Impact of ABCDE Bundle Implementation in the Intensive Care Unit on Specific Patient Costs

2021 ◽  
pp. 088506662110318
Author(s):  
Olufisayo T. Otusanya ◽  
S. Jean Hsieh ◽  
Michelle Ng Gong ◽  
Hayley B. Gershengorn

Objectives: To measure the impact of full versus partial ABCDE bundle implementation on specific cost centers and related resource utilization. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Two medical ICUs within Montefiore Health System (Bronx, NY). Patients: Four hundred and seventy-two mechanically ventilated patients admitted to the medical ICUs during a hospitalization which began and ended between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2013. Interventions: The full (A)wakening, (B)reathing, (C)oordination, (D)elirium Monitoring/Management and (E)arly Mobilization bundle was implemented in the intervention ICU while a portion of the bundle (A, B, and D components) was implemented in the comparison ICU. Measurements and Main Results: Relative to the comparison ICU, implementation of the entire bundle in the intervention ICU was associated with a 27.3% (95% CI: 9.9%, 41.3%; P = 0.004) decrease in total hospital laboratory costs and a 2,888.6% (95% CI: 77.9%, 50,113.2%; P = 0.018) increase in total hospital physical therapy costs. Cost of total hospital medications, diagnostic radiology and respiratory therapy were unchanged. Relative to the comparison ICU, total hospital resource use decreased in the intervention ICU (incidence rate ratio [95% CI], laboratory: 0.68 [0.54, 0.87], P = 0.002; diagnostic radiology: 0.75 [0.59, 0.96], P = 0.020). Conclusions: Full ABCDE bundle implementation resulted in a decrease in total hospital laboratory costs and total hospital laboratory and diagnostic resource utilization while leading to an increase in physical therapy costs.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18112-e18112
Author(s):  
Neeta Somaiah ◽  
George R. Simon

e18112 Background: A plethora of targeted agents are currently being evaluated in patients with NSCLC. The number of targeted agents exceeds the number of targets leading to many targeted agents being evaluated against similar targets. The identification of new targets are likely to increase exponentially in the near future given the numerous currently ongoing molecular profiling efforts. The objective of this analysis is to estimate the target-specific patient resource utilization and its impact on routine clinical care. Methods: A comprehensive search for molecularly targeted agents in clinical testing that have accrued or are accruing NSCLC patients were performed by using publically available search engines and databases. Agents were grouped according to the primary target and the phase of development. We computed the number of patients allocated to completed and ongoing phase III NSCLC trials for advanced NSCLC alone. Results: There are more than 30 categories of molecular targets accruing NSCLC patients in clinical trials. By conservative estimates, approximately 215 agents are currently undergoing clinical testing. The median number of agents per target is 7 (range 2 (HIF-1α and PDGFRα) – 24 (EGFR)). There are 7 EGFR inhibitors and 10 VEGFR inhibitors that were evaluated in phase III trials; with 36,093 and 20,313 stage IV NSCLC patients enrolled or to be enrolled in these trials, respectively. No more than 2 agents per target have been FDA approved for NSCLC to date. Further details of the analyses will be more comprehensively presented at the meeting. Conclusions: Patient resource utilization is unevenly distributed across targets. The optimal number of targeted agents to be evaluated per target remains to be defined. More emphasis on identifying new targets and targeting these with limited number of optimal agents may accelerate the advancement of the field and the impact on patient care.


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 88-88
Author(s):  
John R. Wingard ◽  
Raoul Herbrecht ◽  
Anne Marciniak ◽  
Craig S. Roberts

