Moral distress in nurses caring for patients with Covid-19

2021 ◽  
pp. 096973302110032
Author(s):  
Henry J Silverman ◽  
Raya Elfadel Kheirbek ◽  
Gyasi Moscou-Jackson ◽  
Jenni Day
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Ethical Climate ◽  
Moral Distress ◽  
Qualitative Content Analysis ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Resource Scarcity ◽  
Standards Of Care ◽  
Medical Systems ◽  
Institutional Review ◽  
Good Patient Care

Background: Moral distress occurs when constraints prevent healthcare providers from acting in accordance with their core moral values to provide good patient care. The experience of moral distress in nurses might be magnified during the current Covid-19 pandemic. Objective: To explore causes of moral distress in nurses caring for Covid-19 patients and identify strategies to enhance their moral resiliency. Research design: A qualitative study using a qualitative content analysis of focus group discussions and in-depth interviews. We purposively sampled 31 nurses caring for Covid-19 patients in the acute care units within large academic medical systems in Maryland and New York City during April to June 2020. Ethical considerations: We obtained approval from the Institutional Review Board at the University of Maryland, Baltimore. Results: We identified themes and sub-themes representative of major causes of moral distress in nurses caring Covid-19 patients. These included (a) lack of knowledge and uncertainty regarding how to treat a new illness; (b) being overwhelmed by the depth and breadth of the Covid-19 illness; (c) fear of exposure to the virus leading to suboptimal care; (d) adopting a team model of nursing care that caused intra-professional tensions and miscommunications; (e) policies to reduce viral transmission (visitation policy and PPE policy) that prevented nurses to assume their caring role; (f) practicing within crisis standards of care; and (g) dealing with medical resource scarcity. Participants discussed their coping mechanisms and suggested future strategies. Discussion/Conclusion: Our study affirms new causes of moral distress related to the Covid-19 pandemic. Institutions need to develop a supportive ethical climate that can restore nurses’ moral resiliency. Such a climate should include non-hierarchical interdisciplinary spaces where all providers can meet together as moral peers to discuss their experiences.

scholarly journals Crisis standards of care in a pandemic: navigating the ethical, clinical, psychological and policy-making maelstrom

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Attila J Hertelendy ◽  
Gregory R Ciottone ◽  
Cheryl L Mitchell ◽  
Jennifer Gutberg ◽  
Frederick M Burkle
Keyword(s):  
Resource Allocation ◽  
Moral Distress ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Standards Of Care ◽  
Clinical Decisions ◽  
Societal Benefit ◽  
Life Saving

Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic has caused clinicians at the frontlines to confront difficult decisions regarding resource allocation, treatment options and ultimately the life-saving measures that must be taken at the point of care. This article addresses the importance of enacting crisis standards of care (CSC) as a policy mechanism to facilitate the shift to population-based medicine. In times of emergencies and crises such as this pandemic, the enactment of CSC enables concrete decisions to be made by governments relating to supply chains, resource allocation and provision of care to maximize societal benefit. This shift from an individual to a population-based societal focus has profound consequences on how clinical decisions are made at the point of care. Failing to enact CSC may have psychological impacts for healthcare providers particularly related to moral distress, through an inability to fully enact individual beliefs (individually focused clinical decisions) which form their moral compass.

Allocating Resources in Cancer Care During Pandemic. Findings from a Qualitative Interview Study with Oncologists and Ethical Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 66 (Special Issue) ◽  
pp. 165-166
Author(s):  
Sabine Sommerlatte ◽  
◽  
Anna-Lena Kraeft ◽  
Celine Lugnier ◽  
Anke Reinacher-Schick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Priority Setting ◽  
Cancer Care ◽  
Qualitative Content Analysis ◽  
Qualitative Interviews ◽  
Health Resources ◽  
Diagnostic Procedures ◽  
Resource Scarcity ◽  
Standards Of Care ◽  
Qualitative Interview Study

