Book Reviews : L.S. Levy, L. Rushton, L. Shuker (eds) Benzene in the Environment: An Evaluation of Exposure of the UK General Population and Possible Adverse Health Effects Report R12, Institute for Environment and Health, Leicester 1999 98 pp.; £ 15.00 ISBN 1-899110-21-6

2000 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-55
Author(s):  
D.F. Weetman
2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
James H. Diaz, MD, MPH, DrPH, FACOEM, FACMT

Objectives: To describe the acute health impacts of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in Louisiana as compared with the acute health impacts reported from prior crude oil spills. To predict potential chronic health impacts in Louisiana as compared with the chronic health impacts reported from prior crude oil spills.Setting: Offshore and onshore coastal southeastern Louisiana.Patients and participants: Oil spill offshore and onshore cleanup workers and the general population of coastal southeastern Louisiana.Interventions: Not applicable to an observational study.Main outcome measures: Adverse acute health effects of petrochemical and dispersant exposures in highly exposed offshore and onshore cleanup workers and the general population; prior chronic adverse health effects reported from prior oil spills; and predicted chronic adverse health effects based on intensity of chemical exposures and on seroprevalences of genetic polymorphisms.Results: Acute health effects in cleanup workers mirrored those reported in cleanup workers following prior oil spills as ranked by systems (and by symptoms). Acute health effects in lesser exposed members of the general population mirrored those reported in similar coastal residents following prior oil spills but differed from cleanup workers as ranked by systems (and symptoms).Conclusions: Subpopulations of cleanup workers and the general population with specific conditions or genetic polymorphisms in enzyme systems that detoxify polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in petrochemicals and glycols in dispersants will require long-term surveillance for chronic adverse health effects including cancer, liver and kidney diseases, mental health disorders, and fetal alcohol spectrum disorders.


Author(s):  
MD Petrova ◽  
NYu Mal’kova

Introduction: With the spread of laser technologies in various spheres of human activity, the number of exposures to laser radiation of a wide range of users unfamiliar with specifics of its health effects, including those in everyday life, has increased, thus resulting in an increased number of traumas in the general population in recent years. Objectives: To search for data on the biological mechanisms of action of visible laser radiation in Russian and foreign scientific literature and to analyze adverse health effects of this exposure encountered in domestic and international practice. Methods: We searched for Russian and foreign full-text open access literary sources in Russian Science Citation Index (RSCI) and PubMed databases of biomedical publications for 1969–2019 and selected the most appropriate ones for review. Results: Both Russian and foreign researchers note that human exposure to laser radiation induces specific and non-specific responses at all tissue levels of organization. The extent and nature of developing morphological changes depend on the radiation wavelength, exposure time, power, energy and its density per unit of the irradiated surface. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that portable laser pointers and powerful laser projectors may cause retinal damage, traumatic macular holes and, in some cases, loss of vision. Despite frequently registered good visual recovery, general availability of commercial laser devices poses potential danger, especially for minors, and substantiates the need to raise public awareness of laser safety.


Author(s):  
Kristin Holvik ◽  
Livar Frøyland ◽  
Margaretha Haugen ◽  
Martinus Løvik ◽  
Tor A. Strand ◽  
...  

The Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (Vitenskapskomiteen for mattrygghet, VKM) has, at the request of the Norwegian Food Safety Authority (Mattilsynet; NFSA), assessed the risk of "other substances" in food supplements and energy drinks sold in Norway. VKM has assessed the risk of doses given by NFSA. These risk assessments will provide NFSA with the scientific basis for regulating the addition of "other substances" to food supplements. "Other substances" are described in the food supplement directive 2002/46/EC as substances other than vitamins or minerals that have a nutritional or physiological effect. "Other substances" are added mainly to food supplements, but also to energy drinks and other foods. VKM has not in this series of risk assessments of "other substances" evaluated any claimed beneficial effects from these substances, only possible adverse effects. The present report is a risk assessment of L-tryptophan and is based on previous risk assessments of L-tryptophan and scientific papers retrieved from systematic literature searches. L-tryptophan is an indispensable amino acid in humans, which in addition to its role in protein synthesis, also participates in complex metabolic pathways where it acts as a precursor to the potent neurotransmitter serotonin, the hormone melatonin, and the vitamin niacin (vitamin B3).      L-tryptophan is available from a wide variety of protein-rich foods in the normal diet, including meat, fish, milk and dairy products, egg, beans, lentils and also bread and grains, pasta, rice, fruit and vegetables. According to information from NFSA, L-tryptophan is an ingredient in food supplements sold in Norway. NFSA has requested a risk assessment of the following doses of L-tryptophan in food supplements: 250 mg/day, 300 mg/day, and 450 mg/day for adults, adolescents and children 10 years and above. Usual dietary intake of L-tryptophan in Norway is not known, but data from the USA and the UK suggest an average dietary intake of about 900 mg/day of which the main part is bound in food protein. In phase 1 we have identified seven previous reports that have aimed to assess the safety of L-tryptophan supplementation in humans; the most recent was published by VKM in 2013. To complement the existing reports, a literature search was performed in MEDLINE and EMBASE to retrieve studies published in the period 2012-2015. This search retrieved two recent randomised trials with L-tryptophan. In addition, we performed a literature search concerning safety of L-tryptophan in children and adolescents with no time restriction. This search retrieved no relevant results that met the inclusion criteria. Four aspects related to safety of L-tryptophan were identified in previous reports: 1) adverse effects reported at high doses, including appetite suppression, nausea and vomiting, faintness, dizziness, drowsiness, tremor, fatigue, and headache; 2) a suggested, but not established, increased risk of cataract; 3) the eosinophilia-myalgia syndrome (EMS), which is thought to be caused by contaminants produced in the manufacturing of L-tryptophan supplements, however this is still unresolved; 4) the risk of adverse drug reactions caused by excessive serotonergic action by concomitant use of antidepressants, including monoamine oxidase inhibitors, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants and other drugs, known as the serotonin syndrome. According to previous reports, doses of 3 to 6 g/day of L-tryptophan have been associated with adverse effects. Using an uncertainty factor of 10, conclusions in previous reports have suggested a maximum level of 220 mg/day for adults. An upper tolerable intake level (UL) of 220 mg/day was first proposed in a report by the UK Committee on the Toxicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products and the Environment (COT) in 2004, and was derived from the average dose of L-tryptophan consumed as a prescription drug against depression in the UK at the time (2228 mg/day). This level has been maintained in later reports by other committees, most recently VKM in 2013 as a tentative guidance level. Additional information from the publications retrieved in the literature search did not provide evidence of sufficient weight to change the previous conclusions concerning UL. There is a lack of well-designed supplementation studies with L-tryptophan in humans designed to address adverse effects and dose-response relationship as primary outcome. There is also a lack of data about potential adverse health effects of L-tryptophan supplementation in children and adolescents. Patients using antidepressant drugs constitute a specific vulnerable subgroup of the population with regard to possible adverse effects of L-tryptophan supplements, due to the potentially life-threatening drug interaction effects that occur from excessive serotonergic action.   The Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (VKM) concludes that:   In adults (≥18 years), the specified doses 250, 300, and 450 mg/day L-tryptophan in food supplements may represent a risk of adverse health effects. In adolescents (14 to <18 years), the specified doses 250, 300, and 450 mg/day L-tryptophan in food supplements may represent a risk of adverse health effects. In children (10 to <14 years), the specified doses 250, 300, and 450 mg/day L-tryptophan in food supplements may represent a risk of adverse health effects. Children below 10 years were not included in this assessment.


