scholarly journals Digital Warfare Against COVID-19: Global Use of Contact-Tracing Apps

2021 ◽  
pp. 101053952199989
Author(s):  
Yatika Chaudhary ◽  
Nikita Sandhu ◽  
Abhishek Singh ◽  
Pradeep Aggarwal ◽  
Manisha Naithani

The current COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic has perpetuated a worldwide tussle to control this infection and minimizing death toll and economic damages. The year 2020 would always be remembered as a year of war against a virus, but it would also be marked as a year showing upsurge of technology evolution to deal with infections. Contact tracing has emerged as a new buzzword. Contact tracing digital tools have been introduced worldwide to prevent transmission. In this article, we have outlined various contact tracing apps being used globally, which are rated according to their safety, privacy, and efficacy.

10.2196/24598 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. e24598
Author(s):  
Kylie Zeng ◽  
Stephanie N Bernardo ◽  
Weldon E Havins

Background Since the COVID-19 outbreak began in Wuhan, China, countries worldwide have been forced to take unprecedented measures to combat it. While some countries are still grappling with the COVID-19 pandemic, others have fared better and have re-established relative normalcy quickly. The rapid transmission rate of the virus has shown a greater need for efficient and technologically modern containment measures. The use of digital tools to facilitate strict containment measures in countries that have fared well against the COVID-19 pandemic has sparked both interest and controversy. Objective In this study, we compare the precautions taken against the spread of COVID-19 in the United States, Spain, and Italy, with Taiwan, South Korea, and Singapore, particularly related to the use of digital tools for contact tracing, and propose policies that could be used in the United States for future COVID-19 waves or pandemics. Methods COVID-19 death rate data were obtained from the European Center for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), accessed through the Our World in Data database, and were evaluated based on population size per 100,000 people from December 31, 2019, to September 6, 2020. All policies and measures enacted were obtained from their respective governmental websites. Results We found a strong association between lower death rates per capita and countries that implemented early mask use and strict border control measures that included mandatory quarantine using digital tools. There is a significant difference in the number of deaths per 100,000 when comparing Taiwan, South Korea, and Singapore with the United States, Spain, and Italy. Conclusions Based on our research, it is evident that early intervention with the use of digital tools had a strong correlation with the successful containment of COVID-19. Infection rates and subsequent deaths in Italy, Spain, and the United States could have been much lower with early mask use and, more importantly, timely border control measures using modern digital tools. Thus, we propose that the United States execute the following national policies should a public health emergency be declared: (1) immediately establish a National Command responsible for enacting strict mandatory guidelines enforced by federal and state governments, including national mask use; (2) mandate civilian cooperation with health officials in contact tracing and quarantine orders; and (3) require incoming travelers to the United States and those quarantined to download a contact tracing app. We acknowledge the countries we studied differ in their cultures, political systems, and reporting criteria for COVID-19 deaths. Further research may need to be conducted to address these limitations; however, we believe that the proposed policies could protect the American public.


BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. e047832
Author(s):  
Sheng-Chia Chung ◽  
Sushila Marlow ◽  
Nicholas Tobias ◽  
Alessio Alogna ◽  
Ivano Alogna ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo systematically learn lessons from the experiences of countries implementing find, test, trace, isolate, support (FTTIS) in the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.Design, data sources and eligibility criteriaWe searched MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane Library, SCOPUS and JSTOR, initially between 31 May 2019 and 21 January 2021. Research articles and reviews on the use of contact tracing, testing, self-isolation and quarantine for COVID-19 management were included in the review.Data extraction and synthesisWe extracted information including study objective, design, methods, main findings and implications. These were tabulated and a narrative synthesis was undertaken given the diverse research designs, methods and implications.ResultsWe identified and included 118 eligible studies. We identified the core elements of an effective find, test, trace, isolate, support (FTTIS) system needed to interrupt the spread of a novel infectious disease, where treatment or vaccination was not yet available, as pertained in the initial stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. We report methods used to shorten case finding time, improve accuracy and efficiency of tests, coordinate stakeholders and actors involved in an FTTIS system, support individuals isolating and make appropriate use of digital tools.ConclusionsWe identified in our systematic review the key components of an FTTIS system. These include border controls, restricted entry, inbound traveller quarantine and comprehensive case finding; repeated testing to minimise false diagnoses and pooled testing in resource-limited circumstances; extended quarantine period and the use of digital tools for contact tracing and self-isolation. Support for mental or physical health and livelihoods is needed for individuals undergoing self-isolation/quarantine. An integrated system with rolling-wave planning can best use effective FTTIS tools to respond to the fast-changing COVID-19 pandemic. Results of the review may inform countries considering implementing these measures.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kylie Zeng ◽  
Stephanie N Bernardo ◽  
Weldon E Havins

