A Controlled Trial of Extended-Release Guanfacine and Psychostimulants on Executive Function and ADHD

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of guanfacine extended-release (GXR) versus placebo as adjunct therapy to usual care stimulant therapy in improving executive function in children aged 6 to 12 years diagnosed with ADHD. Method: In this single center, double-blind placebo-controlled crossover trial, subjects continued to take their psychostimulant and were randomly assigned at baseline to receive active treatment or placebo first. Efficacy measures included Behavioural Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF-P), ADHD Rating Scale IV (ADHD-RS IV), and Clinical Global Impressions of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) and Improvement (CGI-I) scales. Safety measures included adverse events and vital signs. Results: Significant benefits of GXR plus psychostimulant were observed on BRIEF-P ( p value = .0392), ADHD-RS-IV ( p < .0001), CGI-S ( p = .0007), and CGI-I ( p = .003). There were no serious adverse events and no new safety signals. Conclusion: Use of GXR as adjunctive therapy to stimulant therapy significantly improves executive function in children with ADHD.

Download Full-text

Safety, pharmacokinetics and antiviral activity of PGT121, a broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibody against HIV-1: a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 1 clinical trial

Nature Medicine ◽

10.1038/s41591-021-01509-0 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Kathryn E. Stephenson ◽

Boris Julg ◽

C. Sabrina Tan ◽

Rebecca Zash ◽

Stephen R. Walsh ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Viral Load ◽

T Cell ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Antiviral Activity ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Serious Adverse Events ◽

Double Blind ◽

Cell Counts ◽

Hiv 1

AbstractHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1-specific broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibodies are currently under development to treat and prevent HIV-1 infection. We performed a single-center, randomized, double-blind, dose-escalation, placebo-controlled trial of a single administration of the HIV-1 V3-glycan-specific antibody PGT121 at 3, 10 and 30 mg kg–1 in HIV-uninfected adults and HIV-infected adults on antiretroviral therapy (ART), as well as a multicenter, open-label trial of one infusion of PGT121 at 30 mg kg–1 in viremic HIV-infected adults not on ART (no. NCT02960581). The primary endpoints were safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and antiviral activity in viremic HIV-infected adults not on ART. The secondary endpoints were changes in anti-PGT121 antibody titers and CD4+ T-cell count, and development of HIV-1 sequence variations associated with PGT121 resistance. Among 48 participants enrolled, no treatment-related serious adverse events, potential immune-mediated diseases or Grade 3 or higher adverse events were reported. The most common reactions among PGT121 recipients were intravenous/injection site tenderness, pain and headache. Absolute and relative CD4+ T-cell counts did not change following PGT121 infusion in HIV-infected participants. Neutralizing anti-drug antibodies were not elicited. PGT121 reduced plasma HIV RNA levels by a median of 1.77 log in viremic participants, with a viral load nadir at a median of 8.5 days. Two individuals with low baseline viral loads experienced ART-free viral suppression for ≥168 days following antibody infusion, and rebound viruses in these individuals demonstrated full or partial PGT121 sensitivity. The trial met the prespecified endpoints. These data suggest that further investigation of the potential of antibody-based therapeutic strategies for long-term suppression of HIV is warranted, including in individuals off ART and with low viral load.

Download Full-text

Studies of Carbamazepine Extended-Release Capsules in Bipolar Disorder

CNS Spectrums ◽

10.1017/s1092852900023075 ◽

2005 ◽

Vol 10 (6) ◽

pp. 3-5

Author(s):

Richard H. Weisler

Keyword(s):

Extended Release ◽

Rating Scale ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Controlled Study ◽

Mixed States ◽

Open Label ◽

Young Mania ◽

Double Blind ◽

Double Blind Placebo ◽

Bipolar Patients

This discussion reviews data from two 3-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled pivotal trials of carbamazepine extended release capsules (CBZ ERC; SPD417.301 and SPD417.304); pooled results from these trials; data from a 3-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in lithium non-responders or non-tolerators (SPD417.302); and additional supportive data from a 6-month, open-label, extension trial (SPD417.303). In addition, information on a retrospective chart review of 600 adolescent and adult bipolar patients on CBZ ERC is presented.In the first large double-blind, placebo-controlled study assessing CBZ ERC in acute mania, manic and mixed bipolar patients from multiple centers were hospitalized and all medications were discontinued. After reaching a stable baseline 2–5 days later, the patients were randomized to CBZ ERC (n=101; 59% with mixed states) or placebo (n=103; 47% with mixed states) for 3 weeks. An aggressive initial titration schedule was implemented, beginning with 200 mg BID and increased by 200 mg/day until good clinical response was achieved or the patient could not tolerate the dosage. Many patients were taking 1,200–1,600 mg/day by the end of week 1. Efficacy was assessed using the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS). The Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) scale and the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) were also followed.

