A Multicenter Retrospective Review of Systemic Anti-Cancer Treatment and Palliative Care Provided to Solid Tumor Oncology Patients in the 12 Weeks Preceding Death in Ireland

2021 ◽  
pp. 104990912098523 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victoria Mallett ◽  
Anna Linehan ◽  
Orla Burke ◽  
Laura Healy ◽  
Sara Picardo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Solid Tumor ◽  
Retrospective Review ◽  
Invasive Procedure ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Incurable Cancer ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Anti Cancer

Background: Systemic anti-cancer treatment (SACT) can improve symptoms and survival in patients with incurable cancer but there may be harmful consequences. Information regarding the use of SACT at the end-of-life and its impact on patients has not been described in Ireland. Aims: The study aimed to quantify and describe the use of SACT at end-of-life. The primary outcome of interest was the number of patients who received treatment in the last 12, 4 and 2 weeks of life. Secondary outcomes included the frequency of admissions and procedures, location of death, and timing of specialist palliative care (SPC) referral. Methods: Retrospective review. Fisher exact testing was used for analyses. Patients were included if they died between January 2015 and July 2017 and received at least 1 dose of treatment for a solid tumor malignancy. Results: Five hundred and eighty two patients were included. Three hundred and thirty eight (58%), 128 (22%) and 36 (6%) received treatment in the last 12, 4 and 2 weeks of life respectively. Patients who received chemotherapy in the last 12 weeks of life were more likely to be admitted to hospital, undergo a procedure, and die in hospital than those who did not (P < 0.001 for all). Median time of SPC referral before death was shorter in those patients who received chemotherapy than those who did not (61 v129 days, p = 0.0001). Conclusion: Patients who received chemotherapy had a higher likelihood of hospital admission, invasive procedure, and in-hospital death. They were less likely to have been referred early to SPC services.

scholarly journals Appropriate Referral Timing To Specialized Palliative Care Service: Survey of Bereaved Families of Cancer Patients Who Died in Palliative Care Units

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keita Tagami ◽  
Kento Masukawa ◽  
Akira Inoue ◽  
Tatsuya Morita ◽  
Yusuke Hiratsuka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Care Service ◽  
Palliative Care Service ◽  
Death Process ◽  
Incurable Cancer ◽  
Anti Cancer ◽  
Specialized Palliative Care ◽  
Palliative Care Units

Abstract Few studies have investigated appropriate referral timing of specialized palliative care (SPC) from the perspective of cancer patients’ and families’ experiences. We aimed to clarify appropriate SPC referral timing for patients with advanced cancer and their families. We used data from a nationwide bereaved family survey in Japan. We sent a questionnaire to 999 bereaved families of cancer patients who died in 164 palliative care units (PCUs) and analyzed the first SPC referral timing and how patients evaluated it. We defined SPC as outpatient or inpatient palliative care service comprising certified palliative care physicians, advanced-practice nurses, and multidisciplinary practitioners. Finally, 51.6% (n = 515) of all responses were analyzed. The SPC referral timing was evaluated as appropriate (26.1%), late or too late (20.2%), early or too early (1.2%), and none of these (52.5%). Of these, 32.3% reported that they were referred to an SPC when diagnosed with advanced or incurable cancer or during anti-cancer treatment, and 62.6% reported they were referred after anti-cancer treatment. Patient-perceived appropriateness of SPC referral timing was associated with their good death process. After excluding “none of these” responses, a significantly higher proportion of respondents who reported being referred to SPC at diagnosis and during anti-cancer treatment evaluated the response timing as appropriate, compared to those who reported being referred after anti-cancer treatment. Appropriate timing for SPC referrals relates to quality of death; findings suggest that appropriate timing is at the time of diagnosis or during anti-cancer treatment.