Abstract Background: Treatment of AIA typically involves prolonged hospitalization and substantial use of intensive care (ICU) resources. This study compared consumption of hospital resources by AIA pts receiving initial treatment with either VOR or CAB. Methods: Data were collected prospectively as part of a clinical trial comparing VOR to CAB in AIA of immunocompromised pts, where VOR showed a significant improvement in success and a relative survival benefit (Herbrecht R et al, NEJM2002; 347: 408–15). Pts in the modified-intent-to-treat population with completed resource utilization data were included. Total days of hospitalization, days of ICU, and hospitalization-free survival days during 12 weeks following initiation of therapy were compared. The impact of survival on resource consumption was explored. Results: There were 143 and 131 pts in the VOR and CAB arms, respectively, with resource utilization data. Resource utilization data are presented in the Table. Resource Utilization by Treatment Arm VOR Mean (SD) CAB Mean (SD) Difference (95% CI) Total Hospital Days 27.8 (22.7) 27.7 (20.8) 0.1 (−5.1, 5.3) Total Hospital Days (survivors) 30.2 (24.2) 33.3 (22.2) −3.1 (−10.3, 4.0) ICU Days 5.6 (10.7) 8.1 (14.4) −2.5 (−5.5, 0.5) ICU Days (survivors) 4.0 (10.9) 8.1 (14.6) −4.1 (−7.9, −0.2) Hospitalization-free survival (days) 40.3 (29.8) 28.4 (28.5) 11.9 (4.9, 18.8) Conclusion: VOR pts had significantly longer hospitalization-free survival and had a trend toward fewer ICU days than CAB pts. Improved survival with less hospital resource utilization and lower total drug acquisition costs (Lewis JS et al, ICAAC 2003, A1359) support the economic benefit of using VOR for primary therapy for AIA.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (7) ◽  
pp. 278-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. V. Gutareva ◽  
◽  
Yu. Yu. Muskharina ◽  
V. V. Gutarev ◽  
E. E. Yablochanska ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Axel Kaehne ◽  
Paula Keating

Abstract Background Emergency department (ED) attendances are contributing to rising costs of the National Health Service (NHS) in England. Critically assessing the impact of new services to reduce emergency department use can be difficult as new services may create additional access points, unlocking latent demand. The study evaluated an Acute Visiting Scheme (AVS) in a primary care context. We asked if AVS reduces overall ED demand and whether or not it changed utilisation patterns for frequent attenders. Method The study used a pre post single cohort design. The impact of AVS on all-cause ED attendances was hypothesised as a substitution effect, where AVS duty doctor visits would replace emergency department visits. Primary outcome was frequency of ED attendances. End points were reduction of frequency of service use and increase of intervals between attendances by frequent attenders. Results ED attendances for AVS users rose by 47.6%. If AVS use was included, there was a more than fourfold increase of total service utilisation, amounting to 438.3%. It shows that AVS unlocked significant latent demand. However, there was some reduction in the frequency of ED attendances for some patients and an increase in time intervals between ED attendances for others. Conclusion The study demonstrates that careful analysis of patient utilisation can detect a differential impact of AVS on the use of ED. As the new service created additional access points for patients and hence introduces an element of choice, the new service is likely to unlock latent demand. This study illustrates that AVS may be most useful if targeted at specific patient groups who are most likely to benefit from the new service.


BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. e039488
Author(s):  
Anna Dowling ◽  
Ellen Slungaard ◽  
Nicola R Heneghan

IntroductionThe prevalence of flight-related neck pain is 70% in UK fast jet pilots; much higher than the general population. The Aircrew Conditioning Programme and direct access physiotherapy exist to minimise the impact on military capability, but a population specific patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) is required to investigate the effectiveness of these. We aimed to explore the experiences of flight-related neck pain to inform the content validity and development of a population specific PROM.MethodsQualitative semistructured interviews combining phenomenological and grounded theory methods, reported using Consolidated criteria for Reporting Qualitative research guidelines. A purposive sample of 10 fast jet pilots with neck pain was recruited. Concept elicitation interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim along with field notes. Data analysis involved subject and methodological expertise used a concept elicitation approach.ResultsParticipants included 10 male fast jet pilots, age 34.7 years. Identified themes included: (1) physical symptoms associated with flying activities; (2) occupational effects revealed modifications of flying, or ‘suboptimal’ performance owing to neck pain; (3) psychological effects revealed feelings or worry and (4) social and activity effects showed impact on out of work time.ConclusionPopulation-specific occupational, psychological and social factors should be considered alongside physical symptoms when managing neck pain in military aircrew. Findings support the development of a PROM specifically designed for military aircrew with neck pain.


2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (8) ◽  
pp. 1448-1464 ◽  
Author(s):  
Örjan Åkerborg ◽  
Andrea Lang ◽  
Anders Wimo ◽  
Anders Sköldunger ◽  
Laura Fratiglioni ◽  
...  

