scholarly journals Writing and Revision Strategies of Students With and Without Dyslexia

2020 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 189-198
Author(s):  
Emma Sumner ◽  
Vincent Connelly
Keyword(s):  
University Students ◽  
Writing Process ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Typically Developing ◽  
Writing Quality ◽  
Digital Writing ◽  
Spelling Errors ◽  
Written Text ◽  
Research Students

Previous work suggests that written text produced by university students with dyslexia is scored lower than that produced by their peers. The present study used a digital writing tablet to examine the writing process and the quality of text written by university students with dyslexia. Revision behavior during and after writing was also investigated. Thirty-two university students with dyslexia (mean age, 20 years), were compared with 32 typically developing (TD) students matched by age. Students composed a written text in response to an expository essay prompt. In line with previous research, students with dyslexia made a higher number of spelling errors and their essays were rated as poorer than TD students. However, students with dyslexia were comparable to their peers on measures of time spent writing, amount of text produced, and the temporal analyses (handwriting execution, pause times). Students with dyslexia made significantly more revisions to spelling during and after transcription than their peers, although other revision behavior was similar across groups. Explanations for the finding of poor writing quality are explored. Importantly, the findings suggest that continued support with spelling and writing is needed for university students with dyslexia. Instruction directed toward effective revision strategies may also prove useful. Limitations and directions for future research are discussed.

scholarly journals Revising writing in an online learning environment

2012 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 129
Author(s):  
Eleni Nikiforou
Keyword(s):  
Online Learning ◽  
University Students ◽  
English Language ◽  
Writing Process ◽  
Good Practice ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Online Learning Environment ◽  
Efl Students ◽  
Research Questions

The screen of the computer provides good practice for the writing process and functions as an exemplar for it since what is being written is not permanent in contrast to writing with pen on paper. The following research questions were addressed to explore the area and were investigated through the data: 1) Do students revise their writing globally or on the surface? 2) Do students co-operate or collaborate to edit their produced text? This paper will report the results from data taken from tertiary EFL students writing collaboratively and/ or co-operatively in a wiki to complete a task. This paper focuses on the revisions and editing university students did to their text while completing a group task in a wiki for the purposes of an upper-intermediate to advance English language course. The methodology that lies behind the research is grounded theory. The research conducted is qualitative and as such the data is collected from the wiki and the history pages which kept track of the students work in the wiki. An attempt is made to distinguish between superficial and global revisions the students performed. Emphasis is given to the frequency with which the students entered the wiki to edit, and the quality of the revisions to their work. From the data we can also draw conclusions as to whether the students collaborated or co-operated to edit their work. The discussion will round off with implications for future research and offer suggestions about how EFL students from the specific and similar contexts could be encouraged to revise in order to write better.

Technology-mediated writing: It’s not how much, but the thought that counts

2021 ◽  
pp. 204275302199638
Author(s):  
Kelley Regan ◽  
Anya S Evmenova ◽  
Melissa D Hughes ◽  
Maria P Rybicki-Newman ◽  
Boris Gafurov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Students With Disabilities ◽  
Instructional Strategies ◽  
Sixth Grade ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Student Writing ◽  
Writing Quality ◽  
Struggling Writers ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Present Group

Struggling writers including students with disabilities (SWD) need instructional strategies to support their ability to write independently. Integrating technology-mediated instruction to support student writing can mitigate students' challenges throughout the writing process and personalize instruction. In the present group design study, teachers taught 11 to 12 year olds in sixth grade with varying abilities to use a technology-based graphic organizer (TBGO) when digitally planning and composing a persuasive paragraph. Results indicated that the writing quality of the paragraph and use of transition words by typical and struggling writers was significantly better when the TBGO was used as compared to students who wrote without the TBGO. Additionally, when the TBGO was removed, students in the treatment group maintained gains. Student participants and teachers in this study identified features that were especially supportive to students’ writing behaviors. Implications for practice and future research are discussed.

scholarly journals Siblings’ Influence on the Development of Individuals with Down Syndrome

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monica Cuskelly
Keyword(s):  
Down Syndrome ◽  
Identity Formation ◽  
Self Regulation ◽  
Developmental Outcomes ◽  
Sibling Relationship ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Typically Developing ◽  
Social Emotional ◽  
Starting Point

This chapter discusses the influences that siblings may have on developmental outcomes of children with Down syndrome including those related to cognition, language, self-regulation, social-emotional functioning, and identity formation. As there is very little research available that addresses sibling influences on individuals with Down syndrome, the literature related to sibling influence within sibships comprising typically developing children has been used to provide a starting point to the discussion. The influential roles of siblings may include teacher; model and social referent; friend and foe; contrast; and advocate, protector, and caregiver. The quality of the sibling relationship may also influence developmental outcomes. The few investigations that have been conducted suggest that siblings make an important contribution to developmental outcomes for individuals with Down syndrome. In conclusion, directions for future research are discussed.

