scholarly journals Bibliometric Analysis of Early COVID-19 Research: The Top 50 Cited Papers

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 117863372096293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hassan ElHawary ◽  
Ali Salimi ◽  
Nermin Diab ◽  
Lee Smith
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Radiological Findings ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Scientific Publications ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Study Characteristics ◽  
Number Of Citations ◽  
Number Of Authors

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic is rapidly evolving with the number of cases exponentially rising. The research scientific community has reacted promptly as evidenced by an outstanding number of COVID-19 related publications. As the number of scientific publications rapidly rises, there is a need to dissect the factors that lead to highly impactful publications. To that end, the present paper summarizes the characteristics of the top 50 cited COVID-19-related publications that emerged early during the pandemic. Methods: A systematic search of the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar was performed, using keywords related to COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-19. Two independent authors reviewed all the search results, screening for the top 50 cited COVID-19-related articles. Inclusion criteria comprised any publication on COVID-19 or the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Data extracted included the type of study, journal, number of citations, number of authors, country of publication, and study content. Results: As of May 29th, the top 50 cited articles were cited 63849 times during the last 4 months. On average, 14 authors contributed to each publication. Over half of the identified articles were published in only 3 journals. Furthermore, 42% and 26% of the identified articles were retrospective case series and correspondence/viewpoints, respectively, while only 1 article was a randomized controlled trial. In terms of content, almost half (48%) of the identified publications reported clinical/radiological findings while only 7 out of the 50 articles investigated potential treatments. Conclusion: By highlighting the characteristics of the top 50 cited COVID-19-related articles, the authors hope to disseminate information that could assist researchers to identify the important topics, study characteristics, and gaps in the literature.

Medical, Surgical, and Wound Care Management of Ulcerated Infantile Hemangiomas: A Systematic Review

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 495-504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane Y. Wang ◽  
Arvin Ighani ◽  
Ana P. Ayala ◽  
Sadanori Akita ◽  
Irene Lara-Corrales ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Wound Care ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Significant Heterogeneity ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Disease Extent ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Published Evidence ◽  
Oral Propranolol

Ulcerated infantile hemangiomas may present a therapeutic challenge, especially if there is concurrent hemorrhage or infection. The aim of this study was to systematically review the published evidence on the treatment of ulcerated hemangiomas, focusing on wound healing as the outcome of interest. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, SCOPUS, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and Web of Science from inception to July 2016. Seventy-seven studies met our inclusion criteria. One study was a randomized controlled trial, 30 were observational studies, and 46 were case reports or case series. There is significant heterogeneity among the methods used. We reviewed 1239 patients in total. Of the 197 treated with oral propranolol, 191 (97.0%) achieved complete ulcer healing. Thirty-one patients failed corticosteroid therapy (oral, intralesional, or topical) and were subsequently successfully treated with other therapies. Surgical resections were typically performed for larger hemangiomas and those causing complications. None of the therapies discussed appear to offer significant advantages over others. Therefore, treatment decisions should be individualized based on location of disease, extent, symptoms, feasibility, cost, and parental preference.

scholarly journals The 100 Most Impactful Papers in Hand and Upper Extremity Surgery over the Last 25 Years: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Orthopaedic Literature

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neil V. Shah ◽  
John J. Kelly ◽  
Jared M. Newman ◽  
Karan Dua ◽  
Alba Avoricani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Level Ii ◽  
Orthopaedic Literature ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Level I ◽  
Number Of Authors

