What Do Parents Attribute the Cause of Bullying to? It Can Amplify or Buffer the Vicious Cycle of Bullying Perpetration and Victimization

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (23) ◽  
pp. 3589-3609
Author(s):  
Boungho Choi ◽  
Soowon Park
Keyword(s):  
Longitudinal Study ◽  
Secondary Students ◽  
Critical Factor ◽  
The Other ◽  
Intervention Programs ◽  
Bullying Victimization ◽  
Vicious Cycle ◽  
Violent Media ◽  
Bullying Perpetration ◽  
Bullying Experiences

The purpose of this study is to examine what do parents attribute the causes of bullying to and how the attributions of parents are related with their adolescents’ experiences of bullying perpetration and bullying victimization in the subsequent year. The data were drawn from 3,293 Korean secondary students and their parents from the Seoul Education Longitudinal Study across two waves (seventh, eighth grades). The results revealed that 1,228 (37.3%) parents thought that bullying was caused by perpetrators’ faults while 512 (15.5%) parents thought bullying was caused by victims’ faults. The other 1,553 (47.2%) showed external attributions (e.g., peer, violent media). Adolescents’ bullying perpetration and victimization interacted with parent’s attribution in predicting later bullying perpetration and victimization. These results indicate that parent’s attribution is a critical factor to understanding the alleviation or deterioration of bullying in adolescents. Intervention programs should be designed to concern parents’ attribution as well as adolescents’ prior bullying experiences.

Unraveling the Bidirectional Relationship Between Bullying Victimization and Perpetration: A Test of Mechanisms From Opportunity and General Strain Theories

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 395-411
Author(s):  
Glenn D. Walters
Keyword(s):  
Longitudinal Study ◽  
General Strain Theory ◽  
Routine Activities ◽  
Strain Theory ◽  
Bullying Victimization ◽  
Peer Delinquency ◽  
Bullying Perpetration ◽  
Bidirectional Relationship ◽  
Causal Mediation Analysis ◽  
General Strain

This study tested two theories designed to explain the bullying perpetration–victimization relationship. Peer delinquency was hypothesized to mediate the pathway from bullying perpetration to victimization, in line with opportunity, lifestyle, and routine activities theories, and anger was held to mediate the pathway from bullying victimization to perpetration as set forth in general strain theory. These pathways were tested in a sample of 3,411 youth (1,728 boys, 1,683 girls) from the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children. A causal mediation analysis performed on three nonoverlapping waves of data, in which prior levels of each predicted variable were controlled, uncovered support for peer delinquency as a mediator of the perpetration–victimization pathway but failed to identify anger as a mediator of the victimization–perpetration pathway. Additional research is required to identify a mediator for the victimization–perpetration pathway and determine whether variables other than peer delinquency mediate the perpetration–victimization pathway.

scholarly journals Examining explanations for the link between bullying perpetration and physical dating violence perpetration: Do they vary by bullying victimization?

2015 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vangie A. Foshee ◽  
Thad S. Benefield ◽  
Heath Luz McNaughton Reyes ◽  
Meridith Eastman ◽  
Alana M. Vivolo-Kantor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dating Violence ◽  
Bullying Victimization ◽  
Bullying Perpetration ◽  
Violence Perpetration ◽  
Physical Dating Violence

The development of epistemological beliefs among secondary students: A longitudinal study.

1997 ◽  
Vol 89 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marlene Schommer ◽  
Christy Calvert ◽  
Gianna Gariglietti ◽  
Amit Bajaj
Keyword(s):  
Longitudinal Study ◽  
Secondary Students ◽  
Epistemological Beliefs

From Victims to Perpetrators of Bullying: The Role of Irrational Cognitions, Externalizing Problems, and Parental Attachment

2021 ◽  
pp. 088626052110435
Author(s):  
Raluca Balan ◽  
Anca Dobrean ◽  
Robert Balazsi
Keyword(s):  
Public Schools ◽  
Path Analysis ◽  
Indirect Effects ◽  
Externalizing Problems ◽  
Parental Attachment ◽  
Bullying Victimization ◽  
Indirect Pathway ◽  
Bullying Perpetration ◽  
Interaction Terms

The transition from bullying victimization to bullying perpetration is well documented in the literature. However, the mechanisms linking bullying victimization to perpetration are not fully understood. The main aim of the current study was to conduct a preliminary research investigating the indirect effects of youths bullying victimization on bullying perpetration through irrational cognitions and externalizing problems. The second aim of the study was to explore the moderating role of the type of parental attachment (secure vs. insecure) in the proposed model in explaining the association of bullying victimization and bullying perpetration. Data were collected from 269 adolescents (11-15 years; M = 11.98, SD = .68), enrolled in middle public schools from Romania. Path analysis and moderated path analysis were conducted to explore the direct and indirect effects and moderating effects, respectively. Study findings indicate that bullying victimization was indirectly related to bullying perpetration separately through youths’ irrational cognition as well as through externalizing problems. The serial indirect pathway from victimization to perpetration through irrational cognitions leading further to externalizing problems was also significant. However, the type of attachment that adolescents reported having toward their parents failed to moderate the indirect pathways, since all the interaction terms were nonsignificant. These findings advance the field prevention and intervention by identifying irrational cognitions and externalizing problems as important targets that anti-bullying programs should address to stop the transition from victims of bullying to perpetrators.

