The Theory of Exhaustible Resources

1982 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 287-307
Author(s):  
Christian Fayat

It is shown in this paper that the price of an exhaustible resource in an economy of pure competition is not equal to the marginal cost of production and that, in this respect, the classical theory is the ‘worst possible case’ were the resources considered to be inexhaustible. The price of an almost depleted resource is shown to be equal to the marginal cost of production when the resource is exhausted, and on the other hand, its level depends on three factors: (a) the present cost of a substitute; (b) the life expectancy of the resource remaining; (c) the rates of interest on the international capital market. We have calculated from a coherent data assemblage the ‘right’ price for oil in the context of the theory, as it appeared prior to the 1973 crisis. This may be seen to have approximated the actual price ($2/bbl.). This is the optimal theoretical price produced using the pure competition of world resources. The technical, historical and strategical reasons behind this noteworthy convergence are given, reasons which establish scientifically the crisis as an ‘impasse’ in an outdated strategy which had become unable to adapt to new production characteristics. However, the theory of exhaustible resources shows that, even in an economy of pure competition, there is a natural revenue which cannot be considered systematically to be a revenue of a monopolistic nature, or even be judged in regard to the conclusion of the classical theory of pure and perfect competition.

2014 ◽  
Vol 522-524 ◽  
pp. 783-786
Author(s):  
Xiao Xia Yan ◽  
Jin Suo Zhang ◽  
Shao Hui Zou

Assuming in the perfectly competitive market, using the optimal control theory and making the social welfare as the maximization target, the paper studies on environment control which impacts the optimal extraction path of exhaustible resource. The special case result shows that: reserve and the changes of environment capacity function and curve are influenced by original reserve, discounted value, the absolute ratio of green environment flow to resource extraction quantity, and marginal cost.


2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 43-55
Author(s):  
Ika Yulianti ◽  
Endah Masrunik ◽  
Anam Miftakhul Huda ◽  
Diana Elvianita

This study aims to find a comparison of the calculation of the cost of goods manufactured in the CV. Mitra Setia Blitar uses the company's method and uses the Job Order Costing (JOC) method. The method used in this study is quantitative. The types of data used are quantitative and qualitative. Quantitative data is in the form of map production cost data while qualitative data is in the form of information about map production process. The result of calculating the cost of production of the map between the two methods results in a difference of Rp. 306. Calculation using the company method is more expensive than using the Job Order Costing method. Calculation of cost of goods manufactured using the company method is Rp. 2,205,000, - or Rp. 2,205, - each unit. While using the Job Order Costing (JOC) method is Rp. 1,899,000, - or Rp 1,899, - each unit. So that the right method used in calculating the cost of production is the Job Order Costing (JOC) method


Author(s):  
Lin Tian ◽  
Baojun Jiang ◽  
Yifan Xu

Problem definition: Mobile communications technologies and online platforms have enabled large-scale consumer-to-consumer (C2C) sharing of their underutilized products. This paper studies a manufacturer’s optimal entry strategy in the product-sharing market and the economic implications of its entry. Academic/practical relevance: Sharing of products or services among consumers has experienced dramatic growth in recent years. The impact of C2C sharing on traditional firms can be very significant. In response to C2C product sharing, many manufacturers (e.g., General Motors and BMW) have entered the product-sharing market to provide business-to-consumer (B2C) rental services in addition to outright sales to consumers. Methodology: We employ a game-theoretic analytical model for our analysis. Results: Our analysis shows that when C2C sharing has a low transaction cost and the manufacturer’s marginal cost of production is not very high, the manufacturer will find it not optimal to offer its own rental services to consumers. In contrast, when the C2C sharing transaction cost is high or the manufacturer’s marginal cost of production is high, the manufacturer should offer enough units of the products for rental to squeeze out C2C sharing (in expectation). When the C2C-sharing transaction cost and the manufacturer’s marginal cost are both in the middle ranges, the manufacturer’s rental services and the C2C sharing will coexist, in which case the manufacturer’s entry in the sharing market may reduce the total number of units of the product in the whole market, but increase the consumer surplus and the social welfare. This reduced number of products due to the manufacturer’s B2C rental service also suggests less environmental impact from production. Managerial implications: The production cost and the C2C sharing transaction cost play critical roles in determining the manufacturer’s optimal quantity to use for its B2C rental services and the equilibrium outcome. In some situations, the manufacturer’s entry in the sharing market provides not only economic benefits to the firm and consumers, but also environmental benefits to the society as a whole.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Said Saleh Salihi ◽  
Said Saleh Salihi

