Life Expectancy after Curative-intent Treatment of Breast Cancer: Impact on Long-term Follow-up Care

2014 ◽  
Vol 80 (6) ◽  
pp. 604-609 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda K. Arrington ◽  
Leanne Goldstein ◽  
Laura Kruper ◽  
Courtney Vito ◽  
John Yim ◽  
...  

Long-term survival rates after treatment for breast cancer are directly influenced by early deaths resulting from disease. For longer-term breast cancer survivors, survival rates appear deceptively low. We hypothesize that the actual survival curve for long-term survivors approaches the overall survival of the general population. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (1988 to 2002) was used to identify patients with nonmetastatic breast cancer who underwent definitive surgical treatment. The survival of the general population was constructed by using national life tables with an age-matched population. Comparisons of survivals were made for 3-, 5-, and 7-year breast cancer survivor cohorts. Of 237,180 patients, 92.4 per cent survived three years, 82.1 per cent five years, and 58.1 per cent seven years. Stage I patients have equivalent or better survivals compared with the age-matched general population in all three cohorts. Stage II patients reached equivalent conditional survival between eight and nine years after diagnosis regardless of cohort. Stage III patients required achieving nine to 10 years after diagnosis to achieve equivalent survival probability, except in 7-year survivors, in whom 10 to 11 years was required. In all stages, once equivalence was reached, survival exceeded the general population over the remaining years. Initial cancer stage influences overall survival for many years after diagnosis. Patients with Stage I cancer return to the general population risk as early as three years after diagnosis, whereas higher stages can require up to nine years to achieve parity with a more generalized population. These findings should be factored into general health screening issues for long-term breast cancer survivors.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1534-1534 ◽  
Author(s):  
Milada Cvancarova ◽  
Kristin V Reinertsen ◽  
Marit B Veieroed ◽  
Michael Vaeth ◽  
Petter Laake ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 362-362
Author(s):  
Victoria Raveis ◽  
Anita Nirenberg ◽  
Yumeng Liu ◽  
Simona Kwon

Abstract Breast cancer treatment advances have lengthened the survivorship period. Limited attention has focused on the myriad issues breast cancer survivors experience related to their cancer and other health conditions as they age. Focus groups, conducted Fall 2019 – Spring 2020 with a diverse sample of breast cancer survivors from the New York metropolitan region (N=28) explored survivors’ healthcare encounters and goals, quality of life, survivorship lifestyle, other health conditions and risks, e.g. emergence of COVID-19. Participants were 40-82 years old (57% were 56 or older); racially diverse (57% White, 18% Black, 14% Hispanic, 11% Bi-racial); 32% were married/partnered and 57% were parents. Mean diagnosis age was 51. Treatments received included lumpectomy (64%), chemotherapy (57%), radiation (46%), hormonal therapy (39%), and single/bilateral mastectomy (36%). Survivors expressed the importance of restoring normality in their life and the necessity to be pro-active in ensuring their health issues were addressed in medical encounters. Person-centered care and clinician engagement was valued, but not routinely experienced. Survivors evaluated treatment options not just on being cancer-free, but on how it would impact their whole life. They expressed concerns about the future and anxiety over long-term survival. Long term survivors, recipients of early experimental and/or extensive treatments, worried about an emergence of long-delayed adverse health consequences and complications managing other health issues in the future, particularly as they grew older. COVID-19 raised additional health concerns, particularly among those with high risk health conditions due to prior cancer treatments; various self-mandated protective activities were integrated into their self-care practices.


2021 ◽  
Vol 53 (01) ◽  
pp. 22-26

Doege D, Thong MS, Koch-Gallenkamp L et al.Age-specific prevalence and determinants of depression in long-term breast cancer survivors compared to female population controls. Cancer Med 2020; 9: 8713–8721. doi:10.1002/cam4.3476


The Breast ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 56 ◽  
pp. S80-S81
Author(s):  
P. Santiá ◽  
A. Jansana ◽  
T. Sanz ◽  
I. de la Cura ◽  
M. Padilla-Ruiz ◽  
...  

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1301
Author(s):  
Saskia W. M. C. Maass ◽  
Daan Brandenbarg ◽  
Liselotte M. Boerman ◽  
Peter F. M. Verhaak ◽  
Geertruida H. de Bock ◽  
...  

