Laparoscopic Shunt Revision Avoids Many Complications of Open Shunt Revision and Has Outcomes Similar to First-time Shunt Placement

2015 ◽  
Vol 81 (3) ◽  
pp. 305-308
Author(s):  
Heather Logghe ◽  
John Maa ◽  
Michael McDermott ◽  
Michael Oh ◽  
Jonathan Carter
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Shunt Revision ◽  
Visceral Injury ◽  
Shunt Placement ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
First Time

Open revision of abdominal shunts is associated with increased risk of wound infection, visceral injury, hernia, and shunt complications. We hypothesized that laparoscopic revision mitigates these risks to a level similar to initial (i.e., first-time) shunt placement. This was a single-center, multisurgeon, retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent either laparoscopic initial shunt placement or laparoscopic shunt revision over a 5-year period. Outcomes were operative time, length of stay, and 30-day complication rate. Sixty-nine patients underwent laparoscopic shunt revision and 99 patients underwent laparoscopic initial shunt placement. Operative times were nearly identical (75 vs 73 minutes, P = 0.63). There were no significant differences in blood loss or hospital length of stay. Abdominal complications and total complications did not differ between groups. Laparoscopic shunt revision avoided many of the known complications of open shunt revision and had outcomes similar to initial laparoscopic shunt placement.

Impact of Frailty on Outcomes Following Spine Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Analysis of 668 Patients

Neurosurgery ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nitin Agarwal ◽  
Ezequiel Goldschmidt ◽  
Tavis Taylor ◽  
Souvik Roy ◽  
Stefanie C Altieri Dunn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Spine Surgery ◽  
Cohort Analysis ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Quality Improvement Initiative ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Frail Patients ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Venous Thromboembolic

Abstract BACKGROUND With an aging population, elderly patients with multiple comorbidities are more frequently undergoing spine surgery and may be at increased risk for complications. Objective measurement of frailty may predict the incidence of postoperative adverse events. OBJECTIVE To investigate the associations between preoperative frailty and postoperative spine surgery outcomes including mortality, length of stay, readmission, surgical site infection, and venous thromboembolic disease. METHODS As part of a system-wide quality improvement initiative, frailty assessment was added to the routine assessment of patients considering spine surgery beginning in July 2016. Frailty was assessed with the Risk Analysis Index (RAI), and patients were categorized as nonfrail (RAI 0-29) or prefrail/frail (RAI ≥ 30). Comparisons between nonfrail and prefrail/frail patients were analyzed using Fisher's exact test for categorical data or by Wilcoxon rank sum tests for continuous data. RESULTS From August 2016 through September 2018, 668 patients (age of 59.5 ± 13.3 yr) had a preoperative RAI score recorded and underwent scheduled spine surgery. Prefrail and frail patients suffered comparatively higher rates of mortality at 90 d (1.9% vs 0.2%, P < .05) and 1 yr (5.1% vs 1.2%, P < .01) from the procedure date. They also had longer in-hospital length of stay (LOS) (3.9 d ± 3.6 vs 3.1 d ± 2.8, P < .001) and higher rates of 60 d (14.6% vs 8.2%, P < .05) and 90 d (15.8% vs 9.8%, P < .05) readmissions. CONCLUSION Preoperative frailty, as measured by the RAI, was associated with an increased risk of readmission and 90-d and 1-yr mortality following spine surgery. The RAI can be used to stratify spine patients and inform preoperative surgical decision making.

scholarly journals Childhood Nephrotic Syndrome Management and Outcome: A Single Center Retrospective Analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chia-shi Wang ◽  
Jia Yan ◽  
Robert Palmer ◽  
James Bost ◽  
Mattie Feasel Wolf ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nephrotic Syndrome ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
High Morbidity ◽  
Metropolitan Statistical Area ◽  
Childhood Nephrotic Syndrome ◽  
Steroid Dependent ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Serious Disease

