scholarly journals A snapshot of biologic drug development

2015 ◽  
Vol 34 (12) ◽  
pp. 1279-1285 ◽  
Author(s):  
L Andrews ◽  
S Ralston ◽  
E Blomme ◽  
K Barnhart

Since the approval of insulin as the first recombinant therapeutic protein, the prominence of biologic therapies in drug development has grown significantly. Many modalities beyond traditional biologics are now being developed or explored for various indications with significant unmet medical needs. From early traditional replacement proteins to more recent, highly engineered antibodies, oligonucleotides, fusion proteins, and gene constructs, biologic agents have delivered life-changing therapies, despite often having scientifically and technically challenging development programs. This brief review outlines some of the major biotherapeutic classes and identifies the advantages and challenges with the development of these products.

2011 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. A334
Author(s):  
F. Catalá-López ◽  
S. Peiró ◽  
R. Gènova-Maleras ◽  
A. Garcia-Altés ◽  
G. Sanfélix-Gimeno ◽  
...  

Antibodies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 21
Author(s):  
Alexandre Ambrogelly

The color of a therapeutic monoclonal antibody solution is a critical quality attribute. Consistency of color is typically assessed at time of release and during stability studies against preset criteria for late stage clinical and commercial products. A therapeutic protein solution’s color may be determined by visual inspection or by more quantitative methods as per the different geographical area compendia. The nature and intensity of the color of a therapeutic protein solution is typically determined relative to calibrated standards. This review covers the analytical methodologies used for determining the color of a protein solution and presents an overview of protein variants and impurities known to contribute to colored recombinant therapeutic protein solutions.


Healthcare ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 334
Author(s):  
Eunmi Lee ◽  
Sunkyung Cha ◽  
Geun Myun Kim

We investigated the effect of predisposing, enabling, need factors, and health behaviors on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients with multimorbidity according to Andersen’s model. This study is a secondary analysis of population-based cross-sectional surveys. Data from 328 patients with multimorbidity (≥3 co-occurring chronic diseases) from the 6th/7th Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys were analyzed using logistic regression. Patients ≥65 years, without private insurance, with poor subjective health, unmet medical needs, and/or limited activity were more likely to experience mobility problems. Self-care problems were more likely among those without private insurance and/or with limited activity. Patients lacking living security, with poor subjective health, limited activity, and/or who smoked were more likely to experience problems performing usual activities. Pain/discomfort was more likely among females, Medicaid beneficiaries, and patients with limited activity and/or with poor subjective health. Patients with poor subjective health, limited activity, and/or unmet medical needs were more likely to experience anxiety/depression. The investigation of HRQoL in multimorbidity should consider predisposing, enabling, need factors, and health behaviors. Interventions addressing movement restrictions and personalized care based on HRQoL domains should be prioritized.


Vaccines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 151
Author(s):  
Alexie Mayor ◽  
Adélaïde Chesnay ◽  
Guillaume Desoubeaux ◽  
David Ternant ◽  
Nathalie Heuzé-Vourc’h ◽  
...  

Respiratorytract infections (RTIs) are frequent and life-threatening diseases, accounting for several millions of deaths worldwide. RTIs implicate microorganisms, including viruses (influenza virus, coronavirus, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)), bacteria (Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus anthracis) and fungi (Pneumocystis spp., Aspergillus spp. and very occasionally Candida spp.). The emergence of new pathogens, like the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, and the substantial increase in drug resistance have highlighted the critical necessity to develop novel anti-infective molecules. In this context, antibodies (Abs) are becoming increasingly important in respiratory medicine and may fulfill the unmet medical needs of RTIs. However, development of Abs for treating infectious diseases is less advanced than for cancer and inflammatory diseases. Currently, only three Abs have been marketed for RTIs, namely, against pulmonary anthrax and RSV infection, while several clinical and preclinical studies are in progress. This article gives an overview of the advances in the use of Abs for the treatment of RTIs, based on the analysis of clinical studies in this field. It describes the Ab structure, function and pharmacokinetics, and discusses the opportunities offered by the various Ab formats, Ab engineering and co-treatment strategies. Including the most recent literature, it finally highlights the strengths, weaknesses and likely future trends of a novel anti-RTI Ab armamentarium.


2016 ◽  
Vol 42 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 429-450 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas J. Hwang ◽  
Aaron S. Kesselheim

Accelerating the development and approval of novel therapeutics has emerged as a key public health priority given the mortality, morbidity, and economic costs associated with infections caused by drug-resistant bacteria. However, there is limited empirical evidence to guide policymaking, such as the factors that may disadvantage antibiotics compared to other classes of drugs. In this Article, we empirically examine characteristics of the key clinical trials underpinning FDA's approval of antibiotics and other drugs over the past decade. Despite perceptions that antibiotic trials are larger and more difficult to conduct, we find that antibiotic trials are no larger than those conducted for drugs approved in other disease areas with high unmet medical needs, suggesting that policymakers may need to target other levers to meaningfully stimulate innovation. We discuss the risks and benefits of harnessing new and existing regulatory pathways to speed the approval of new drugs, particularly those intended to treat patients with serious and life-threatening infections, and we evaluate ways that proposals for new regulatory pathways could be improved to better prioritize and expedite the approval of therapies with the greatest potential for patient health benefits.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document