Background: Fatigue is the most common and persistent symptom among women in the first five years after a breast cancer diagnosis. However, long-term prevalence of fatigue, among breast cancer survivors, needs further investigation. Aim: To compare fatigue experienced by long-term breast cancer survivors with that in a reference population and to evaluate the determinants of that fatigue. Design and Setting: A cross-sectional cohort study of 350 breast cancer survivors ≥5 years after diagnosis and a reference population of 350 women matched by age and general practitioner. Method: Fatigue was measured using the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20), and a sum score of >60 (multidimensional fatigue) was the primary outcome. Logistic regression was applied to compare the prevalence of multidimensional fatigue between the survivor and reference populations, adjusted for body mass index (BMI) and for cardiovascular and psychological variables. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) were estimated. Logistic regression was applied to evaluate the determinants of multidimensional fatigue among the survivors. Results: Breast cancer survivors (median 10 years after diagnosis), more often experienced multidimensional fatigue than the reference population (26.6% versus 15.4%; OR, 2.0 [95%CI, 1.4–2.9]), even after adjusting for confounders. The odds of multidimensional fatigue were also higher among survivors with symptoms of depression (32.2% versus 2.7%; OR, 17.0 [95%CI, 7.1–40.5]) or anxiety (41.9% versus 10.1%; OR, 6.4 [95%CI, 3.6–11.4]). Conclusion: One in four breast cancer survivors experience multidimensional fatigue and fatigue occurs more frequently than in women of the same age and general practitioner. This fatigue appears to be associated with symptoms of depression and anxiety.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kati Hiltrop ◽  
Paula Heidkamp ◽  
Clara Breidenbach ◽  
Christoph Kowalski ◽  
Marco Streibelt ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsay L. Puckett ◽  
Shahryar G. Saba ◽  
Sonia Henry ◽  
Stacey Rosen ◽  
Elise Rooney ◽  
...  

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 1303
Author(s):  
Khairunnisa’ Md Yusof ◽  
Kelly A. Avery-Kiejda ◽  
Shafinah Ahmad Suhaimi ◽  
Najwa Ahmad Zamri ◽  
Muhammad Ehsan Fitri Rusli ◽  
...  

Breast cancer has been reported to have the highest survival rate among various cancers. However, breast cancer survivors face several challenges following breast cancer treatment including breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL), sexual dysfunction, and psychological distress. This study aimed to investigate the potential risk factors of BCRL in long term breast cancer survivors. A total of 160 female breast cancer subjects were recruited on a voluntary basis and arm lymphedema was assessed through self-reporting of diagnosis, arm circumference measurement, and ultrasound examination. A total of 33/160 or 20.5% of the women developed BCRL with significantly higher scores for upper extremity disability (37.14 ± 18.90 vs. 20.08 ± 15.29, p < 0.001) and a lower score for quality of life (103.91 ± 21.80 vs. 115.49 ± 16.80, p = 0.009) as compared to non-lymphedema cases. Univariate analysis revealed that multiple surgeries (OR = 5.70, 95% CI: 1.21–26.8, p < 0.001), axillary lymph nodes excision (>10) (OR = 2.83, 95% CI: 0.94–8.11, p = 0.047), being overweight (≥25 kg/m2) (OR = 2.57, 95% CI: 1.04 – 6.38, p = 0.036), received fewer post-surgery rehabilitation treatment (OR = 2.37, 95% CI: 1.05–5.39, p = 0.036) and hypertension (OR = 2.38, 95% CI: 1.01–5.62, p = 0.043) were associated with an increased risk of BCRL. Meanwhile, multivariate analysis showed that multiple surgeries remained significant and elevated the likelihood of BCRL (OR = 5.83, 95% CI: 1.14–29.78, p = 0.034). Arm swelling was more prominent in the forearm area demonstrated by the highest difference of arm circumference measurement when compared to the upper arm (2.07 ± 2.48 vs. 1.34 ± 1.91 cm, p < 0.001). The total of skinfold thickness of the affected forearm was also significantly higher than the unaffected arms (p < 0.05) as evidenced by the ultrasound examination. The continuous search for risk factors in specific populations may facilitate the development of a standardized method to reduce the occurrence of BCRL and provide better management for breast cancer patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document