The Relationship Between Perceived Greenness and Perceived Restorativeness of University Campuses and Student-Reported Quality of Life

2016 ◽  
Vol 48 (10) ◽  
pp. 1292-1308 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Aaron Hipp ◽  
Gowri Betrabet Gulwadi ◽  
Susana Alves ◽  
Sonia Sequeira
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
University Students ◽  
Health Resources ◽  
Green Spaces ◽  
World Health ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Convenience Sample ◽  
World Health Organization Quality ◽  
Quality Of Life Scale

University students are exposed to many stressors, necessitating opportunities for restoration. Research has indicated that actual experiences in nearby green spaces are associated with restorative psychological and physiological health benefits. However, the perception of greenness and restorativeness of environments might also impact health outcomes. Can green campus spaces provide restorative potential to university students? Do students perceive the greenness and restorative benefits? To explore these questions, students at three universities (convenience sample) were surveyed with items on perceived greenness of campus, perceived restorativeness of campus, and the World Health Organization Quality-of-Life Scale. Results indicate that those with higher perceived campus greenness report greater quality of life, a pathway significantly and partially mediated by perceived campus restorativeness. Future research should help identify effective ways in which university green spaces can be developed as health resources for students.

Supporting Young Writers through the Writing Process in a Paperless Classroom

2014 ◽  
pp. 337-362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca S. Anderson ◽  
Jessica S. Mitchell ◽  
Rachael F. Thompson ◽  
Kim D. Trefz
Keyword(s):  
Writing Instruction ◽  
Writing Process ◽  
Process Approach ◽  
Digital Tools ◽  
Fifth Grade ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Digital Writing ◽  
Student Centered ◽  
Fifth Grade Students ◽  
Writing Tools

In this chapter, the authors describe fifth-grade students' perceptions of how digital tools support writing instruction in a paperless classroom. Extending a constructivist paradigm that embraces student-centered pedagogies, this study explores both the teacher's approach as well as the students' perceptions of the digital process approach to writing. An overview of each stage of the writing process is provided that includes research supporting digital writing tools for that stage. This is followed by the findings from each section which includes: 1) how the teacher implemented the digital writing tools, and 2) the students' perceptions of the digital tools. The chapter concludes by offering areas of future research as well as offering the limitations of the study.

scholarly journals Obesity, Nutrition, and Physical Activity for People with Significant Disabilities

2017 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-28
Author(s):  
Brianna Grumstrup ◽  
MaryAnn Demchak
Keyword(s):  
Health Knowledge ◽  
Overweight And Obesity ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Typically Developing ◽  
Obesity Prevalence ◽  
Health Issues ◽  
Contributing Factors ◽  
Significant Disabilities ◽  
Effective Interventions

This review of literature focuses on health issues for individuals with Intellectual Disabilities (ID), Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (IDD), and Multiple Impairments (MI). This population has two to three times higher overweight and obesity prevalence than typically developing individuals. Furthermore, they have higher risk for obesity related diseases such as reduced lifespan and quality of life. Contributing factors for higher rates of overweight or obesity, effective interventions, and barriers to health knowledge and practice are discussed. Implications and future research needs are highlighted.

scholarly journals Why and How Do University Students Use Facebook in Everyday Life?

2020 ◽  
Vol 71 ◽  
pp. 59-76
Author(s):  
Ali SIMSEK ◽  
Fahme DABAJ ◽  
Eylem SIMSEK
Keyword(s):  
University Students ◽  
Everyday Life ◽  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Positive Attitudes ◽  
Interpersonal Communications ◽  
Research Questions ◽  
Analyze Data

The use of Facebook in everyday life has become widespread all around the world regardless of countries and cultures. The largest group of Facebook users consists of young people, particularly university students. This study investigated the attitudes of university students toward Facebook, their major reasons for using this social media application in everyday life, and the factors affecting the types of desired relationships with Facebook friends. A survey consisting of 63 items about demographics of participants and their preferences for the use of Facebook was administered to collect data. The sample of the study included 924 undergraduate students from a large public university in North Cyprus. A number of descriptive and inferential statistical techniques were employed to analyze data in relation to the research questions. Results suggested that the students generally had positive attitudes toward Facebook, although there were certain differences in terms of demographics. The primary reason for using Facebook was interpersonal communications with close friends. The most powerful factor affecting the types of relationships in Facebook was perceived quality of communication and/or socialization. Along with the other findings, implications of the results for future research were discussed.