Abstract Introduction Despite growth in hand/upper extremity investigation, impactful studies have not been thoroughly identified. Previous studies have been limited in scope. This study sought to identify and characterize the most impactful orthopaedic papers in hand/upper extremity over the past 25 years. Materials and Methods The top 1,000 hand/upper extremity orthopaedic studies published from 1992 to 2017 were identified with Web of Science. After screening for relevance in order of decreasing citation number, the top 100 articles were identified for bibliometric analysis. Results The mean number of authors and citations were 4.51 (range, 1–21) and 169.4 (range, 105–863). Common study types included, case series (n = 52), randomized controlled trial (n = 17), and prospective cohort (n = 16), which predominantly covered topics related to shoulder (n = 34), wrist/forearm (n = 21), and hand (n = 17). Among wrist/forearm and hand studies, distal radius fractures (n = 12) and nerve-related topics (n = 10) were most frequently analyzed. Most studies were of level IV (n = 51) and level II (n = 16) evidence. Recent studies had greater impact (mean citations/year: 2011, 82.7/year vs. 1992, 16.1/year). Conclusion Most of the 100 top orthopaedic articles in hand/upper extremity were of level IV or II evidence, retrospective, and nonrandomized. Despite an observed recent increase in level I studies, a lack of prospective, randomized trials is apparent.

scholarly journals The The Effectiveness of Early Mobilization Time on Balance and Functional Ability after Ischemic Stroke

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (7) ◽  
pp. 1088-1092
Author(s):  
Umi Budi Rahayu ◽  
Samekto Wibowo ◽  
Ismail Setyopranoto
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Functional Ability ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Early Mobilization ◽  
Berg Balance Scale ◽  
Early Mobilisation ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Significant Difference

BACKGROUND: Early mobilisation (EM) after-ischemic stroke is a motor learning intervention aimed to restore nerve cells and to improve balance and functional ability. Unfortunately, the study of when this intervention began has not been widely studied. AIM: On this study was compared the effect of EM started at 24 hours and 48 hours after an ischemic stroke on balance and functional ability. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Randomized controlled trial involving 40 patients on 2 groups meeting predefined inclusion criteria. The levels of balance were measured using the Berg Balance Scale, and the functional ability was measured using the Barthel Index, at 5th and 7th day. RESULTS: A significant difference was observed in both balance (p = 0.038) and functional ability (p = 0.021) obtained on the 7th day of assessment between both groups. A significant difference on the 5th day was observed only in the functional ability (p = 0.002) and not in the balance (p = 0.147), between the groups. CONCLUSION: EM started at 24 hours after the ischemic stroke has been found to have a better impact on balance and functional ability compared to that at 48 hours.

scholarly journals Manual Therapy in Cervical and Lumbar Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review of the Literature

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (11) ◽  
pp. 6176
Author(s):  
Tomasz Kuligowski ◽  
Anna Skrzek ◽  
Błażej Cieślik
Keyword(s):  
Manual Therapy ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Lumbar Radiculopathy ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
The Mean

The aim of this study was to describe and update current knowledge of manual therapy accuracy in treating cervical and lumbar radiculopathy, to identify the limitations in current studies, and to suggest areas for future research. The study was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews. A comprehensive literature review was conducted using PubMed and Web of Science databases up to April 2020. The following inclusion criteria were used: (1) presence of radiculopathy; (2) treatment defined as manual therapy (i.e., traction, manipulation, mobilization); and (3) publication defined as a Randomized Controlled Trial. The electronic literature search resulted in 473 potentially relevant articles. Finally, 27 articles were accepted: 21 on cervical (CR) and 6 in lumbar radiculopathy (LR). The mean PEDro score for CR was 6.6 (SD 1.3), and for LR 6.7 (SD 1.6). Traction-oriented techniques are the most frequently chosen treatment form for CR and are efficient in reducing pain and improving functional outcomes. In LR, each of the included publications used a different form of manual therapy, which makes it challenging to summarize knowledge in this group. Of included publications, 93% were either of moderate or low quality, which indicates that quality improvement is necessary for this type of research.

scholarly journals DIPG-25. KETOGENIC DIET IN DIFFUSE INTRINSIC PONTINE GLIOMA IN CHILDREN: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY INVESTIGATING THE FEASIBILITY

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii291-iii292
Author(s):  
Alexandre Perez ◽  
Janak Nathan ◽  
Moatasem El-Ayadi ◽  
Christian Korff ◽  
Marc Ansari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ketogenic Diet ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Pontine Glioma ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Small Patient Population ◽  
Small Patient ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Aggressive Clinical Behavior