The utilization and impact of oncology supportive care clinics on patients with metastatic lung cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 123-123
Author(s):  
Yan S Kim ◽  
Esther J Luo ◽  
Matthew T Chin ◽  
Shelley Leong ◽  
Sudhir S Rajan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Supportive Care ◽  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Metastatic Lung Cancer ◽  
Large Patient ◽  
Anti Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Lung

123 Background: The American Society of Clinical Oncology has endorsed early integration of oncology with palliative care. In 2012, Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) introduced Oncology Supportive Care Clinics (OSCCs). OSCCs are outpatient palliative care clinics designed to incorporate palliative care into standard oncology practice at the time of a patient's cancer diagnosis. This study examines the utilization and impact of OSCCs on patients with metastatic lung cancer. Methods: We identified adult patients with incidental stage IV lung cancer using the KPNC cancer registry from 2012-2015 and followed them for 12 months. We ascertained OSCC utilization using KPNC’s electronic health record. We examined the patterns of OSCC referral/utilization and compared survival, in-hospital death, and treatment received in patients who used and did not use OSCC services. Results: A total of 607 patients were included and 245 (40.4%) were referred to OSCC. The median time from diagnosis to referral was 48 days and ¼ were referred within 15 days. The majority (86%) of the patients referred were seen by OSCC. Only 22 patients (9.0%) refused to be seen. We found no large patient- or facility-level differences between patients referred and not referred to OSCC. At the end of follow up, 398 (65.6%) of the patients died. Patients seen by OSCC were less likely to die (59.2% vs. 68.9%, p < 0.02) at 1 year. Fewer patients who used OSCC died in the hospital compared to those who did not (26 or 12.3% vs. 67 or 16.9%); however, it did not achieve statistical significance (p = 0.13). Among patients who used OSCC, 166 (78.7%) received anti-cancer treatment, compared to 221 (55.8%) among those who did not (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Despite having a robust infrastructure and integrated system in place, over half of the patients diagnosed with metastatic lung cancer did not receive a referral. Future work is needed to understand the reasons why so many patients were not referred. Furthermore, our data showed that receiving OSCC services did not adversely impact survival and the receipt of anti-cancer treatment. These findings serve to reassure patients and providers that the addition of palliative care does not harm patients or limit their treatment.

Chemotherapy use at the end of life in Brazil.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e24003-e24003
Author(s):  
Munir Murad Junior ◽  
Thiago Henrique Mascarenhas Nébias ◽  
Marcos Antonio da Cunha Santos ◽  
Mariangela Cherchiglia
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Early Palliative Care ◽  
Study Population ◽  
One Year

e24003 Background: Chemotherapy in the last days of life is not associated with a survival benefit, and recent data suggest it may cause harm by decreasing quality of life and increasing costs. Both ESMO and ASCO have published position statements encouraging discussions about the appropriate cessation of chemotherapy. End-of-life chemotherapy rates vary worldwide but in summary, up to a fifth of cancer patients are treated with chemotherapy in the last month of life with no clear benefits. The aim of this study is to describe the rate of chemotherapy use in the last month of life in patients who are candidates for palliative care in Brazil. Methods: It is a prospective non-concurrent cohort carried out from a database developed through probabilistic and deterministic linkage of data from information systems of the Brazilian Public Health System. The study population is composed of all patients who started cancer treatment between 2009 and 2014 and who was hospitalized at least 1 time after starting treatment. To address the indication for palliative care, patients whose death occurred within one year after the first hospitalization were selected. Results: A total of 299,202 patients started cancer treatment in that period and 62,249 died 1year after hospitalization. Among the deceased patients, the median age was 62 years, 50.9% of them were in stage IV and 34.1% in stage III and 46% lived in the southeastern region of the country. The most common cancers were lung (n = 17805; 28.6%) colorectal (n = 12273; 19.7%) and gastric (n = 10248; 16.5%). The average number of hospitalizations was 2.7 and 89% of these patients required emergency hospitalization. About half (45,4%; n=28,250) of the patients underwent chemotherapy at the last 30 days of life. The rates of use of chemotherapy in the last month was 44% for lung cancer, 74,4% for colon, 50.2% for gastric and 51.8% breast cancers. Conclusions: Despite international recommendations on the use of chemotherapy at the end of life, this seems to be a common practice unfortunately. Measures to implement early palliative care should be a priority for the care of cancer patients in Brazil.