"Allocation of health resources towards the treatment of patients with COVID-19 may affect the quality of care for non-COVID-19 patients. Several medical societies representing cancer health professionals have issued statements on priority setting in cancer care in the wake of the Sars-CoV-2 outbreak (1, 2). However, there is a lack of empirical data on how resources are prioritized in cancer care and which criteria are taken into consideration by those involved in decision making. In this paper we will present findings from qualitative interviews conducted with oncologists in Germany between February and July 2021. Transcripts of interviews are analysed following principles of qualitative content analysis based on Kuckartz (3). According to preliminary analysis of the first five interviews conducted three major topics emerge: 1. Experiences with scarcity regarding selected diagnostic procedures and treatment. 2. Material and procedural criteria for priority setting and decisions on deviations of standards of care. 3. Effects of priority setting on coping and psycho-social support. We will discuss findings with regards to their possible contribution to an empirical and normative founded guidance for priority setting in cancer care in times of Sars-CoV-2 outbreak and comparable events. 1. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Hämatologie und Onkologie. Coronavirus-Infektion (COVID-19) bei Patienten mit Blut- und rebserkrankungen. https://www.onkopedia.com/de/onkopedia/guidelines/coronavirus-infektion-covid-19-bei-patient-innen-mit-blut-und-krebserkrankungen/@@guideline/html/index.html 2. Marron JM, Joffe S, Jagsi R et al. Ethics and Resource Scarcity: ASCO Recommendations for the Oncology Community During the COVID19 Pandemic. J Clin Onc. April 28 2020, doi:10.1200/JCO.20.00960 3. Kuckartz, U. (2018). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Methoden, Praxis, Computer¬unterstützung (4th ed.). Beltz Juventa. "

scholarly journals Exploring the experiences related to postpartum changes: perspectives of mothers and healthcare providers in Iran

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahboobeh Asadi ◽  
Mahnaz Noroozi ◽  
Mousa Alavi
Keyword(s):  
Postpartum Period ◽  
Qualitative Content Analysis ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Educational Interventions ◽  
Psychological State ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Childbearing Age ◽  
New Period ◽  
Women's Lives ◽  
Field Notes

Abstract Background Numerous changes occur in different aspects of women’s lives in the postpartum period. Women’s adjusting with problems and taking advantage of this opportunity can develop their personality. In this regard, accurate knowledge of their experiences and feelings is necessary to help them to benefit from this period. Therefore, the present study aimed to explore the experiences related to postpartum changes in women. Methods In the present qualitative study, 23 participants, including women of childbearing age who gave birth and healthcare providers (midwives and obstetricians) in Isfahan, Iran were selected using purposive sampling with a maximum variation strategy. Data were collected through in-depth semi structured interviews, field notes, and daily notes, and simultaneously analyzed using the conventional qualitative content analysis. Results The data analysis results led to the extraction of three main categories including “feeling of decreased female attractiveness” (with two sub-categories of “ feeling of decreased beauty” and “feeling of decreased sexual function”), “feeling of insolvency and helplessness” (with two sub-categories of “physical burnout”, and “mental preoccupations”) and “beginning a new period in life” (with three sub-categories of “changing the meaning of life”, “feeling of maturity” and “deepening the communication”). Conclusions Findings of this study can provide a good context for designing interventions to improve the women’s quality of life by explaining and highlighting their experiences in the postpartum period. In this regard, providing sufficient empathy, social and psychological support from family members (especially husband), performing appropriate educational interventions and also regular assessment of women’s psychological state by healthcare providers in postpartum period can reduce their concerns and help to improve their health.

How Research Will Adapt to HIPAA: A View from Within the Healthcare Delivery System

2002 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 491-502
Author(s):  
Mary L. Durham
Keyword(s):  
Health Information ◽  
Healthcare Delivery ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
The United States ◽  
Personal Health Information ◽  
Personal Health ◽  
Business Associations ◽  
Electronic Information ◽  
Healthcare Delivery System ◽  
Institutional Review

