scholarly journals Exploring the application of flood scaling property in hydrological model calibration

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanchen Zheng ◽  
Jianzhu Li ◽  
Ting Zhang ◽  
Youtong Rong ◽  
Ping Feng
Keyword(s):  
Model Calibration ◽  
Hydrological Model ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Swat Model ◽  
Flood Frequency ◽  
Efficiency Coefficient ◽  
Distributed Hydrological Model ◽  
Flood Peak ◽  
Scaling Property ◽  
Streamflow Data

Abstract Model calibration has always been one major challenge in hydrological community. Flood scaling property (FS) is often used to estimate the flood quantiles for data-scarce catchments based on the statistical relationship between flood peak and contributing areas. This paper investigates the potential of applying FS and multivariate flood scaling property (MLR) as constraints in model calibration. Based on the assumption that the scaling property of flood exists in four study catchments in Northern China, eight calibration scenarios are designed with adopting different combination of traditional indicators and FS or MLR as objective functions. The performance of the proposed method is verified by employing a distributed hydrological model, namely Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model. The results indicate that reasonable performance could be obtained in FS with less requirements of observed streamflow data, exhibiting better simulation on flood peak than Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient calibration scenario. The observed streamflow data or regional flood information are required in MLR calibration scenario to identify the dominant catchment descriptors, and MLR achieve better performance on catchment interior points, especially for the events with uneven distribution of rainfall. On account of the improved performance on hydrographs and flood frequency curve at watershed outlet, adopting the statistical indicators and flood scaling property simultaneously as model constraints is suggested. The proposed methodology enhances the physical connection of flood peak among sub-basins and considers watershed actual conditions and climatic characteristics for each flood event, facilitating a new calibration approach for both gauged catchments and data-scarce catchments.

scholarly journals Multi-site calibration and validation of SWAT with satellite-based evapotranspiration in a data-sparse catchment in southwestern Nigeria

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 1113-1144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abolanle E. Odusanya ◽  
Bano Mehdi ◽  
Christoph Schürz ◽  
Adebayo O. Oke ◽  
Olufiropo S. Awokola ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soil Moisture ◽  
River Basin ◽  
Model Calibration ◽  
Hydrological Model ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Potential Evapotranspiration ◽  
Swat Model ◽  
Water Balance Components ◽  
Southwestern Nigeria ◽  
Calibration And Validation

Abstract. The main objective of this study was to calibrate and validate the eco-hydrological model Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) with satellite-based actual evapotranspiration (AET) data from the Global Land Evaporation Amsterdam Model (GLEAM_v3.0a) and from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer Global Evaporation (MOD16) for the Ogun River Basin (20 292 km2) located in southwestern Nigeria. Three potential evapotranspiration (PET) equations (Hargreaves, Priestley–Taylor and Penman–Monteith) were used for the SWAT simulation of AET. The reference simulations were the three AET variables simulated with SWAT before model calibration took place. The sequential uncertainty fitting technique (SUFI-2) was used for the SWAT model sensitivity analysis, calibration, validation and uncertainty analysis. The GLEAM_v3.0a and MOD16 products were subsequently used to calibrate the three SWAT-simulated AET variables, thereby obtaining six calibrations–validations at a monthly timescale. The model performance for the three SWAT model runs was evaluated for each of the 53 subbasins against the GLEAM_v3.0a and MOD16 products, which enabled the best model run with the highest-performing satellite-based AET product to be chosen. A verification of the simulated AET variable was carried out by (i) comparing the simulated AET of the calibrated model to GLEAM_v3.0b AET, which is a product that has different forcing data than the version of GLEAM used for the calibration, and (ii) assessing the long-term average annual and average monthly water balances at the outlet of the watershed. Overall, the SWAT model, composed of the Hargreaves PET equation and calibrated using the GLEAM_v3.0a data (GS1), performed well for the simulation of AET and provided a good level of confidence for using the SWAT model as a decision support tool. The 95 % uncertainty of the SWAT-simulated variable bracketed most of the satellite-based AET data in each subbasin. A validation of the simulated soil moisture dynamics for GS1 was carried out using satellite-retrieved soil moisture data, which revealed good agreement. The SWAT model (GS1) also captured the seasonal variability of the water balance components at the outlet of the watershed. This study demonstrated the potential to use remotely sensed evapotranspiration data for hydrological model calibration and validation in a sparsely gauged large river basin with reasonable accuracy. The novelty of the study is the use of these freely available satellite-derived AET datasets to effectively calibrate and validate an eco-hydrological model for a data-scarce catchment.

