scholarly journals Three-Dimensional Printing and Its Applications in Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery

2016 ◽  
Vol 156 (6) ◽  
pp. 999-1010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Trevor D. Crafts ◽  
Susan E. Ellsperman ◽  
Todd J. Wannemuehler ◽  
Travis D. Bellicchi ◽  
Taha Z. Shipchandler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
3D Printing ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Neck Surgery ◽  
Head And Neck Surgery ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Three Dimensional Printing ◽  
Training Models ◽  
Ovid Medline ◽  
Dimensional Printing

Objective Three-dimensional (3D)-printing technology is being employed in a variety of medical and surgical specialties to improve patient care and advance resident physician training. As the costs of implementing 3D printing have declined, the use of this technology has expanded, especially within surgical specialties. This article explores the types of 3D printing available, highlights the benefits and drawbacks of each methodology, provides examples of how 3D printing has been applied within the field of otolaryngology–head and neck surgery, discusses future innovations, and explores the financial impact of these advances. Data Sources Articles were identified from PubMed and Ovid MEDLINE. Review Methods PubMed and Ovid Medline were queried for English articles published between 2011 and 2016, including a few articles prior to this time as relevant examples. Search terms included 3-dimensional printing, 3 D printing, otolaryngology, additive manufacturing, craniofacial, reconstruction, temporal bone, airway, sinus, cost, and anatomic models. Conclusions Three-dimensional printing has been used in recent years in otolaryngology for preoperative planning, education, prostheses, grafting, and reconstruction. Emerging technologies include the printing of tissue scaffolds for the auricle and nose, more realistic training models, and personalized implantable medical devices. Implications for Practice After the up-front costs of 3D printing are accounted for, its utilization in surgical models, patient-specific implants, and custom instruments can reduce operating room time and thus decrease costs. Educational and training models provide an opportunity to better visualize anomalies, practice surgical technique, predict problems that might arise, and improve quality by reducing mistakes.

Clinical applications of three‐dimensional printing in otolaryngology–head and neck surgery: A systematic review

2019 ◽  
Vol 129 (9) ◽  
pp. 2045-2052 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris J. Hong ◽  
Andreas A. Giannopoulos ◽  
Brian Y. Hong ◽  
Ian J. Witterick ◽  
Jonathan C. Irish ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Neck Surgery ◽  
Clinical Applications ◽  
Head And Neck Surgery ◽  
Three Dimensional Printing ◽  
Dimensional Printing

3D Reconstruction Role in Surgical Treatment of Sinonasal Tumours

2018 ◽  
Vol 69 (6) ◽  
pp. 1455-1457
Author(s):  
Dragos Octavian Palade ◽  
Bogdan Mihail Cobzeanu ◽  
Petronela Zaharia ◽  
Marius Dabija
Keyword(s):  
3D Printing ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Three Dimensional Printing ◽  
Great Progress ◽  
3D Printed ◽  
Medical Modeling ◽  
Dimensional Printing ◽  
Tissue Defects

Three-dimensional printing has numerous applications and has gained much interest in the medical world. The constantly improving quality of 3D-printing applications has contributed to their increased use on patients. Nowadays, 3D printing is very well integrated in the surgical practice and research. Also, the field of head and neck reconstructive surgery is constantly evolving because of the three-dimensional printing, a technology which can be widely used in a variety of situations such as reconstruction of tissue defects, surgical planning, medical modeling and prosthesis. By using 3D printing into tissue engineering and materials, it may be possible for otolaryngologists to implant 3D printed functional grafts into patients and will also provide a rapid production of personalized patient-specific devices. Advances in 3D printed implants and future tissue-engineered constructs will bring great progress to the field of otorhinolaryngology.

scholarly journals Clinical Applications of Additive Manufacturing Models in Neurosurgery: a Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 40 (04) ◽  
pp. e349-e360
Author(s):  
André Giacomelli Leal ◽  
Ricardo Ramina ◽  
Paulo Henrique Pires de Aguiar ◽  
Beatriz Luci Fernandes ◽  
Mauren Abreu de Souza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
3D Printing ◽  
Surgical Simulation ◽  
Anatomical Variation ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Three Dimensional Printing ◽  
Training Models ◽  
Rapid Construction ◽  
Biological Implants ◽  
Dimensional Printing