While the new Health Insurance Privacy and Accountability Act (HIPAA) research rules governing privacy, confidentiality and personal health information will challenge the research and medical communities, history teaches us that the difficulty of this challenge pales in comparison to the potential harms that such regulations are designed to avoid. Although revised following broad commentary from researchers and healthcare providers around the country, the HIPAA privacy requirements will dramatically change the way healthcare researchers do their jobs in the United States. Given our reluctance to change, we risk overlooking potentially valid reasons why access to personal health information is restricted and regulated. In an environment of electronic information, public concern, genetic information and decline of public trust, regulations are ever-changing. Six categories of HIPAA requirements stand out as transformative: disclosure accounting/tracking, business associations, institutional review board (IRB) changes, minimum necessary requirements, data de-identification, and criminal and civil penalties.

scholarly journals Advocating for equity during the pandemic

BMJ Leader ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. leader-2020-000380
Author(s):  
Onyinyechi F Eke ◽  
Alister Martin ◽  
Hazar Khidir ◽  
Onyeka Otugo ◽  
Andrew Marshall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Small Group ◽  
Health Equity ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
The State ◽  
Standards Of Care ◽  
Community Members ◽  
Alternative Framework ◽  
Marginalised Groups

In response to an imminent surge in COVID-19 cases, the state of Massachusetts (MA) released its Crisis Standards of Care (CSC) guidelines in April 2020. A small group of Boston healthcare providers, community members, lawyers, ethicists and disability advocates brought to bear our collective strengths to forge a formidable coalition now known as the Massachusetts Coalition for Health Equity, to champion the rights of marginalised groups that would be adversely affected by the implementation of the original MA CSC guidelines. In this coalition, members of marginalised communities were adequately represented, led discussions on the implications of implementing inequitable elements of the CSC guidelines and actively involved in creating an alternative framework. In this article, we discuss the process of building a coalition whose concerted advocacy efforts led to the revision of the MA CSC guidelines.

scholarly journals 2019 Novel Coronavirus Vaccination among Post-graduate Residents and Fellows

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 215013272110229
Author(s):  
Mostafa Abohelwa ◽  
Mohamed Elmassry ◽  
John Abdelmalek ◽  
Drew Payne ◽  
Kenneth Nugent
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
The United States ◽  
Health Sciences ◽  
Institutional Review Board ◽  
Institutional Review ◽  
Texas Tech University ◽  
Novel Coronavirus ◽  
United States Healthcare

Background Coronavirus-2 (COVID-19) has caused a worldwide pandemic since December 2019. Since then, clinical trials with vaccines have been started and completed, and at present, 3 COVID-19 vaccines have been approved for use in the United States. Healthcare providers were among the first to get vaccinated, but the precise attitudes of healthcare workers toward vaccination are uncertain. Objective To understand residents and fellows’ attitudes toward vaccination and record any side effects after vaccination. Methods We conducted an anonymous survey that was open from 3-1-2021 to 3-12-2021 using distribution lists from the Graduate Medical Education office on the Lubbock campus of the Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center after getting approval from the Institutional Review Board (L21-088). Results Eighty-one residents and fellows (26.6% out of 304) responded to our survey. Among those who responded, 63 (77.8 %) were between 25 and 35 years old, and 41 (50.6%) were males. Seventy-seven (95.1%) received the vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech), 78 (96.3%) reported that they supported vaccination, and 3 (3.7%) reported that they did not want vaccination. Eight members (9.8%) had tested positive for COVID-19 infection before vaccination, but only 1 (1.23%) had tested positive for COVID-19 antibodies. All residents and fellows reported side effects after the vaccination, including pain at the injection site (77; 100%), local redness (9; 11.6%), local swelling (13; 16.8%), fever (25; 32.5%), fatigue (25; 32.5%), chills (34; 44.1 %), headache (38; 49.4%). Conclusions Most medical trainees have a high interest in COVID-19 vaccination; however, a few reported that they did not want vaccination.

