scholarly journals Prognostic Significance of Thrombocytosis in Node-negative Colon Cancer

2005 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 228-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
EG Kandemir ◽  
A Mayadagli ◽  
B Karagoz ◽  
O Bilgi ◽  
O Turken ◽  
...  

Several clinical studies have shown that thrombocytosis is a poor prognostic factor in some types of cancer, but data about the impact of thrombocytosis on prognosis in patients with colon cancer are very limited. We investigated the prevalence and prognostic effect of pre-operative thrombocytosis, defined as a platelet count > 400 × 109/l, retrospectively in patients with node-negative colon cancer. Out of 198 patients, 24 (12.1%) had thrombocytosis, and its presence correlated with tumour depth and lymphatic invasion. Univariate analysis revealed that disease-free survival and overall survival were shorter in patients with pre-operative thrombocytosis than those without thrombocytosis. On multivariate analysis, thrombocytosis alone retained significance as a poor prognostic factor for both disease-free survival and overall survival. In conclusion, this study shows an association between thrombocytosis and poor survival in patients with node-negative colon cancer. The pre-operative platelet count may help to identify patients with an unfavourable prognosis in this subgroup.

2010 ◽  
Vol 2010 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Marszalek ◽  
Séverine Alran ◽  
Suzy Scholl ◽  
Virginie Fourchotte ◽  
Corinne Plancher ◽  
...  

Objectives. The purpose of this retrospective evaluation of advanced-stage ovarian cancer patients was to compare outcome with published findings from other centers and to discuss future options for the management of advanced ovarian carcinoma patients.Methods. A retrospective series of 340 patients with a mean age of 58 years (range: 17–88) treated for FIGO stage III and IV ovarian cancer between January 1985 and January 2005 was reviewed. All patients had primary cytoreductive surgery, without extensive bowel, peritoneal, or systematic lymph node resection, thereby allowing initiation of chemotherapy without delay. Chemotherapy consisted of cisplatin-based chemotherapy in combination with alkylating agents before 2000, whereas carboplatin and paclitaxel regimes were generally used after 1999-2000. Overall survival and disease-free survival were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test.Results. With a mean followup of 101 months (range: 5 to 203), 280 events (recurrence or death) were observed and 245 patients (72%) had died. The mortality and morbidity related to surgery were low. The main prognostic factor for overall survival was postoperative residual disease (P<.0002), while the main prognostic factor for disease-free survival was histological tumor type (P<.0007). Multivariate analysis identified three significant risk factors: optimal surgery (RR=2.2for suboptimal surgery), menopausal status (RR=1.47for postmenopausal women), and presence of a taxane in the chemotherapy combination (RR=0.72).Conclusion. These results confirm that optimal surgery defined by an appropriate and comprehensive effort at upfront cytoreduction limits morbidity related to the surgical procedure and allows initiation of chemotherapy without any negative impact on survival. The impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy to improve resectability while lowering the morbidity of the surgical procedure is discussed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 137-144
Author(s):  
Guillermo Peralta-Castillo ◽  
Antonio Maffuz-Aziz ◽  
Mariana Sierra-Murguía ◽  
Sergio Rodriguez-Cuevas

Author(s):  
Jun Yin ◽  
Mohamed E Salem ◽  
Jesse G Dixon ◽  
Zhaohui Jin ◽  
Romain Cohen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Disease-free survival with a 3-year median follow-up (3-year DFS) was validated as a surrogate for overall survival with a 5-year median follow-up (5-year OS) in adjuvant chemotherapy colon cancer (CC) trials. Recent data show further improvements in OS and survival after recurrence, in patients who received adjuvant FOLFOX. Hence, re-evaluation of the association between DFS and OS and determination of the optimal follow-up duration of OS to aid its utility in future adjuvant trials are needed. Methods Individual patient data from nine randomized studies conducted between 1998 and 2009 were included; three trials tested biologics. Trial-level surrogacy examining the correlation of treatment effect estimates of 3-year DFS with 5 to 6.5-year OS was evaluated using both linear regression (R2WLS) and Copula bivariate (R2Copula) models and reported with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). For R2, a value closer to 1 indicates a stronger correlation. Results Data from a total of 18,396 patients were analyzed (median age = 59 years; 54.0% male), with 54.1% having low-risk tumors (pT1-3 & pN1), 31.6% KRAS mutated, 12.3% BRAF mutated, and 12.4% microsatellite instability high/deficient mismatch repair tumors. Trial level correlation between 3-year DFS and 5-year OS remained strong (R2 =0.82, 95% CI = 0.67 to 0.98; R2 =0.92, 95% CI = 0.83 to 1.00) and increased as the median follow-up of OS extended. Analyses limited to trials that tested biologics showed consistent results. Conclusion Three-year DFS remains a validated surrogate endpoint for 5-year OS in adjuvant CC trials. The correlation was likely strengthened with 6 years of follow-up for OS.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 1903 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eun kyo Joung ◽  
Jiyoung Kim ◽  
Nara Yoon ◽  
Lee-so Maeng ◽  
Ji Hoon Kim ◽  
...  