Download Full-text

Studies of Carbamazepine Extended-Release Capsules in Bipolar Disorder

CNS Spectrums ◽

10.1017/s1092852900024500 ◽

2005 ◽

Vol 10 (S1) ◽

pp. 3-5

Author(s):

Richard H. Weisler

Keyword(s):

Extended Release ◽

Rating Scale ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Controlled Study ◽

Mixed States ◽

Open Label ◽

Young Mania ◽

Double Blind ◽

Double Blind Placebo ◽

Bipolar Patients

Download Full-text

Effects of Bupropion on Cognitive Function in Schizophrenia: A Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

Global Journal of Health Science ◽

10.5539/gjhs.v9n5p67 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 9 (5) ◽

pp. 67

Author(s):

Mansoureh Mirzadeh ◽

Najmeh Shahini ◽

Masoud Kashani Lotf Abadi ◽

Maryam Tavakoli ◽

Arash Javanbakht ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Randomized Controlled Trial ◽

Cognitive Function ◽

Rating Scale ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Control Group ◽

P Value ◽

Double Blind ◽

Randomized Controlled ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Schizophrenic Patients

Smoking habits are common in schizophrenic patients. Nicotine can suppress negative symptoms and cognitive impairments. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of bupropion on cognitive function in schizophrenic patients. This study is a double blind randomized controlled trial in a large referral psychiatric university hospital in Iran. Ninety smoker schizophrenic patients were randomly allocated (based on DSM -IV TR criteria) in two groups (46 patients for case group and 44 patients in control group). They get risperidone up to 6 mg/d and bupropion up to 400 mg/d .clinical assessment (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Brief psychiatric rating scale (BPRS) were taken in beginning of study, 14th and 28th days of study. Cognitive assessment (Stroop, Digit Span, and Wechsler, Wisconsin) were taken in begging of study, the days 2nd, 7th, 14th, 28th. All data were analyzed by SPSS Ver. 17 with analytic and descriptive tests. Mean age of patients was 37.66±1.01. Mean duration of disorder was 11.63±.98 years. The scores were significantly lower at the day 28th compared to the beginning of the study in both groups in Wechsler, Stroop color word , Stroop word , Stroop color , BPRS, PANSS p value ≤0.05 .The difference between the two treatments was not significant as indicated by the effect of group, the between-subjects factor p value ≥0.05. In this study, the side effects were examined and there was no significant difference between the two groups p value ≥0.05. Augmentation of bupropion to routine treatment improves cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia in abstinence of tobacco.

Download Full-text

Inhibition of Interleukin-6 (IL-6) Reverses Anemia In Patients with Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): Results of a Phase II, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.640.640 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 640-640 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Michael W. Schuster ◽

James R Rigas ◽

Sergey V Orlov ◽

Branislav Milovanovic ◽

Kumar Prabhash ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Adverse Events ◽

Clinical Chemistry ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Safety Data ◽

Primary Objective ◽

Serious Adverse Events ◽

Double Blind ◽

Reactive Protein ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Cancer Related Anemia

