factors that contribute to winter–summer cloud amount differences, as these seasons are primarily responsible for the model discrepancies with observations. We find that differences in the total cloud amount annual cycle are primarily caused by differences in low, rather than high, clouds; the largest differences occur between the surface and 950 hPa. Grouping models based on their seasonal cycles of cloud amount and stratifying cloud amount by cloud-influencing factors, we find that model groups disagree most under strong lower tropospheric stability, weak to moderate mid-tropospheric subsidence, and cold lower tropospheric air temperatures. Intergroup differences in low cloud amount are found to be a function of lower tropospheric thermodynamic characteristics. Further, we find that models with a larger low cloud amount in winter have a larger ice condensate fraction, whereas models with a larger low cloud amount in summer have a smaller ice condensate fraction. Stratifying model output by the specifics of the cloud microphysical scheme reveals that models treating cloud ice and liquid condensate as separate prognostic variables simulate a larger ice condensate fraction than those that treat total cloud condensate as a prognostic variable and use a temperature-dependent phase partitioning. Thus, the cloud microphysical parameterization is the primary cause of inter-model differences in the Arctic cloud annual cycle, providing further evidence of the important role that cloud ice microphysical processes play in the evolution and modeling of the Arctic climate system.

scholarly journals Aerosol indirect effect on warm clouds over South-East Atlantic, from co-located MODIS and CALIPSO observations

2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Costantino ◽  
F.-M. Bréon
Keyword(s):  
Indirect Effect ◽  
Air Entrainment ◽  
Cloud Microphysics ◽  
Aerosol Concentration ◽  
Physical Interaction ◽  
East Atlantic ◽  
Aerosol Indirect Effect ◽  
Dry Air ◽  
Cloud Properties ◽  
Low Cloud

Abstract. In this study, we provide a comprehensive analysis of aerosol interaction with warm boundary layer clouds over the South-East Atlantic. We use aerosol and cloud parameters derived from MODIS observations, together with co-located CALIPSO estimates of the layer altitudes, to derive statistical relationships between aerosol concentration and cloud properties. The CALIPSO products are used to differentiate between cases of mixed cloud-aerosol layers from cases where the aerosol is located well-above the cloud top. This technique allows us to obtain more reliable estimates of the aerosol indirect effect than from simple relationships based on vertically integrated measurements of aerosol and cloud properties. Indeed, it permits us to somewhat distinguish the effects of aerosol and meteorology on the clouds, although it is not possible to fully ascertain the relative contribution of each on the derived statistics. Consistently with the results from previous studies, our statistics clearly show that aerosol affects cloud microphysics, decreasing the Cloud Droplet Radius (CDR). The same data indicate a concomitant strong decrease in cloud Liquid Water Path (LWP), which is inconsistent with the hypothesis of aerosol inhibition of precipitation (Albrecht, 1989). We hypothesise that the observed reduction in LWP is the consequence of dry air entrainment at cloud top. The combined effect of CDR decrease and LWP decrease leads to rather small sensitivity of the Cloud Optical Thickness (COT) to an increase in aerosol concentration. The analysis of MODIS-CALIPSO coincidences also evidences an aerosol enhancement of low cloud cover. Surprisingly, the Cloud Fraction (CLF) response to aerosol invigoration is much stronger when (absorbing) particles are located above cloud top than in cases of physical interaction. This result suggests a relevant aerosol radiative effect on low cloud occurrence: absorbing particles above the cloud top may heat the corresponding atmosphere layer, decrease the vertical temperature gradient, increase the low tropospheric stability and provide favourable conditions for low cloud formation. We also analyse the impact of anthropogenic aerosols on precipitation, through the statistical analysis of CDR-COT co-variations. A COT value of 10 is found to be the threshold beyond which precipitation is mostly formed, in both clean and polluted environments. For larger COT, polluted clouds show evidence of precipitation suppression. Results suggest the presence of two competing mechanisms governing LWP response to aerosol invigoration: a drying effect due to aerosol enhanced entrainment of dry air at cloud top (predominant for optically thin clouds) and a moistening effect due to aerosol inhibition of precipitation (predominant for optically thick clouds).

Examining Cloud Macrophysical Changes over the Pacific for 2007–2017 Using CALIPSO, CloudSat, and MODIS Observations

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seung-Hee Ham ◽  
Seiji Kato ◽  
Fred G. Rose ◽  
Norman G. Loeb ◽  
Kuan-Man Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Southern Oscillation ◽  
Meteorological Conditions ◽  
High Cloud ◽  
Enso Events ◽  
Active Sensor ◽  
The Pacific ◽  
Low Cloud ◽  
Passive Sensor ◽  
Cloud Tops ◽  
High Clouds

AbstractCloud macrophysical changes over the Pacific from 2007 to 2017 are examined by combining CALIOP and CloudSat (CALCS) active-sensor measurements, and these are compared with MODIS passive-sensor observations. Both CALCS and MODIS capture well-known features of cloud changes over the Pacific associated with meteorological conditions during El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) events. For example, mid (cloud tops at 3–10 km) and high (cloud tops at 10–18 km) cloud amounts increase with relative humidity (RH) anomalies. However, a better correlation is obtained between CALCS cloud volume and RH anomalies, confirming more accurate CALCS cloud boundaries than MODIS. Both CALCS and MODIS show that low cloud (cloud tops at 0–3 km) amounts increase with EIS and decrease with SST over the eastern Pacific, consistent with earlier studies. It is also further shown that the low cloud amounts do not increase with positive EIS anomalies if SST anomalies are positive. While similar features are found between CALCS and MODIS low cloud anomalies, differences also exist. First, compared to CALCS, MODIS shows stronger anti-correlation between low and mid/high cloud anomalies over the central and western Pacific, which is largely due to the limitation in detecting overlapping clouds from passive MODIS measurements. Second, compared to CALCS, MODIS shows smaller impacts of mid and high clouds on the low troposphere (< 3 km). The differences are due to the underestimation of MODIS cloud layer thicknesses of mid and high clouds.