Preferred Place of Death for Patients With Incurable Cancer and Their Family Caregivers in Egypt

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 423-428
Author(s):  
Samy A. Alsirafy ◽  
Ahmad M. Hammad ◽  
Noha Y. Ibrahim ◽  
Dina E. Farag ◽  
Omar Zaki
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Family Caregivers ◽  
Full Employment ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Place Of Death ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Incurable Cancer ◽  
Mediterranean Countries ◽  
Egyptian Patients

Background: Little is known about the place of death of patients with cancer in Eastern Mediterranean countries including Egypt, where palliative care is underdeveloped. Identifying the preferred place of death (PPoD) is important for the development of appropriate palliative care models in these countries. Objectives: To know the PPoD of Egyptian patients with incurable cancer and their family caregivers (FCGs) and to determine the factors that may impact their preferences. Methods: An observational cross-sectional study that included 301 dyads of patients with incurable cancer and one of their FCGs. A questionnaire was designed to collect data about the characteristics of patients and FCGs as well as their preferences. Results: The majority of dyads (272/301, 90.4%) answered the PPoD question. Home was the PPoD in 93% of patients and 90.1% of FCGs ( P = .218). The congruence between patients’ and FCGs’ PPoD was 92.7% (κ = 0.526). In multivariate analysis, poorer performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 3 or 4) and full employment of FCGs associated significantly with patients’ preference to die in hospital (odds ratio [OR] = 3.015 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.004-9.054], P = .049 and OR = 4.402 [95% CI: 1.561-12.417], P = .005, respectively), while poorer performance status and nonreferral to the palliative medicine unit were associated with FCGs’ preference of hospital death (OR = 2.705 [95% CI: 1.105-6.626], P = .029 and OR = 2.537 [95% CI: 1.082-5.948], P = .032, respectively). Conclusions: The results of the current study suggest that home is the PPoD for the vast majority of Egyptian patients with incurable cancer and their FCGs. Palliative care interventions that promote home death of patients with incurable cancer are needed in Egypt.

scholarly journals Nursing home staff’s perspective on end-of-life care of German nursing home residents: a cross-sectional survey

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anke Strautmann ◽  
Katharina Allers ◽  
Alexander Maximilian Fassmer ◽  
Falk Hoffmann
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Nursing Home ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Nursing Staff ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Nursing Home Residents ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Cross Sectional

Abstract Background Nursing homes are becoming more important for end-of-life care. Within the industrialised world, Germany is among the countries with the most end-of-life hospitalizations in nursing home residents. To improve end-of-life care, investigation in the status quo is required. The objective was to gain a better understanding of the perspectives of nursing home staff on the current situation of end-of-life care in Germany. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted as a postal survey among a random sample of 1069 German nursing homes in 2019. The survey was primarily addressed to nursing staff management. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. Staff was asked to rate different items regarding common practices and potential deficits of end-of-life care on a 5-point-Likert-scale. Estimations of the proportions of in-hospital deaths, residents with advance directives (AD), cases in which documented ADs were ignored, and most important measures for improvement of end-of-life care were requested. Results 486 (45.5%) questionnaires were returned, mostly by nursing staff managers (64.7%) and nursing home directors (29.9%). 64.4% of the respondents rated end-of-life care rather good, the remainder rated it as rather bad. The prevalence of in-hospital death was estimated by the respondents at 31.5% (SD: 19.9). Approximately a third suggested that residents receive hospital treatments too frequently. Respondents estimated that 45.9% (SD: 21.6) of the residents held ADs and that 28.4% (SD: 26.8) of available ADs are not being considered. Increased staffing, better qualification, closer involvement of general practitioners and better availability of palliative care concepts were the most important measures for improvement. Conclusions Together with higher staffing, better availability and integration of palliative care concepts may well improve end-of-life care. Prerequisite for stronger ties between nursing home and palliative care is high-quality education of those involved in end-of-life care.