Abstract Abstract 640 Background: ALD518 is a humanized, desialyated anti-IL-6 antibody being developed for the treatment of cancer-related anemia, cachexia and fatigue. The primary objective of the study was to determine the efficacy and safety of ALD518 in patients with advanced NSCLC. Secondary objectives examined hematologic parameters. Methods: 124 patients with NSCLC, ECOG 0–3, weight loss in the preceding 3 months of >5% body weight, hemoglobin (Hb) >7g/dL, and C-reactive protein (CRP) >10mg/L were dosed. Patients were randomized to 1 of 4 groups (n~30/group). Placebo or ALD518 80mg, 160mg, or 320mg was administered intravenously every 8 weeks. Pts were followed up for 24 weeks. Data included hematologic parameters, clinical chemistry, CRP, D-dimer, lean body mass and adverse events (AEs). Quality of life data included the FACIT-F, FACT-L, and FAACT questionnaires. Data presented in this abstract relates to the safety and hematology results. Results: 29 pts completed the study treatments and evaluations, 38 failed to complete every visit, 52 died of progressive disease, and 5 withdrew because of adverse events. There were no dose limiting toxicities (DLTs), infusion reactions, or anti-idiotypic antibody responses to ALD518 observed in the study. 84 pts had serious AEs of which 1 was deemed to be possibly related to administration of ALD518 (rectal hemorrhage). The majority of the serious adverse events were due to progression of the NSCLC. Six patients had a CTC grade 4 change in laboratory safety data during the study. Four patients experienced a grade 4 hypercalcemia: 1 (3.6%), 2 (6.1%), and 1 (3.2%) in the ALD518 80mg, 160mg and placebo groups, respectively, and there was 1 patient with grade 4 GGT elevation (placebo) and 1 patient with grade 4 hypokalemia (ALD518 160mg). There were no treatment related differences in vitals sign or 12-lead ECG data. The mean (±SD) values for Hb, hematocrit (Hct), mean corpuscular Hb (MCH) and platelet counts are listed below: 38/93 pts treated with ALD518 and 10/31 given placebo had a pre-dose Hb =< 11g/dL. 24 of these pts on ALD518 and 7 of these pts on placebo remained in the study at week 4. 14/24 pts on ALD518 and 0/7 on placebo had raised their Hb from =< 11g/dL to >= 12g/dL. Conclusions: ALD518 increased Hb, Hct, MCH in NSCLC pts and raised Hb to >= 12g/dL in 58% of pts with a Hb =< 11g/dL at baseline. There was also a modest fall in platelet count observed in patients treated with ALD518 but no patients had a CTC grade 4 thrombocytopenia and only one patient (ALD518 160mg group) had a grade 3 thrombocytopenia at one time point. There were no major safety signals related to the administration of ALD518. Further study of ALD518 as a novel non-erythropoietic stimulating agent for cancer-related anemia is warranted. Disclosures: Schuster: Alder Biopharmaceuticals Inc: Honoraria. Rigas: Alder Biopharmaceuticals inc: Honoraria. Smith:Alder Biopharmaceuticals Inc: Employment.

Download Full-text

Tocilizumab in early progressive rheumatoid arthritis: FUNCTION, a randomised controlled trial

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ◽

10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207628 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 75 (6) ◽

pp. 1081-1091 ◽

Cited By ~ 99

Author(s):

Gerd R Burmester ◽

William F Rigby ◽

Ronald F van Vollenhoven ◽

Jonathan Kay ◽

Andrea Rubbert-Roth ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽

Randomised Controlled Trial ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Physical Function ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Health Assessment ◽

Serious Adverse Events ◽

Double Blind ◽

Treatment Groups ◽

Randomised Controlled

ObjectivesThe efficacy of tocilizumab (TCZ), an anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibody, has not previously been evaluated in a population consisting exclusively of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA).MethodsIn a double-blind randomised controlled trial (FUNCTION), 1162 methotrexate (MTX)-naive patients with early progressive RA were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) to one of four treatment groups: 4 mg/kg TCZ+MTX, 8 mg/kg TCZ+MTX, 8 mg/kg TCZ+placebo and placebo+MTX (comparator group). The primary outcome was remission according to Disease Activity Score using 28 joints (DAS28–erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) <2.6) at week 24. Radiographic and physical function outcomes were also evaluated. We report results through week 52.ResultsThe intent-to-treat population included 1157 patients. Significantly more patients receiving 8 mg/kg TCZ+MTX and 8 mg/kg TCZ+placebo than receiving placebo+MTX achieved DAS28-ESR remission at week 24 (45% and 39% vs 15%; p<0.0001). The 8 mg/kg TCZ+MTX group also achieved significantly greater improvement in radiographic disease progression and physical function at week 52 than did patients treated with placebo+MTX (mean change from baseline in van der Heijde–modified total Sharp score, 0.08 vs 1.14 (p=0.0001); mean reduction in Health Assessment Disability Index, −0.81 vs −0.64 (p=0.0024)). In addition, the 8 mg/kg TCZ+placebo and 4 mg/kg TCZ+MTX groups demonstrated clinical efficacy that was at least as effective as MTX for these key secondary endpoints. Serious adverse events were similar among treatment groups. Adverse events resulting in premature withdrawal occurred in 20% of patients in the 8 mg/kg TCZ+MTX group.ConclusionsTCZ is effective in combination with MTX and as monotherapy for the treatment of patients with early RA.Trial registration numberClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01007435