L1 versus L2 writing processes: What insight can we obtain from a keystroke logging program?

2021 ◽  
pp. 136216882110412
Author(s):  
Mohammed Ali Mohsen
Keyword(s):  
Mother Tongue ◽  
L2 Writing ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Writing Quality ◽  
Writing Processes ◽  
Daunting Task ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Language Writing ◽  
Written Form

Writing in a language different from one’s mother tongue is a daunting task. The same challenge may apply to languages that have diglossic features whose spoken form differs from the written form. This article investigates Arab students’ writing behaviors (fluency, pauses, and revision) in response to an argumentative composition in their L1 (first language: Arabic) and L2 (second language: English), given that understanding their complexities in writing processes would help instructors to rectify language writing-related problems. Guided by Kellogg’s model, this article attempts to investigate the cognitive processes underlying these writing behaviors as aided by a keystroke logging program (Inputlog 7.0). It also examined if writing behaviors would be correlated to the writing quality of their produced final texts. Data were collected from log files of the Inputlog generated upon the students’ writing processes, screened video recordings, and a stimulated recall interview. Results indicated that compared with L2 writing in character production, L1 writing processes were highly significant, less significant in pauses over word boundaries, and highly significant in time on the task factor. Concerning revision behavior, no significant differences were found in time spent on deletion and insertion, whereas a significant difference was found in R-burst for L2 writing. As regards quality of text, many pauses and minimal production of words tend to be negative indicators for writing quality output. Pedagogical implications and suggestions for future research are highlighted.

scholarly journals Handwriting fluency and the quality of primary grade students’ writing

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gustaf B. Skar ◽  
Pui-Wa Lei ◽  
Steve Graham ◽  
Arne Johannes Aasen ◽  
Marita Byberg Johansen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Grade ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Unique Contribution ◽  
Writing Quality ◽  
Language Background ◽  
Writing Practices ◽  
Writing Students ◽  
And Gender ◽  
Primary Grade Students

AbstractUntil children can produce letters quickly and accurately, it is assumed that handwriting disrupts and limits the quality of their text. This investigation is the largest study to date (2596 girls, 2354 boys) assessing the association between handwriting fluency and writing quality. We tested whether handwriting fluency made a statistically unique contribution to predicting primary grade students’ writing quality on a functional writing task, after variance due to attitude towards writing, students’ language background (L1, L2, bilingual), gender, grade, and nesting due to class and school were first controlled. Handwriting fluency accounted for a statistically significant 7.4% of the variance in the writing quality of primary grade students. In addition, attitude towards writing, language background, grade and gender each uniquely predicted writing quality. Finally, handwriting fluency increased from one grade to the next, girls had faster handwriting than boys, and gender differences increased across grades. An identical pattern of results were observed for writing quality. Directions for future research and writing practices are discussed.

scholarly journals A Comparative Analysis on Cohesive Markers in Essay Composition of First Language and Second Language: Direct Writing Versus Translation

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 01-10
Author(s):  
Noor Shahariah Saleh ◽  
Siti Fatimah Murtaza ◽  
Nurshila Umar Baki
Keyword(s):  
Second Language ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Writing Process ◽  
First Language ◽  
Direct Writing ◽  
Writing Quality ◽  
L1 Transfer ◽  
Written Text ◽  
Second Language Development ◽  
Advanced Proficiency

Studies have revealed that first language has significant impacts on learners’ second language development. Utilizing L1 in the writing processes such as translation method and direct writing is a conventional strategy used by low proficiency level L2 learners. However, there is a lack of studies that determine the quality of writing influenced by L1 transfer. This study aims to provide a comparative analysis on the use of cohesive markers as a result of the use of Malay in English written text via translation and direct composition. The writing quality in terms of content, organisation and writing style of a group of students with low, intermediate and advanced proficiency levels from a secondary school in the district of Tangkak, Johor was scrutinised. Data were collected via two different topics of writing tasks using direct composition and translation writing process. The first topic involved English direct composition while the second topic employed direct Malay composition which was then translated into English. The results of the study indicated that English essays of direct writing showed less variety of cohesive markers as compared to Malay essays due to the lack of L2 writing skills. The learners apparently generated more ideas in their native language as well as utilized their L1 cohesive markers into L2 composition via the translation writing process. Nevertheless, the similarities and differences of cohesive markers in Malay and English help teachers to understand learners' organisation of Malay and English essays.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document