There is a paucity of information on outpatient management and risk factors for hospitalization and complications in childhood nephrotic syndrome (NS). We described the management, patient adherence, and inpatient and outpatient usage of 87 pediatric NS patients diagnosed between 2006 and 2012 in the Atlanta Metropolitan Statistical Area. Multivariable analyses were performed to examine the associations between patient characteristics and disease outcome. We found that 51% of the patients were treated with two or more immunosuppressants. Approximately half of the patients were noted to be nonadherent to medications and urine protein monitoring. The majority (71%) of patients were hospitalized at least once, with a median rate of 0.5 hospitalizations per patient year. Mean hospital length of stay was 4.0 (3.8) days. Fourteen percent of patients experienced at least one serious disease complication. Black race, frequently relapsing/steroid-dependent and steroid-resistant disease, and the first year following diagnosis were associated with higher hospitalization rates. The presence of comorbidities was associated with longer hospital length of stay and increased risk of serious disease complications. Our results highlight the high morbidity and burden of NS and point to particular patient subgroups that may be at increased risk for poor outcome.

scholarly journals Similar Efficacy of Arthroscopy and Arthrotomy in Infection Eradication in the Treatment of Septic Knee: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2022 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhimin Liang ◽  
Xiaofan Deng ◽  
Lingli Li ◽  
Jing Wang
Keyword(s):  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Septic Arthritis ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Similar Efficacy ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Lower Complication ◽  
Lower Complication Rate ◽  
Infection Eradication

Aim: To compare the arthroscopy vs. arthrotomy for the treatment of native knee septic arthritis.Methods: Electronic databases of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched for eligible studies. Retrospective comparative studies comparing arthroscopy or arthrotomy for patients with septic arthritis of the native knee were eligible for this review. The primary outcome was recurrence of infection after first procedure. The secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay, operative time, range of motion of the involved knee after surgery, overall complications and mortality rate,Results: Thirteen trials were included in this study. There were a total of 2,162 septic arthritis knees treated with arthroscopic debridement and irrigation, and 1,889 septic arthritis knees treated with open debridement and irrigation. Arthroscopy and arthrotomy management of the knee septic arthritis showed comparable rate of reinfection (OR = 0.85; 95% CI, 0.57–1.27; P = 0.44). No significant difference was observed in hospital length of stay, operative time and mortality rate between arthroscopy and arthrotomy management group, while arthroscopy treatment was associated with significantly higher knee range of motion and lower complication rate when compared with arthrotomy treatment.Conclusion: Arthroscopy and arthrotomy showed similar efficacy in infection eradication in the treatment of native septic knee. However, arthroscopy treatment was associated with better postoperative functional recovery and lower complication rate.

Routine Nasogastric Decompression in Small Bowel Obstruction: Is it Really Necessary?

2013 ◽  
Vol 79 (4) ◽  
pp. 422-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annabelle L. Fonseca ◽  
Kevin M. Schuster ◽  
Adrian A. Maung ◽  
Lewis J. Kaplan ◽  
Kimberly A. Davis
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Small Bowel ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Small Bowel Obstruction ◽  
Bowel Obstruction ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Nasogastric Decompression

Bowel rest, nasogastric (NG) decompression, and intravenous hydration are used to treat small bowel obstruction (SBO) conservatively; however, there are no data to support nasogastric tube (NGT) use in patients without active emesis. We aim to evaluate the use of nasogastric decompression in SBO and the safety of managing patients with SBO without the use of a NGT. A retrospective chart review was conducted of adult patients admitted to Yale New Haven Hospital over five years with the diagnosis of SBO. We compared patients who received NG decompression with those who did not. Outcome variables assessed were days to resolution, associated complications, hospital length of stay, and disposition. Of 290 patients who fit the criteria, 190 patients (65.52%) were managed conservatively. Fifty-five patients (18.97%) did not receive NGTs. Sixty-eight patients (23.45%) did not present with emesis; however, nearly 75 per cent of these patients received NGTs. Development of pneumonia and respiratory failure was significantly associated with NGT placement. Time to resolution and hospital length of stay were significantly higher in patients with NGTs. Patients with NG decompression had a significantly increased risk of pneumonia and respiratory failure as well as increased time to resolution and hospital length of stay.

scholarly journals MP38: The impact of physician handoffs on the outcomes of emergency department patients: a medical administrative database retrospective cohort study