Objective: To estimate the cost of dementia care and its relation to dependence. Method: Disease severity and health care resource utilization was retrieved from the Swedish National Study on Aging and Care. Informal care was assessed with the Resource Utilization in Dementia instrument. A path model investigates the relationship between annual cost of care and dependence, cognitive ability, functioning, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and comorbidities. Results: Average annual cost among patients diagnosed with dementia was €43,259, primarily incurred by accommodation. Resource use, that is, institutional care, community care, and accommodation, and corresponding costs increased significantly by increasing dependency. Path analysis showed that cognitive ability, functioning, and neuropsychiatric symptoms were significantly correlated with dependence, which in turn had a strong impact on annual cost. Discussion: This study confirms that cost of dementia care increases with dependence and that the impact of other disease indicators is mainly mediated by dependence.


Author(s):  
Małgorzata Paprocka-Borowicz ◽  
Mona Wiatr ◽  
Maria Ciałowicz ◽  
Wojciech Borowicz ◽  
Agnieszka Kaczmarek ◽  
...  

Stroke is a high-risk factor for depression. Neurological rehabilitation is greatly difficult and often does not include treatment of depression. The post-stroke depression plays an important role in the progress of treatment, health, and the life of the patient. The appropriate treatment of depression could improve the quality of life of the patient and their family. The study aimed to evaluate the impact of physical activity and socio-economic status of the patient on the effectiveness of recovery from depression and the severity of the symptoms of depression. The study was conducted with 40 patients after stroke aged 42–82 years, and included 10 women and 30 men who were hospitalized for two weeks. The severity of depression/anxiety (D/A) symptoms were evaluated two times; at admission and after two weeks of physical therapy. The hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) questionnaire was used for this purpose. Socio-economic status was evaluated by several simple questions. It was revealed that physical therapy has a positive influence on mental state. The severity of D/A symptoms after stroke is related to the financial status of the patients (2 = 11.198, p = 0.024). The state of health (2 = 20.57, p = 0.022) and physical fitness (2 = 12.95, p = 0.044) changed the severity of symptoms of anxiety and depressive disorders. The kinesiotherapy in the group of patients with post-stroke depression had positive effects; however, economic and health conditions may influence the prognosis of the disease.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 204209862098569
Author(s):  
Phyo K. Myint ◽  
Ben Carter ◽  
Fenella Barlow-Pay ◽  
Roxanna Short ◽  
Alice G. Einarsson ◽  
...  

Background: Whilst there is literature on the impact of SARS viruses in the severely immunosuppressed, less is known about the link between routine immunosuppressant use and outcome in COVID-19. Consequently, guidelines on their use vary depending on specific patient populations. Methods: The study population was drawn from the COPE Study (COVID-19 in Older People), a multicentre observational cohort study, across the UK and Italy. Data were collected between 27 February and 28 April 2020 by trained data-collectors and included all unselected consecutive admissions with COVID-19. Load (name/number of medications) and dosage of immunosuppressant were collected along with other covariate data. Primary outcome was time-to-mortality from the date of admission (or) date of diagnosis, if diagnosis was five or more days after admission. Secondary outcomes were Day-14 mortality and time-to-discharge. Data were analysed with mixed-effects, Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression models using non-users of immunosuppressants as the reference group. Results: In total 1184 patients were eligible for inclusion. The median (IQR) age was 74 (62–83), 676 (57%) were male, and 299 (25.3%) died in hospital (total person follow-up 15,540 days). Most patients exhibited at least one comorbidity, and 113 (~10%) were on immunosuppressants. Any immunosuppressant use was associated with increased mortality: aHR 1.87, 95% CI: 1.30, 2.69 (time to mortality) and aOR 1.71, 95% CI: 1.01–2.88 (14-day mortality). There also appeared to be a dose–response relationship. Conclusion: Despite possible indication bias, until further evidence emerges we recommend adhering to public health measures, a low threshold to seek medical advice and close monitoring of symptoms in those who take immunosuppressants routinely regardless of their indication. However, it should be noted that the inability to control for the underlying condition requiring immunosuppressants is a major limitation, and hence caution should be exercised in interpretation of the results. Plain Language Summary Regular Use of Immune Suppressing Drugs is Associated with Increased Risk of Death in Hospitalised Patients with COVID-19 Background: We do not have much information on how the COVID-19 virus affects patients who use immunosuppressants, drugs which inhibit or reduce the activity of the immune system. There are various conflicting views on whether immune-suppressing drugs are beneficial or detrimental in patients with the disease. Methods: This study collected data from 10 hospitals in the UK and one in Italy between February and April 2020 in order to identify any association between the regular use of immunosuppressant medicines and survival in patients who were admitted to hospital with COVID-19. Results: 1184 patients were included in the study, and 10% of them were using immunosuppressants. Any immunosuppressant use was associated with increased risk of death, and the risk appeared to increase if the dose of the medicine was higher. Conclusion: We therefore recommend that patients who take immunosuppressant medicines routinely should carefully adhere to social distancing measures, and seek medical attention early during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Author(s):  
G.J. Melman ◽  
A.K. Parlikad ◽  
E.A.B. Cameron