A Climatology of Midlatitude Continental Clouds from the ARM SGP Central Facility: Part I: Low-Level Cloud Macrophysical, Microphysical, and Radiative Properties

2005 ◽  
Vol 18 (9) ◽  
pp. 1391-1410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiquan Dong ◽  
Patrick Minnis ◽  
Baike Xi
Keyword(s):  
Radiative Forcing ◽  
Cloud Amount ◽  
Cloud Layer ◽  
Radiative Properties ◽  
Cloud Base ◽  
Liquid Water Path ◽  
Stratus Cloud ◽  
Cloud Properties ◽  
Low Cloud ◽  
Central Facility

Abstract A record of single-layer and overcast low cloud (stratus) properties has been generated using approximately 4000 h of data collected from January 1997 to December 2002 at the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Southern Great Plains Central Facility (SCF). The cloud properties include liquid-phase and liquid-dominant mixed-phase low cloud macrophysical, microphysical, and radiative properties including cloud-base and -top heights and temperatures, and cloud physical thickness derived from a ground-based radar and lidar pair, and rawinsonde sounding; cloud liquid water path (LWP) and content (LWC), and cloud-droplet effective radius (re) and number concentration (N) derived from the macrophysical properties and radiometer data; and cloud optical depth (τ), effective solar transmission (γ), and cloud/top-of-atmosphere albedos (Rcldy/RTOA) derived from Eppley precision spectral pyranometer measurements. The cloud properties were analyzed in terms of their seasonal, monthly, and hourly variations. In general, more stratus clouds occur during winter and spring than in summer. Cloud-layer altitudes and physical thicknesses were higher and greater in summer than in winter with averaged physical thicknesses of 0.85 and 0.73 km for day and night, respectively. The seasonal variations of LWP, LWC, N, τ, Rcldy, and RTOA basically follow the same pattern with maxima and minima during winter and summer, respectively. There is no significant variation in mean re, however, despite a summertime peak in aerosol loading. Although a considerable degree of variability exists, the 6-yr average values of LWP, LWC, re, N, τ, γ, Rcldy, and RTOA are 151 gm−2 (138), 0.245 gm−3 (0.268), 8.7 μm (8.5), 213 cm−3 (238), 26.8 (24.8), 0.331, 0.672, and 0.563 for daytime (nighttime). A new conceptual model of midlatitude continental low clouds at the ARM SGP site has been developed from this study. The low stratus cloud amount monotonically increases from midnight to early morning (0930 LT), and remains large until around local noon, then declines until 1930 LT when it levels off for the remainder of the night. In the morning, the stratus cloud layer is low, warm, and thick with less LWC, while in the afternoon it is high, cold, and thin with more LWC. Future parts of this series will consider other cloud types and cloud radiative forcing at the ARM SCF.

scholarly journals Elucidating ice formation pathways in the aerosol–climate model ECHAM6-HAM2

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (14) ◽  
pp. 9061-9080 ◽  
Author(s):  
Remo Dietlicher ◽  
David Neubauer ◽  
Ulrike Lohmann
Keyword(s):  
Temperature Regime ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Cloud Amount ◽  
Supercooled Liquid ◽  
Cloud Microphysics ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Ice Formation ◽  
Total Cloud Amount

Abstract. Cloud microphysics schemes in global climate models have long suffered from a lack of reliable satellite observations of cloud ice. At the same time there is a broad consensus that the correct simulation of cloud phase is imperative for a reliable assessment of Earth's climate sensitivity. At the core of this problem is understanding the causes for the inter-model spread of the predicted cloud phase partitioning. This work introduces a new method to build a sound cause-and-effect relation between the microphysical parameterizations employed in our model and the resulting cloud field by analysing ice formation pathways. We find that freezing processes in supercooled liquid clouds only dominate ice formation in roughly 6 % of the simulated clouds, a small fraction compared to roughly 63 % of the clouds governed by freezing in the cirrus temperature regime below −35 ∘C. This pathway analysis further reveals that even in the mixed-phase temperature regime between −35 and 0 ∘C, the dominant source of ice is the sedimentation of ice crystals that originated in the cirrus regime. The simulated fraction of ice cloud to total cloud amount in our model is lower than that reported by the CALIPSO-GOCCP satellite product. This is most likely caused by structural differences of the cloud and aerosol fields in our model rather than the microphysical parametrizations employed.

Influences of Recent Particle Formation on Southern Ocean Aerosol Variability and Low Cloud Properties

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabel L. McCoy ◽  
Christopher S. Bretherton ◽  
Robert Wood ◽  
Cynthia H. Twohy ◽  
Andrew Gettelman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Southern Ocean ◽  
Particle Formation ◽  
Cloud Properties ◽  
Low Cloud
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document