CJEM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (S1) ◽  
pp. S56-S56
Author(s):  
A. Mokhtari ◽  
D. Simonyan ◽  
A. Pineault ◽  
M. Mallet ◽  
S. Blais ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Emergency Physician ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Independent Predictor ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Emergency Physicians ◽  
Icu Admission ◽  
The Impact

Introduction: A physician handoff is the process through which physicians transfer the primary responsibility of a care unit. The emergency department (ED) is a fast-paced and crowded environment where the risk of information loss between shifts is significant. Yet, the impact of handoffs between emergency physicians on patient outcomes remains understudied. We performed a retrospective cohort study in the ED to determine if handed-off patients, when compared to non-handed-off patients, were at higher risk of negative outcomes. Methods: We included every adult patient first assessed by an emergency physician and subsequently admitted to hospital in one of the five sites of the CHU de Québec-Université Laval during fiscal year 2016-17. Data were extracted from the local hospital discharge database and the ED information system. Primary outcome was mortality. Secondary outcomes were incidence of ICU admission and surgery and hospital length of stay. We conducted multilevel multivariate regression analyses, accounting for patient and hospital clusters and adjusting for demographics, CTAS score, comorbidities, admitting department delay before evaluation by an emergency physician and by another specialty, emergency department crowding, initial ED orientation and handoff timing. We conducted sensitivity analyses excluding patients that had an ED length of stay > 24 hours or events that happened after 72 hours of hospitalization. Results: 21,136 ED visits and 17,150 unique individuals were included in the study. Median[Q1-Q3] age, Charlson index score, door-to-emergency-physician time and ED length of stay were 71[55-83] years old, 3[1-4], 48 [24,90] minutes, 20.8[9.9,32.7] hours, respectively. In multilevel multivariate analysis (OR handoff/no handoff [CI95%] or GMR[SE]), handoff status was not associated with mortality 0.89[0.77,1.02], surgery 0.95[0.85,1.07] or hospital length of stay (-0.02[0.03]). Non-handed-off patients had an increased risk of ICU admission (0.75[0.64,0.87]). ED occupancy rate was an independent predictor of mortality and ICU admission rate irrespectively of handoff status. Sensitivity and sub-group based analyses yielded no further information. Conclusion: Emergency physicians’ handoffs do not seem to increase the risk of severe in-hospital adverse events. ED occupancy rate is an independent predictor of mortality. Further studies are needed to explore the impact of ED handoffs on adverse events of low and moderate severity.

Laparoendoscopic Single Site Cholecystectomy: The First 100 Patients

2009 ◽  
Vol 75 (8) ◽  
pp. 681-686 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan M. Hernandez ◽  
Connor A. Morton ◽  
Sharona Ross ◽  
Michael Albrink ◽  
Alexander S. Rosemurgy
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Single Site ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Laparoendoscopic Single Site ◽  
Small Series ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Median Operative Time

Laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) surgery promises improved cosmesis and possibly less pain. However, given the small series reported to date, true estimates of the advantages and possible disadvantages of LESS surgery remain unknown. This study was undertaken to evaluate the first 100 patients undergoing LESS cholecystectomy at our institution. Patients referred for cholecystectomy since November 2007 were considered for LESS cholecystectomy. Outcomes, including blood loss, operative time, complications, and length of stay, were recorded. Outcomes are compared with an uncontrolled concurrent group of patients undergoing multi-incision laparoscopic (i.e., conventional) cholecystectomy. One hundred patients with a median age of 44 years underwent LESS cholecystectomy; 30 patients with a median age of 46 years underwent conventional cholecystectomy over the same time period. Median operative time (70 vs 66 minutes, P = 0.67, Mann-Whitney) and hospital length of stay (1 vs 1 day, P = 0.81, Mann-Whitney) were not different for patients undergoing LESS or multi-incision cholecystectomies, respectively. Five patients undergoing LESS cholecystectomy had postoperative complications: cystic duct stump leak (one), pain control issues (three), and urinary retention (one). LESS cholecystectomy is a safe and effective alternative to conventional cholecystectomy. It can be undertaken without added operative time and provides patients with minimal, if any, scarring.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document