BACKGROUND Since the COVID-19 outbreak began in Wuhan, China, countries worldwide have been forced to take unprecedented measures to combat it. While some countries are still grappling with the COVID-19 pandemic, others have fared better and have re-established relative normalcy quickly. The rapid transmission rate of the virus has shown a greater need for efficient and technologically modern containment measures. The use of digital tools to facilitate strict containment measures in countries that have fared well against the COVID-19 pandemic has sparked both interest and controversy. OBJECTIVE In this study, we compare the precautions taken against the spread of COVID-19 in the United States, Spain, and Italy, with Taiwan, South Korea, and Singapore, particularly related to the use of digital tools for contact tracing, and propose policies that could be used in the United States for future COVID-19 waves or pandemics. METHODS COVID-19 death rate data were obtained from the European Center for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), accessed through the Our World in Data database, and were evaluated based on population size per 100,000 people from December 31, 2019, to September 6, 2020. All policies and measures enacted were obtained from their respective governmental websites. RESULTS We found a strong association between lower death rates per capita and countries that implemented early mask use and strict border control measures that included mandatory quarantine using digital tools. There is a significant difference in the number of deaths per 100,000 when comparing Taiwan, South Korea, and Singapore with the United States, Spain, and Italy. CONCLUSIONS Based on our research, it is evident that early intervention with the use of digital tools had a strong correlation with the successful containment of COVID-19. Infection rates and subsequent deaths in Italy, Spain, and the United States could have been much lower with early mask use and, more importantly, timely border control measures using modern digital tools. Thus, we propose that the United States execute the following national policies should a public health emergency be declared: (1) immediately establish a National Command responsible for enacting strict mandatory guidelines enforced by federal and state governments, including national mask use; (2) mandate civilian cooperation with health officials in contact tracing and quarantine orders; and (3) require incoming travelers to the United States and those quarantined to download a contact tracing app. We acknowledge the countries we studied differ in their cultures, political systems, and reporting criteria for COVID-19 deaths. Further research may need to be conducted to address these limitations; however, we believe that the proposed policies could protect the American public.


2021 ◽  
pp. 50-60
Author(s):  
Kate Mark ◽  
Jay Bradley ◽  
Chaloner Chute ◽  
Colin Sumpter ◽  
Mahmood Adil ◽  
...  

Introduction: Technology has played a key role in enabling public health to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic at a pace and scale never seen before. The Digital Health and Care Innovation Centre (DHI) assisted with development of two new digital services to enable testing and contact tracing at scale using innovative methods. Methods: The DHI employed a design innovation approach by bringing all relevant stakeholders together to co-design new technology services to identify the ‘preferred future’. Workshops were used to identify the preferred solutions. The innovative methods for development of digital health tools included adopting an iterative approach, addressing the situational requirements posed by COVID-19, and democratising technology for purposes of pandemic control. Results: A National Notification Service (NNS) for automation of delivery and feedback (if results messages were viewed) was developed and adopted by five of the 14 health boards in Scotland, processing over 7 million results since inception. The Simple Tracing Tools (STT) is an open-platform web-based app that is designed for data entry by contact tracing teams. STT was adopted by all local health protection teams and informed development of the national case management system. Discussion: The Cynefin framework can be used to understand the design innovation process when facing the challenges of designing digital tools during a pandemic. There are significant opportunities for public health to engage with digital health to transform the pandemic response and derive benefit for tackling future population health challenges.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra R. Linares ◽  
Katrina A. Bramstedt ◽  
Mohan M. Chilukuri ◽  
P. Murali Doraiswamy

