Ethics Education of Human Factors Engineers for Responsible AI Development

Author(s):  
Esa M. Rantanen ◽  
John D. Lee ◽  
Katherine Darveau ◽  
Dave B. Miller ◽  
James Intriligator ◽  
...  

This panel discussion is third in a series examining the educational challenges facing future human factors and ergonomics professionals. The past two panels have focused on training of technical skills in data science, machine learning, and artificial intelligence to human factors students. This panel discussion expands on these topics and argues for a need of new and broader training curricula that include ethics for responsible development of AI-based systems that will touch lives of everybody and have widespread societal impacts.

Author(s):  
Daniel Hannon ◽  
Esa Rantanen ◽  
Ben Sawyer ◽  
Ashley Hughes ◽  
Katherine Darveau ◽  
...  

The continued advances in artificial intelligence and automation through machine learning applications, under the heading of data science, gives reason for pause within the educator community as we consider how to position future human factors engineers to contribute meaningfully in these projects. Do the lessons we learned and now teach regarding automation based on previous generations of technology still apply? What level of DS and ML expertise is needed for a human factors engineer to have a relevant role in the design of future automation? How do we integrate these topics into a field that often has not emphasized quantitative skills? This panel discussion brings together human factors engineers and educators at different stages of their careers to consider how curricula are being adapted to include data science and machine learning, and what the future of human factors education may look like in the coming years.


Author(s):  
Beth Blickensderfer ◽  
Lori J Brown ◽  
Alyssa Greenman ◽  
Jayde King ◽  
Brandon Pitts

When General Aviation (GA) pilots encounter unexpected weather hazards in-flight, the results are typically deadly. It is unsurprising that the National Transportation Safety Board repeatedly lists weather related factors in GA flight operations as an unsolved aviation safety challenge. Solving this problem requires multidisciplinary perspectives. Fortunately, in the past several years innovative laboratory research and industry products have become available. This panel discussion brings together Human Factors and Ergonomics researchers and practitioners to discuss and describe the current work and future directions to avoid weather related accidents in GA.


2021 ◽  
pp. 026638212110619
Author(s):  
Sharon Richardson

During the past two decades, there have been a number of breakthroughs in the fields of data science and artificial intelligence, made possible by advanced machine learning algorithms trained through access to massive volumes of data. However, their adoption and use in real-world applications remains a challenge. This paper posits that a key limitation in making AI applicable has been a failure to modernise the theoretical frameworks needed to evaluate and adopt outcomes. Such a need was anticipated with the arrival of the digital computer in the 1950s but has remained unrealised. This paper reviews how the field of data science emerged and led to rapid breakthroughs in algorithms underpinning research into artificial intelligence. It then discusses the contextual framework now needed to advance the use of AI in real-world decisions that impact human lives and livelihoods.


Author(s):  
Salim A. Mouloua ◽  
James Ferraro ◽  
Mustapha Mouloua ◽  
P.A. Hancock

The present study was designed to examine the research trends in the literature focusing on Human Factors issues relevant to Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems. As these UAV technologies continue to proliferate with increasing autonomy and supervisory control requirements, it is crucial to evaluate the current and emerging research trends across the generations. This paper reviews the research trends of 228 papers matching our search criteria. The search retained only relevant and complete papers published over the past thirty years (1988-2017) in the Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Results were tabulated, graphed, and discussed based on research categories, topic areas, authors’ affiliation, and sources of funding. Results showed a substantial increase in the number of articles in the last two decades, with most papers driven by academic institutions and military and government agencies.


Author(s):  
Janet I. Creaser ◽  
Arnold M. Lund ◽  
Jeff English ◽  
Ronald G. Shapiro ◽  
Anthony D. Andre

Welcome to the 12th Annual Human Factors and Ergonomics Career Panel. This year, the panel will impart wisdom on achieving expertise in the HF/E field. First, Jeff English defines for us what it means to be an expert and the steps to take on the journey to expertise. Arnold Lund describes the ingredients individuals possess that help them on their way to expertise and success. Ronald Shapiro will help you conduct a reality check of how you personally define success and set goals to achieve that success. Anthony Andre provides tips for new graduates on getting a job in a market that is increasingly emphasizing experience. Finally, Janet Creaser has a few words about some of the advice she has put into practice in the past two years.