Abstract PURPOSE Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma (DIPG) is one of the most devastating diseases amongst children with cancer, thus novel strategies are urgently needed. We aimed to retrospectively evaluate the feasibility of the carbohydrate restricted ketogenic diet (KD) in DIPG patients. METHODS Searches of MEDLINE and Embase identified four publications meeting the inclusion criteria (diagnosis of DIPG and exposition to a KD ≥ 3 months). One additional case was identified by contact with experts. The minimal feasibility criteria were defined as the ability to use the KD for ≥ 3 months. Individual patient data were extracted from the publications or obtained from investigators. RESULTS Five patients (males, n=3; median age 4.4 years; range, 2.5–17 years) met the inclusion criteria (one patient – identified and not included - was on KD < 3 months due to disease progression). Further feasibility analyses showed a duration of the KD of ≥ 3 months and less than 7 months (n=2), > 7 months and less than 1 year (n= 2), and two years (n=1), respectively. CONCLUSION These results – based on a small patient population – suggest that the KD appears to be a feasible treatment option for children with DIPG. The potential duration of the KD is limited by the aggressive clinical behavior of DIPG. The safety analysis is currently being retrospectively assessed. These data should encourage further studies on a larger scale; ideally assessing the impact of the KD in DIPG patients in a randomized controlled trial.

scholarly journals Assessment and Trends in the Methodological Quality of the Top 50 Most Cited Articles in Shoulder Instability

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 232596712096708
Author(s):  
Avinesh Agarwalla ◽  
Kaisen Yao ◽  
Anirudh K. Gowd ◽  
Nirav H. Amin ◽  
J. Martin Leland ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Loss ◽  
Shoulder Instability ◽  
Methodological Quality ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Number Of Citations

Background: Citation counts have often been used as a surrogate for the scholarly impact of a particular study, but they do not necessarily correlate with higher-quality investigations. In recent decades, much of the literature regarding shoulder instability is focused on surgical techniques to correct bone loss and prevent recurrence. Purpose: To determine (1) the top 50 most cited articles in shoulder instability and (2) if there is a correlation between the number of citations and level of evidence or methodological quality. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: A literature search was performed on both the Scopus and the Web of Science databases to determine the top 50 most cited articles in shoulder instability between 1985 and 2019. The search terms used included “shoulder instability,” “humeral defect,” and “glenoid bone loss.” Methodological scores were calculated using the Modified Coleman Methodology Score (MCMS), Jadad scale, and Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) score. Results: The mean number of citations and mean citation density were 222.7 ± 123.5 (range, 124-881.5) and 16.0 ± 7.9 (range, 6.9-49.0), respectively. The most common type of study represented was the retrospective case series (evidence level, 4; n = 16; 32%) The overall mean MCMS, Jadad score, and MINORS score were 61.1 ± 10.1, 1.4 ± 0.9, and 16.0 ± 3.0, respectively. There were also no correlations found between mean citations or citation density versus each of the methodological quality scores. Conclusion: The list of top 50 most cited articles in shoulder instability comprised studies with low-level evidence and low methodological quality. Higher-quality study methodology does not appear to be a significant factor in whether studies are frequently cited in the literature.

