scholarly journals Does Using Multiple Computer Monitors Affect Health and Productivity? A Systematic Review

2019 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 977-977
Author(s):  
Kaitlin M. Gallagher ◽  
Laura Cameron ◽  
Madison Boulé ◽  
Diana De Carvalho
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Study Participant ◽  
Head Rotation ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Performance Outcomes ◽  
User Preference ◽  
Office Work ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Computer Monitors ◽  
And Performance

Multiple monitor configurations are used in office settings to promote increased productivity by providing more screen space. Our systematic review compiled literature to determine if office workers who use multiple computer monitor configurations have altered health and performance outcomes compared to the use of a single monitor. A secondary purpose was to compare the studies’ monitor configurations to purchasing trends. Finally, we compiled user preference results and methodological information, such as the tasks used and participant placement. Our systematic review was registered on PROSPERO (Gallagher, Cameron, De Carvalho, & Boule, 2018) a-priori and conducted and reported according to the PRISMA statement guidelines (Moher, Liberati, Tetzlaff, Altman, & Group, 2010). Inclusion criteria were any study that assessed participants over the age of 18 years, looked at office work tasks, and assessed the use of either two or more monitors at a time in comparison to single monitor use. The primary outcomes were changes in health and performance-related variables. Secondary outcomes were user preference, the characteristics of the monitor configurations tested in the study, participant placement with respect to those monitors, and tasks used to assess configuration effectiveness. Two team members (KG & MB) independently screened the titles and abstracts to determine studies that potentially met the inclusion criteria. Justification for inclusion/exclusion was recorded on a standardized form. For all included studies, the independent reviewers separately extracted information and performed a risk of bias assessment. Discrepancies were resolved through discussion and if necessary, consultation with a third reviewer (DC). We included eighteen articles in the systematic review. Four studies were conducted in a field setting using workers’ real tasks and fourteen were conducted in a laboratory setting. Performance outcomes generally improved or remained the same with the use of multiple computer monitors versus a single monitor; however, results were shown to be influenced by the task involved. Health-related outcomes were less consistent and have not been investigated enough on multiple monitor configurations and larger displays. Head rotation from neutral is found with multiple monitor use. Muscle activity and discomfort measures need further assessment, especially for larger monitors. Future work should assess health and performance measures together to get a clear picture of the potential benefits and disadvantages of the monitor setup, be cognizant of the tasks and user placements chosen, consider recent purchasing trends when selecting monitors for research studies, and conduct field studies to assess the influence of monitor choice and placement on performance, and health and well-being.

scholarly journals Enhancing Employees’ Performance through Organizational Care Policies in the Health Care Context

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 5
Author(s):  
Andrea Tomo ◽  
Lucio Todisco
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Employee Motivation ◽  
Performance Outcomes ◽  
Monetary Incentives ◽  
Work Involvement ◽  
Health Care Context ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Conceptual Study ◽  
The Impact

Literature is increasingly recognizing that organizations must combine themes of care and concern with more established economic objectives. This conceptual study will expand on this literature by considering how expressions of organizational care toward employees, by improving their well-being, may influence their motivation, work involvement and, in turn, improve performance. In more detail, by extending the conceptual framework developed by Bonner & Sprinkle (2001), it is argued that managers should take into account the impact, not only of monetary and non-monetary incentives, but even of other caring policies, on employee motivation and performance outcomes. On this ground, this study develops a theoretical model on how organizational care may help employees in expressing their work potential and enhancing their performance. The model is developed within the health care context since its particular setting that strongly affects employees’ well-being.

Post Endoscopy Barrett’s Neoplasia (PEBN) After A Negative Index Endoscopy: A Systematic Review & Proposal For Definitions and Performance Measures in Endoscopy

Endoscopy ◽  
2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Madhav Desai ◽  
David A Lieberman ◽  
Sachin Srinivasan ◽  
Venkat Nutalapati ◽  
Abhishek Challa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Barrett’S Esophagus ◽  
Barrett's Esophagus ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Negative Index ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Surveillance Interval ◽  
And Performance

Background and aims: A high rate of neoplasia (high grade dysplasia; HGD and esophageal adenocarcinoma; EAC) has been reported in Barrett’s Esophagus at index endoscopy but precise rates of post endoscopy Barrett’s neoplasia (PEBN) are unknown. Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis was performed examining electronic databases (inception to October 2021) for studies reporting PEBN. Consistent with definitions of Post Colonoscopy Colorectal Cancer as proposed by the World Endoscopy Organization, we defined neoplasia(HGD/EAC) detected at index endoscopy and/or within 6 months of a negative index endoscopy as “prevalent” neoplasia; those detected after 6 months of a negative index endoscopy and prior to next surveillance interval(i.e. 3 years) as PEBN or “interval” neoplasia, and those detected after 36 months of a negative index endoscopy as “incident” neoplasia. Pooled incidence rates and proportion relative to total neoplasia were analyzed. Results: 11 studies (n=59,795, age:62.3±3.3 years, 61%males) met inclusion criteria. The pooled incidence rates were: prevalent neoplasia 4.5% (95%confidence interval: 2.2-8.9) at baseline and additional 0.3%(0.1-0.7) within first 6 months, PEBN 0.52%(0.48-0.58) and incident neoplasia: 1.41%(0.93-2.14). At 3 years from index endoscopy, PEBN accounted for 3% while prevalent neoplasia accounted for 97% of total Barrett’s neoplasia. Conclusion: Neoplasia detected at or within 6 months of index endoscopy account for most of the Barrett’s neoplasia(>90%). Post-Endoscopy Barrett’s Neoplasia account for ~3% of cases and can be used for validation in future. This highlights the importance of a high-quality index endoscopy in Barrett’s Esophagus and the need to establish quality benchmarks to measure endoscopists’ performance.