Malaysian AIDS Council: The “PutItOn” Campaign

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (01) ◽  
pp. 1-37
Author(s):  
Li Lin Lau ◽  
Farzana Quoquab ◽  
Abu Bakar Abdul Hamid
Keyword(s):  
Condom Use ◽  
Sexual Transmission ◽  
The Other ◽  
Intervention Programs ◽  
Cultural Issues ◽  
Promotional Strategy ◽  
The Social ◽  
Sociocultural Pressure ◽  
The Government ◽  
To Come

This case illustrates the issues pertaining to the “PutItOn” campaign promotion launched by the Malaysian AIDS Council (MAC). This case primarily discusses the social marketing challenges encountered by MAC with the task to promote intervention programs on condom use and women’s safe sex practices to influence social change. However, promoting condom use is regarded as taboo and is not allowed to be mentioned in Malaysian mainstream mass media because of restrictions by the Communications and Multimedia Act. The government also cannot openly advocate condom use because of sociocultural sensitivity. In addition, some people might misinterpret promoting condom use as encouraging promiscuity. On the other hand, official statistics show that new HIV cases have shifted the trend from men to women in recent years, and the major factor for women infected by HIV was through sexual transmission. Dr. Suzi, communication manager of MAC, is in charge of the “PutItOn” campaign. She faced difficulty in increasing awareness among women about the campaign with the consideration of social and cultural issues. The campaign was launched in December 2014, but not many people seemed aware of this campaign after four months of its launch. The chairman of MAF, Dr. Roselina, advised her to come up with an effective promotional strategy for the “PutItOn” campaign by April. Dr. Suzi had only one month to devise a plan to solve the problem; otherwise, MAC has to close the campaign. Dr. Suzi was worried about the sociocultural pressure to promote the “PutItOn” campaign.

scholarly journals Change in Anti-COVID-19 Behavior and Prejudice against Minorities during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Longitudinal Evidence from Five European Countries

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tibor Zingora ◽  
Sylvie Graf ◽  
Martina Hrebickova ◽  
Jaroslav Tocik ◽  
David Lacko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Longitudinal Study ◽  
Mass Media ◽  
Intergroup Contact ◽  
Change Score ◽  
The Other ◽  
European Countries ◽  
Negative Consequences ◽  
Individual Level ◽  
Latent Change Score ◽  
Score Model

In the COVID-19 pandemic, it is vital to identify factors increasing behaviors that limit the transmission of COVID-19 (i.e., anti-COVID-19 behavior) and factors protecting against the negative consequences of the pandemic on societies (i.e., prejudice). A simultaneous investigation of a change in anti-COVID behavior and prejudice during the pandemic is essential because some factors (e.g., fear of COVID-19) could increase both outcomes, whilst other factors (e.g., norms in anti-COVID behavior or intergroup contact in prejudice) could bring desirable changes in one outcome without negatively affecting the other. In a three-wave longitudinal study (NT1 = 4275) in five European countries from April to October 2020, we employed a latent change score model to distinguish between intra- and inter-individual changes in anti-COVID-19 behavior and prejudice. On the intra-individual level, anti-COVID-19 behavior was increased by anti-COVID-19 norms; and prejudice against migrants from the Middle East was influenced by positive and negative direct and mass-media intergroup contact.

scholarly journals Covid-19-Associated Pulmonary Aspergillosis: The Other Side of the Coin

Vaccines ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 713
Author(s):  
Claudio Costantini ◽  
Frank L. van de Veerdonk ◽  
Luigina Romani
Keyword(s):  
Immune Response ◽  
Clinical Presentation ◽  
Fungal Infections ◽  
Critical Factor ◽  
The Other ◽  
Current View ◽  
Immune Homeostasis ◽  
Pulmonary Aspergillosis ◽  
Secondary Infections ◽  
The Individual

The immune response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a critical factor in the clinical presentation of COVID-19, which may range from asymptomatic to a fatal, multi-organ disease. A dysregulated immune response not only compromises the ability of the host to resolve the viral infection, but may also predispose the individual to secondary bacterial and fungal infections, a risk to which the current therapeutic immunomodulatory approaches significantly contribute. Among the secondary infections that may occur in COVID-19 patients, coronavirus-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA) is emerging as a potential cause of morbidity and mortality, although many aspects of the disease still remain unresolved. With this opinion, we present the current view of CAPA and discuss how the same mechanisms that underlie the dysregulated immune response in COVID-19 increase susceptibility to Aspergillus infection. Likewise, resorting to endogenous pathways of immunomodulation may not only restore immune homeostasis in COVID-19 patients, but also reduce the risk for aspergillosis. Therefore, CAPA represents the other side of the coin in COVID-19 and our advances in the understanding and treatment of the immune response in COVID-19 should represent the framework for the study of CAPA.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document