Effectiveness of palliative care services: A population-based study of end-of-life care for cancer patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (8) ◽  
pp. 1344-1352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rossana De Palma ◽  
Daniela Fortuna ◽  
Sarah E Hegarty ◽  
Daniel Z Louis ◽  
Rita Maria Melotti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Conditional Logistic Regression ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
Administrative Databases ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Palliative Care Services ◽  
The Impact

Background: Multiple studies demonstrate substantial utilization of acute hospital care and, potentially excessive, intensive medical and surgical treatments at the end-of-life. Aim: To evaluate the relationship between the use of home and facility-based hospice palliative care for patients dying with cancer and service utilization at the end of life. Design: Retrospective, population-level study using administrative databases. The effect of palliative care was analyzed between coarsened exact matched cohorts and evaluated through a conditional logistic regression model. Setting/participants: The study was conducted on the cohort of 34,357 patients, resident in Emilia-Romagna Region, Italy, admitted to hospital with a diagnosis of metastatic or poor-prognosis cancer during the 6 months before death between January 2013 and December 2015. Results: Patients who received palliative care experienced significantly lower rates of all indicators of aggressive care such as hospital admission (odds ratio (OR) = 0.05, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.04–0.06), emergency department visits (OR = 0.23, 95% CI: 0.21–0.25), intensive care unit stays (OR = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.26–0.32), major operating room procedures (OR = 0.22, 95% CI: 0.21–0.24), and lower in-hospital death (OR = 0.11, 95% CI: 0.10–0.11). This cohort had significantly higher rates of opiate prescriptions (OR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.21–1.33) ( p < 0.01 for all comparisons). Conclusion: Use of palliative care at the end of life for cancer patients is associated with a reduction of the use of high-cost, intensive services. Future research is necessary to evaluate the impact of increasing use of palliative care services on other health outcomes. Administrative databases linked at the patient level are a useful data source for assessment of care at the end of life.

Standardized criteria for required palliative care consultation on the solid tumor oncology service.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 37-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerin Adelson ◽  
Julia Paris ◽  
Cardinale B. Smith ◽  
Jay Horton ◽  
R. Sean Morrison
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Solid Tumor ◽  
Readmission Rate ◽  
Symptom Control ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Oncology Service ◽  
Palliative Care Consultation ◽  
Mortality Index ◽  
Care Consultation

37 Background: Studies have shown that routine integration of Palliative Care (PC) for patients with advanced cancer is associated with improved symptom control, clearer understanding of prognosis, lower utilization of health care resources, and increased hospice use. The 2012 ASCO guidelines call for incorporation of PC for any patient with metastatic cancer and/or high symptom burden. Despite a top-rated PC division at Mount Sinai, our Solid Tumor (ST) Division utilized PC and hospice less than other medical centers. Our inpatient ST service consistently demonstrated poor quality metrics. Our 2011-2012 UHC statistics were: mortality index, 1.35 (target <1), 30-day readmission rate, 21.7%, (target < 10.3%) and length of stay (LOS) index, 1.23 (target <1). We hypothesized that implementing standardized criteria for PC consultation would improve these metrics. Methods: During this 3-month pilot, criteria for PC consultation included patients with one or more of the following: stage IV disease, Stage III lung or pancreatic cancer, hospitalization within prior 30 days, >7 day hospitalization, uncontrolled symptoms (pain, nausea, dyspnea, delirium, distress). We looked at two baseline groups for comparison: 1) patients who met eligibility in a six week period prior to the intervention 2) For UHC index data, we used the hospital dashboard average over a 1-year period prior to the intervention. This included all ST patients who were eligible for the intervention (60%) and those who were not (40%). Primary outcomes were: hospice utilization, ST mortality index, 30-day readmission rate and LOS. Results: Comparing Group 1 to the Pilot Group, palliative care consultation doubled from 41% to 82%, 30-day readmission decreased from 36% to 17% (p= .022), and hospice utilization increased from 14% to 25% (p=.146). UHC data (Group 2 vs. Pilot) showed: mortality index improved (1.35 to .59) and 30-day readmission rates decreased (21.7% to 13.5%, p=.026). LOS was unchanged (1.23 to 1.25). Conclusions: Mandating palliative care consults for patients at the highest risk for in hospital death and readmission improved hospice utilization, 30-day readmission, oncology service mortality and adherence with ASCO guidelines.