This research aims to determine and analyze the right determination of the cost of goods manufactured based on the Activity Based Costing (ABC) System at the Dyas't Baubau Bread Company. This type of research is to use the descriptive method using the Activity Based Csoting system. Dyas't. The results of this study The cost of production with the Activity Based Costing system on Dyas't Baubau bread is Rp. 420.60 with a selling price of Rp. 650.00, obtaining a profit of Rp. 229.40 or 54.54% of the cost of goods manufactured. Meanwhile, if using the conventional system, the cost of goods manufactured by Dyas't Baubau Bread Company is Rp. 549.65 with a selling price of Rp. 650.00, obtaining a profit of Rp. 100.35 or 18.265% of the cost of goods manufactured, the cost of goods manufactured using the Activity Based Costing system. for sesame brown bread of Rp. 250.61 with a selling price of Rp. 330.00, obtaining a profit of Rp. 79.39 or 31.68% of the cost of goods manufactured. Meanwhile, if using the conventional system, the cost of production of sesame brown bread is IDR 244.25 with a selling price of IDR 330.00, you will gain a profit of IDR 85.75 or 33.11% of the cost of goods manufactured


2006 ◽  
Vol 32 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 159-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Outterson

The World Health Organization’s CHOICE program analyzes the cost effectiveness of various health interventions related to the Millennium Development Goals. The program identifies the best strategies for improving health in low-income countries, using a standard set of methodological assumptions. These studies evaluate interventions in many areas, including child health and HIV/AIDS.For some of these treatments, drug costs are a significant variable: if the drug price doubles, the intervention becomes less cost effective. But if the drug price is reduced by 90%, then more therapies become affordable.Drug prices are uniquely susceptible to radical price reductions through generic competition. Patented pharmaceuticals may be priced at more than 30 times the marginal cost of production; the excess is the patent rent collected by the drug company while the patent and exclusive marketing periods remain. Patent rents are significant. AIDS drugs which sell for US$10,000 per person per year in the US are sold generically for less than US$200. If patented drugs could be sold at the marginal cost of production, cost effective treatments would become even more attractive, and other interventions would become affordable.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiaxin Li

In market economy, there are four types of markets: perfect competition, monopolistic competition, oligopoly, monopoly. The main differences among them are the ability to set price, barrier to enter and exit the market, numbers of companies. To study innovation’s efficiency in these markets, it is necessary to understand their special characteristics. To simplify the problem, when patent is employed, only the innovation company has the access to this new technology. When it does not exist, every company in the market can use the new technology. In perfect competition market, there are no barrier to enter or exit and lots of companies producing identical products, so no company can set the price. Because there is no barrier, companies that can earn profit will enter the market, which decreases the price. Eventually, all companies’ marginal cost, average cost and marginal benefit is equal to the price, average benefit. In other words, companies in perfect competition market earn zero economic profit. Social welfare is always maximum in this type of markets. In this case, when one company discovers new production technology, other companies will follow immediately. Lower cost causes higher supply, which makes the price decrease and equal to the average cost eventually, leaving every company having zero economic profit, including the first company discovered the new technology, so there is no incentive for any company to spend resource on innovation. However, consumers’ welfare would increase because of lower price. When patent is employed, one company can produce products in a lower price and earn certain economic profit, but can hardly make an influence on the market because there are too many suppliers. Thus, in perfect competition market, patent is a good way to provide incentives for innovations. In monopolistic competition market, there are lots of companies selling slightly different products. The difference among products enables one company to increase the price over in a limited range, so monopolistic competition market is inefficient. In this type of markets, there are two types of innovations: technology and product. The former one reduces the cost and has the same consequence as that in perfect competition market. The latter one, product innovation, makes the product more special, giving the company more market power. However, without patent, product innovation will be copied easily, making the original product less special and canceling out the market power gained by the original company. Since there is no economic benefit, there is no incentive for any company in the market to innovate. When patent is employed, products’ difference is kept and gives the company more market power since there is consumer preference in monopolistic competition market. This increase of market power is not as negligible as that in perfect competition market, so the market becomes less efficient when the company with patent increases the price. In oligopoly market, there are only a few companies with great market power, so all of them can set the price. In this market, companies make decision based on both output and price effects. Output effect means when price is higher than marginal cost, companies can increase profit by increase its output. Price effect means when a company increases its output, the market price goes down, causing less profit for the company. When output effect is more impactful than price effect, companies will increase sales. When price effect is more impactful than output effect, companies will decrease sales. Oligopoly market can be inefficient without restrictions. Regarding innovations, there is still no incentives without the presence of patents. With patent, innovation company will gain market power that is huge enough to cause inefficiency and even to force other companies to exit the market. Thus, patent in oligopoly market will cause negative impact on society, which should be limited. The last type of markets if monopoly. In monopoly market, there is only one company, so patent is necessary. When this company innovates and decreases its production cost, it will tend to increase its output to maximize profit, which enlarges consumers’ welfare. However, this increase is not as much as that in perfect competition market, so innovation in monopoly market is still inefficient.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 144-153
Author(s):  
Dadang Mulyana