scholarly journals Development of load duration curve system in data-scarce watersheds based on a distributed hydrological model

2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 886-900
Author(s):  
Jia Wang ◽  
Xin-hua Zhang ◽  
Chong-Yu Xu ◽  
Hao Wang ◽  
Xiao-hui Lei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hydrological Model ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Swat Model ◽  
River Basins ◽  
Point Sources ◽  
Guizhou Province ◽  
Polluted Water ◽  
Distributed Hydrological Model ◽  
Load Duration ◽  
Load Duration Curve

AbstractMany developing countries and regions are currently facing serious water environmental problems, especially the lack of monitoring systems for medium- to small-sized watersheds. The load duration curve (LDC) is an effective method to identify polluted waterbodies and clarify the point sources or non-point sources of pollutants. However, it is a large challenge to establish the LDC in small river basins due to the lack of available observed runoff data. In addition, the LDC cannot yet spatially trace the specific sources of the pollutants. To overcome the limitations of LDC, this study develops a LDC based on a distributed hydrological model of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT). First, the SWAT model is used to generate the runoff data. Then, for the control and management of over-loaded polluted water, the spatial distribution and transportation of original sources of point and non-point pollutants are ascertained with the aid of the SWAT model. The development procedures of LDC proposed in this study are applied to the Jian-jiang River basin, a tributary of the Yangtze River, in Duyun city of Guizhou province. The results indicate the effectiveness of the method, which is applicable for water environmental management in data-scarce river basins.

scholarly journals Effect of length of the observed dataset on the calibration of a distributed hydrological model

2015 ◽  
Vol 368 ◽  
pp. 305-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
X. Cui ◽  
W. Sun ◽  
J. Teng ◽  
H. Song ◽  
X. Yao
Keyword(s):  
Hydrological Model ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Swat Model ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
Hydrological Models ◽  
Distributed Hydrological Model ◽  
Discharge Data ◽  
One Year ◽  
Parameter Values ◽  
Discharge Measurements

Abstract. Calibration of hydrological models in ungauged basins is now a hot research topic in the field of hydrology. In addition to the traditional method of parameter regionalization, using discontinuous flow observations to calibrate hydrological models has gradually become popular in recent years. In this study, the possibility of using a limited number of river discharge data to calibrate a distributed hydrological model, the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT), was explored. The influence of the quantity of discharge measurements on model calibration in the upper Heihe Basin was analysed. Calibration using only one year of daily discharge measurements was compared with calibration using three years of discharge data. The results showed that the parameter values derived from calibration using one year’s data could achieve similar model performance with calibration using three years’ data, indicating that there is a possibility of using limited numbers of discharge data to calibrate the SWAT model effectively in poorly gauged basins.

scholarly journals Uncertainty analysis of a spatially-distributed hydrological model with rainfall multipliers

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (12) ◽  
pp. 1062-1074 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arpana Rani Datta ◽  
Tirupati Bolisetti
Keyword(s):  
Uncertainty Analysis ◽  
Hydrological Model ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Swat Model ◽  
Error Model ◽  
Model Parameters ◽  
Distributed Hydrological Model ◽  
Input Uncertainty ◽  
Spatially Distributed ◽  
Input Error

This paper has developed an input error model to account for input uncertainty, and applied the rainfall multiplier approaches to the calibration and uncertainty analysis of Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT), a spatially-distributed hydrological model. The developed input error model has introduced the season-dependent rainfall multipliers to the Bayesian framework and reduced the dimension of the posterior probability density function. The method is applied to a watershed located in Southwestern Ontario, Canada. The results of the developed method are compared with two other methods. The SWAT model parameters and the input error model parameters are jointly inferred by a Markov chain Monte Carlo sampler. The results show the measured precipitation data overestimates the true precipitation values for the study area. The uncertainty in model prediction is underestimated for high flows and overestimated for low flows. There is no significant change in the estimation of parameter uncertainty and streamflow prediction uncertainty in the developed method from those in the other methods. The study emphasizes that the rainfall multiplier approaches are applicable to spatially-distributed hydrological modelling for accounting of input uncertainty.

scholarly journals Hydrological Model Calibration with Streamflow and Remote Sensing Based Evapotranspiration Data in a Data Poor Basin