Abstract Introduction Three-dimensional (3D) printing technologies provide a practical and anatomical way to reproduce precise tailored-made models of the patients and of the diseases. Those models can allow surgical planning, besides training and surgical simulation in the treatment of neurosurgical diseases. Objective The aim of the present article is to review the scenario of the development of different types of available 3D printing technologies, the processes involved in the creation of biomodels, and the application of those advances in the neurosurgical field. Methods We searched for papers that addressed the clinical application of 3D printing in neurosurgery on the PubMed, Ebsco, Web of Science, Scopus, and Science Direct databases. All papers related to the use of any additive manufacturing technique were included in the present study. Results Studies involving 3D printing in neurosurgery are concentrated on three main areas: (1) creation of anatomical tailored-made models for planning and training; (2) development of devices and materials for the treatment of neurosurgical diseases, and (3) biological implants for tissues engineering. Biomodels are extremely useful in several branches of neurosurgery, and their use in spinal, cerebrovascular, endovascular, neuro-oncological, neuropediatric, and functional surgeries can be highlighted. Conclusions Three-dimensional printing technologies are an exclusive way for direct replication of specific pathologies of the patient. It can identify the anatomical variation and provide a way for rapid construction of training models, allowing the medical resident and the experienced neurosurgeon to practice the surgical steps before the operation.

scholarly journals Transfiguring Healthcare: Three-Dimensional Printing in Pharmaceutical Sciences; Trends during COVID-19: A Review

2021 ◽  
pp. 207-218
Author(s):  
K. G. Siree ◽  
T. M. Amulya ◽  
T. M. Pramod Kumar ◽  
S. Sowmya ◽  
K. Divith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
3D Printing ◽  
Medical Devices ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Pharmaceutical Sciences ◽  
Three Dimensional Printing ◽  
Custom Made ◽  
High Degree ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Dimensional Printing ◽  
Shed Light

Three-dimensional (3D) printing is a unique technique that allows for a high degree of customisation in pharmacy, dentistry and in designing of medical devices. 3D printing satiates the increasing exigency for consumer personalisation in these fields as custom-made medicines catering to the patients’ requirements are novel advancements in drug therapy. Current research in 3D printing indicates towards reproducing an organ in the form of a chip; paving the way for more studies and opportunities to perfecting the existing technique. In addition, we will also attempt to shed light on the impact of 3D printing in the COVID-19 pandemic.

scholarly journals Three-dimensional printing for device selection in cardiology: Several key points should not be neglected

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongxing Luo ◽  
Zhongmin Wang
Keyword(s):  
3D Printing ◽  
Clinical Medicine ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Three Dimensional Printing ◽  
Image Postprocessing ◽  
Key Points ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Recent Developments ◽  
3D Transesophageal Echocardiography ◽  
Dimensional Printing

We comment on the recent developments and problems of three-dimensional printing in cardiology. Since there are currently no standards or consensuses for 3D printing in clinical medicine and the technology is at its infancy in cardiology, it’s very important to detail the procedures to allow more similar studies to further our understandings of this novel technology. Most studies have employed computed tomography to obtain source data for 3D printing, the use of real-time 3D transesophageal echocardiography for data acquisition remains rare, so it would be very valuable and inspiring to detail the image postprocessing steps, or the reliability of the study results will be doubtful.

scholarly journals Main Clinical Use of Additive Manufacturing (Three-Dimensional Printing) in Finland Restricted to the Head and Neck Area in 2016–2017

2019 ◽  
Vol 109 (2) ◽  
pp. 166-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.B.V. Pettersson ◽  
M. Salmi ◽  
P. Vallittu ◽  
W. Serlo ◽  
J. Tuomi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Computer Aided Design ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Imaging Data ◽  
University Hospitals ◽  
Three Dimensional Printing ◽  
Dimensional Printing ◽  
Head Area