Transfusion utilization at the end of life.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (30_suppl) ◽  
pp. 303-303
Author(s):  
Lauren S. Prescott ◽  
Alaina J. Brown ◽  
Charlotte C. Sun ◽  
Charles F. Levenback ◽  
Lois M. Ramondetta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Surgery ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Invasive Procedure ◽  
Red Blood Cell Transfusion ◽  
Transfusion Rate ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Anti Cancer ◽  
Chi Squared

303 Background: Both the AMA’s Consortium for Performance Improvement and the Joint Commission have identified blood transfusions as one of the top 5 treatments that are over-utilized. We sought to quantify packed red blood cell transfusion (PRBT) utilization among ovarian cancer (OCa) pts in the last 6 months of life and identify risk factors for PRBT. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of deceased OCa pts treated at our institution in their last 6 months of life from 2007-2011. Pts who underwent emergent procedures for bleeding were excluded. Demographic and end of life-interventions were compared between transfusion and non-transfusion groups using chi-squared and univariate analysis. End-of-life interventions included anti-cancer treatment (chemotherapy radiation, or hormonal therapy), invasive procedure or abdominal surgery, as well as aggressive end-of-life care as defined by the NQF. Results: Of the 182 pts who met inclusion criteria, 59.9% received a PRBT in the last 6 months of life. Of those pts, 54.1% received a PRBT in the last 30 days of life. Mean hgb level at which pts were transfused was 8.4 ± 0.9 g/dL. Pts received a combined total of 436 units of PRBC. The majority of pts received 1 transfusion (n=50, range 1-16). Mean number of total units transfused was 4 (range 1-25). The most common indication for PRBT was hgb < 9 g/dL (61.1%), followed by symptomatic anemia (21.9%). There was no difference in PRBT rate between pts who received medical interventions in the last 6 months of life v. those who did not. Specifically, transfusion rate was not correlated with: anti-cancer treatments (93.2% v. 92.7%, OR 0.93; 95% CI (0.29, 2.96)), invasive procedures (82.2% v. 81.7%, OR 0.96; CI (0.45,2.08)), abdominal surgery (11.0% v. 11.0%, OR 1.01; 95% CI(0.39,2.59)), or aggressive end-of-life care (46.6% v. 56.9%, OR 1.51; 95% CI (0.83,2.74)). Conclusions: The majority of our pts received a PRBT in the last 6 months of life. We did not identify significant differences in clinical interventions between pts who received a PRBT and those who did not. Based on our analysis, transfusion practices in terminally ill OCa pts should be reevaluated. Creation of transfusion guidelines for cancer pts could potentially result in better utilization of blood bank resources.

A retrospective review of patients with hematological malignancy referred to an inpatient palliative care service in a tertiary hospital.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 117-117
Author(s):  
Yee Choon Meng ◽  
Mervyn Yong Hwang Koh ◽  
Zi Yan Chiam ◽  
Jun Jun Zhang ◽  
Yin Mei, Allyn Hum
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Retrospective Review ◽  
Hematological Malignancies ◽  
Hematological Malignancy ◽  
Care Service ◽  
Symptom Control ◽  
Palliative Care Service ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Care Needs

