Influence of Thermal Treatment and Soy Bean Protein Characteristics on Muscle Protein Emulsion Stability

2006 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 195-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. P. Rodríguez ◽  
C. Regue ◽  
A. Bonaldo ◽  
C. Carrara ◽  
L. G. Santiago
Keyword(s):  
Heat Treatment ◽  
Soy Protein ◽  
Emulsion Stability ◽  
Muscle Protein ◽  
Soy Protein Isolate ◽  
Protein Isolate ◽  
Stable Emulsion ◽  
Protein Isolates ◽  
Interfacial Film ◽  
Soy Protein Isolates

The effects of heat treatment on the interaction of salt soluble muscle protein and soy protein isolate in model emulsions were studied. Three soy protein isolates (SPI) were used: a commercial one (CSPI) and two pilot plant samples: a native soy protein isolate (NSPI) and an acid treated soy protein isolate (ASPI). Emulsions were prepared with muscle protein (MP), NSPI, ASPI, CSPI and mixtures of MP and the different SPIs, and then treated at 20, 55, 70, 80 and 90°C. Coalescence, soluble protein and electrophoresis of the aqueous phase of the emulsions were evaluated for each temperature. At 20°C the more native soy protein (NSPI) was compatible with MP, producing a stable emulsion that became more stable during heat treatment. CSPI alone could not form a stable interfacial film through the temperature range, however emulsion stabilisation was achieved at 55°C and 70°C when adding MP. Emulsions prepared with MP ASPI were highly unstable at 20°C, while as the emulsion temperature increased, coalescence decreased abruptly and maintained low values at every temperature. MP, NSPI, ASPI and MP NSPI produced stable emulsions both at 20°C and higher temperatures.

scholarly journals Application of soy protein isolate in the fining of red wine

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evandro Ficagna ◽  
Angelo Gava ◽  
Simone Bertazzo Rossato ◽  
César Valmor Rombaldi ◽  
Elessandra da Rosa Zavareze
Keyword(s):  
Soy Protein ◽  
Soy Protein Isolate ◽  
Protein Isolate ◽  
Sensory Profile ◽  
Red Wines ◽  
Compound A ◽  
Soy Protein Isolates ◽  
Fining Agents ◽  
Chromatic Properties ◽  
Protein Origin

Soy protein isolate was evaluated as a potential fining agent as an alternative to the predominant protein commercial fining agents (ovalbumin, porcine gelatin, and pea protein isolate). Two red wines (cv. ‘Merlot’ and cv. ‘Lambrusco Maestri’) were finned, bottled, and analyzed for phenolic content, color, turbidity, and sensory profile. Independent of the protein used, fining promoted a reduction in a majority of the phenolic compound, a slight (but significant) reduction of chromatic properties, and a decrease in the turbidity of the wines. A decrease in astringency, persistence, bitterness, and wine body, as well as an increase in brightness, clarity, and acidity, was also observed in all treatments. The application of soy protein isolates yielded similar results to those obtained with other commercial fining agents, both in the physicochemical and the sensory measures, which favors its usage as an alternative to the traditional fining agents of animal-protein origin.

scholarly journals Effects of non-meat proteins on the quality of fermented sausages

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 259-267
Author(s):  
Ana Velemir ◽  
Snježana Mandić ◽  
Goran Vučić ◽  
Danica Savanović
Keyword(s):  
Soy Protein ◽  
Binding Capacity ◽  
Soy Protein Isolate ◽  
Protein Isolate ◽  
Minor Effect ◽  
Fermented Sausage ◽  
Protein Isolates ◽  
Fermented Sausages ◽  
Meat Proteins

Introduction. Non-meat proteins are widely used in meat processing. In our study, we analyzed the effects of whey and soy protein isolates on the physicochemical and sensory properties of domestic fermented sausage. Study objects and methods. Five groups of sausages were traditionally fermented under industrial conditions. The sausage group without the additives was labelled the control, while other sausages were manufactured with the addition of 0.5% and 1.5% protein isolates of whey and soybean. Using a quantitative descriptive test, we assessed the sensory characteristics of the sausages and instrumentally determined their color, hardness, water activity (aw), and pH. Results and discussion. The proteins added to fermented sausages improved emulsification, texture, as well as water and fat binding capacity, which was confirmed by the results for hardness. Using a 0.5% soy protein isolate resulted in a firmer product. The additives had a minor effect on the color: the samples with the additives had a slightly lower L* value, and those with a soy protein had higher yellowness (b*). Conclusion. Using the additives did not have a significant effect on the chemical composition and overall sensory quality of all tested samples (P > 0.05).