Background: The prognostic role of the translational factor, elongation factor-1 alpha 1 (EEF1A1), in colon cancer is unclear. Objectives: The present study aimed to investigate the expression of EEF1A in tissues obtained from patients with stage II and III colon cancer and analyze its association with patient prognosis. Methods: A total of 281 patients with colon cancer who underwent curative resection were analyzed according to EEF1A1 expression. Results: The five-year overall survival in the high-EEF1A1 group was 87.7%, whereas it was 65.6% in the low-EEF1A1 expression group (hazard ratio (HR) 2.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.38–4.44, p = 0.002). The five-year disease-free survival of patients with high EEF1A1 expression was 82.5%, which was longer than the rate of 55.4% observed for patients with low EEF1A1 expression (HR 2.94, 95% CI 1.72–5.04, p < 0.001). Univariate Cox regression analysis indicated that age, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level, adjuvant treatment, total number of metastatic lymph nodes, and EEF1A1 expression level were significant prognostic factors for death. In multivariate analysis, expression of EEF1A1 was an independent prognostic factor associated with death (HR 3.01, 95% CI 1.636–5.543, p < 0.001). EEF1A1 expression was also an independent prognostic factor for disease-free survival in multivariate analysis (HR 2.54, 95% CI 1.459–4.434, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that high expression of EEF1A1 has a favorable prognostic effect on patients with colon adenocarcinoma.


2014 ◽  
Vol 111 (03) ◽  
pp. 483-490 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valéria Jósa ◽  
Kristóf Dede ◽  
Emese Ágoston ◽  
Marcell Szász ◽  
Dániel Sinkó ◽  
...  