117 Background: Patients with hematological malignancies are referred to palliative care service later and less often than patients with solid organ tumor. However, there are no data in Singapore, on the referral pattern among patients with hematological malignancy. The objective of the study is to identify the characteristics and outcomes of patients with hematological malignancy referred to an In-patient Palliative Care Service (PCS). Methods: We performed a retrospective review of all patients with hematological malignancies referred to the in-patient PCS from December 2015 to December 2016. Basic demographics and outcomes of patients’ admission were collected as per protocol. Results: 53 patients were included in the study. 27 (50.9%) patients were male, 49 (92.5%) were ≥60 years old, 20 (37.7%) were receiving cancer treatment at the point of referral, and 24 (45.3%) had Palliative Performance Scale (PPS) ≤ 40%. The most common hematological diagnosis was lymphoma (N = 26, 49.1%). The top 3 reasons for referral were symptom management (N = 44; 83%), advance disease (N = 24; 45.3% and end-of-life discussion (N = 15, 28.3%). Among 44 patients referred for symptom control, 18 (40.9%) had pain, 12 (27.3%) had dyspnoea, 8 (18.2%) had confusion and 6 (13.6%) had fatigue or drowsiness. 30 patients (56.6%) died during the admission. Among 30 patients who died, the mean time from referral to death was 9.8 days; 16 (53.3%) died within 1 week from referral, 9 (30%) died between 1-4 weeks from referral and 5 (16.7%) died beyond 4 weeks after referral.5 patients (9.4%) had Advance Care Planning completed. Conclusions: Our review showed that patients with hematological malignancies are referred late in their disease trajectory and have high Palliative Care needs. Hence, collaborative effort to facilitate timely referral of patients with hematological malignancy to PCS will optimize end-of-life care.

End-of-life care and prognosis of elderly patients with advanced cancer in palliative care unit.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e23011-e23011
Author(s):  
Shuji Hiramoto ◽  
Tomoko Tamaki ◽  
Hori Tetsuo ◽  
Ayako Kikuchi ◽  
Akira Yoshioka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Significant Prognostic Factor ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Consciousness Level ◽  
Number Of Patients

e23011 Background: Prognosis of end-of-life characteristics, which are indicators of palliative care, especially in elderly cancer patients, remains unclear. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 510 patients who died of advanced cancer at our hospital from August 2011 to August 2016. The patients were divided into two groups: elderly patients (over 80 years old, N = 140) and non-elderly patients (under 80 years old, N = 370). The number of patients (306 male and 204 female) with gastro-esophageal, biliary-pancreatic, colorectal, lung, breast, urological, gynecological, hepatocellular, and other cancers were 114, 98, 82, 84, 25, 36, 20 and 51, respectively. The primary endpoint of the study was to analyze the relationship of end-of-life symptoms, treatment, and chemotherapy with age. The secondary endpoint was to identify the prognostic factors in elderly patients with advanced cancer at the end-of-life. Results: ECOG Performance Status of 0.1 was recorded for 12 patients and 2-4 for 498 patients. The prevalence rate of cancer pain in elderly patients was 19.3%, which was significantly lower than that in non-elderly patients (31.4%). Fatigue in elderly patients was 27.9%, which was significantly lower than that in non-elderly patients (37.6%). Continuous deep sedation usage in elderly patients was 12.9%, which was significantly lower than that in non-elderly patients (28.9%). The mean opioid dose in elderly patients was 23.3mg/day, which was significantly lower than that that in non-elderly patients (43.8mg/day). The rate of more than one line of chemotherapy for elderly patients was 44.4%, which was lower than that for non-elderly patients (65.4%). The rate of use of more than one type of cytotoxic agent in the last regimen for elderly patients was 13.3%, which was lower than that for non-elderly patients (30.8%). Consciousness level was recognized as a significant prognostic factor (HR 1.714, p = 0.048) using multivariate analysis of prognosis in elderly patients at the end-of-life. Conclusions: End-of-life symptoms and the intensity of end-of-life treatment, including chemotherapy, were lesser in elderly patients as compared to non-elderly patients. Consciousness level was a significant prognostic factor in elderly patients at the end-of-life.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document