Background and Aims: Additive manufacturing or three-dimensional printing is a novel production methodology for producing patient-specific models, medical aids, tools, and implants. However, the clinical impact of this technology is unknown. In this study, we sought to characterize the clinical adoption of medical additive manufacturing in Finland in 2016–2017. We focused on non-dental usage at university hospitals. Materials and Methods: A questionnaire containing five questions was sent by email to all operative, radiologic, and oncologic departments of all university hospitals in Finland. Respondents who reported extensive use of medical additive manufacturing were contacted with additional, personalized questions. Results: Of the 115 questionnaires sent, 58 received answers. Of the responders, 41% identified as non-users, including all general/gastrointestinal (GI) and vascular surgeons, urologists, and gynecologists; 23% identified as experimenters or previous users; and 36% identified as heavy users. Usage was concentrated around the head area by various specialties (neurosurgical, craniomaxillofacial, ear, nose and throat diseases (ENT), plastic surgery). Applications included repair of cranial vault defects and malformations, surgical oncology, trauma, and cleft palate reconstruction. Some routine usage was also reported in orthopedics. In addition to these patient-specific uses, we identified several off-the-shelf medical components that were produced by additive manufacturing, while some important patient-specific components were produced by traditional methodologies such as milling. Conclusion: During 2016–2017, medical additive manufacturing in Finland was routinely used at university hospitals for several applications in the head area. Outside of this area, usage was much less common. Future research should include all patient-specific products created by a computer-aided design/manufacture workflow from imaging data, instead of concentrating on the production methodology.

scholarly journals Comparison of Presurgical Dental Models Manufactured with Two Different Three-Dimensional Printing Techniques

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcin Metlerski ◽  
Katarzyna Grocholewicz ◽  
Aleksandra Jaroń ◽  
Mariusz Lipski ◽  
Grzegorz Trybek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
3D Printing ◽  
Oral Surgery ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Mean Deviation ◽  
Printing Technology ◽  
Three Dimensional Printing ◽  
Reference Models ◽  
3D Printing Technology ◽  
Dimensional Printing ◽  
Printing Time

Three-dimensional printing is a rapidly developing area of technology and manufacturing in the field of oral surgery. The aim of this study was comparison of presurgical models made by two different types of three-dimensional (3D) printing technology. Digital reference models were printed 10 times using fused deposition modelling (FDM) and digital light processing (DLP) techniques. All 3D printed models were scanned using a technical scanner. The trueness, linear measurements, and printing time were evaluated. The diagnostic models were compared with the reference models using linear and mean deviation for trueness measurements with computer software. Paired t-tests were performed to compare the two types of 3D printing technology. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. For FDM printing, all average distances between the reference points were smaller than the corresponding distances measured on the reference model. For the DLP models, the average distances in the three measurements were smaller than the original. Only one average distance measurement was greater. The mean deviation for trueness was 0.1775 mm for the FDM group and 0.0861 mm for the DLP group. Mean printing time for a single model was 517.6 minutes in FDM technology and 285.3 minutes in DLP. This study confirms that presurgical models manufactured with FDM and DLP technologies are usable in oral surgery. Our findings will facilitate clinical decision-making regarding the best 3D printing technology to use when planning a surgical procedure.

scholarly journals Transoral Endoscopic Head and Neck Surgery and Its Role Within the Multidisciplinary Treatment Paradigm of Oropharynx Cancer: Robotics, Lasers, and Clinical Trials

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (29) ◽  
pp. 3285-3292 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Christopher Holsinger ◽  
Robert L. Ferris
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Multidisciplinary Treatment ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Neck Surgery ◽  
Head And Neck Surgery ◽  
Invasive Technique ◽  
Swallowing Dysfunction ◽  
Treatment Paradigm

Transoral endoscopic head and neck surgery is a new approach for the treatment of oropharyngeal tumors. Using either a robotic system and/or laser, surgeons gain access through the mouth via minimally invasive technique and thus have improved visualization of the tumors of the oropharynx, without disfiguring incisions. This transoral route of access minimizes long-term speech and swallowing dysfunction. Surgeons view this approach as a considerable technologic advance, analogous to the evolution in radiation therapy from conventional two- and three-dimensional conformal techniques to intensity-modulated techniques. Although the use of radiation with or without chemotherapy to treat oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) is supported by evidence from prospective clinical trials, there are no prospective data supporting the use of this new surgical approach for OPC. Here, we review the fundamentals of transoral endoscopic head and neck surgery, with robotics and laser technology, and discuss ongoing clinical trials for patients with OPC.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document