Should Treatment of Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis Be Based on Bone Biopsies?

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 73S-74S
Author(s):  
Nima Heidari ◽  
Iris Kwok ◽  
Alexandros Vris ◽  
Alexander Charalambous

Recommendation: Yes. Bone biopsies play both a crucial diagnostic and interventional role in the management of diabetic foot infection. Although bone biopsies are not required in every case of diabetic foot infection, their most important role is in guiding accurate antibiotic treatment, as they provide more accurate microbiological information than superficial soft tissue samples in patients with diabetic foot osteomyelitis. Level of Evidence: Moderate. Delegate Vote: Agree: 100%, Disagree: 0%, Abstain: 0% (Unanimous, Strongest Consensus)

Author(s):  
Irene Sanz-Corbalán ◽  
Aroa Tardáguila-García ◽  
Yolanda García-Álvarez ◽  
Mateo López-Moral ◽  
Francisco Javier Álvaro-Afonso ◽  
...  

Introduction: The knowledge about level of adherence to oral antibiotic treatment in diabetic patients with ulcer infection could be essential as a method of evaluation/monitoring of conservative treatment. Aim: To assess the adherence to oral antibiotic treatment in outpatients with diabetic foot infection (soft tissue vs. osteomyelitis) by 8-item structured, self-reported medication adherence scale. Methods: cross-sectional study was carried out with 46 consecutive patients who had diabetic foot infection (soft tissue or bone infection) and required antibiotic oral treatment at outpatient clinical setting. Medication adherence was tested using the Spanish version of the validated eight-item self-report MMAS-8. Results: patients with diabetic ulcer infection, had well level of adherence to antibiotic medication (7   ±   1.2 vs. 7.4   ±   1.5). Patients with lower level of adherence had lower level of satisfaction with the antibiotic medication. The profile of the patients with lower level of adherence were patients with primary level of education and patient who required more help to take the medication. Conclusion: Patients with diabetic foot infection demonstrated well level of adherence to antibiotic medication, independently of type of infection (soft tissue vs. osteomyelitis) by 8-item structured, self-reported medication adherence scale.


Author(s):  
Peter A Crisologo ◽  
Matthew Malone ◽  
Javier La Fontaine ◽  
Orhan Oz ◽  
Kavita Bhavan ◽  
...  

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate surrogate markers commonly used in the literature for diabetic foot osteomyelitis remission after initial treatment for diabetic foot infections. Methods: Thirty-five patients with diabetic foot infections were prospectively enrolled and followed for 12 months. Osteomyelitis was determined from bone culture and histology initially and for recurrence. Chi square and Fischer's exact test were used for dichotomous variables and the student's t-test and Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables with an alpha of 0.05. Results: Twenty-four patients were diagnosed with osteomyelitis and eleven patients with soft-tissue infections. 16.7% (n=) of patients with osteomyelitis had a re-infection based on bone biopsy. The success of osteomyelitis treatment varied based on the surrogate marker used to define remission: osteomyelitis infection (16.7%), failed wound healing (8.3%), re-ulceration (20.8%), re-admission (16.7%), amputation (12.5%). There was no difference in outcomes among patients who were initially diagnosed with osteomyelitis and soft tissue infections. There were no differences in osteomyelitis re-infection (16.7% vs 45.5%, p=0.07), wounds that failed to heal (8.3% vs 9.1%, p=0.94), re-ulceration (20.8% vs 27.3%, p=0.67), re-admission for diabetic foot infections at the same site (16.7% vs 36.4%, p=0.20), amputation at the same site after discharge (12.5% vs 36.4%, p=0.10). Osteomyelitis at the index site based on bone biopsy indicated that failed therapy was 16.7%. Indirect markers demonstrated a failure rate ranging from 8.3-20.8%. Conclusions: Most osteomyelitis markers were similar to markers in soft tissue infection subjects. Commonly reported surrogate markers were not shown to be specific to identify patients that failed osteomyelitis treatment when compared with patients that had soft tissue infections. Given this, these surrogate markers are not reliable for use in practice to identify osteomyelitis treatment failure.