This article will discuss market structure and competition prices in islamic economics. Literature searching is the method used in writing this article. This article found that market in Islam is defined as a means of meeting between seller and buyer, where the buyer came to the market with a demand for goods membewa certain to meet with the seller that brings offers the same goods as well. And the outcome of the meeting will produce an agreement between the seller and the buyer of the price level and the number of items in the transaction. If an agreement between the seller and the buyer then there was a provision of an item in the transaction. The market structure has a notion that some form of management of the producer to the market based on their characteristics, for example, such as the type of product produced, the number of companies in an industry. Easy or not exit or enter the industry and the role of advertising in industry activity. Perfect competition is a market structure that is most ideal for systems market is considered to ensure their activities to produce goods or services is high. The conclusion of the article are: however, in practice it is not easy to realize a market that has a structure of perfect competition. pricing is one of the practices that are not allowed by the Islamic Shari'a. Government or who have economic power do not have the right and authority to determine the fixed price of a commodity, unless the government has provided for the trader’s sufficient quantities to be sold using a price has been agreed. Tabi'at (fixed) This we can see from how the attitude of the prophet Muhammad pbuh on the issue. When visited by a companion to ask for fixing the price, the Prophet pbuh stated his rejection.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 49-58
Author(s):  
Dewi Sukmasari ◽  
◽  
Yenni Agustina ◽  
Agrianti Agrianti ◽  
Susi Sarumpaet ◽  
...  

Purpose: The cost of production is an important component in determining the selling price. The right and accurate cost of goods manufactured can provide the right information for decision-makers. Kelurahan Tanjung Raya is one of the sub-districts located in the subdistrict of peace. One form of a business carried out by the home industry is the chips business. The chip business is one of the businesses that can help the family economy. This PkM partner is the Dasawisama Women chip business group in the Tanjung Raya sub-district, RT 015. The main problem of partners is that they are still biased in calculating the cost of goods manufactured, while the production cost is an essential component in determining the selling price. The PkM method provided is in the form of training and mentoring. As the results of this activity, the respondent welcomed this activity with a positive response and increased understanding of the respondents in comparing the cost of goods manufactured with the conventional method and the ABC method. The purpose of this study was to increase the skill and the knowledge of participants. Method: The activities carried out were training and accompaniment. Results: Respondents welcomed this activity with a positive response and increased respondent understanding in comparing the cost of goods manufactured comparisons with the conventional method and the ABC method. Conclusion: This activity has a positive impact on increasing the skills and income of the participant group. Keywords: Cost of production, ABC, Selling price


2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan M. Roldan Fernandez ◽  
Manuel Burgos Payan ◽  
Jesus M. Riquelme Santos

AbstractRenewable producers can offer selling bids with very low marginal cost since they are not obliged to include on any cost related to the use of energy from the wind or sun. Accordingly, when the Market Operator integrates a renewable bid in the merit-order generation curve, all the generators based on conventional technologies, with higher marginal cost due to the cost of fuels, are displaced to the right. The right-shifting of the merit-order generation curve leads to a lower clearing price, a small increment of the traded energy (almost inelastic demand curve), and a reduction of the total cost of the energy traded in the wholesale market. This is the key mechanism of the well-known merit-order effect of renewables. Load-shifting (demand-side management) plans are expected to yield a reduction of the cost of the traded energy for the customers, since the cost-saving due to the energy eschewed at peak hours would be greater than the extra cost due to the increased demand at off-peak hours. This work will show that the main effects of load-shifting on the market are qualitatively similar to that of renewables, which exemplify the existence a “merit-order effect of load-shifting”. To analyse the characteristics of the merit-order effect of load-shifting, a simplified model has been developed, based on the displacement of the generation and demand curves. A set of scenarios has been generated in order to quantify the main effects on the Spanish/Iberian market for 2015.


Author(s):  
Michail Katsigiannis ◽  
Constantinos Valagiannopoulos

Finland, among the first to adopt mobile broadband services, faces rapid growth of mobile data traffic. Therefore, Finnish mobile operators continually invest in their radio access networks to handle this growth, which represents an attractive revenue source. This study presents a demand curve estimate for mobile broadband data traffic, which takes into account the impact of technology evolution on network coverage and capacity. Based on the demand curve and the market equilibrium, this study proposes two strategies for mobile operators: i) reducing the marginal cost of traffic, and ii) changing the pricing structure. Assuming that mobile operators are price-takers (perfect competition), the findings of this study indicate that a continuing reduction of marginal cost is imposed by market forces. However, this policy of cost reduction will inevitably reach its limits. Thus, this study proposes a change in pricing structure from flat-rate tariff to usage-based charging.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document