Author(s):  
K. . Togawa

Agricultural workers can be exposed to a wide variety of agents (e.g. pesticides), some of which may have adverse health effects, such as cancer. To study the health effects of agricultural exposures, an international consortium of agricultural cohort studies, AGRICOH, was established. The present analysis compared cancer incidence between the AGRICOH cohorts and the general population and found lower overall cancer incidence in the AGRICOH cohorts, with some variation across cohorts for specific cancer types. The observed lower cancer incidence may be due to healthy worker bias or lower prevalence of risk factors in the agricultural populations. Further analysis is underway.


BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. e044833
Author(s):  
Gabriel Silver ◽  
Yordanka Krastev ◽  
Miriam K Forbes ◽  
Brenton Hamdorf ◽  
Barry Lewis ◽  
...  

IntroductionPerfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a diverse group of compounds that have been used in hundreds of industrial applications and consumer products including aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) for many years. Multiple national and international health and environmental agencies have accepted that PFAS exposures are associated with numerous adverse health effects. Australian firefighters have been shown to have elevated levels of PFAS in their blood, specifically perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and perfluorohexane sulfonic acid (PFHxS), due to the historical use of AFFF. While PFAS concentrations decline over time once the source of exposure has been removed, their potential adverse health effects are such that it would be prudent to develop an intervention to lower levels at a faster rate than occurs via natural elimination rates.Methods and analysisThis is a randomised controlled trial of current and former Australian firefighters in the Metropolitan Fire Brigade/Fire Rescue Victoria, and contractors, with previous occupational exposure to PFAS and baseline elevated PFOS levels. The study is investigating whether whole blood donation every 12 weeks or plasma donation every 6 weeks will significantly reduce PFAS levels, compared with a control group. We have used covariate-adaptive randomisation to balance participants’ sex and blood PFAS levels between the three groups and would consider a 25% reduction in serum PFOS and PFHxS levels to be potentially clinically significant after 12 months of whole blood or plasma donation. A secondary analysis of health biomarkers is being made of changes between screening and week 52 in all three groups.Ethics and disseminationThis trial has been approved by Macquarie University Human Research Ethics Committee (reference number: 3855), final protocol V.2 dated 12 June 2019. Study results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and presentations at conferences.Trial registration numberAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12619000204145).


2021 ◽  
pp. 105971232198909
Author(s):  
Harry Heft

It is usually a mark of good design when technologies and tools that mediate goal-directed action are such that the user’s attentional focus is maintained on the intended ends of action rather than on the technologies and tools themselves. When the mediators become the focus, the continuity of goal-directed action is disrupted, and the flow of action can be re-directed. What then is the purpose of the projects designed by the RAAAF studio, as described by Rietveld, which seem to be intended to do both? Disruption of the continuity of goal-directed perception-action may prompt reflection about the circumstances at work, and in so doing provoke a transformation in habitual patterns of action and of thought. The project “The End of Sitting” is intended to remediate the adverse health effects of standard chair-dominated offices through an unconventional office landscape that prompts intermittent postural readjustments, boosting the levels of activity common in such settings. The project “Bunker 599” demonstrates that seemingly unremarkable features of the landscape can sometimes conceal aspects of culture’s history, and that design can function to draw attention to a hidden and even vanishing history. Design can enrich an individual’s sense of place in a stream of cultural history.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document