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S94-S95
Author(s):  
Hyun Kyung Kim ◽  
Olga Vasylyeva

Abstract Background Bone cultures in diabetic foot infection is the most accurate method to identify causative pathogen, while there is only 30% concordance between superficial wound swab and bone biopsy cultures. Diabetic foot infection is commonly polymicrobial, therefore report on the bone biopsy culture may come with several updates before it is finalized. Our study is aimed to describe how often additional pathogens were identified after patients’ discharge on antibiotics therapy for diabetic foot osteomyelitis, and evaluate microbiological appropriateness of antibiotic regimen upon discharge based on the final result of the bone culture. Methods Medical records of the patients 18 years old or older, who had inpatient bone biopsy, deep tissue debridement or amputation for diabetic foot infection, were reviewed from January 2014 through Dec 2015 in Rochester Regional Health System. Antibiotic regimens for the patients discharged before final culture result were evaluated for microbiological appropriateness by two reviewers trained in infectious diseases. Results In total, 198 procedures were screened, 158 procedures met inclusion criteria, out of which 74 patients with 80 procedures (51%) were discharged before the final culture result was available. Average time from procedure to the final culture report was 6 days, and from discharge to the final culture was 3.7 days. In most of the cases (70%, 56 out of 80) the patients were discharged on empiric regimen discordant with final culture result. Predominant organisms were Gram-positive bacteria 74%, with Gram negatives 24%, and yeast 2%. Most infections were polymicrobial (81%), mixed with anaerobic bacteria in 37%. The most frequent isolates were Staphylococcus aureus (15%), Corynebacterium (14%), anaerobic Gram-positive cocci (12%), and Staphylococcus epidermidis (8%). All negative Gram stains (31%, 25 out of 80) had positive growth on culture. Conclusion Half of the patients with diabetic foot osteomyelitis, who underwent bone biopsy, were discharged before final culture results were available. Most of them were discharged on empiric regimen discordant with final culture. This data suggests that careful outpatient follow-up on the final culture would likely result in modification of antibiotics therapy to target newly reported pathogen. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 685-690 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin Chisman ◽  
Danielle Lowry ◽  
Mujahid A Saeed ◽  
Alok Tiwari ◽  
Miruna D David

Author(s):  
Rodrigo Paes Cuiabano Leme ◽  
Jéssica Chaves ◽  
Luiz Carlos Gonçalves ◽  
Leonardo César Alvim ◽  
João Roberto Chaves de Almeida ◽  
...  

Background: Diabetic foot infection (DFI) is the commonest diabetic problem requiring hospital admission. Culture yield can be challenging, particularly in the presence of biofilms. Literature confirms biofilms are ubiquitous in diabetic foot ulcer, although, there is not a microbiologic diagnostic approach regarding biofilm disruption on DFI. We postulated sonicating a stainless-steel wire along with tissue samples into the thioglycollate broth media (TBM) may improve the diagnosis of DFI. Method: Pro-spective unicentric study that assessed patients with DFI who underwent surgical debridement. The vascular surgery team collected tissue fragments and inoculated the specimens into three TBM to execute the conventional culture method (CCM), and ad-ditional fragments to place into other TBM along with a Kirschner wire (K-wire – Kw method). The microbiologist processed the samples and the resultant sonication fluid in aerobic sheep-blood agar after 24 hours, 5 and 10 days of incubation. Both methods were compared (Wilcoxon test; p < 0.05). Results: The number of pathogens isolated in each method was not statistically significant (p = 0.414): CM = 1.67 (± 0.92); KwM = 1.75 (± 0.94). The KwM was not inferior to CCM. In addition, despite the absence of statistical significance, the KwM detected more pathogens than CCM.


2005 ◽  
Vol 49 (10) ◽  
pp. 4368-4371 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. J. Legat ◽  
R. Krause ◽  
P. Zenahlik ◽  
C. Hoffmann ◽  
S. Scholz ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT We investigated the pharmacokinetics of piperacillin and tazobactam in the extracellular space fluid of inflamed soft tissues of six patients with diabetic foot infection using in vivo microdialysis and found similar penetration for piperacillin but not for tazobactam into inflamed and noninflamed soft tissue.