Ethical Considerations In ICU Preparations For Viral Epidemics

2021 ◽  
Vol 66 (Special Issue) ◽  
pp. 142-143
Author(s):  
Cristina Petrișor ◽  
◽  
Sebastian Tranca ◽  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Picture ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Administrative Support ◽  
Moral Distress ◽  
Ethical Issues ◽  
Ventilatory Support ◽  
H1n1 Influenza ◽  
Modern World ◽  
Medical Systems ◽  
Infected People

"Intensive Care Units (ICUs) admit patients with the most severe forms of the diseases, viral ARDS included. Since the 2009 H1N1 influenza outbreak, ICU preparations and triage have been recommended. The novel COVID-19 clinical picture resembles influenza in terms of organ dysfunction which may start with hypoxemic breathing insufficiency and ultimately, a possibility of evolution towards multiple organ failure. Its current clinical picture is not new for intensivists. However, there are several important differences as far as we know now: there is overall human susceptibility to become infected and nobody can be specifically protected by vaccination. This fact led to large numbers of infected people all over the world, overwhelming medical systems. Almost 10% of COVID-19 infections would be qualified for ICU admittance and ventilatory support. The main ethical issues in ICUs, in time of viral epidemics are: lack of free ICU beds, free ventilator machines, pressures on providing aggressive treatments for people with low chances of survival, dealing with terminally ill patients, high degrees of burnout in the medical team, reporting errors and inadequate behavior of other medical staff, lack of adequate protective equipment, as well as lack of administrative support. All these facts lead to moral distress and high burnout incidences. Administrative preparations, prioritization and triage are important aspects to consider. In conclusion, we all see that the modern world is not prepared enough to face such challenges and from these situations we, all (health care professionals, providers, population and authorities) should learn important personal and professional lessons. "

scholarly journals Stroke Rehabilitation - An Overview of Existing Guidelines and Standards of Care

2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard D Zorowitz ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Stroke Rehabilitation ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Standards Of Care ◽  
Interdisciplinary Management ◽  
Stroke Survivors ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
The Us ◽  
Guidelines And Standards ◽  
Complications Of Stroke ◽  
The Uk

Over seven million stroke survivors live in the US today. Despite the publication of the first post-stroke rehabilitation clinical practice guideline in 1995, many healthcare providers are unaware not only of stroke survivors’ potential for functional recovery, but also common secondary complications of stroke. This article summarises the best available evidence-based recommendations for the interdisciplinary management of stroke survivors and caregivers from five sources: two in the US, one in Canada, and two in the UK. Unique characteristics of each guideline are described, followed by a list of common clinical recommendations found in most, if not all, of the guidelines. Despite the advances in stroke rehabilitation over the past 16 years, much research still needs to be done to improve the level of evidence in stroke rehabilitation.

scholarly journals Relationships Among Palliative Care, Ethical Climate, Empowerment, and Moral Distress in Intensive Care Unit Nurses

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 295-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krista Wolcott Altaker ◽  
Jill Howie-Esquivel ◽  
Janine K. Cataldo
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Ethical Climate ◽  
Moral Distress ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
National Database ◽  
Palliative Care Teams ◽  
Intensive Care Unit Nurses ◽  
Distress Scale

Background Intensive care unit nurses experience moral distress when they feel unable to deliver ethically appropriate care to patients. Moral distress is associated with nurse burnout and patient care avoidance. Objectives To evaluate relationships among moral distress, empowerment, ethical climate, and access to palliative care in the intensive care unit. Methods Intensive care unit nurses in a national database were recruited to complete an online survey based on the Moral Distress Scale–Revised, Psychological Empowerment Index, Hospital Ethical Climate Survey, and a palliative care delivery questionnaire. Descriptive, correlational, and regression analyses were performed. Results Of 288 initiated surveys, 238 were completed. Participants were nationally representative of nurses by age, years of experience, and geographical region. Most were white and female and had a bachelor’s degree. The mean moral distress score was moderately high, and correlations were found with empowerment (r = −0.145; P = .02) and ethical climate scores (r = −0.354; P < .001). Relationships between moral distress and empowerment scores and between moral distress and ethical climate scores were not affected by access to palliative care. Nurses reporting palliative care access had higher moral distress scores than those without such access. Education, ethnicity, unit size, access to full palliative care team, and ethical climate explained variance in moral distress scores. Conclusions Poor ethical climate, unintegrated palliative care teams, and nurse empowerment are associated with increased moral distress. The findings highlight the need to promote palliative care education and palliative care teams that are well integrated into intensive care units.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document