AbstractObjectiveTo characterize the global physician community’s opinions on the use of digital tools for COVID-19 public health surveillance and self-surveillance.MethodsCross-sectional, random, stratified survey done on Sermo, a physician networking platform, between September 9-15, 2020. We aimed to sample 1,000 physicians divided among the USA, EU, and rest of the world. The survey questioned physicians on the risk-benefit ratio of digital tools, as well as matters of data privacy and trust.ResultsThe survey was completed by 1004 physicians with a mean (SD) age of 49.14 (12) years. Enthusiasm was highest for self-monitoring smart watches (66%) and contact tracing apps (66%) and slightly lower (48-56%) for other tools. Trust was highest for health providers (68%) and lowest for technology companies (30%). Most respondents (69.8%) felt that loosening privacy standards to fight the pandemic would lead to misuse of privacy in the future.ConclusionThe survey provides foundational insights about how physicians think of surveillance. Collaborations between public health and technology researchers to strengthen evidence of effectiveness and build public trust may be useful.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bettina Maria Zimmermann ◽  
Amelia Fiske ◽  
Barbara Prainsack ◽  
Nora Hangel ◽  
Stuart McLennan ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND In Germany, Austria and Switzerland Bluetooth-based contact tracing apps have been rolled out to assist the authorities’ COVID-19 containment strategies. While the Austrian app was launched early on in March 2020, Swiss and German apps were both launched in June 2020. Uptake rates have been lower than originally expected. OBJECTIVE This study set out to explore: (1) how people living in Germany, Austria, and the German-speaking part of Switzerland conceptualize and evaluate digital contact tracing apps during the first pandemic wave; (2) how such applications were framed in newspapers and whether differences existed between countries; and (3) how people’s concepts and assessments intersected with public discussions. METHODS Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 110 participants as part of the SolPan consortium. Newspaper coverage about contact tracing apps in the German-speaking area was analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively. RESULTS We found that interview participants and newspaper coverage in all countries conceptualized contact tracing apps as governmental surveillance tools and embedded them in a broader context of technological surveillance. Participants identified trust in authorities, respecting individual privacy, voluntariness and temporary use of contact tracing apps as prerequisites for democratic compatibility. Newspaper coverage reinforced these concepts and reacted to policy discussions and updates on app development. App developers and researchers featured more prominently in Swiss and German newspaper coverage than in Austria. CONCLUSIONS Non-use of digital contact tracing apps might be due to expectations of privacy risks that are not compensated for by potential benefits and that are rooted in a deeper skepticism towards digital tools. When authorities plan on implementing new digital tools and practices in the future, they should be very transparent and proactive in communicating the objectives, the contribution of the technology and how it differs from other, possibly similar, tools. It is also important to publicly address and solve ethical, legal and social issues related to such technologies prior to their launch.


Author(s):  
Isobel Braithwaite ◽  
Tom Callender ◽  
Miriam Bullock ◽  
Robert W Aldridge

AbstractIntroductionTraditional approaches to case-finding, case isolation, and contact tracing methods have so far proved insufficient on their own to prevent the development of local epidemics of COVID-19 in many high-income countries despite relatively advanced public health systems. As a result, many governments have resorted to widespread social distancing measures and mass quarantines (‘lock-downs’) to reduce transmission and to prevent healthcare systems from being overwhelmed. However, such measures impose heavy human and societal costs. Automated or semi-automated digital contact tracing, in conjunction with scaled-up community testing, has been proposed as a key part of exit strategies from lockdowns. However, the effectiveness of these approaches to contact tracing is unclear, and to be effective, trusted, and widely adopted such technology must overcome several challenges.Methods and analysisWe will perform a rapid systematic review to assess the effectiveness of automated and semi-automated digital tools for contact tracing, and identify key considerations for successful implementation, to inform the control of COVID-19. We will search PubMed, EMBASE, EBSCO Medical COVID information portal, OVID Global Health, Cochrane Library, medRxiv, BioRxiv, and arXiv for peer-reviewed and pre-print papers on automated or semi-automated digital tools for contact tracing of COVID-19, another respiratory disease with pandemic potential (limited to SARS, MERS, or pandemic influenza), or Ebola, in human populations. Studies will be eligible if published in English between 1 January 2000 and 14 April 2020. We will synthesise study findings narratively and will consider meta-analysis if ≥ 3 suitable studies with comparable interventions and outcomes are available.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval is not required for this review. We plan to disseminate findings via pre-print, journal publication, through social media and web-based platforms and through direct stakeholder engagement.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document