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (22) ◽  
pp. 3768
Author(s):  
T. A. Jeewanthi G. Sirisena ◽  
Shreedhar Maskey ◽  
Roshanka Ranasinghe
Keyword(s):  
Remote Sensing ◽  
Model Calibration ◽  
Hydrological Model ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Study Region ◽  
Calibration Methods ◽  
Streamflow Data ◽  
Best Parameter ◽  
Parameter Values ◽  
Water Assessment

Conventional calibration methods adopted in hydrological modelling are based on streamflow data measured at certain river sections. However, streamflow measurements are usually sparse and, in such instances, remote-sensing-based products may be used as an additional dataset(s) in hydrological model calibration. This study compares two main calibration approaches: (a) single variable calibration with streamflow and evapotranspiration separately, and (b) multi-variable calibration with both variables together. Here, we used remote sensing-based evapotranspiration data from Global Land Evaporation: the Amsterdam Model (GLEAM ET), and measured streamflow at four stations to calibrate a Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) and evaluate the performances for Chindwin Basin, Myanmar. Our results showed that when one variable (either streamflow or evapotranspiration) is used for calibration, it led to good performance with respect to the calibration variable but resulted in reduced performance in the other variable. In the multi-variable calibration using both streamflow and evapotranspiration, reasonable results were obtained for both variables. For example, at the basin outlet, the best NSEs (Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiencies) of streamflow and evapotranspiration on monthly time series are, respectively, 0.98 and 0.59 in the calibration with streamflow alone, and 0.69 and 0.73 in the calibration with evapotranspiration alone. Whereas, in the multi-variable calibration, the NSEs at the basin outlet are 0.97 and 0.64 for streamflow and evapotranspiration, respectively. The results suggest that the GLEAM ET data, together with streamflow data, can be used for model calibration in the study region as the simulation results show reasonable performance for streamflow with an NSE > 0.85. Results also show that many different sets of parameter values (‘good parameter sets’) can produce results comparable to the best parameter set.

scholarly journals Multi-site calibration and validation of SWAT with satellite-based evapotranspiration in a data sparse catchment in southwestern Nigeria

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abolanle E. Odusanya ◽  
Bano Mehdi ◽  
Christoph Schürz ◽  
Adebayo O. Oke ◽  
Olufiropo S. Awokola ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
River Basin ◽  
Model Calibration ◽  
Hydrological Model ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Potential Evapotranspiration ◽  
Swat Model ◽  
Model Structure ◽  
Analysis Model ◽  
Southwestern Nigeria ◽  
Calibration And Validation

Abstract. The main objective of this study was to calibrate and validate the eco-hydrological model Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) with satellite based actual evapotranspiration (AET) data (Global Land Evaporation Amsterdam Model (GLEAM_v3.0a) and Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer Global Evaporation (MOD16) for the Ogun River Basin (20 292 km2) located in southwestern Nigeria. The novelty of the study is the use of freely available satellite derived AET data for calibration/validation of each of the SWAT delineated subbasins, thereby obtaining a better performing model at the local scale as well as at the whole watershed level. The Sequential Uncertainty Fitting technique (SUFI-2) in the SWAT-Calibration and Uncertainty Program was used for the sensitivity analysis, model calibration, validation, and uncertainty analysis. Three different structures of the SWAT model were used in which each model structure was a set-up of SWAT with a different potential evapotranspiration (PET) equation. The two global AET products (GLEAM_v3.0a and MOD16) were subsequently used to calibrate the SWAT simulated AET outputs from each model structure resulting in six calibration/validation procedures at a monthly time scale. The model performance for the three SWAT model structures was evaluated for each of the 53 subbasins through the six calibrations/validations, which enabled the best model structure with the highest performing AET product to be chosen. A verification of the simulated AET variable was carried out by: (i) comparing the simulated AET of the calibrated model to GLEAM_v3.0b AET, this is a product that has a different forcing data to version of GLEAM used for the calibration, and (ii) assessing the long-term average annual and average monthly water balances at the outlet of the watershed. Overall, the SWAT model structure composed of Hargreaves PET equation and calibrated using the GLEAM_v3.0a data performed well for the simulation of AET and provided a good level of confidence for using the SWAT model as a decision support tool. The 95% uncertainty of the SWAT simulated variable bracketed most of the satellite based AET data in each subbasin. The SWAT model also proved efficient in capturing the seasonal variability of the water balance components at the outlet of the watershed. This study demonstrated the potential to use remotely sensed evapotranspiration data for hydrological model calibration and validation in a sparsely gauged large river basin with reasonable accuracy.