2017 ◽  
Vol 107 (6) ◽  
pp. 538-540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Partha P. Chakraborty ◽  
Ajitesh Roy ◽  
Rana Bhattacharjee ◽  
Satinath Mukhopadhyay ◽  
Subhankar Chowdhury

Osteolysis, caused by active resorption of bone matrix by osteoclasts, can be primary or can develop secondary to a variety of disease processes. An elevated level of inflammatory cytokines in the local milieu and increased blood flow secondary to infection or autonomic neuropathy stimulate the osteoclasts and cause bone loss in the diabetic foot. Charcot's neuroarthropathy and osteomyelitis are well-known foot complications of diabetes, and secondary osteolysis has largely been underappreciated and, hence, underreported. Plain radiographs, an initial component in the evaluation of the diabetic foot, may not successfully differentiate secondary osteolysis from osteomyelitis. We describe a patient with phalangeal osteolysis secondary to soft-tissue infection in whom a correct and timely diagnosis helped avoid unnecessary surgical interventions.


Diabetologia ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 60 (12) ◽  
pp. 2486-2494 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julien Vouillarmet ◽  
Myriam Moret ◽  
Isabelle Morelec ◽  
Paul Michon ◽  
Julien Dubreuil

2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-8
Author(s):  
Dimitrios Velissaris ◽  
Nikolaos-Dimitrios Pantzaris ◽  
Christina Platanaki ◽  
Nikolina Antonopoulou ◽  
Charalampos Gogos

Abstract Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are a very common cause of mortality and morbidity. The distinction between infected and non-infected DFU remains a very challenging task for clinicians in everyday practice. Even when infection is documented, the spectrum of diabetic foot infection is wide, ranging from cellulitis and soft tissue infection to osteomyelitis. Procalcitonin (PCT), a well-established sepsis biomarker, has been used in the diagnosis of several infections including osteomyelitis in patients with diabetes mellitus. This review gathers and presents all the relevant data, up until now, regarding the use of PCT as an assessment tool in diabetic patients with foot infection. Current evidence suggests that PCT levels could aid clinicians in distinguishing infected from non-infected DFUs as well as in the distinction between soft tissue infection and bone involvement, but further and larger studies are warranted to confirm these findings.


Author(s):  
Ana Belen Manas ◽  
Surabhi Taori ◽  
Raju Ahluwalia ◽  
Hani Slim ◽  
C. Manu ◽  
...  

Whether deep swab cultures taken at admission reliably identify pathogens compared to surgical bone specimens in hospitalized individuals with diabetic foot osteomyelitis and soft tissue infection is unclear. Comparison of microbiological isolates between a deep wound swab (DWS) taken at the time of admission through the actively infected, discharging ulcer probing to the bone and the subsequent surgical bone sample (SBS) taken during surgical debridement was made. A total of 63 subjects (age 60.8 ± 13.5 years, 75% male, 80% Type 2 diabetes, HbA1C 8.9%±2.2%) were included. The proportion of Gram-positive (DWS 49% v SBS 52%) and Gram-negative (DWS 60% v SBS 60%) isolates was similar between the techniques. However, the overall concordance of isolates between the two techniques was only fair (κ=0.302). The best concordance was observed for Staphylococcus aureus (κ=0.571) and MRSA (κ=0.644). There was a correlation between number of isolates in SBS with prior antibiotic therapy of any duration (r= -0.358, p=0.005) and with the duration of ulceration (r=0.296, p=0.045); no clinical correlations were found for DWS. Prior antibiotic therapy (p=0.03) and duration of ulceration <8 weeks (p=0.025) were predictive of negative growth on SBS. In conclusion, we found only a fair concordance between deep wound swabs acquired at admission and surgical bone specimens in those presenting with a severe diabetic foot infection and features of osteomyelitis. Ensuring early surgical debridement of all infected tissue and obtaining bone specimens should be considered a clinical priority, which may also reduce the likelihood of negative growth on SBS.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document