Download Full-text

Safety and immunogenicity of a seasonal trivalent inactivated split influenza vaccine: a double blind, phase III randomized clinical trial in healthy Serbian adults

Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy ◽

10.1177/2515135520925336 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 8 ◽

pp. 251513552092533

Author(s):

Goran Stevanovic ◽

Aleksandar Obradovic ◽

Snezana Ristic ◽

Dragan Petrovic ◽

Branislava Milenkovic ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Adverse Events ◽

Influenza Vaccine ◽

Injection Site ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Geometric Mean ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Serious Adverse Events ◽

Double Blind ◽

Post Vaccination ◽

Robust Immune Response

This study was a phase III, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of a seasonal trivalent split, inactivated influenza vaccine (TIV) in healthy Serbian adults between the ages of 18 and 65 years. This egg-based vaccine was manufactured by the Institute of Virology, Vaccines and Sera, Torlak, Belgrade, Serbia. A total of 480 participants were assigned randomly in a ratio of 2:1 to receive a single intramuscular dose (0.5 ml) of the vaccine (15 µg of hemagglutinin per strain) or placebo (phosphate-buffered saline). Participants were monitored for safety, including solicited and unsolicited adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). No SAEs related to vaccination were reported. Injection site pain (51.3%), injection site tenderness (40.4%), tiredness (17.0%), and headache (15.1%) were the most commonly reported solicited events in the vaccine group. Incidence of related unsolicited AEs was low (1.3%) among vaccinees. Hemagglutinin inhibition (HAI) titers were measured before and 21 days after vaccination in 151 participants. Overall, HAI seroconversion rates to H1 and H3 were observed in 90.1% and 76.2% of vaccinees, respectively. For B antigen, it was 51.5%, likely due to high pre-vaccination titers. Post-vaccination seroprotection rates were in the range of 78.2–95.0% for the three antigens. Post-vaccination geometric mean titers (GMT) were at least 3.8 times higher than baseline levels for all the three strains among vaccinees. Overall, the study showed that the vaccine was safe and well tolerated, and induced a robust immune response against all three vaccine strains. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02935192, October 17, 2016

Download Full-text

Safety and efficacy of glycopyrrolate as a premedication for endoscopic submucosal dissection: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Endoscopy ◽

10.1055/s-0043-112491 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 49 (10) ◽

pp. 949-956 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Eui Kim ◽

Min Um ◽

Kyoung Kim ◽

Jung Kim ◽

Su Kim ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Adverse Events ◽

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽

Medical Center ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Controlled Study ◽

Research Information ◽

Serious Adverse Events ◽

Double Blind ◽

Double Blind Placebo ◽

Submucosal Dissection

Abstract Background and study aims Anticholinergic premedication has not been validated for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we investigated the efficacy and safety of glycopyrrolate as a premedication for ESD. Methods A total of 196 patients undergoing ESD at a single tertiary medical center between December 2014 and February 2016 were randomly allocated to receive one of the following two premedications: glycopyrrolate (0.004 mg/kg intramuscularly [IM]) or placebo (2.0 mL normal saline solution IM). All patients received the premedication 30 minutes prior to ESD in a double-blind manner. The endoscopists reported the ease of performing the procedure and the incidence of secretion-induced hypoxemia, cough, and other procedure-related adverse events. Results Glycopyrrolate and placebo were received by 96 and 100 patients, respectively. ESD was successfully performed in all patients without any serious adverse events related to sedation or ESD. The median visual analog scale for procedure ease was higher in the glycopyrrolate group at 8 (interquartile range [IQR] 7 – 9) vs. 7 (IQR 6 – 8.25); P < 0.001. The proportions of patients with secretion-induced hypoxemia (4.4 % vs. 14.3 %; P = 0.03) and cough (16.7 % vs. 35.7 %; P = 0.005) were lower in the glycopyrrolate group. Conclusions The use of glycopyrrolate as a premedication for ESD significantly improved the ease of performing the procedure and reduced the incidence of secretion-induced hypoxemia and cough during ESD. Glycopyrrolate may be a promising premedication to ensure safe and stable ESD procedures.Trial registration: Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS): KCT0001540.