Abstract P311: Effect of Non-Invasive Imaging on Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Downstream Testing: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Circulation ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 125 (suppl_10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Seamus P Whelton ◽  
Khurram Nasir ◽  
Michael J Blaha ◽  
Daniel S Berman ◽  
Roger S Blumenthal
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Statistical Power ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cardiovascular Imaging ◽  
Significant Trend ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Introduction: Non-invasive cardiovascular imaging has been proposed as a method to improve risk stratification and motivate improved patient and physician risk factor modification. Despite increasing use of these technologies there remains limited evidence documenting its effect on downstream testing and improvement in risk factor control. Hypothesis: Addition of the EISNER study to a prior meta-analysis will improve statistical power to demonstrate the downstream consequences of non-invasive cardiovascular imaging. Methods: A comprehensive literature search of the MEDLINE database (1966 through July 2011) was conducted. Major inclusion criteria required: 1) randomized controlled trial design, 2) participants with no known history of coronary heart disease or stroke, and 3) comparison of a group provided with results of a non-invasive imaging scan versus those without results. A total of eight trials with 4,084 participants met the inclusion criteria for this analysis. We analyzed the data using a random effects model to allow for heterogeneity. Results: Among imaging groups there was a significant increase in prescribing for statins (RR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.01–1.32) and a non-significant trend for increased prescription of aspirin (RR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.97–1.35), ACE/ARB (RR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.96–1.31), and insulin (RR, 1.54; 95% CI, 0.75–3.18). There was a non-significant trend towards increased smoking cessation (RR, 1.35; 95% CI, 0.88–2.08). For downstream outcomes there was a non-significant increase in coronary angiography (RR, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.92–1.57), but not for revascularization (RR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.55–1.53). There was no significant effect of imaging on the change in traditional risk factors. Limitations: There remains a limited number of trials in this important area. Therefore, trials included in this analysis use a variety of different imaging modalities and we were not able to pool the results based on appropriate clinical action (intensification at high risk and reduction at low risk). Conclusions: Non-invasive cardiovascular imaging leads to increased statin use, but associations with other downstream treatments and change in risk factors are not statistically significant. Our results highlight the limited amount of data for describing the downstream consequences after CAC testing.

scholarly journals Effect of virgin olive oil pulling and chlorhexidine mouth washon plaque and gingivitis: a randomized controlled trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 85
Author(s):  
Nabeeh A AlQahtani ◽  
Jimly James Kunjappu ◽  
Kholood Badr Al Ghamdi ◽  
Shreyas Tikare
Keyword(s):  
Olive Oil ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Virgin Olive Oil ◽  
Gingival Index ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Used Oil ◽  
Home Based ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference

Aim: The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of oil pulling with virgin olive oil and chlorhexidine mouthwash in reducing plaque and gingivitis.Material and Methods: A total of sixty subjects satisfying the inclusion criteria were selected. The subjects were then randomly divided into two groups of thirty each. Group I used oil pulling with olive oil and Group II used 0.2% chlorhexidine as mouthwash. The plaque index and modified gingival index scores were measured at baseline, first week and second week.Results: The results showed that there was statistically significant reduction of mean plaque and gingivitis scores from baseline to first week and second week in both olive oil (p<0.05) and chlorhexidine group (p<0.05). There was significant difference in mean plaque scores between olive oil group and chlorhexidine group at second week (p<0.05). There was no significant difference in mean gingivitis scores between olive oil group and chlorhexidine group at second week (p<0.05).Conclusions: Oil pulling with virgin olive oil was found to be effective in reducing plaque and gingivitis. Regular and proper oil pulling with virgin olive oil can therefore be recommended as a routine home-based practice in promoting oral health.

A Randomized Controlled Trial: The Effect of Acupressure and Foot Reflexology on Pain During Heel-Lancing in Neonates

2021 ◽  
pp. 105477382110618
Author(s):  
Ayşe Özge Deniz ◽  
Ayfer Açikgöz
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Procedural Pain ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Intergroup Difference ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Sedation Scale ◽  
Neonatal Pain ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Pain Scores

This randomized controlled study aimed to determine the effects of acupressure and foot reflexology on procedural pain during heel-lancing in newborns. This study was conducted with 105 neonates (35 foot reflexology group, 35 acupressure group, and 35 control group) who met the inclusion criteria and who were delivered by cesarean section between October 2017 and March 2018 at a state hospital in Turkey. A “Newborn Information Form” and a “Neonatal Pain, Agitation, and Sedation Scale” (N-PASS) were used to collect data. The study found a significant intergroup difference between pain scores of neonates during the procedures ( p < .05). Advanced analyses found that the pain scores in the acupressure and foot reflexology groups were similar, whereas the pain scores in the control group were higher than in the other two groups. Acupressure and foot reflexology administered during heel lancing in newborns are effective methods for reducing pain.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document