AbstractCOVID-19 has disrupted healthcare operations and resulted in large-scale cancellations of elective surgery. Hospitals throughout the world made life-altering resource allocation decisions and prioritised the care of COVID-19 patients. Without effective models to evaluate resource allocation strategies encompassing COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 care, hospitals face the risk of making sub-optimal local resource allocation decisions. A discrete-event-simulation model is proposed in this paper to describe COVID-19, elective surgery, and emergency surgery patient flows. COVID-19-specific patient flows and a surgical patient flow network were constructed based on data of 475 COVID-19 patients and 28,831 non-COVID-19 patients in Addenbrooke’s hospital in the UK. The model enabled the evaluation of three resource allocation strategies, for two COVID-19 wave scenarios: proactive cancellation of elective surgery, reactive cancellation of elective surgery, and ring-fencing operating theatre capacity. The results suggest that a ring-fencing strategy outperforms the other strategies, regardless of the COVID-19 scenario, in terms of total direct deaths and the number of surgeries performed. However, this does come at the cost of 50% more critical care rejections. In terms of aggregate hospital performance, a reactive cancellation strategy prioritising COVID-19 is no longer favourable if more than 7.3% of elective surgeries can be considered life-saving. Additionally, the model demonstrates the impact of timely hospital preparation and staff availability, on the ability to treat patients during a pandemic. The model can aid hospitals worldwide during pandemics and disasters, to evaluate their resource allocation strategies and identify the effect of redefining the prioritisation of patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 243-254
Author(s):  
Fränce Hardtstock ◽  
Zeki Kocaata ◽  
Thomas Wilke ◽  
Axel Dittmar ◽  
Marco Ghiani ◽  
...  

Abstract Background This study analyzes the impact of skeletal-related events (SRE) on healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs incurred by patients with bone metastases (BM) from solid tumors (ST), who are therapy-naïve to bone targeting agents (BTAs). Methods German claims data from 01/01/2010 to 30/06/2018 were used to conduct a retrospective comparative cohort analysis of BTA-naive patients with a BM diagnosis and preceding ST diagnosis. HCRU and treatment-related costs were compared in two matched cohorts of patients with and without a history of SREs, defined as pathological fracture, spinal cord compression, surgery to bone and radiation to bone. The first SRE was defined as the patient-individual index date. Conversely, for the non-SRE patients, index dates were assigned randomly. Results In total, 45.20% of 9,832 patients reported experiencing at least one SRE (n = 4444) while 54.80% experienced none (n = 5388); 2,434 pairs of SRE and non-SRE patients were finally matched (mean age: 70.87/71.07 years; females: 39.07%/38.58%). Between SRE and non-SRE cohorts, significant differences in the average number of hospitalization days per patient-year (35.80/30.80) and associated inpatient-care costs (14,199.27€/10,787.31€) were observed. The total cost ratio was 1.16 (p < 0.001) with an average cost breakdown of 23,689.54€ and 20,403.27€ per patient-year in SRE and non-SRE patients. Conclusion The underutilization of BTAs within a clinical setting poses an ongoing challenge in the real-world treatment of BM patients throughout Germany. Ultimately, the economic burden of treating SREs in patients with BM from ST was found to be considerable, resulting in higher direct healthcare costs and increased utilization of inpatient care facilities.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document