Download Full-text

Safety and efficacy of faecal microbiota transplantation for active peripheral psoriatic arthritis: an exploratory randomised placebo-controlled trial

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ◽

10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-219511 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. annrheumdis-2020-219511

Author(s):

Maja Skov Kragsnaes ◽

Jens Kjeldsen ◽

Hans Christian Horn ◽

Heidi Lausten Munk ◽

Jens Kristian Pedersen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Psoriatic Arthritis ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Treatment Failure ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Faecal Microbiota ◽

Serious Adverse Events ◽

Double Blind ◽

Acr20 Response ◽

Safety And Efficacy ◽

Faecal Microbiota Transplantation

ObjectivesAlthough causality remains to be established, targeting dysbiosis of the intestinal microbiota by faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been proposed as a novel treatment for inflammatory diseases. In this exploratory, proof-of-concept study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of FMT in psoriatic arthritis (PsA).MethodsIn this double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, superiority trial, we randomly allocated (1:1) adults with active peripheral PsA (≥3 swollen joints) despite ongoing treatment with methotrexate to one gastroscopic-guided FMT or sham transplantation into the duodenum. Safety was monitored throughout the trial. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of participants experiencing treatment failure (ie, needing treatment intensification) through 26 weeks. Key secondary endpoints were change in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and American College of Rheumatology (ACR20) response at week 26.ResultsOf 97 screened, 31 (32%) underwent randomisation (15 allocated to FMT) and 30 (97%) completed the 26-week clinical evaluation. No serious adverse events were observed. Treatment failure occurred more frequently in the FMT group than in the sham group (9 (60%) vs 3 (19%); risk ratio, 3.20; 95% CI 1.06 to 9.62; p=0.018). Improvement in HAQ-DI differed between groups (0.07 vs 0.30) by 0.23 points (95% CI 0.02 to 0.44; p=0.031) in favour of sham. There was no difference in the proportion of ACR20 responders between groups (7 of 15 (47%) vs 8 of 16 (50%)).ConclusionsIn this first preliminary, interventional randomised controlled trial of FMT in immune-mediated arthritis, we did not observe any serious adverse events. Overall, FMT appeared to be inferior to sham in treating active peripheral PsA.Trial registration numberNCT03058900.

Download Full-text

A 40 Month Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial on the Effect of BCc1 Nanomedicine on Survival of Metastatic and Non-Metastatic Gastric Cancer Patients

10.21203/rs.3.rs-147862/v1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Maryam Hafizi ◽

Somayeh Kalanaky ◽

Hassan Moaiery ◽

Sajad Noorian ◽

Maryam Khayamzadeh ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Gastric Cancer ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Metastatic Gastric Cancer ◽

P Value ◽

Double Blind ◽

Gastric Cancer Patients

Abstract Background: Complementary experiments on nanomedicines as proper candidates for the control and treatment of cancer are widely being conducted nowadays. In the previous study, the effect of BCc1 nanomedicine, which is synthetized based on nanochelating technology, on overall survival (OS) and quality of life of gastric cancer patients was evaluated after 18 months of consumption. The OS of the same patients is reported in this study after 40 months. Methods: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel, multicenter design was used in this study. 123 metastatic and non-metastatic gastric cancer patients of both genders (between 25 and 85 years old) participated in this experiment to evaluate their OS after consuming BCc1 for 40 months and to identify the adverse events of this nanomedicine. Results: The median OS of metastatic patients was 257 days in the BCc1 group [95% confidence interval (CI): 144. 142-369.858], while it was 161 days in the placebo [95% CI: 118.462-203.538]; hazard ratio (HR): 0.802 [95% CI: 0.483-1.333] (P-Value = 0.395). Similarly, the median OS of non-metastatic patients was 718 days in the BCc1 group [95% CI; 577.706-860.213], while it was 520 days in the placebo [95% CI: 460.280- 580.690]; HR: 0.807 [95% CI: 0.343,1.902] (P-Value = 0.624). There was no evidence of adverse events after 40 months.Conclusion: The OS improvement of metastatic and non-metastatic gastric cancer patients in the previous (18 months of follow-up) and current (40 months of follow-up) studies showed that BCc1 can be used along with base treatments to improve cancer patients’ OS. Trial registration: IRCTID, IRCT2017101935423N1.Registered on 19 October 2017, http://www.irct.ir/ IRCT2017101935423N1.

Download Full-text