Author(s):  
Ranjana K. Mehta ◽  
Hasan Ayaz ◽  
Ryan McKendrick ◽  
Kurtulus Izzetoglu ◽  
Ben Willems ◽  
...  

Functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) is an emerging neuroimaging technique that has found home in various human factors and ergonomics applications. Why fNIRS? Is it better than EEG or fMRI? Is it an appropriate neuroimaging technique for my research/application? What are the methodological considerations for fNIRS analyses? This panel discussion is aimed at answering these questions, among others, when panelists from varied human factors and ergonomics applications discuss how they employ fNIRS in their investigations.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah Petrat

AbstractThe development of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies continues to advance. To fully exploit the potential, it is important to deal with the topics of human factors and ergonomics, so that a smooth implementation of AI applications can be realized. In order to map the current state of research in this area, three systematic literature reviews with different focuses were conducted. The seven observation levels of work processes according to Luczak and Volpert (1987) served as a basis. Overall n = 237 sources were found and analyzed. It can be seen that the research critically deals with human-centered, effective as well as efficient work in relation to AI. Research gaps, for example in the areas of corporate education concepts and participation and voice, identify further needs in research. The author postulates not to miss the transition between forecasts and verifiable facts.


Author(s):  
Avishek Choudhury ◽  
Onur Asan

The recent launch of complex artificial intelligence (AI) in the domain of healthcare has embedded perplexities within patients, clinicians, and policymakers. The opaque and complex nature of artificial intelligence makes it challenging for clinicians to interpret its outcome. Incorrect interpretation and poor utilization of AI might hamper patient safety. The principles of human factors and ergonomics (HFE) can assist in simplifying AI design and consecutively optimize human performance ensuring better understanding of AI outcome, their interaction with the clinical workflow. In this paper, we discuss the interactions of providers with AI and how HFE can influence these interacting components to patient safety.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Onur Asan ◽  
Avishek Choudhury

BACKGROUND Despite advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) to develop prediction and classification models, little research has been devoted to real-world translations with a user-centered design approach. AI development studies in the health care context have often ignored two critical factors of ecological validity and human cognition, creating challenges at the interface with clinicians and the clinical environment. OBJECTIVE The aim of this literature review was to investigate the contributions made by major human factors communities in health care AI applications. This review also discusses emerging research gaps, and provides future research directions to facilitate a safer and user-centered integration of AI into the clinical workflow. METHODS We performed an extensive mapping review to capture all relevant articles published within the last 10 years in the major human factors journals and conference proceedings listed in the “Human Factors and Ergonomics” category of the Scopus Master List. In each published volume, we searched for studies reporting qualitative or quantitative findings in the context of AI in health care. Studies are discussed based on the key principles such as evaluating workload, usability, trust in technology, perception, and user-centered design. RESULTS Forty-eight articles were included in the final review. Most of the studies emphasized user perception, the usability of AI-based devices or technologies, cognitive workload, and user’s trust in AI. The review revealed a nascent but growing body of literature focusing on augmenting health care AI; however, little effort has been made to ensure ecological validity with user-centered design approaches. Moreover, few studies (n=5 against clinical/baseline standards, n=5 against clinicians) compared their AI models against a standard measure. CONCLUSIONS Human factors researchers should actively be part of efforts in AI design and implementation, as well as dynamic assessments of AI systems’ effects on interaction, workflow, and patient outcomes. An AI system is part of a greater sociotechnical system. Investigators with human factors and ergonomics expertise are essential when defining the dynamic interaction of AI within each element, process, and result of the work system.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document