SummaryThe aim of the present study was to analyse the preoperative platelet count and the platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) of different stages and with hepatic metastasis of CRC (mCRC) and to compare these factors as potential prognostic markers. Clinicopathological data of 10 years were collected retrospectively from 336 patients with CRC and 118 patients with mCRC. Both in the CRC and the mCRC group overall survival (OS) was significantly worse in patients who had elevated platelet count (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.2, p < 0.001 and HR = 2.9, p = 0.018, respectively). Multivariate analysis indicated that elevated platelet count was an independent prognostic factor of CRC (HR = 1.7, p = 0.035) and mCRC (HR = 3.1, p = 0.017). Disease-free survival (DFS) was significantly worse in patients with elevated platelet count in the CRC group (HR = 2.0, p = 0.011). In the multivariate analysis the PLR was not a prognostic factor in either of the two cohorts (HR = 0.92, p < 0.001 and HR = 0.89, p = 0.789, respectively). The platelet count is a valuable prognostic marker for the survival in patients both with CRC and mCRC while the PLR is not prognostic in either group.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1616-1616 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eyal C. Attar ◽  
Kati Maharry ◽  
Krzysztof Mrózek ◽  
Michael D. Radmacher ◽  
Susan P. Whitman ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1616 Poster Board I-642 CD74 is a type II integral membrane protein receptor that binds its ligand MIF to induce phosphorylation of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase-1/2 (ERK-1/2) and drive cellular proliferation via nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kB) activation. CD74 expression has been identified in human solid tumors, and its expression is associated with adverse prognosis in advanced pancreatic cancer. As CD74 is expressed and NF-kB constitutively activated in myeloblasts, we hypothesized that CD74 expression might also be associated with adverse outcome in AML. To investigate the prognostic impact of CD74 expression in the context of other predictive molecular markers in CN-AML, we assessed CD74 expression levels by Affymetrix HG-U133 Plus 2.0 microarray in 102 younger [<60 years (y)] adults with primary CN-AML, treated on the front-line CALGB 19808 trial with an induction regimen containing daunorubicin, cytarabine, etoposide and, in some cases, the inhibitor of multidrug resistance valspodar, and consolidation with autologous stem cell transplantation. Microarray data were analyzed using the Robust Multichip Average method, making use of a GeneAnnot chip definition file, which resulted in a single probe-set measurement for CD74. At diagnosis, CD74 expression, when assessed as a continuous variable, was significantly associated only with extramedullary disease involvement (P=.006) among clinical features, and with none of the molecular prognostic variables tested, including NPM1, WT1, CEBPA, FLT3 (FLT3-ITD and FLT3-TKD) mutations, MLL partial tandem duplication, or differential BAALC and ERG expression levels. Although CD74 expression levels were not associated with achievement of complete remission (CR; 83% vs 81%), higher levels of CD74 were associated with shorter disease-free survival [DFS; P=.046, hazard ratio (HR) 1.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12-3.08] and with shorter overall survival (OS; P=.02, HR 1.32, CI 1.04-1.67). In multivariable analyses, higher CD74 expression was independently associated with shorter DFS (P=.045, HR 1.98, CI 1.16-3.40), after adjusting for WT1 mutations (P<.001) and FLT3-TKD (P=.04), and shorter OS (P=.01, HR 1.58, CI 1.11-2.25) after adjusting for FLT3-TKD (P=.02), WT1 mutations (P=.007), BAALC expression levels (P=.02), white blood counts (P=.007), and extramedullary involvement (P=.04). As quartiles 2-4 had similar expression levels distinct from the lowest quartile, to display the impact of CD74 expression levels on clinical outcome only, pts were dichotomized into low (the lowest quartile) and high (the top three quartiles) CD74 expressers. The Kaplan-Meier curves for DFS and OS (Figures 1 and 2) are shown below. In conclusion, our study identifies elevated CD74 expression as associated with adverse prognosis in younger CN-AML pts. Since we previously reported that higher CD74 expression was favorably associated with achievement of CR in AML patients receiving chemotherapy plus bortezomib, an inhibitor of the proteasome and NF-kB (Attar et al., Clin Cancer Res, 2008;14:1446-54), it is possible that in future studies elevated CD74 levels can be used not only for prognostication, but also to stratify CN-AML pts to study of bortezomib-containing chemotherapy regimens. Figure 1 Disease free survival Figure 1. Disease free survival Figure 2 Overall survival Figure 2. Overall survival Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4018-4018
Author(s):  
M. E. Buyse ◽  
K. J. Punt ◽  
C. H. Köhne ◽  
P. Hohenberger ◽  
R. Labianca ◽  
...  

4018 Background: Disease-free survival (DFS) is the primary endpoint of most trials testing adjuvant treatments. However many other endpoints are used. There is much confusion about these endpoints since different definitions were used among trials, or no definitions were provided at all. Moreover there is no consensus on either the definition of each endpoint or on the most relevant among these endpoints. This creates difficulties when comparing the results of various trials. Methods: Adjuvant trials in colon cancer were used as a model. A systematic review was performed on published adjuvant studies in colon cancer from 1997–2006, and the definitions of endpoints other than overall survival (OS) were recorded. A panel of medical oncologists, surgical oncologists, and a statistician, all with expertise in randomised trials in colorectal cancer, aimed to reach consensus on the definition of the various endpoints as well as to select the most relevant among these. Results: A total of 52 studies were identified. In addition to overall survival 8 other endpoints were used, and both the definition of these endpoints as well as the starting point differed considerably among these studies. No definition was provided for the endpoint in 19 (37%) studies and for the starting point in 30 (58%) studies. The panel reached consensus on the definition of each endpoint ( table ), and agreed that DFS, defined as the time from randomisation to any event irrespective of cause was considered to be the most relevant endpoint for adjuvant studies. The date of randomisation was considered to be the most appropriate starting point. Conclusions: The proposed guideline will help in the design of future adjuvant studies in colon cancer, and will achieve the uniformity required to facilitate cross-study comparisons. It may serve as a model for adjuvant studies in other solid tumors. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document