scholarly journals The impact of mindfulness‐based interventions on doctors’ well‐being and performance: A systematic review

2019 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 138-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renée A. Scheepers ◽  
Helga Emke ◽  
Ronald M. Epstein ◽  
Kiki M. J. M. H. Lombarts
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Well Being ◽  
And Performance ◽  
The Impact

Efficacy of anger management interventions for individuals with traumatic brain injury: A systematic review

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 27
Author(s):  
McKenzie Seaton, LAT, ATC, MSRT Student ◽  
Victoria DeFazio, CTRS ◽  
Heather R. Porter, PhD, CTRS
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Anger Management ◽  
Anger Expression ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Trait Anger ◽  
Recreational Therapy ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Management Interventions

The purpose of this systematic review is to examine the efficacy of anger management interventions for individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI). A total of 4,178 articles were identified of which six met the inclusion criteria. Anger management interventions included TBI education, anger education, emotional recognition, support, and maintenance of an anger log. Data were collected on eight outcomes (trait anger, anger expression-out, anger control, self-reported aggressiveness, anger recognition strategies, well-being, self-reported anger, and treatment satisfaction) with mixed findings. Suggestions for recreational therapy practice are provided. Further research is needed, particularly for the pediatric and adolescent TBI population.

Relationship between Self-Report and Performance Measures of Function: A Systematic Review

2006 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 253-270 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liliana Coman ◽  
Julie Richardson
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Performance Measures ◽  
Functional Limitations ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Community Dwelling Older Adults ◽  
Similar Assessment

ABSTRACTThe authors conducted a systematic review of studies examining correlations between assessments of function obtained using self-report and those obtained using performance-based measures for community-dwelling older adults.METHODSArticles for this review were identified using electronic searching in MEDLINE, CINHAL, and AGELINE and hand-searching techniques. Two reviewers selected the studies that met the inclusion criteria, extracted the data, and assessed the methodological quality of the data.RESULTSSeventeen studies met the inclusion criteria for review. Correlations between self-report and performance ranged from −0.72 to 0.60. Sixty per cent of the studies compared self-report instruments measuring disability with performance measures addressing functional limitations. In studies that assessed the same functional tasks and functional limitations using the two methods, the correlation varied between 0.60 and 0.86.CONCLUSIONWhen the construct measured by the two methods was the same, the correlations were moderate to large and, therefore, measurement of functional limitations by self-report or performance probably reflected a similar assessment of function.

Street Lighting Management and Performance Evaluation: Opportunities and Challenges

2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 303-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gustavo Guilherme Thiel ◽  
Sandra Rolim Ensslin ◽  
Leonardo Ensslin
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Performance Evaluation ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Management Process ◽  
Research Gaps ◽  
Scientific Publications ◽  
Street Lighting ◽  
Research Opportunities ◽  
And Performance

Street lighting aims to contribute to the well-being and safety of citizens, and Performance Evaluation emerges as a tool to aid them in their management process. This study aims to explore what the literature offers on performance evaluation in street lighting management, in order to develop knowledge in the researchers, and clearly presenting research opportunities. In this regard, a Bibliographic Portfolio is composed from the most relevant scientific publications; Bibliometrics and a Systematic Review were performed as well. The process guided by the instrument of intervention, called ProKnow-C, presented research gaps and opportunities on the topic in question.

scholarly journals MP31: Debriefing critical incidents in health care: a review of the evidence

CJEM ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (S1) ◽  
pp. S51-S52 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Katherine Conrad ◽  
R. DB. Morrison
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Critical Incident ◽  
Critical Incidents ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Stressful Events ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Inclusion Criteria

Introduction: Emergency health care providers (HCPs) regularly perform difficult medical resuscitations that require complex decision making and action. Critical incident debriefing has been proposed as a mechanism to mitigate the psychological effect of these stressful events and improve both provider and patient outcomes. The purpose of this updated systematic review is to determine if HCPs performing debriefing after critical incidents, compared to no debriefing, improves the outcomes of the HCPs or patients. Methods: We performed a librarian assisted systematic review of OVID Medline, CINAHL, OVID Embase and Google Scholar (January 2006 to February 2017) No restrictions for language were imposed. Two investigators evaluated articles independently for inclusion criteria, quality and data collection. Agreement was measured using the Kappa statistic and quality of the articles were assessed using the Downs and Black evaluation tool. Results: Among the 658 publications identified 16 met inclusion criteria. Participants included physicians, nurses, allied health and learners involved in both adult and pediatric resuscitations. Findings suggest that HCPs view debriefing positively (n=7). One moderate quality study showed that debriefing can enhance medical student and resident knowledge. Several studies (n=8) demonstrated at least some improvement in CPR and intubation related technical skills. Debriefing is also associated with improved short term patient survival but not survival to discharge (n=5). Two studies reported benefits to HCPs mental health as evidenced by improved ability to manage grief and decreased reported symptoms of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Conclusion: We found HCPs value debriefing after critical incidents and that debriefing is associated with improved HCP knowledge, skill and well-being. Despite these positive findings, there continues to be limited evidence that debriefing significantly impacts long term patient outcomes. Larger scale higher quality studies are required to further delineate the effect of structured debriefing on patient and provider outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document