Quality characteristics of chicken sausages using a combination of jack bean (Canavalia ensiformis L.) and soy protein isolate as a binder

Food Research ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 249-261
Author(s):  
M. Canti ◽  
A. Murdiati ◽  
S. Naruki ◽  
Supriyanto
Keyword(s):  
Protein Content ◽  
Soy Protein ◽  
Emulsion Stability ◽  
Soy Protein Isolate ◽  
Essential Amino Acids ◽  
Protein Isolate ◽  
Jack Bean ◽  
Texture Properties ◽  
Texture Attributes

Jack beans are one of the legumes with a high protein content to make protein isolates. This research aimed to evaluate the physical, sensory and proximate qualities of chicken sausages with jack bean protein isolate (JBPI) and the combination of JBPI and soy protein isolate (SPI) as a binder to improve the quality of the chicken sausages. This research included the preparation of JBPI and chicken sausages. The treatments were formulated as follows: control (without JBPI and SPI); T1 (SPI: JBPI = 100: 0); T2 (SPI: JBPI = 80:20); T3 (SPI: JBPI = 60:40); T4 (SPI: JBPI = 40: 60); T5 (SPI: JBPI = 20: 80); T6 (SPI: JBPI = 0: 100). The analysis of the physical, sensory, and proximate properties of sausages have been performed. The results showed that the JBPI protein content was high at 93.98% db, and contained higher essential amino acids than the FAO/WHO standards, i.e., leucine, lysine, phenylalanine + tyrosine, threonine. The combination of JBPI and SPI improved emulsion stability, lightness, yellowness, texture properties, protein content, and reduced cooking loss and redness of chicken sausages compared to control (p<0.05). The results of the sensory evaluation showed that the overall preference, slice properties, and texture attributes of chicken sausage with the addition of a combination of SPI and JBPI were 40:60 (T4) significantly different from the control received by the panellists (p<0.05). The formulation with the addition of a combination of SPI and JBPI of 40:60 was the optimal treatment because it improves the overall physical, sensory, and chemical characteristics of the resulting chicken sausage. JBPI had the potential as an alternative to substitution for SPI.

Ingestion of whey hydrolysate, casein, or soy protein isolate: effects on mixed muscle protein synthesis at rest and following resistance exercise in young men

2009 ◽  
Vol 107 (3) ◽  
pp. 987-992 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason E. Tang ◽  
Daniel R. Moore ◽  
Gregory W. Kujbida ◽  
Mark A. Tarnopolsky ◽  
Stuart M. Phillips
Keyword(s):  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
Resistance Exercise ◽  
Soy Protein ◽  
Muscle Protein ◽  
Muscle Protein Synthesis ◽  
Soy Protein Isolate ◽  
Young Men ◽  
Protein Isolate ◽  
Whey Hydrolysate ◽  
Micellar Casein

This study was designed to compare the acute response of mixed muscle protein synthesis (MPS) to rapidly (i.e., whey hydrolysate and soy) and slowly (i.e., micellar casein) digested proteins both at rest and after resistance exercise. Three groups of healthy young men ( n = 6 per group) performed a bout of unilateral leg resistance exercise followed by the consumption of a drink containing an equivalent content of essential amino acids (10 g) as either whey hydrolysate, micellar casein, or soy protein isolate. Mixed MPS was determined by a primed constant infusion of l-[ ring-13C6]phenylalanine. Ingestion of whey protein resulted in a larger increase in blood essential amino acid, branched-chain amino acid, and leucine concentrations than either casein or soy (P < 0.05). Mixed MPS at rest (determined in the nonexercised leg) was higher with ingestion of faster proteins (whey = 0.091 ± 0.015, soy = 0.078 ± 0.014, casein = 0.047 ± 0.008%/h); MPS after consumption of whey was ∼93% greater than casein (P < 0.01) and ∼18% greater than soy (P = 0.067). A similar result was observed after exercise (whey > soy > casein); MPS following whey consumption was ∼122% greater than casein (P < 0.01) and 31% greater than soy (P < 0.05). MPS was also greater with soy consumption at rest (64%) and following resistance exercise (69%) compared with casein (both P < 0.01). We conclude that the feeding-induced simulation of MPS in young men is greater after whey hydrolysate or soy protein consumption than casein both at rest and after resistance exercise; moreover, despite both being fast proteins, whey hydrolysate stimulated MPS to a greater degree than soy after resistance exercise. These differences may be related to how quickly the proteins are digested (i.e., fast vs. slow) or possibly to small differences in leucine content of each protein.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document