scholarly journals Influence of multisite calibration on streamflow estimation based on the hydrological model with CMADS inputs

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yongyu Song ◽  
Jing Zhang ◽  
Yuequn Lai
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Heterogeneity ◽  
Model Calibration ◽  
Water Resource Management ◽  
Hydrological Model ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Swat Model ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Model Driven ◽  
Streamflow Estimation ◽  
Set Up

Abstract Due to the spatial heterogeneity, the hydrological model calibration results only at the total outlet of the basin may not represent the whole basin. To more accurately simulate the historical streamflow process within the Qujiang River Basin, we set up three calibration strategies (single-site, S1; multisite simultaneous, S2; and multisite sequential, S3) for four hydrological stations based on the SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) model driven by CMADS (China Meteorological Assimilation Driving Datasets for the SWAT model). In addition, the implications of these calibration issues are extended to future streamflow projections using multimodel ensemble data in CMIP6 (Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6). In the model calibration phase, the SWAT model achieved very satisfactory results in the study area. Compared with S1 and S2, S3 can effectively improve the accuracy of streamflow simulation of stations within the basin and reduce the simulation deviation. Especially at the daily scale, the average NSE values of the four stations with S3 increased by 0.26 and 0.07, and the overall deviation decreased by 0.25 and 6.43%, respectively. Parameter sensitivity analysis also shows that spatial heterogeneity can be more adequately considered when using S3 to calibrate the model. As for the results of future streamflow projection, when using the S3, the average annual streamflow of four stations in the three climate scenarios from 2021 to 2050 is about 44.21, 130.00, 321.55 and 713.24 m3/s, respectively. Correspondingly, the use of S1 and S2 would bring certain risks to future water resource management.

scholarly journals SWAT Model Adaptability to a Small Mountainous Forested Watershed in Central Romania

Forests ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 860
Author(s):  
Nicu Constantin Tudose ◽  
Mirabela Marin ◽  
Sorin Cheval ◽  
Cezar Ungurean ◽  
Serban Octavian Davidescu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Metropolitan Area ◽  
Hydrological Model ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Swat Model ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Forested Watershed ◽  
Sensitive Parameters ◽  
Lower Uncertainty ◽  
Validation Stage ◽  
Water Assessment

This study aims to build and test the adaptability and reliability of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool hydrological model in a small mountain forested watershed. This ungauged watershed covers 184 km2 and supplies 90% of blue water for the Brașov metropolitan area, the second largest metropolitan area of Romania. After building a custom database at the forest management compartment level, the SWAT model was run. Further, using the SWAT-CUP software under the SUFI2 algorithm, we identified the most sensitive parameters required in the calibration and validation stage. Moreover, the sensitivity analysis revealed that the surface runoff is mainly influenced by soil, groundwater and vegetation condition parameters. The calibration was carried out for 2001‒2010, while the 1996‒1999 period was used for model validation. Both procedures have indicated satisfactory performance and a lower uncertainty of model results in replicating river discharge compared with observed discharge. This research demonstrates that the SWAT model can be applied in small ungauged watersheds after an appropriate parameterisation of its databases. Furthermore, this tool is appropriate to support decision-makers in conceiving sustainable watershed management. It also guides prioritising the most suitable measures to increase the river basin resilience and ensure the water demand under climate change.

A Review on SWAT Model for Stream Flow Simulation

2013 ◽  
Vol 726-731 ◽  
pp. 3792-3798
Author(s):  
Wen Ju Zhao ◽  
Wei Sun ◽  
Zong Li Li ◽  
Yan Wei Fan ◽  
Jian Shu Song ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Data ◽  
Stream Flow ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Swat Model ◽  
Flow Simulation ◽  
Model Parameters ◽  
Distributed Hydrological Model ◽  
Rs And Gis ◽  
Model Research ◽  
Gis And Rs

SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) model is one of distributed hydrological model, based on spatial data offered by GIS and RS. This article mainly introduces the SWAT model principle, structure, and it is the application of stream flow simulation in China and other countries, then points out the deficiency existing in the process of model research. In order to service in water resources management work better, experts and scholars further research the rate constant and uncertainty of the simplification of the model parameters, and the combination of RS and GIS to use, and hydrological scale problems.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document